Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

83%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
338 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
174 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
231 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
114 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
131 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
61 FPS
4.5ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 24,964
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 56,083

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 61 83 100 131
1440p QHD 114 144 184 231
1080p Full HD 174 222 281 338

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 222
1920x1080 Low 338
1920x1080 Medium 281
1920x1080 Ultra 174
2560x1440 High 144
2560x1440 Low 231
2560x1440 Medium 184
2560x1440 Ultra 114
3840x2160 High 83
3840x2160 Low 131
3840x2160 Medium 100
3840x2160 Ultra 61

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Fivem, with the data showing that every tested resolution and preset configuration clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. Benchmark results indicate that this pairing is heavily overqualified for the game, providing headroom that ranges from a marginal 1.1 FPS surplus at 4K Ultra to a massive 277.5 FPS surplus at 1080p Low.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU component of this combo, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, sits in a tight performance cluster according to its nearest rivals. The Intel Core i7-11850H posts an average score of 24935, which is a mere 0.1% behind the Ryzen 5 7500F’s 24964 average. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is effectively identical, scoring 25005 and trailing by just 0.2%. The Intel Core i7-13620H comes in at 24911, a 0.2% deficit, while the Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872, representing a 0.4% gap. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver near-identical CPU-bound behavior in Fivem, meaning users upgrading from or considering these alternatives should expect no meaningful difference in frame pacing or minimum frame delivery.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5080’s nearest rivals present a more interesting picture. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, sitting 0.6% below the RTX 5080’s 56083 average. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB posts 55698, a 0.7% deficit, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X trails by 2.3% with a score of 54828. Notably, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE actually outperforms the RTX 5080 by 2.2%, scoring 57367. For Fivem specifically, these GPU rivals would produce frame rates within a few percentage points of each other at every resolution, meaning the choice between them would not visibly alter the gameplay experience given the already-high baseline performance.

FAQ

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured data shows an average of 61.1 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. This is just above the 60 FPS playable threshold, leaving minimal headroom for demanding multiplayer scenarios.

Q: What is the highest frame rate achievable at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system reaches an average of 337.5 FPS. Even at Ultra settings, the average remains high at 174.2 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its closest GPU rival?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 2.2% faster in average benchmark score, while the AMD Radeon 8060S is 0.6% slower. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB trails by 0.7%, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 2.3% behind.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7500F a bottleneck at lower resolutions?

A: The data suggests no problematic bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system delivers 337.5 FPS, and the CPU’s nearest rivals all score within 0.4% of its average, indicating that any of these processors would sustain similar high frame rates.

Q: What settings should be used for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 114.4 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most demanding preset and still provides a comfortable margin.

Q: Does the system ever drop below 60 FPS in the measured configurations?

A: No. Every resolution and settings combination in the measured data exceeds 60 FPS, with the lowest result being 61.1 FPS at 4K Ultra.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance ceiling. Low settings yield an average of 337.5 FPS, which is the highest recorded frame rate across all tests. Medium settings produce 280.7 FPS, High settings deliver 221.6 FPS, and Ultra settings still maintain 174.2 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 48.4% reduction in frame rate, yet even the most demanding preset remains nearly three times above the playable threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain exceptionally high but show the expected impact of increased pixel count. Low settings average 230.7 FPS, Medium settings reach 183.9 FPS, High settings post 143.7 FPS, and Ultra settings settle at 114.4 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings reduces performance by 59.8 FPS, a 34.3% drop, which is consistent with the 77.8% increase in total pixels.

At 3840x2160, the system still delivers playable performance across all presets, though the margins tighten considerably. Low settings average 130.6 FPS, Medium settings achieve 99.5 FPS, High settings produce 82.7 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 61.1 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only configuration where the system approaches the 60 FPS boundary, with just 1.1 FPS of headroom. The difference between 1440p Ultra and 4K Ultra is 53.3 FPS, representing a 46.6% performance reduction for a 125% increase in pixel count.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally shows that this system can run Fivem at playable frame rates in every tested configuration. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear 60 FPS with enormous margins; the lowest result is Ultra at 174.2 FPS, which is 114.2 FPS above the playable threshold. The 2560x1440 resolution follows the same pattern, with Ultra settings delivering 114.4 FPS, providing 54.4 FPS of headroom over the 60 FPS requirement.

The 3840x2160 resolution is the only scenario requiring careful consideration. While all four presets technically clear 60 FPS, the Ultra setting produces just 61.1 FPS, leaving only 1.1 FPS of margin. This is functionally playable but leaves no room for frame drops during intense multiplayer activity. High settings at 4K provide a safer buffer at 82.7 FPS, while Medium and Low offer 99.5 FPS and 130.6 FPS respectively. For users prioritizing visual fidelity, 4K Ultra is viable but borderline; for consistent performance, dropping to High or Medium at 4K is advisable.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals how the CPU and GPU share the workload in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 337.5 FPS on Low settings, indicating that the CPU is capable of feeding frames at an extremely high rate. The Ryzen 5 7500F’s 12 threads and strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3dmark single-thread score of 974, keep the GPU well-fed even at these elevated frame rates.

As resolution increases, the GPU becomes progressively more dominant in determining performance. The transition from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra results in a 59.8 FPS drop, while the move from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra costs another 53.3 FPS. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions, where the RTX 5080’s rendering throughput becomes the limiting factor rather than CPU instruction processing.

The settings scaling further clarifies the division of labor. At 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra is 163.3 FPS, demonstrating that GPU workload increases substantially with graphical fidelity. At 4K, the same Low-to-Ultra comparison shows a 69.5 FPS difference. The diminishing absolute gap at higher resolutions indicates that both CPU and GPU are working closer to their limits, with the GPU taking on an increasingly larger share of the performance burden as pixel count and settings complexity rise.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 174.2 FPS. This provides a substantial 114.2 FPS buffer above the playable threshold, making it the recommended configuration for users who prioritize visual quality without any performance concerns.

For 2560x1440, Ultra settings again represent the best choice, producing an average of 114.4 FPS. The 54.4 FPS margin over the 60 FPS threshold offers comfortable headroom, though users who anticipate heavy multiplayer activity may prefer High settings at 143.7 FPS for additional safety.

At 3840x2160, Ultra settings achieve 61.1 FPS, which technically meets the playable threshold but with minimal margin. This is the recommended maximum preset, as it is the most demanding option that still clears 60 FPS. However, given the 1.1 FPS buffer, users seeking more consistent performance should consider High settings at 82.7 FPS, which provides a 22.7 FPS safety margin while still delivering high visual fidelity.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 3707 tested combinations in the Fivem database, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 ranks 172nd. This places it in the top 4.6% of all tested configurations, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of systems evaluated for this game.

The high ranking is consistent with the measured frame rates, which show the system delivering well above 60 FPS at every resolution and preset combination. The rank of 172 out of 3707 reflects a system that is positioned firmly in the upper echelon of Fivem performance, with only 171 combinations achieving better results. Given that the RTX 5080 already outperforms its nearest GPU rival by up to 2.3% in some cases, and the CPU sits within 0.4% of its closest competitors, this ranking is primarily driven by the GPU’s substantial rendering capabilities rather than any CPU advantage.

The practical implication of this ranking is that users of this system will experience Fivem at frame rates that exceed the requirements of virtually any display configuration, from high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors to 4K panels with VRR support. The only scenario requiring caution is 4K Ultra, where the 61.1 FPS average is technically playable but leaves little room for unexpected performance dips in demanding multiplayer scenarios.