Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

83%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
288 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
140 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
192 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
94 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
108 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
52 FPS
5.6ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 24,964
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 43,223

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 52 68 84 108
1440p QHD 94 121 149 192
1080p Full HD 140 180 231 288

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 180
1920x1080 Low 288
1920x1080 Medium 231
1920x1080 Ultra 140
2560x1440 High 121
2560x1440 Low 192
2560x1440 Medium 149
2560x1440 Ultra 94
3840x2160 High 68
3840x2160 Low 108
3840x2160 Medium 84
3840x2160 Ultra 52

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER delivers a strong performance profile in Fivem, with measured data showing that the combination is capable of high frame rates across all tested resolutions. The benchmark results indicate a system that comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold in the majority of settings, with the most demanding configuration at 4K being the only scenario that dips below that mark.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination produces exceptional frame rates that scale predictably with graphical fidelity. The Low preset achieves an average of 287.9 FPS, which drops to 231.0 FPS on Medium. The High preset sees a further reduction to 180.0 FPS, while the Ultra preset still maintains a very smooth 139.8 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 51.4% decrease in average frame rate, but even the most demanding setting remains far above the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains highly playable across all four presets. The Low setting produces an average of 192.3 FPS, while Medium delivers 149.1 FPS. High settings yield 120.6 FPS, and Ultra still manages an impressive 93.8 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra here is 98.5 FPS, showing that the hardware has sufficient headroom to handle the increased pixel count without significant compromise.

At 3840x2160, the performance profile changes more dramatically. The Low preset produces a solid 107.5 FPS average, with Medium achieving 84.2 FPS and High reaching 67.7 FPS. However, the Ultra preset drops to 52.1 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data shows a steep decline between Medium and Ultra at 4K, with a 32.1 FPS difference, indicating that the Ultra preset at this resolution pushes the hardware beyond its comfortable operating range.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results reveal that this combination is primarily GPU-limited at higher resolutions, while the CPU becomes more relevant at lower resolutions where frame rates are extremely high. At 1920x1080, the frame rates ranging from 139.8 to 287.9 FPS suggest that the Ryzen 5 7500F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads based on Zen 4 architecture, provides sufficient processing power to feed the RTX 4070 SUPER effectively. The diminishing returns between 1080p Low and 1440p Low (287.9 vs 192.3 FPS) indicate that the GPU is handling the increased resolution load.

The scaling between resolutions provides insight into component roles. At 1440p, the Ultra preset achieves 93.8 FPS, which is 45.9 FPS lower than the 1080p Ultra result of 139.8 FPS. This 32.8% performance drop aligns with the 77.8% increase in pixel count, suggesting that the GPU is the limiting factor at this resolution. However, at 4K Ultra, the 52.1 FPS result represents a 44.5% drop from 1440p Ultra, which is more severe than the pixel count increase would suggest, indicating that the combination reaches its practical limits at this extreme setting.

The data shows that the RTX 4070 SUPER, with its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, scales well from 1080p to 1440p, but the transition to 4K exposes the GPU's limitations under the heaviest load. The CPU's role diminishes as resolution increases, with the 1080p results showing frame rates high enough that CPU overhead could become a factor, though the measured performance indicates no significant bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but with limitations. The High preset achieves 67.7 FPS average, and Medium produces 84.2 FPS, both above the 60 FPS threshold. However, the Ultra preset drops to 52.1 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The Ultra preset is fully playable at 2560x1440 with an average of 93.8 FPS. This is the most demanding setting that maintains performance above 60 FPS at this resolution.

Q: How does the 1080p Ultra performance compare to 1440p Ultra?

A: The 1080p Ultra result of 139.8 FPS is 46.0 FPS higher than the 1440p Ultra result of 93.8 FPS. This represents a 49.0% performance advantage at the lower resolution.

Q: Is the Low preset at 4K smoother than the Medium preset?

A: Yes, the Low preset at 3840x2160 averages 107.5 FPS, which is 23.3 FPS higher than the Medium preset's 84.2 FPS. Both remain well above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1080p with High settings?

A: The High preset at 1920x1080 produces an average of 180.0 FPS, which is three times the 60 FPS playable threshold and provides a very responsive experience.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra?

A: No, the 4K Ultra preset averages 52.1 FPS, which falls 7.9 FPS short of the 60 FPS threshold. Users seeking 4K with Ultra settings would need to consider less demanding alternatives.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals show that the Ryzen 5 7500F sits in a tight performance cluster. The Intel Core i7-11850H has an average score of 24935, which is 0.1% behind the Ryzen's 24964 average. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005, placing it 0.2% ahead. The Intel Core i7-13620H achieves 24911, a 0.2% deficit, while the Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872, 0.4% behind. These deltas are minimal, meaning any of these processors would deliver near-identical frame rates in Fivem when paired with the same GPU.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB with a score of 43262, which is 0.1% behind the 4070 SUPER's 43223. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, also 0.1% behind, while the Quadro M6000 achieves 43301, 0.2% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile leads the group with 43667, sitting 1.0% ahead. These performance differences are small enough that gaming experiences in Fivem would be virtually indistinguishable between these GPUs.

For users considering alternative configurations, combining any of these rival CPUs with the RTX 4070 SUPER would yield comparable results. Similarly, pairing the Ryzen 5 7500F with any of the rival GPUs would produce frame rates within a few percentage points of the measured values. The benchmark data positions this combo in a dense performance neighborhood where component selection has minimal impact on actual gameplay.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination ranks 627th out of 3707 tested configurations in Fivem, placing it in the top 16.9% of all combos evaluated. This percentile ranking reflects the hardware's capability to deliver high frame rates across most settings and resolutions. The ranking considers all tested combinations, including those with more powerful and expensive components, making this position notable for a mid-range pairing.

The percentile data for individual components reinforces this position. The CPU ranks in the 77th percentile against all tested processors, while the GPU sits in the 83rd percentile against all tested graphics cards. These figures indicate that both components perform well above the median, and their combination produces results that are stronger than either component's individual percentile might suggest. The measured FPS data confirms this, with 11 of 12 tested settings achieving average frame rates above 60 FPS.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem with excellent results at 1080p and 1440p, and with good results at 4K with some settings adjustments. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset delivering 139.8 FPS. The 2560x1440 resolution also sees all presets above 60 FPS, with Ultra achieving 93.8 FPS. At 3840x2160, the High preset provides 67.7 FPS, Medium achieves 84.2 FPS, and Low delivers 107.5 FPS, all above the playable threshold. Only the 4K Ultra preset falls short at 52.1 FPS.

The verdict by resolution confirms that this system is fully playable at 1080p and 1440p with any settings, and at 4K with High, Medium, or Low presets. Users targeting 4K Ultra would need to reduce settings or consider hardware upgrades, but the system handles the vast majority of scenarios without issue. The data supports the conclusion that this is a capable gaming configuration for Fivem across common resolutions and settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding setting that maintains performance above 60 FPS, achieving an average of 139.8 FPS. This provides the maximum visual quality while still delivering frame rates more than double the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also remains the best choice, with an average of 93.8 FPS. This setting combination offers full visual fidelity while staying comfortably above 60 FPS, making it the optimal balance for this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the High preset is the most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS, delivering an average of 67.7 FPS. While Medium and Low presets produce higher frame rates (84.2 and 107.5 FPS respectively), High offers the best visual quality without dropping below the playable threshold. The Ultra preset at 4K is not recommended, as its 52.1 FPS average falls short of the 60 FPS requirement.