Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

68%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
168 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
82 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
110 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
54 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
61 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
30 FPS
9.4ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 24,964
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 21,035

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 30 39 48 61
1440p QHD 54 70 87 110
1080p Full HD 82 106 132 168

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 106
1920x1080 Low 168
1920x1080 Medium 132
1920x1080 Ultra 82
2560x1440 High 70
2560x1440 Low 110
2560x1440 Medium 87
2560x1440 Ultra 54
3840x2160 High 39
3840x2160 Low 61
3840x2160 Medium 48
3840x2160 Ultra 30

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 delivers a distinct performance profile in Fivem, a multiplayer title that scales predictably across resolutions and presets. Measured data places this combo at rank 2275 out of 3707 tested combos, which means it sits in the lower-middle portion of the database — a position that reflects its ability to handle 1080p and 1440p gaming comfortably, while 4K remains a challenge. The combination of a six-core Zen 4 processor and an 8 GB GDDR6 graphics card produces frame rates that are playable at most settings, but the margin for error narrows significantly as resolution climbs. Below is a detailed breakdown of the measured FPS data, followed by answers to common questions, ranking context, alternative hardware, optimal settings, and a final verdict.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS results for Fivem are presented across three resolutions — 3840x2160 (4K), 2560x1440 (1440p), and 1920x1080 (1080p) — with four preset tiers: Low, Medium, High, and Ultra. Minimum and maximum frame rates are only available for the Medium preset at each resolution, while other presets report only the average FPS. This limitation means the analysis relies primarily on average frame rates, but the available min/max data for Medium settings provides insight into frame pacing and consistency.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 5050 and Ryzen 5 7500F combination struggles to maintain fluid gameplay at higher presets. The Low preset delivers an average of 61 FPS, which is the only 4K setting that clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings drop the average to 48 FPS, with a minimum of 41 FPS and a maximum of 56 FPS — a range that indicates noticeable stutter during busy scenes. High settings fall to 39 FPS average, and Ultra bottoms out at 30 FPS average. The data shows a clear pattern: each step up in preset costs roughly 9-10 FPS at 4K, making Ultra effectively unplayable and High marginal at best.

At 2560x1440, the combo finds a much more comfortable operating range. Low settings produce an average of 110 FPS, which is more than double the playable threshold. Medium settings average 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS — the min/max spread of 26 FPS suggests occasional dips but nothing that breaks immersion. High settings average 70 FPS, which remains safely above 60 FPS. Ultra is the outlier, averaging 54 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold. This resolution is the sweet spot for this hardware: three of four presets are playable, and the transition from Medium to High costs only 17 FPS, while High to Ultra costs 16 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the combination excels, delivering high frame rates across all presets. Low settings average 168 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth for a multiplayer title. Medium settings average 132 FPS, with a minimum of 112 FPS and a maximum of 152 FPS — the tight 40 FPS range indicates consistent performance even during chaotic sequences. High settings average 106 FPS, and Ultra averages 82 FPS. Every preset at 1080p clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin, with Ultra still offering 22 FPS of headroom. The scaling from Low to Ultra costs 86 FPS, but the lowest playable preset (Ultra) still delivers a robust experience.

Comparing across resolutions, the data shows that the RTX 5050’s 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus become a limiting factor at 4K, where the average FPS drops by roughly 40-50% compared to 1440p at the same settings. The Ryzen 5 7500F’s six cores and 12 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p and 1440p, as evidenced by the high averages, but the GPU’s raw throughput (13.17 TFLOPS FP32) is not enough to sustain 4K at high fidelity. The measured FPS data also reveals that the Medium preset consistently provides the best balance of visual quality and performance, with the largest min/max dataset available for analysis.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 82, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This makes Ultra settings a viable option for 1080p gaming with this CPU-GPU combination.

Q: Does this combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: Only at Low settings, where the average FPS is 61. Medium settings average 48 FPS, High averages 39 FPS, and Ultra averages 30 FPS, all of which fall below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500F compare to its nearest rival in CPU benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935), 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-13620H (24911), and 0.4% higher than the Intel Core 5 210H (24872). It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F by 0.2%, which scores 25005.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all tested GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 falls in the 66th percentile, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 21035.

Q: Which resolution offers the most playable presets for this combo?

A: At 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable. At 2560x1440, three presets (Low, Medium, High) are playable, while Ultra falls below 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low is playable.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS at Medium settings for each resolution?

A: At 1080p, the minimum is 112 FPS and the maximum is 152 FPS. At 1440p, the minimum is 74 FPS and the maximum is 100 FPS. At 4K, the minimum is 41 FPS and the maximum is 56 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination holds a rank of 2275 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the 61st percentile of all tested systems (calculated from the rank and total count). This is a middling position that reflects the hardware’s capability: it is not a top-tier setup, but it is far from the bottom. The rank indicates that roughly 1432 combos perform worse, while 2275 perform better, which aligns with the measured FPS data showing strong 1080p performance and playable 1440p, but weak 4K.

The comboRankInGame is a composite measure that weighs both CPU and GPU contributions. The CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus of 77 shows the Ryzen 5 7500F is a strong processor, ranking in the top quarter of all CPUs. The GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus of 66 is lower, indicating the RTX 5050 is a mid-tier graphics card. This mismatch — a strong CPU paired with a mid-tier GPU — explains why the combo’s overall rank (roughly 61st percentile) sits between the two component percentiles. In Fivem, which is a multiplayer title likely sensitive to both CPU physics and GPU rendering, the CPU’s strengths help maintain high frame rates at lower resolutions, but the GPU becomes the bottleneck at 4K.

The rank also suggests that this combo is better suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming than for high-resolution or high-settings play. The data shows that at 1080p, the combo ranks well enough to deliver a smooth experience at all presets, while at 4K, it barely clears the playable threshold at Low settings. This is consistent with a rank in the lower-middle of the distribution — capable, but not exceptional.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearestRivals data for both the CPU and GPU, several alternative components would produce similar performance in Fivem. For the CPU, the Intel Core i7-11850H (avgScore 24935, deltaPct 0.1), AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (avgScore 25005, deltaPct -0.2), Intel Core i7-13620H (avgScore 24911, deltaPct 0.2), and Intel Core 5 210H (avgScore 24872, deltaPct 0.4) all fall within a 0.4% performance delta of the Ryzen 5 7500F. This means swapping the CPU to any of these alternatives would yield nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, as the differences are within measurement noise.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (avgScore 21153, deltaPct -0.6), AMD Radeon HD 8970M (avgScore 21237, deltaPct -1), AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (avgScore 20713, deltaPct 1.6), and NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (avgScore 21379, deltaPct -1.6). The RTX 5050’s avgScore is 21035, so these rivals are all within 1.6% of its performance. In practical terms, pairing the Ryzen 5 7500F with any of these GPUs would produce FPS numbers within a few frames of the measured results — for example, the RX 5600 XT would be roughly 1.6% slower, which at 1080p Ultra (82 FPS) translates to about 1 FPS difference, while the RTX A4000 Mobile would be 1.6% faster, adding roughly 1 FPS.

It is important to note that these rival GPUs are not identical in architecture or features — the RX Vega M GL and HD 8970M are older or mobile parts — but their benchmark scores indicate similar raw throughput. For a user seeking comparable performance, any of these CPU-GPU pairings would deliver a similar experience in Fivem, with the caveat that the Ryzen 5 7500F’s superior CPU percentile (77 vs. these rivals’ unknown values) might offer better headroom in CPU-bound multiplayer scenarios.

Best Settings per Resolution

The data identifies the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS for each resolution, based on the measured average FPS.

At 3840x2160, the only playable preset is Low, which averages 61 FPS. Medium falls to 48 FPS, High to 39 FPS, and Ultra to 30 FPS, so no other preset clears the threshold. Low is the recommended setting for 4K, and even then, the 61 FPS average leaves only 1 FPS of headroom, which could dip below 60 in intense scenes.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, which averages 70 FPS. Medium averages 87 FPS and Low averages 110 FPS, but High offers the best visual quality while maintaining 10 FPS of headroom above the threshold. Ultra averages 54 FPS, so it is not recommended. The data shows that High at 1440p provides a balanced experience, with the 70 FPS average indicating smooth gameplay.

At 1920x1080, the best playable preset is Ultra, which averages 82 FPS. This is the highest preset available in the data, and it still provides 22 FPS of headroom above the playable threshold. High averages 106 FPS, Medium averages 132 FPS, and Low averages 168 FPS, but Ultra is the most demanding setting that remains playable. Users prioritizing maximum visual fidelity should choose Ultra at 1080p, while those seeking higher frame rates can drop to High or Medium without sacrificing playability.

These recommendations are based solely on the average FPS data. For the Medium preset, where min/max data is available, the minimum frame rates (112 FPS at 1080p, 74 FPS at 1440p, 41 FPS at 4K) confirm that the recommended presets maintain acceptable consistency — the 1080p Medium minimum is far above the threshold, and the 1440p High setting, while not directly measured for min/max, has an average that suggests the minimum would likely stay above 60 FPS.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Fivem has a nuanced answer, dictated by resolution and settings. The verdictByResolution data is clear: at 1920x1080, all four presets — Low (168 FPS), Medium (132 FPS), High (106 FPS), and Ultra (82 FPS) — clear the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the optimal resolution for this combo, offering a wide range of playable settings with significant headroom. The Ryzen 5 7500F’s strong single-thread performance (cinebench R23 singlecore score of 3218) and the RTX 5050’s 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput combine to deliver a fluid experience at 1080p, even at the most demanding preset.

At 2560x1440, the combo remains playable at Low (110 FPS), Medium (87 FPS), and High (70 FPS), but Ultra (54 FPS) falls short. The best playable setting is High, providing a 70 FPS average that balances visual quality and performance. This resolution is viable for most users, but those who demand Ultra settings would need to accept a frame rate below the playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, the combo is only playable at Low (61 FPS), with Medium (48 FPS), High (39 FPS), and Ultra (30 FPS) all failing to reach 60 FPS. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus (320 GB/s bandwidth) are insufficient for high-fidelity 4K rendering in Fivem, and the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking reflects this limitation. Users targeting 4K should stick to Low settings or consider a more powerful GPU.

Overall, this PC can run Fivem, but the experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution. For 1080p gaming, it is fully capable across all presets, with Ultra delivering 82 FPS. For 1440p, it handles most presets well, with High being the recommended ceiling. For 4K, only Low settings are playable, and even then, the margin is thin. The combo’s rank of 2275 out of 3707 confirms that it is a mid-tier system — not a high-end rig, but one that offers solid performance for the majority of players who game at 1080p or 1440p. The data does not support 4K gaming at high settings, but for the typical Fivem player, this hardware is more than adequate.