Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
333 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
163 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
219 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
107 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
122 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
60 FPS
4.8ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 27,636
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 77 96 122
1440p QHD 107 138 173 219
1080p Full HD 163 210 263 333

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 210
1920x1080 Low 333
1920x1080 Medium 263
1920x1080 Ultra 163
2560x1440 High 138
2560x1440 Low 219
2560x1440 Medium 173
2560x1440 Ultra 107
3840x2160 High 77
3840x2160 Low 122
3840x2160 Medium 96
3840x2160 Ultra 60

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a robust Fivem experience across all tested resolutions, with the data showing 60 FPS or higher at every preset combination measured. The strongest performance appears at 1080p, where even the most demanding settings produce an average frame rate that far exceeds typical display refresh rates, while 4K Ultra remains playable at exactly the 60 FPS threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the combination produces an average of 122 FPS on Low settings, 96 FPS on Medium, 77 FPS on High, and 60 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset is the only 4K configuration with complete frame time data, showing a minimum of 82 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS. This spread of 28 FPS between minimum and maximum indicates some scene-to-scene variability, but the average remains well above the playability threshold. The step from Medium to High costs 19 FPS on average, while the step from High to Ultra costs another 17 FPS. The Low-to-Medium transition drops 26 FPS, which is the largest single-preset penalty at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the averages climb substantially. Low settings produce 219 FPS, Medium delivers 173 FPS, High reaches 138 FPS, and Ultra settles at 107 FPS. The Medium preset again provides the only min/max data at this resolution, with a minimum of 147 FPS and a maximum of 199 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 46 FPS, while Medium to High costs 35 FPS, and High to Ultra costs another 31 FPS. Every preset at 1440p clears 100 FPS on average, which means the frame rate is never the limiting factor for high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptionally high. Low settings yield 333 FPS average, Medium produces 263 FPS, High delivers 210 FPS, and Ultra still manages 163 FPS. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 223 FPS and a maximum of 302 FPS, giving a range of 79 FPS. The preset scaling at 1080p shows a consistent pattern: Low-to-Medium costs 70 FPS, Medium-to-High costs 53 FPS, and High-to-Ultra costs 47 FPS. Even at Ultra settings, the average frame rate is more than double the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

The data reveals a clear pattern across resolutions: the absolute FPS penalty for each preset step grows larger as resolution decreases. At 4K, the total drop from Low to Ultra is 62 FPS; at 1440p, it is 112 FPS; at 1080p, it is 170 FPS. This indicates that at lower resolutions, the CPU can feed frames quickly enough for the GPU to fully express its capability, making preset changes more impactful.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions shows that the RTX 4080 becomes the dominant factor at 4K. Comparing the Ultra preset across resolutions: the average goes from 163 FPS at 1080p, to 107 FPS at 1440p, to 60 FPS at 4K. This represents a 34% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 44% further drop from 1440p to 4K. The proportional decline tracks closely with pixel count increases, which is characteristic of GPU-bound rendering.

At 1080p, the Ryzen 5 7600X's single-thread performance becomes more relevant. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 170 FPS, compared to 62 FPS at 4K. This wider spread at lower resolution suggests that the CPU can maintain high frame delivery rates, allowing the GPU's settings-dependent workload to dominate the FPS differences. The 7600X's 3DMark single-thread score of 1060 and PassMark single-thread score of 4135 indicate strong per-core capability, which matters for a multiplayer title like Fivem where server-side and client-side simulation can create CPU-bound scenarios.

The 1440p results sit between these extremes. The frame rates at 1440p are roughly 1.4 times higher than 4K at equivalent settings, while 1080p is roughly 1.5 times higher than 1440p. This near-linear scaling with pixel count at each preset level points to the GPU being the primary limiter across all tested configurations. The CPU's role appears secondary, though the 7600X's 6 cores and 12 threads with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz provide sufficient headroom to avoid dropping below the GPU's output at any resolution.

The memory bandwidth of the RTX 4080, rated at 716.8 GB/s with 16 GB of GDDR6X, supports the high frame rates observed at 1080p without bottlenecking. The CPU's dual-channel DDR5 support, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, is unlikely to constrain performance in this title given the measured frame rates.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU nearest rivals show that the Ryzen 5 7600X's average benchmark score of 27636 sits within a narrow band of comparable processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K both score 27578, representing a 0.2% delta. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27712, which is 0.3% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535, 0.4% lower. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem when paired with the same GPU. The 7600X's percentile rank of 79 against all CPUs places it above the median, but its closest competitors cluster tightly around the same performance level.

The GPU nearest rivals similarly show tight clustering. The RTX 4080's average benchmark score of 54247 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER at 54209, a 0.1% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 1.1% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, 2.6% higher, and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, 2.7% higher. These small deltas mean that swapping to any of these GPUs would shift Fivem frame rates by only a few frames at most. The RTX 4080's percentile rank of 86 against all GPUs indicates it sits well above most graphics cards, but the immediate rivals are all within 3% of its aggregate benchmark performance.

For a user considering alternatives, the practical implication is that the CPU could be swapped to a Ryzen 7 5700X or Core i5-12600K without observable FPS changes. On the GPU side, the RTX 4080 SUPER offers nearly identical performance, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB would deliver slightly lower FPS in Fivem despite its marginally higher aggregate benchmark score, which may reflect strengths in other workloads.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem at 60 FPS or higher at every resolution and preset combination that was measured. At 3840x2160, all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable, with Ultra averaging exactly 60 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the boundary case; any more demanding settings or heavier scenes could push it below the threshold, but the measured data confirms playability.

At 2560x1440, all presets clear 60 FPS with substantial margin. The lowest average among 1440p presets is Ultra at 107 FPS, which is 78% above the playability threshold. This resolution offers the best balance of visual quality and frame rate headroom, with Medium reaching 173 FPS for high-refresh-rate displays.

At 1920x1080, all presets are comfortably playable, with Ultra at 163 FPS being the slowest configuration. Even the most demanding settings leave enough performance for background applications or streaming overhead. The verdict is unequivocal: this combination is well-suited for Fivem at any resolution up to 4K, with the only caveat being that 4K Ultra sits exactly at the 60 FPS line.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest FPS this combination achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest measured average is 333 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The Medium preset at 1080p reaches 263 FPS average with a 302 FPS maximum.

Q: Can this system handle 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the 3840x2160 Ultra preset averages 60 FPS, which exactly meets the playable threshold. All other 4K presets average 77 FPS or higher.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7600X compare to its closest CPU rivals?

A: The 7600X's average benchmark score of 27636 is within 0.4% of the Ryzen 7 5700X, Core i5-12600K, Ryzen 5 8500GE, and Ryzen 7 5800. The largest delta is 0.4% against the Ryzen 7 5800.

Q: What GPU is the closest performance match to the RTX 4080?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has a benchmark score of 54209 versus the RTX 4080's 54247, a 0.1% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% higher, and the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% higher.

Q: Is there a resolution where frame rates drop below 60 FPS?

A: No. All measured configurations across 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080 at Low, Medium, High, and Ultra settings average at least 60 FPS.

Q: What is the performance gap between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low averages 219 FPS while Ultra averages 107 FPS, a difference of 112 FPS. The Medium preset shows a 147 FPS minimum and 199 FPS maximum.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 220 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 6% of all configurations in the database. The rank of 220 with 3707 total combinations means the vast majority of tested systems deliver lower frame rates in this game. This position reflects the strong pairing of a top-tier GPU with a high-single-thread-performance CPU, both of which contribute to Fivem's multiplayer-oriented workload.

The rank is consistent with the measured frame rates: the 4K Ultra result of 60 FPS is exactly at the playable threshold, which many lower-ranked combinations would fail to reach. The 1080p Ultra average of 163 FPS places this combo well ahead of typical mid-range systems that might achieve 60-90 FPS at that setting. The percentile rankings support this, with the CPU at the 79th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile against their respective hardware pools.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages exactly 60 FPS. This is the maximum visual quality available at this resolution while maintaining playability. The High preset at 77 FPS offers additional headroom if frame pacing becomes an issue, but Ultra is technically viable.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are Ultra with an average of 107 FPS. This provides the highest visual fidelity while leaving 47 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. This configuration is ideal for 144Hz monitors, as the average frame rate approaches the refresh rate even with maximum settings.

At 1920x1080, the recommended settings are Ultra with an average of 163 FPS. This is the most demanding preset and still delivers more than double the playable threshold. The 1080p Ultra configuration is suitable for 144Hz or 165Hz displays, with the Medium preset at 263 FPS serving those with 240Hz panels who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity.