Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a robust Fivem experience, with benchmark results indicating that the pairing is capable of high refresh rate gameplay at mainstream resolutions and remains playable even at 4K. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy across the three tested resolutions, with the system comfortably exceeding the 60 FPS playability threshold in most configurations. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, comparable alternatives, and optimal settings based strictly on the provided benchmark data.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this hardware combination in Fivem reveals a strong scaling pattern from 4K down to 1080p, with average frame rates that consistently favor higher refresh rate monitors at lower resolutions.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the system produces an average of 56.6 FPS on High settings. This narrowly misses the 60 FPS playability threshold, though it remains a playable experience for most users. Dropping to Medium settings yields a notable improvement to 77 FPS average, comfortably clearing the threshold. Low settings at 4K push performance to 91.9 FPS average, while Ultra settings drop to 48.6 FPS average, falling short of smooth gameplay. The data indicates that 4K gaming requires a compromise on visual fidelity to maintain fluidity, with Medium being the highest preset that clears 60 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440 (1440p), the performance headroom expands significantly. High settings deliver 107.8 FPS average, while Medium reaches 137.3 FPS. Low settings hit 171.5 FPS average, and even the demanding Ultra preset maintains 83.5 FPS average. Every preset at this resolution clears the 60 FPS threshold, making 1440p the sweet spot for this hardware combination. The spread between Low and Ultra is substantial—an 88 FPS difference—which indicates that the GPU has ample headroom to accommodate higher graphical loads.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system performs exceptionally well across all settings. Low settings produce 258.1 FPS average, Medium reaches 208.1 FPS, and High delivers 165.1 FPS. Ultra settings still maintain a strong 125.8 FPS average, which is more than double the playability threshold. The data shows that at 1080p, the bottleneck shifts away from the GPU, as even Ultra settings leave significant performance on the table. This resolution is ideal for high-refresh-rate displays, with all presets exceeding 120 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide useful context for understanding what other hardware would behave similarly in Fivem. For the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, the benchmark data shows it sits at the 81st percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 29,713. The closest alternatives are all within a narrow performance band:

• AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (avg score 29,656, delta 0.2%): Nearly identical performance, would deliver effectively the same frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.
• AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (avg score 29,868, delta -0.5%): Marginally faster, within a negligible margin.
• AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (avg score 29,879, delta -0.6%): Also within 1% of the 9600X, indicating similar gaming behavior.
• AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (avg score 29,955, delta -0.8%): The fastest of the group, though the difference remains under 1%.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, the GPU ranks at the 81st percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 37,648. The nearest rivals include:

• NVIDIA Tesla P4 (avg score 37,628, delta 0.1%): Essentially identical performance, despite being a datacenter-oriented card.
• AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (avg score 37,507, delta 0.4%): A close match, though older architecture.
• NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (avg score 38,135, delta -1.3%): Slightly faster, indicating the desktop RTX 4070 is within a hair of a high-end laptop GPU.
• AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (avg score 37,157, delta 1.3%): The closest slower alternative, still within a small margin.

These rival comparisons suggest that swapping either component for any of the listed alternatives would produce nearly indistinguishable Fivem performance. The tight delta percentages—all under 1.5%—mean users with these nearby parts should expect similar frame rates at each resolution and preset.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K with High settings?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings is 56.6, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings are required at 4K to clear the threshold, delivering 77 FPS average.

Q: What is the best preset at 1440p for this hardware?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 83.5 FPS, which is the highest preset available and remains well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. All four presets at 1440p are playable.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 compare to the RTX 4080 Mobile in this context?

A: The RTX 4070's average benchmark score is 37,648, while the RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38,135, a delta of -1.3%. This means the desktop RTX 4070 is only 1.3% slower, so Fivem performance would be nearly identical between the two.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 9600X a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The 1080p results show Ultra settings averaging 125.8 FPS and Low settings at 258.1 FPS. The large gap between presets suggests the GPU is the primary limiter, but the CPU's 81st percentile ranking and single-thread score of 4,570 in Passmark indicate it handles the game's demands without significant constraint.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings is 208.1, which is more than triple the 60 FPS playability threshold and suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.

Q: Does this system hit 60 FPS at 4K on any preset?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160, both Low settings (91.9 FPS average) and Medium settings (77 FPS average) clear the 60 FPS threshold. High and Ultra presets do not.

The Verdict

The verdict data shows that this hardware combination can run Fivem playably at all three tested resolutions, though with different preset ceilings. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with the best playable setting being Ultra at 125.8 FPS average. At 2560x1440, all four presets are also playable, with Ultra being the best at 83.5 FPS average. At 3840x2160, only Low and Medium presets are playable, with Medium being the best setting at 77 FPS average. The system's overall rank in the benchmark database is 874 out of 3,707 combinations, placing it in the top quartile of tested configurations for this game.

In practical terms, this PC is a high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p machine for Fivem, and a competent 4K machine when visual settings are moderated. The 56.6 FPS average at 4K High is borderline—technically below the 60 FPS line but close enough that most users would find it acceptable. For strict adherence to the 60 FPS playability threshold, Medium is the highest selectable preset at 4K.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling data between resolutions and presets reveals how the CPU and GPU divide responsibilities in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the performance delta between Low (258.1 FPS) and Ultra (125.8 FPS) is 132.3 FPS, indicating that the GPU is heavily engaged but not saturated—the CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 4,570) allows high frame rates, yet the GPU still governs the visual preset scaling.

At 2560x1440, the Low-to-Ultra spread narrows to 88 FPS (171.5 down to 83.5), showing that the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor as resolution increases. The CPU still has headroom, but the RTX 4070's workload grows. At 3840x2160, the spread compresses further to 43.3 FPS (91.9 Low down to 48.6 Ultra), demonstrating that the GPU is the dominant constraint at 4K. The CPU's role diminishes as resolution climbs, with the Ryzen 5 9600X's 6 cores and 12 threads providing sufficient throughput even at the lowest preset.

The preset-to-preset scaling at each resolution further clarifies this. At 1080p, moving from Medium to Ultra costs 82.3 FPS (208.1 to 125.8), a steep drop that highlights GPU workload. At 1440p, the same preset jump costs 53.8 FPS (137.3 to 83.5). At 4K, the Medium-to-Ultra transition costs 28.4 FPS (77 to 48.6). This diminishing absolute cost at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is increasingly the primary performance driver, while the CPU maintains consistent frame pacing across all settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the measured FPS data and the 60 FPS playability threshold, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution is as follows:

• 3840x2160 (4K): Medium settings, averaging 77 FPS. This is the highest preset that clears the threshold; High (56.6 FPS) and Ultra (48.6 FPS) fall short.
• 2560x1440 (1440p): Ultra settings, averaging 83.5 FPS. All presets are playable, so the highest fidelity option is recommended.
• 1920x1080 (1080p): Ultra settings, averaging 125.8 FPS. This provides the best visual quality while still delivering more than double the playability threshold.

For users prioritizing maximum frame rates over visual fidelity, Low settings at 1080p yield 258.1 FPS, which would suit a 240Hz monitor. At 1440p, Low settings produce 171.5 FPS, also suitable for high-refresh displays. At 4K, Low settings deliver 91.9 FPS, which is the fastest option available but visually less demanding. The recommended balance of fidelity and performance, however, points to Medium at 4K, Ultra at 1440p, and Ultra at 1080p as the optimal configurations.