Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

84%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
67 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
89 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
44 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
50 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
24 FPS
11.6ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 44,573
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 24 31 39 50
1440p QHD 44 56 71 89
1080p Full HD 67 86 107 136

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 86
1920x1080 Low 136
1920x1080 Medium 107
1920x1080 Ultra 67
2560x1440 High 56
2560x1440 Low 89
2560x1440 Medium 71
2560x1440 Ultra 44
3840x2160 High 31
3840x2160 Low 50
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 Ultra 24

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a playable Fivem experience at 1080p and 1440p, but the data clearly shows that 4K is out of reach. The measured results reveal a system that scales predictably with resolution and settings, with the Ryzen 5 7500X3D’s strong single-thread performance and the Arc B570’s mid-range rasterization capabilities defining the overall performance envelope.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the combination struggles to maintain playable frame rates across most settings. With Low settings, the average FPS is 50, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings yield an average of 39 FPS, with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 45 FPS. High settings drop the average to 31 FPS, and Ultra settings bring it down further to 24 FPS. The data shows a clear pattern: even at the lowest graphical preset, 4K resolution remains unplayable for this hardware pairing.

Moving to 2560x1440, the situation improves substantially. Low settings produce an average of 89 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings average 71 FPS, with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 81 FPS, meaning the frame rate never dips below the playable threshold even at its lowest point. High settings average 56 FPS, which falls just short of playable, and Ultra settings drop to 44 FPS. The transition from Low to Medium costs roughly 18 FPS on average, while moving from Medium to High costs another 15 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the system performs strongly across all presets. Low settings deliver an average of 136 FPS, Medium settings average 107 FPS with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 123 FPS, High settings average 86 FPS, and Ultra settings average 67 FPS. Every preset at 1080p clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra maintaining a 7 FPS margin above the playable line. The step from High to Ultra costs 19 FPS, which is the largest drop between consecutive presets at this resolution.

The measured data shows that the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens with resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 69 FPS; at 1440p, it is 45 FPS; and at 4K, it narrows to 26 FPS. This indicates that at higher resolutions the GPU becomes the limiting factor, compressing the performance range across settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D plays a significant role in Fivem’s performance at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 136 FPS, and even at 1080p Ultra it maintains 67 FPS. This suggests that the CPU’s 6 cores, 12 threads, and 96 MB of L3 cache are sufficient to feed the Arc B570 effectively at this resolution, where the GPU is less likely to be the bottleneck.

As resolution increases, the GPU becomes increasingly dominant in determining frame rates. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings shows a drop from 107 FPS to 71 FPS, a 36 FPS reduction. Moving from 1440p to 4K at Medium settings further reduces the average from 71 FPS to 39 FPS, a 32 FPS drop. This pattern holds across all presets: the frame rate penalty for each resolution step-up grows as the resolution climbs, which points to the Intel Arc B570’s 10 GB GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth being the primary constraint at higher pixel counts.

The CPU’s influence is most visible in the minimum frame rates recorded at Medium settings. At 1080p, the minimum is 91 FPS; at 1440p, it is 60 FPS; and at 4K, it is 33 FPS. The 1440p minimum of exactly 60 FPS is notable because it suggests the CPU and GPU are balanced at that point, with the Arc B570’s 80 ROPs and 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate providing just enough throughput to maintain the playable threshold during demanding scenes.

The Ryzen 5 7500X3D’s benchmark profile supports this interpretation. Its PassMark single-thread score of 3494 and multithread score of 25047 place it in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong per-core performance that benefits games like Fivem which rely heavily on single-threaded simulation logic. The CPU’s 4.00 GHz base clock and 4.50 GHz boost clock, combined with its 5 nm process node, allow it to sustain high frequencies without the 65 W TDP becoming a thermal constraint.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D provide context for how this CPU compares to other options. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H averages a benchmark score of 44466, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen’s 44573 average. The Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342, a 0.5% deficit, and the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309, a 0.6% deficit. The Intel Core i5-14600 scores 44889, which is 0.7% higher than the Ryzen 5 7500X3D. These deltas are all within one percentage point, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in Fivem when paired with the same GPU.

For the Intel Arc B570, the nearest rivals show a similar clustering. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile averages 20534, just 0.1% higher than the Arc B570’s 20556 average. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, 0.1% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, 0.4% lower, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, 0.5% higher. The Arc B570 sits in the 65th percentile among all GPUs, which aligns with its measured performance in Fivem: capable at 1080p and 1440p, but insufficient for 4K.

The practical implication is that swapping the CPU or GPU for any of these direct rivals would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Fivem. A system with an Intel Core i5-14600 instead of the Ryzen 5 7500X3D would be marginally faster, while an Intel Core Ultra X9 388H would be marginally slower, but all differences would be within the margin of measurement error. Similarly, the Arc A750 is the closest GPU alternative, with a 0.1% performance delta that would not change the playability verdict at any resolution.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 60 FPS in 4K?

A: No. The measured data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. The highest average FPS at 4K is 50 with Low settings, which falls 10 FPS short of the 60 FPS threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra settings average 39, 31, and 24 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best preset at 1440p that maintains 60 FPS?

A: Medium settings provide the highest playable average at 2560x1440, with 71 FPS. The minimum recorded at Medium is 60 FPS, so the frame rate stays at or above the playable threshold. Low settings average 89 FPS but are less demanding visually.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the GPU is likely the limiting factor at higher presets, as the average FPS drops from 136 at Low to 67 at Ultra. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3494 PassMark score, allows it to sustain high frame rates, but the Arc B570 cannot maintain Ultra settings above 70 FPS at this resolution.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to the Arc A750 in raw performance?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, while the Arc A750 scores 20582. This is a 0.1% difference in favor of the A750, meaning the two GPUs perform virtually identically in synthetic tests and would produce similar results in Fivem.

Q: What is the lowest frame rate recorded across all tested configurations?

A: The lowest minimum FPS in the measured data is 33 FPS, recorded at 3840x2160 with Medium settings. The next lowest minimum is 60 FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings, followed by 91 FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7500X3D significantly better than the Core i5-14600?

A: The data shows the opposite. The Core i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889, which is 0.7% higher than the Ryzen 5 7500X3D’s 44573. This difference is small enough that neither CPU would provide a noticeable advantage in Fivem gameplay.

The Verdict

The verdict by resolution is clear. At 3840x2160, no settings achieve playable frame rates — the highest average is 50 FPS at Low, and the system is therefore not suitable for 4K gaming in Fivem. At 2560x1440, Low and Medium settings are playable, with Medium being the best option at 71 FPS average. At 1920x1080, all four presets — High, Low, Medium, and Ultra — are playable, with Ultra averaging 67 FPS.

This PC can run Fivem at 60 FPS for the majority of players using 1080p displays. The 136 FPS average at Low settings provides headroom for competitive play, while the 67 FPS average at Ultra delivers a visually rich experience that still clears the playable threshold. For 1440p users, Medium settings are the ceiling, but they do maintain the 60 FPS minimum. The system is not viable for 4K gaming in this title, as even the lowest settings fall short of the playable threshold.

The overall ranking of this combination is 2980 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. This reflects the Arc B570’s mid-range position in the GPU market, while the CPU’s 89th percentile ranking shows it is not the limiting factor in most scenarios.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves an average of 60 FPS or higher. The best available option is Low settings, which produces 50 FPS, but this remains below the playable threshold and is therefore not recommended for a 60 FPS target.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 71 FPS and a minimum of 60 FPS. Low settings also qualify with 89 FPS, but Medium offers a better visual balance while maintaining the playable threshold.

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 67 FPS. High settings average 86 FPS, Medium averages 107 FPS, and Low averages 136 FPS, but Ultra provides the highest visual quality while still clearing the 60 FPS bar. The 67 FPS average leaves only a 7 FPS margin, so players who prioritize frame rate stability may prefer High settings instead.