Fivem

This PC configuration, pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Fivem across all tested resolutions. The data indicates that the system is not merely playable, but rather that it consistently operates well above the 60 FPS threshold, even when maximum graphical settings are applied. This analysis examines the benchmark results to understand the performance scaling, the respective roles of the CPU and GPU, and the overall capability of this hardware combination for this specific multiplayer title.

How This Combo Ranks

The benchmark data places this specific CPU and GPU combination at rank 31 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. This top 1% ranking signifies that this pairing is among the most capable configurations tested for this game, placing it ahead of the vast majority of alternatives. The rank is a combined measure, reflecting the synergy between the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F's processing power and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D's graphics muscle in the context of Fivem's specific engine demands.

This high ranking is consistent with the raw performance of the individual components. The processor sits in the 77th percentile when compared against all tested CPUs, indicating strong single and multi-threaded capabilities that are beneficial for game logic and physics. More significantly, the graphics card is a dominant force, ranking in the 92nd percentile against all GPUs. The RTX 5090 D’s performance is a primary driver for the combo's elite standing, providing the immense fill rate and shading power needed to achieve the triple-digit frame rates seen in the measured data. The data suggests that the GPU's immense power is the defining factor in this combo's high rank, with the CPU providing a solid, capable foundation that does not bottleneck the graphics card at any resolution.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the measured average frame rates, the system can run Fivem at the highest possible settings at all tested resolutions while maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data shows that the most demanding preset, Ultra, is playable at every resolution, which reflects the hardware's strength.

• 3840x2160 (4K): The best settings are Ultra, with an average FPS of 72. This is the most demanding scenario and the system still clears the 60 FPS target with a solid 20% headroom.
• 2560x1440 (1440p): The best settings are Ultra, with an average FPS of 130. At this resolution, the system has significant performance in reserve, more than doubling the playable threshold.
• 1920x1080 (1080p): The best settings are Ultra, with an average FPS of 197. The performance here is exceptionally high, indicating that the system is far from being stressed at this resolution.

The verdict is clear: this configuration can handle Fivem at maximum visual fidelity and high refresh rates at 1440p and 1080p, and remains fully playable at 4K Ultra. The frame rates are high enough to suggest this system is not only for 60 FPS gaming but is also well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors, particularly at 1440p and 1080p.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear pattern in how the CPU and GPU workloads scale across resolutions and presets. At 1080p, the system achieves its highest frame rates, with the Low preset hitting 337 FPS and Ultra still reaching 197 FPS. This relatively small performance gap between presets, compared to lower resolutions, suggests that at 1080p, the workload is more balanced, with both the CPU and GPU having ample resources. The high FPS at lower resolutions often indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU quickly, preventing a bottleneck.

As the resolution increases to 1440p and then 4K, there is a measurable and consistent decline in average FPS across all settings. For example, at Ultra settings, performance drops from 197 FPS at 1080p to 130 FPS at 1440p, and further to 72 FPS at 4K. This scaling pattern is a strong indicator that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. The RTX 5090 D is still incredibly fast, but the sheer number of pixels in 4K places a much greater demand on its rendering pipeline. The CPU, meanwhile, maintains its role, and the relatively smooth scaling suggests it is not introducing a significant bottleneck, allowing the GPU's performance to dictate the frame rate as resolution increases.

The data implies a synergistic dynamic. At 1080p, the GPU is so powerful that it can render frames faster than the CPU can process game logic, making the CPU the more influential component. At 4K, the GPU's workload increases so substantially that it becomes the definitive performance limiter, regardless of the CPU's speed. The Ryzen 5 7500F provides enough throughput to keep the RTX 5090 D well-fed at all resolutions, ensuring that the user's experience is limited by graphics fidelity, not processor speed.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest graphical preset that can be used while maintaining over 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: The data indicates that the Ultra preset is playable at 4K, with an average FPS of 72. This is the most demanding setting tested, and it still clears the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How much faster is this system at 1080p compared to 4K on the Ultra preset?

A: The average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 197, while at 4K Ultra it is 72. This means the system delivers roughly 2.7 times more frames per second at 1080p than at 4K.

Q: Is this combination more reliant on the GPU or the CPU at 1440p resolution?

A: The performance scaling between resolutions indicates that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. At 1440p, with an Ultra preset average of 130 FPS, the GPU is doing significant work, and its power is the main factor in achieving such high frame rates.

Q: Does the system provide a smooth experience at 1440p with the "High" settings?

A: Yes, the "High" preset at 1440p yields an average FPS of 167. This is far above the 60 FPS playable threshold and indicates an exceptionally smooth and responsive experience.

Q: What kind of performance can be expected on the "Low" settings at 1080p?

A: The benchmark results show an average FPS of 337 on the "Low" preset at 1080p. This extremely high frame rate is beneficial for competitive play or for users with very high refresh rate monitors.

Q: Is there any point of comparison for this combo's overall standing?

A: Yes, this specific combination of CPU and GPU ranks 31st out of 3707 tested combinations for Fivem, placing it in the top 1% of all tested systems for this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is the complete set of measured average frame rates from the FACT PACK.

• 3840x2160 (4K)
• Low: Average FPS 147
• Medium: Average FPS 116 (min 99, max 133)
• High: Average FPS 93
• Ultra: Average FPS 72

• 2560x1440 (1440p)
• Low: Average FPS 265
• Medium: Average FPS 209 (min 178, max 240)
• High: Average FPS 167
• Ultra: Average FPS 130

• 1920x1080 (1080p)
• Low: Average FPS 337
• Medium: Average FPS 310 (min 263, max 356)
• High: Average FPS 254
• Ultra: Average FPS 197

These numbers illustrate a linear and predictable scaling of performance with resolution. The system is clearly over-provisioned for 1080p gaming, while 4K represents the most demanding scenario where it still performs admirably.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Fivem? The answer is a definitive yes, and the data shows it does so with exceptional prowess. The verdict by resolution is unequivocal: the system is playable at all settings across all tested resolutions. At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Ultra with an average FPS of 72, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the system excels, running Ultra at an average of 130 FPS. At 1920x1080, performance is outstanding, with the Ultra preset averaging 197 FPS. This configuration does not just run the game; it dominates it, providing a high-refresh-rate experience at 1440p and 1080p, and a fully smooth, high-fidelity experience at 4K.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For users and analysts looking to understand the performance neighborhood of this configuration, the benchmark data for the individual components offers valuable comparisons.

The CPU, an AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, has an average benchmark score of 24964. Its nearest rivals in terms of average score are:

• Intel Core i7-11850H with a score of 24935, which is 0.1% slower.
• AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with a score of 25005, which is 0.2% faster.
• Intel Core i7-13620H with a score of 24911, which is 0.2% slower.
• Intel Core 5 210H with a score of 24872, which is 0.4% slower.

These processors would be expected to deliver a nearly identical level of CPU-bound performance in Fivem, meaning they would likely not be the limiting factor in this system.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, has an average benchmark score of 77712. Its nearest rivals are:

• AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT with a score of 76904, which is 1.1% slower.
• AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT with a score of 78940, which is 1.6% faster.
• NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB with a score of 79396, which is 2.1% faster.
• NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB with a score of 79605, which is 2.4% faster.

In a gaming context, these GPUs would behave similarly, though the Tesla P100 cards are professional-grade hardware. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, a mobile part, is noteworthy; its slightly higher score suggests it could offer a marginal performance increase. Any of these alternatives would place the system in a similar performance tier for Fivem, where the game's frame rates would be dictated more by the CPU and game engine than by the small differences in GPU compute power.