Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 46 | 59 | 75 |
| 1440p QHD | 63 | 82 | 102 | 134 |
| 1080p Full HD | 97 | 128 | 157 | 199 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a distinctly resolution-dependent experience in Fivem, a multiplayer title from 2017. Across the three tested resolutions, the data shows a clear trend: this combo is exceptionally strong at 1080p, highly capable at 1440p, but only marginally playable at 4K, where it relies on lower settings to maintain fluidity.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark results, measured directly from the game, reveal a wide performance envelope. At 1920x1080, the combo is overwhelmingly fast. With Low settings, the average frame rate hits 198.7 FPS. Moving to Medium yields 156.5 FPS, while High settings still produce a very smooth 128 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 97.1 FPS, ensuring a high-refresh-rate experience across the board.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows the expected scaling cost. The Low preset averages 133.5 FPS, which is a substantial drop from the 1080p figure but still excellent. Medium delivers 102.3 FPS, and High keeps things fluid at 82.3 FPS. The Ultra preset, while the most demanding, still manages to clear the playability threshold with an average of 63 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. The Ultra preset falls to a demanding 33.8 FPS, making it unplayable. High settings fare better at 46.4 FPS but still miss the 60 FPS target. Medium comes close, averaging 59.4 FPS, which is just under the mark. Only Low settings at 4K achieve a comfortable margin, with an average of 75 FPS. The frame rate deltas between resolutions are significant; for instance, moving from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra results in a drop from 97.1 FPS to 63 FPS, a 35% reduction. The jump from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra is even more severe, falling to 33.8 FPS.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions indicates a shifting balance between the CPU and GPU. At 1920x1080, the high frame rates, particularly the 198.7 FPS on Low settings, suggest that the Ryzen 5 9600X is doing substantial work feeding the RTX 5060. The relatively small gap between Low and Medium presets (from 198.7 FPS to 156.5 FPS) points to a scenario where the CPU’s single-thread performance, shown in its benchmarks (e.g., 1253 in 3DMark single-thread and 2183.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core), is a key enabler.
As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on a more prominent role. The scaling is more pronounced between presets, with the gap between Low (133.5 FPS) and Ultra (63 FPS) widening. This indicates that the RTX 5060’s rendering load is increasing, and its 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 128-bit bus become more relevant factors. The CPU is still adequate, but the GPU is no longer secondary.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The RTX 5060’s 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are strained, evidenced by the precipitous drop to 33.8 FPS on Ultra. Here, the CPU’s role diminishes significantly; no amount of CPU headroom can compensate for the GPU’s inability to process pixels at that rate. The data suggests that for this combo, 4K is solely a GPU-limited scenario, while 1080p is where the CPU’s capabilities are most utilized.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearest rivals in the database, other hardware would behave similarly to this combination.
For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X has an average benchmark score of 29713 and sits in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include:
- AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE with an average score of 29656, which is 0.2% slower.
- AMD Ryzen 7 7840H with an average score of 29868, which is 0.5% faster.
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT with an average score of 29879, which is 0.6% faster.
- AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS with an average score of 29955, which is 0.8% faster.
These chips would deliver near-identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem, meaning the frame rates at 1080p would be very similar. The small deltas (all within 1%) confirm that the 9600X is well-matched with these alternatives.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331 and sits in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are:
- AMD Radeon 860M with an average score of 26401, which is 0.3% faster.
- NVIDIA GeForce MX550 with an average score of 26421, which is 0.3% faster.
- AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary with an average score of 26553, which is 0.8% faster.
- AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT with an average score of 26011, which is 1.2% slower.
These GPUs would produce nearly identical results in Fivem, particularly at 1440p and 4K where the GPU is the limiting factor. The RX 6750 XT, being slightly slower, would likely see a marginal FPS decrease at all resolutions, while the 5700 XT 50th Anniversary would be a hair faster.
How This Combo Ranks
In the global database of tested combinations, the Ryzen 5 9600X + RTX 5060 combination ranks 1774th out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. This places it in the upper half of all systems tested, indicating that it is a solid, capable pairing for this specific game. The rank reflects the strong 1080p and 1440p performance, while the weaker 4K results prevent a higher placement. Given that the combo sits just past the halfway point of all tested systems, it outperforms a majority of other hardware pairings, making it a reliable choice for most gamers.
The Verdict
Can this PC run Fivem? Yes, but with caveats depending on the display resolution.
- 1920x1080: Absolutely. All four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clear the 60 FPS threshold. The highest preset, Ultra, runs at an average of 97.1 FPS, making this a flawless experience for high-refresh-rate monitors.
- 2560x1440: Completely playable. All four presets also clear 60 FPS here, with Ultra averaging 63 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for this combo, offering a perfect balance of visual fidelity and performance.
- 3840x2160: Only marginally playable. The Low preset is the only one that clears 60 FPS, averaging 75 FPS. Medium falls just short at 59.4 FPS, while High and Ultra are not viable options for a smooth experience.
Best Settings per Resolution
The data defines the most demanding preset that still maintains an average of at least 60 FPS at each resolution.
- 3840x2160: Low is the only playable setting. It delivers an average of 75 FPS, which is smooth but requires a significant sacrifice in visual quality. The next step up, Medium, drops to 59.4 FPS, just under the playable threshold.
- 2560x1440: Ultra is the best setting that remains playable, achieving an average of 63 FPS. This allows for maximum visual detail without sacrificing the 60 FPS target.
- 1920x1080: Ultra is also the best setting here, and it runs exceptionally well at an average of 97.1 FPS. This provides the best visual experience with a massive performance headroom.
In summary, this hardware combo excels at 1080p and 1440p, offering a high-performance experience with all settings maxed out. At 4K, it is only suitable for users willing to play on Low settings for a smooth frame rate. The benchmarks clearly show that the RTX 5060 is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the Ryzen 5 9600X provides ample processing power for the game’s CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions.