Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

83%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
328 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
161 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
215 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
107 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
118 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
59 FPS
4.7ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 25,005
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 54,209

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 59 76 94 118
1440p QHD 107 136 169 215
1080p Full HD 161 211 261 328

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 211
1920x1080 Low 328
1920x1080 Medium 261
1920x1080 Ultra 161
2560x1440 High 136
2560x1440 Low 215
2560x1440 Medium 169
2560x1440 Ultra 107
3840x2160 High 76
3840x2160 Low 118
3840x2160 Medium 94
3840x2160 Ultra 59

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER delivers a commanding performance profile in Fivem, with measured data showing this combination is more than capable of pushing high refresh rates at mainstream resolutions while remaining playable even at 4K with quality settings enabled. The benchmark results, derived from measured data rather than projections, place this combo at rank 299 out of 3707 tested configurations, placing it in the top percentile of systems for this title.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is High, which delivers an average of 76.3 FPS. While Ultra dips below the playable threshold at 59.2 FPS average, High provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS baseline. For users prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity, Low settings produce 117.8 FPS average, and Medium hits 94.3 FPS average, but High is the optimal balance of visual quality and performance for 4K output.

Moving to 2560x1440, the system fully flexes its capabilities. Ultra settings run at an average of 107.4 FPS, making it the best choice for this resolution. The headroom is substantial: High reaches 135.5 FPS, Medium achieves 169.2 FPS, and Low pushes to 214.6 FPS. At 1440p, the RTX 4080 SUPER has enough bandwidth and compute headroom to allow maximum settings without sacrificing smoothness.

At 1920x1080, the story is one of overwhelming performance. Ultra settings produce an average of 160.6 FPS, making it the definitive choice for 1080p gaming. The lower presets scale impressively: High at 210.5 FPS, Medium at 260.6 FPS, and Low at 327.9 FPS. For competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors, the Low preset at 327.9 FPS average is exceptional, but Ultra remains the recommended setting given its 160.6 FPS average comfortably exceeds any 60 Hz or 144 Hz display requirement.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling data across resolutions reveals a system that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions but shows increasing CPU influence as resolution drops. At 3840x2160, moving from Low to Ultra cuts average FPS from 117.8 to 59.2, a reduction of roughly half, indicating the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K. The Ryzen 5 8400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads based on Zen 4 architecture, provides sufficient headroom that the RTX 4080 SUPER becomes the limiting factor.

At 2560x1440, the performance spread narrows somewhat: Low runs at 214.6 FPS while Ultra drops to 107.4 FPS. The 107.2 FPS difference between extremes shows the GPU still dominates, but the CPU's role becomes more pronounced as frame rates climb. The 8400F's single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 951, keeps pace with the GPU's output at 1440p without becoming a limiting factor.

The 1920x1080 results reveal the most interesting dynamic. Here, Low settings yield 327.9 FPS, while Ultra produces 160.6 FPS. The 167.3 FPS gap demonstrates that at 1080p, the GPU remains the primary constraint, but the CPU's contribution is more visible. The Ryzen 5 8400F's multithreaded capability, shown in its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20851, ensures the system can feed frames efficiently even at very high frame rates. However, the data indicates that at even lower resolutions or with less demanding settings, the CPU would eventually become the limiting factor; at 1080p Low, the 327.9 FPS average suggests the CPU is nearing its ceiling in this title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores are closely matched. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F scores 24964, a mere 0.2% below the 8400F's 25005 average. The Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935, 0.3% lower, and the Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911, 0.4% lower. On the upside, the AMD EPYC 9474F scores 25103, 0.4% higher. These deltas are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning any of these processors would deliver nearly identical Fivem performance when paired with the RTX 4080 SUPER. The 8400F's 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs reinforces its position as a solid mid-range performer.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER sits in a tight cluster. The standard RTX 4080 scores 54247, just 0.1% lower, making it virtually indistinguishable in Fivem. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, 1.1% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, 2.7% higher. The AMD Radeon 8060S leads the group at 55757, 2.8% higher. These differences are small enough that users upgrading from an RTX 4080 to the SUPER variant would see minimal FPS gains in Fivem, and the alternative GPUs listed would behave similarly in this title. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates strong overall performance, though the nearest rivals show that step-up options exist within a narrow performance band.

The Verdict

This combination can absolutely run Fivem, and the data shows it does so with authority. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra delivering 160.6 FPS average. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, and Ultra runs at 107.4 FPS average, providing a high-quality experience well above the 60 FPS baseline. At 3840x2160, three of four presets exceed 60 FPS: High at 76.3 FPS, Medium at 94.3 FPS, and Low at 117.8 FPS. The only setting that fails to hit 60 FPS is Ultra at 59.2 FPS average, which falls just short of the threshold.

For 4K users, the recommendation is clear: run High settings for a smooth experience, or accept the marginal 0.8 FPS deficit of Ultra if visual fidelity is paramount. The 1440p and 1080p experiences are unrestricted, with maximum settings delivering frame rates that exceed most high-refresh-rate displays. The measured verdict by resolution confirms this: 3840x2160 is playable at High, Low, and Medium; 2560x1440 is playable at all settings; and 1920x1080 is playable at all settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured average FPS values are: Low at 117.8, Medium at 94.3, High at 76.3, and Ultra at 59.2. The progression shows a consistent decline of roughly 20-25 FPS per preset step, with the gap between Low and Ultra totaling 58.6 FPS. This resolution is the only one where Ultra fails to reach the 60 FPS target, and even then, the shortfall is minimal.

At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low at 214.6, Medium at 169.2, High at 135.5, and Ultra at 107.4. The scaling is steeper than at 4K, with a 107.2 FPS difference between Low and Ultra. Each preset step reduces performance by roughly 30-35 FPS, indicating that the GPU's rendering load increases substantially with each quality tier.

At 1920x1080, the averages are: Low at 327.9, Medium at 260.6, High at 210.5, and Ultra at 160.6. The 167.3 FPS spread between Low and Ultra is the largest of any resolution, confirming that 1080p is where the GPU has the most headroom. The step-down from Low to Medium is 67.3 FPS, Medium to High is 50.1 FPS, and High to Ultra is 49.9 FPS, showing a gradual but consistent performance cost for each quality increase.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 3707 tested combinations for Fivem, this pairing of AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 299th. This places it in the top 8% of all tested configurations, a strong result that reflects the high-end nature of the GPU paired with a capable mid-range CPU. The rank is more heavily influenced by the GPU's performance class than the CPU, given that the RTX 4080 SUPER sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs while the 8400F sits at the 77th percentile among CPUs.

The combination's ranking suggests that users with higher-tier CPUs, such as those in the top percentiles, would see marginal gains in Fivem, but the 8400F does not bottleneck the experience meaningfully. The 299th position out of 3707 combos also indicates that a substantial number of tested systems—roughly 3400—fall below this configuration in performance. For a game like Fivem, which is multiplayer-focused and benefits from high frame rates, this combo ranks well above the median and provides a smooth, high-refresh experience across all common resolutions.