Fivem

This analysis examines the measured performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in Fivem, based on benchmark data collected across three resolutions and four graphics presets. The data indicates a system with substantial headroom, consistently exceeding the 60 FPS playability threshold even at the most demanding settings tested.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark results for this combination show a clear pattern: performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, with the system maintaining high average frame rates across all tested configurations.

1920x1080: At this resolution, the combo delivers exceptional performance. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 333. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 263 FPS, with a minimum of 223 FPS and a maximum of 302 FPS. High settings produce an average of 210 FPS, while Ultra settings still maintain a robust 163 FPS average. No minimum or maximum values were recorded for the Low, High, and Ultra presets at this resolution.

2560x1440: The 1440p results show a similar trajectory but with lower absolute numbers. Low settings average 219 FPS. Medium settings average 173 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 147 FPS and maximum of 199 FPS. High settings average 138 FPS, and Ultra settings average 107 FPS. As with 1080p, minimum and maximum data points are only available for the Medium preset.

3840x2160: At 4K resolution, the system still performs admirably. Low settings average 122 FPS. Medium settings average 96 FPS, with a minimum of 82 FPS and maximum of 110 FPS. High settings average 77 FPS. Ultra settings bring the average down to exactly 60 FPS, which is the playable threshold for this benchmark. Minimum and maximum values are only recorded for the Medium preset at this resolution as well.

The data shows a consistent scaling pattern. From 1080p to 1440p, average FPS values drop by roughly 34-38% across the presets. The transition from 1440p to 4K results in a further reduction of approximately 44-46%. The Medium preset is the only one that provides full min/max data, showing a variance of roughly 28 FPS at 1080p, 52 FPS at 1440p, and 28 FPS at 4K.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 4K?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is exactly 60 FPS, which meets the playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 333, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does performance scale when moving from 1440p to 4K?

A: The scaling varies by preset. For Ultra settings, the average drops from 107 FPS at 2560x1440 to 60 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of 47 FPS. For Medium settings, the average drops from 173 FPS to 96 FPS, a reduction of 77 FPS.

Q: Is there any resolution or preset where the system falls below 60 FPS?

A: No. Every tested combination of resolution and settings maintains an average FPS of 60 or higher. The lowest average recorded is 60 FPS at 4K Ultra.

Q: Which preset shows the smallest performance gap between 1080p and 1440p?

A: The Low preset shows the smallest absolute drop, going from 333 FPS at 1920x1080 to 219 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 114 FPS.

Q: What minimum FPS value is recorded for the Medium preset at 4K?

A: The minimum FPS for Medium settings at 3840x2160 is 82 FPS, with a maximum of 110 FPS, resulting in an average of 96 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU in this configuration provide context for what other hardware would deliver similar performance in Fivem.

CPU Rivals: The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 has an average benchmark score of 26324, placing it in the 78th percentile among all CPUs. Its closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS, which scores 26402, a negligible 0.3% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX scores 26274, just 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26212, a 0.4% gap, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187, a 0.5% difference. These four processors are all within a half-percent of the Ryzen 5 7600's score, meaning any of them would produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem when paired with the same GPU.

GPU Rivals: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, placing it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, scoring 54209, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 1.1% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, 2.6% higher, and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, 2.7% higher. In practical terms, the RTX 4080 SUPER would behave almost identically to the RTX 4080 in Fivem, while the AMD options would yield slightly higher frame rates, though the 2.7% difference is likely within the margin of measurement error for a game like this.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 220th out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places the system in the top 6% of all tested configurations, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of hardware combinations benchmarked in this game. The high ranking reflects the substantial headroom visible in the FPS data, particularly at lower resolutions where the system produces triple-digit average frame rates. This position in the rankings is consistent with the individual component percentiles: the CPU sits at the 78th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile, both well above average.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Fivem? The data is unambiguous: yes, and with considerable margin. The verdict by resolution confirms that all four tested presets are playable at every resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on all settings. Ultra averages exactly 60 FPS, High averages 77 FPS, Medium averages 96 FPS, and Low averages 122 FPS. The best playable setting is Ultra, with an average FPS of 60.

At 2560x1440, all presets are comfortably above 60 FPS. Ultra averages 107 FPS, High averages 138 FPS, Medium averages 173 FPS, and Low averages 219 FPS. Ultra is the best playable setting, with an average of 107 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance. Ultra averages 163 FPS, High averages 210 FPS, Medium averages 263 FPS, and Low averages 333 FPS. Ultra is the best playable setting, with an average of 163 FPS.

This system is not merely capable of running Fivem; it provides a smooth experience at the highest settings even at 4K, and at lower resolutions it produces frame rates far beyond what most displays can refresh.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above 60 is Ultra across all three resolutions.

At 1920x1080, Ultra settings yield an average of 163 FPS. This is the highest average FPS achieved at the Ultra preset across all resolutions, representing a 103 FPS improvement over the 4K Ultra result.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings yield an average of 107 FPS. This is a 56 FPS reduction compared to 1080p Ultra, but still far above the playability threshold.

At 3840x2160, Ultra settings yield an average of exactly 60 FPS. This is the minimum playable threshold, meaning the system runs the game at its most demanding settings without dipping below the target frame rate.

For users prioritizing smoothness over visual quality, the Low preset at 1080p provides 333 FPS, which is over five times the playable threshold. The Medium preset at 1080p provides 263 FPS with a recorded minimum of 223 FPS, ensuring consistent frame times.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance data reveals how the CPU and GPU each contribute to Fivem's performance across resolutions and presets.

At 1920x1080, the system appears to be heavily CPU-bound. The average FPS at Low settings is 333, which is extraordinarily high. The scaling from Low to Ultra is significant: 333 to 210 High to 263 Medium to 163 Ultra, a 51% reduction from Low to Ultra. This suggests that at lower resolutions, the GPU has ample headroom and the CPU becomes the limiting factor, particularly at the highest frame rates.

At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on a larger role. The average FPS at Low is 219, which is 114 FPS lower than at 1080p. This reduction indicates that the GPU is now processing more pixels, and the load shifts from the CPU to the graphics card. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows proportionally: 219 to 138 High to 173 Medium to 107 Ultra, a 51% reduction from Low to Ultra, mirroring the 1080p scaling.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant factor. The average FPS at Low drops to 122, which is 97 FPS lower than 1440p Low. The scaling from Low to Ultra is 122 to 77 High to 96 Medium to 60 Ultra, a 51% reduction. The consistency of the 51% reduction across all resolutions suggests that the game's rendering pipeline scales linearly with pixel count, and the GPU's workload is the primary constraint at 4K.

The CPU's role is most evident at 1080p, where it sustains frame rates above 200 FPS on most presets. The GPU's role becomes progressively more important as resolution increases, culminating in the 4K results where the system lands exactly at the 60 FPS threshold on Ultra. This indicates that for users targeting 4K Ultra, the GPU is the limiting component, while those playing at 1080p or 1440p would see minimal gains from a GPU upgrade, as the CPU is likely the bottleneck at those resolutions.