Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

62%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
188 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
92 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
125 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
58 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
71 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
33 FPS
8.3ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 25,005
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 33 44 52 71
1440p QHD 58 75 98 125
1080p Full HD 92 121 148 188

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 121
1920x1080 Low 188
1920x1080 Medium 148
1920x1080 Ultra 92
2560x1440 High 75
2560x1440 Low 125
2560x1440 Medium 98
2560x1440 Ultra 58
3840x2160 High 44
3840x2160 Low 71
3840x2160 Medium 52
3840x2160 Ultra 33

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a solid, if not spectacular, Fivem experience across the three most common gaming resolutions. Benchmark data shows this combination is fully capable of maintaining smooth framerates at 1080p and 1440p with the right settings, but it begins to strain at 4K. The following analysis breaks down exactly what to expect from this pairing, drawing exclusively from measured performance data.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the goal is to identify the most demanding preset that still holds an average of at least 60 FPS, which is the established playable threshold for this title.

At 1920x1080, this combo has ample headroom. The Ultra preset, which is the most visually demanding option, delivers an average of 92.1 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS target, so you can max out the game's settings without worrying about performance dipping into unplayable territory. Benchmark results indicate that even this demanding preset leaves performance on the table, suggesting the system is not fully taxed at this resolution.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the picture changes slightly. The Ultra preset averages 57.5 FPS, which falls just below the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that the High preset is the most demanding option that remains playable, averaging 75.4 FPS. This is a significant jump from the Ultra figure, and it offers a good balance between visual fidelity and smooth gameplay. While you cannot run the absolute highest settings, High at 1440p will provide a responsive and visually appealing experience.

At 3840x2160, the limitations of this hardware become clear. The High preset averages 43.7 FPS, the Medium preset averages 51.5 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 33.0 FPS. None of these meet the 60 FPS requirement. The only playable option at 4K is the Low preset, which averages 71.4 FPS. This is a significant compromise in visual quality, but it is the only way to achieve a smooth framerate at this resolution. The data indicates that this combination is not intended for high-fidelity 4K gaming in Fivem.

CPU and GPU Roles

Understanding which component is the limiting factor at each resolution helps set expectations for scaling and future upgrades. The measured FPS data across resolutions and presets reveals how the balance shifts.

At 1920x1080, the system is likely CPU-bound in many scenarios. The performance difference between the Low preset (188.2 FPS) and the Ultra preset (92.1 FPS) is substantial, but even the Low preset's extremely high framerate suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU more data than it can process at lower settings. The scaling from Low to Ultra results in a 96.1 FPS drop, which is a large performance cost for higher fidelity. This indicates that the GPU is doing a lot of work, but the CPU is keeping up without becoming a bottleneck.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on a more dominant role. The framerate drop from Low (124.5 FPS) to Ultra (57.5 FPS) is still significant, but the overall framerates are lower, which is typical of increased pixel count. The GPU's workload is now heavier, and the CPU has more headroom to supply frames. The 67.0 FPS difference between Low and Ultra here is smaller than at 1080p, showing that the GPU is becoming the primary constraint.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The framerates across all presets are much lower, with a range from 71.4 FPS on Low to 33.0 FPS on Ultra. The CPU's role diminishes further, as the GPU is struggling to render the vast number of pixels. The performance scaling from Low to Ultra is a 38.4 FPS drop, which is the smallest absolute difference across all resolutions, confirming that the GPU's rendering capability is the limiting factor. In short, for 1080p and 1440p, the CPU and GPU are well balanced, but for 4K, the RTX 4060 is clearly the component holding back performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is a detailed look at the average framerates for each resolution and preset combination. Note that min and max FPS data were not recorded in the fact pack.

1920x1080

  • Low: 188.2 FPS average.
  • Medium: 148.4 FPS average.
  • High: 121.2 FPS average.
  • Ultra: 92.1 FPS average.

At 1080p, performance is excellent across the board. Even the Ultra preset maintains an average well above the 60 FPS threshold, making this resolution the sweet spot for this hardware.

2560x1440

  • Low: 124.5 FPS average.
  • Medium: 98.0 FPS average.
  • High: 75.4 FPS average.
  • Ultra: 57.5 FPS average.

1440p shows a clear step down from 1080p, but the High preset remains very playable. The Ultra preset is the only one that dips below the 60 FPS line, reinforcing the recommendation to use High for a consistent experience.

3840x2160

  • Low: 71.4 FPS average.
  • Medium: 51.5 FPS average.
  • High: 43.7 FPS average.
  • Ultra: 33.0 FPS average.

4K is a major challenge for this combo. Only the Low preset achieves a playable average framerate. The data shows a steep decline in performance as settings increase, making this resolution unsuitable for high-fidelity gaming with this pairing.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K with high settings?

A: No. The benchmark data shows the High preset at 3840x2160 averages 43.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The only playable setting at this resolution is Low, which averages 71.4 FPS.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming?

A: The High preset is recommended. It averages 75.4 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset averages 57.5 FPS, which is just below the threshold and may result in noticeable stutter.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 or the Ryzen 5 8400F the bottleneck at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the system appears well-balanced. The framerates are very high across all presets, from 188.2 FPS on Low to 92.1 FPS on Ultra, with no single component showing a severe limitation.

Q: How does the Ultra preset perform at 1080p?

A: It performs very well. The average framerate is 92.1 FPS, which is significantly above the 60 FPS threshold, allowing for a fully maxed-out visual experience at this resolution.

Q: What is the playable threshold used for these verdicts?

A: The playable threshold is 60 FPS. Any preset with an average framerate at or above this value is considered playable.

Q: Is the performance data measured or estimated?

A: The data is measured. The fact pack specifies that `dataIsMeasured` is true, meaning these are real benchmark results, not theoretical projections.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for this specific CPU and GPU combination provide context for what other hardware might offer a similar experience.

For the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, the closest matching processors in terms of average benchmark score are:

  • AMD Ryzen 5 7500F: This CPU has an average score of 24964, which is a 0.2% delta from the 8400F's score of 25005. Expect essentially identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem.
  • Intel Core i7-11850H: This mobile chip scores 24935, a 0.3% delta. It would behave similarly in terms of CPU throughput.
  • Intel Core i7-13620H: With a score of 24911, this is a 0.4% delta. Again, very close performance to the 8400F.
  • AMD EPYC 9474F: This server processor scores 25103, a -0.4% delta. While a different class of chip, its benchmark score is in the same ballpark.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, the nearest rivals by average benchmark score are:

  • AMD Radeon HD 7790: This older GPU scores 17666, a -0.2% delta from the RTX 4060's 17639. This suggests similar raw compute performance, though feature support will differ.
  • AMD Radeon 780M: An integrated GPU scoring 17588, a 0.3% delta. Its performance is surprisingly close to the discrete RTX 4060 in these benchmarks, though it will lack dedicated VRAM.
  • AMD Radeon Pro 560: Scoring 17551, a 0.5% delta. A professional-grade card with similar raw performance.
  • AMD Radeon Pro 460: Scoring 17509, a 0.7% delta. Again, a close performance match.

In practice, a system with a Ryzen 5 7500F and an RTX 4060 would produce nearly identical Fivem framerates to the tested combo. The same goes for pairing the 8400F with a Radeon 780M, though that would be a very different hardware configuration.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination holds a rank of 2045 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. This places it in the 55th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms a slight majority of configurations in this database.

This mid-pack ranking is consistent with the measured performance. The combo is not a top-tier performer, but it is far from a weak one. It delivers a very strong 1080p experience and a good 1440p experience, which covers the majority of what most players need. The 4K performance is the clear weak point, which is expected for hardware in this class. The rank reflects this balance: capable at mainstream resolutions, but not a high-end powerhouse. For most players targeting 1080p or 1440p, this is a competent and well-rounded pairing.