Fivem

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS for this combo at 4K Ultra settings?

A: The measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is exactly 60 FPS, which matches the playable threshold of 60 FPS used in this benchmark database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F outperform its closest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F holds an average benchmark score of 32750, putting it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697), 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662), and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812).

Q: How does the RTX 4080's average benchmark score compare to the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 scores 54247 on average, which is a 0.1% lead over the RTX 4080 SUPER's 54209 average score. The gap is effectively negligible in aggregate performance terms.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all tested processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, indicating it outperforms the majority of tested desktop processors while remaining below the top tier.

Q: Is the 4K Ultra result stable enough for consistent play?

A: The 4K Ultra average is exactly 60 FPS with no reported minimum or maximum values in the measured data, so the frame pacing at that setting is not characterized beyond the average. The 4K Medium setting shows a minimum of 82 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS, suggesting more headroom.

Q: How many tested combos does this system rank above in Fivem?

A: This CPU and GPU combination ranks 257th out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem, placing it in the top 7% of all recorded configurations for this game.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on aggregate benchmark scores, are clustered within a narrow band. The Intel Core i5-14600T trails by only 0.1%, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is 0.2% behind, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is 0.3% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H leads by 0.2%. In practical terms, any of these four processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound behavior in Fivem, with differences well below the margin of measurement noise. Systems built around any of these CPUs would be expected to produce frame rates within a couple of percent of one another in multiplayer scenarios.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080's nearest performance neighbors include the RTX 4080 SUPER, which is only 0.1% slower on average, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X, which is 1.1% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and AMD Radeon 8060S sit 2.6% and 2.7% ahead, respectively. These deltas are small enough that a user moving between any of these GPUs would see essentially identical FPS in Fivem at the same settings, though the RTX 4080 SUPER is the most direct drop-in equivalent given its matching architecture generation. The AMD alternatives are further afield in architectural terms, but their aggregate scores indicate similar overall rasterization throughput.

For a system builder seeking behavior comparable to this exact pairing, the data suggests that swapping the Ryzen 5 7400F for any of the four listed CPU rivals would preserve the CPU-side performance envelope, and swapping the RTX 4080 for the RTX 4080 SUPER would preserve the GPU-side envelope. Any of these combinations would land in the same general FPS strata across resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals how the balance shifts between CPU and GPU workload as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the system produces 324 FPS on Low settings, 263 FPS on Medium, 210 FPS on High, and 163 FPS on Ultra. The spread from Low to Ultra is 161 FPS, indicating that at this resolution the GPU has ample headroom and the frame rate responds strongly to graphics load. The CPU's single-thread performance, as reflected in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072, is sufficient to feed the RTX 4080 without becoming the limiting factor at 1080p.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Low setting yields 219 FPS, Medium 173 FPS, High 138 FPS, and Ultra 107 FPS. The drop from 1080p Low to 1440p Low is 105 FPS, while the drop from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra is 56 FPS. This narrowing delta between resolutions as settings increase indicates that at higher presets, the GPU begins to exert more influence, while at lower presets the gap between resolutions is driven by pixel throughput demands.

At 3840x2160, the scaling becomes more pronounced. Low produces 122 FPS, Medium 96 FPS, High 77 FPS, and Ultra 60 FPS. The 4K Low figure is roughly 38% of the 1080p Low figure, which aligns with the fourfold pixel count increase and suggests the GPU is the dominant constraint at 4K. The CPU's role diminishes further at this resolution because frame rates are lower, giving the processor more time between frames to complete its work. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 21765 indicates the CPU has substantial parallel headroom, but Fivem's multiplayer nature likely benefits from the strong single-thread score of 3072 more than from raw multi-thread throughput.

Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: at 1080p the GPU is the primary lever for frame rate changes, while at 4K the GPU is almost entirely responsible for the observed scaling. The CPU maintains playable performance even at the lowest tested settings, where frame rates exceed 300 FPS, confirming it is not a bottleneck in this configuration.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem at all tested resolutions and presets above the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset delivers exactly 60 FPS on average, which clears the threshold but leaves zero margin for frame rate dips. The High preset at 4K yields 77 FPS, providing more comfortable headroom, while Medium reaches 96 FPS and Low hits 122 FPS. All four 4K settings are playable.

At 2560x1440, every preset clears 60 FPS with substantial margin. The Ultra setting averages 107 FPS, High averages 138 FPS, Medium averages 173 FPS, and Low averages 219 FPS. Even the most demanding preset at this resolution runs at nearly double the playable threshold.

At 1920x1080, the system is overwhelmingly playable at all settings. Ultra averages 163 FPS, High averages 210 FPS, Medium averages 263 FPS, and Low averages 324 FPS. None of these figures approach the 60 FPS floor. The verdict is unambiguous: the system exceeds the playability criterion at every resolution and every preset tested.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 60 FPS. This is the maximum graphical quality achievable at 4K while meeting the playability bar, though users sensitive to frame rate variance may prefer High at 77 FPS for additional margin.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best playable setting, averaging 107 FPS. This provides both maximum visual quality and a comfortable buffer above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the recommended configuration for 1440p displays.

At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 163 FPS, making it the clear choice for maximum quality. The system has enough performance headroom at this resolution to run the heaviest preset while still delivering frame rates that would satisfy high-refresh-rate monitors.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 257th out of 3707 tested configurations for Fivem. This places the system in the top 6.9% of all recorded combos in the database. The ranking reflects the balance of a strong single-threaded CPU with a high-end GPU, which together produce the high frame rates observed across all resolutions. The CPU's 83rd percentile standing among all processors and the GPU's 86th percentile among all GPUs combine to place this system well above the median tested configuration. The rank of 257 indicates that only a small fraction of tested systems achieve higher performance in this specific game, and those systems likely pair even more powerful CPUs or GPUs with similar architectural traits.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers 324 FPS on Low settings, 263 FPS on Medium with a minimum of 223 FPS and a maximum of 302 FPS, 210 FPS on High, and 163 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset is the only 1080p setting with recorded minimum and maximum values, showing a 79 FPS range between its lowest and highest observed frame rates.

At 2560x1440, Low averages 219 FPS, Medium averages 173 FPS with a minimum of 147 FPS and a maximum of 199 FPS, High averages 138 FPS, and Ultra averages 107 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p shows a frame rate range of 52 FPS, narrower than the 1080p Medium range, which indicates more consistent pacing at the higher resolution.

At 3840x2160, Low averages 122 FPS, Medium averages 96 FPS with a minimum of 82 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS, High averages 77 FPS, and Ultra averages 60 FPS. The 4K Medium preset records a 28 FPS range, the tightest of all Medium presets across resolutions, suggesting that at 4K the GPU workload is more uniform. The Ultra preset at 4K sits exactly at the 60 FPS threshold, making it the only measured configuration without margin above the playability floor.