Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

82%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
250 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
122 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
164 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
80 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
91 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
45 FPS
6.4ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 32,750
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 23,172

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 45 58 72 91
1440p QHD 80 104 130 164
1080p Full HD 122 157 197 250

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 157
1920x1080 Low 250
1920x1080 Medium 197
1920x1080 Ultra 122
2560x1440 High 104
2560x1440 Low 164
2560x1440 Medium 130
2560x1440 Ultra 80
3840x2160 High 58
3840x2160 Low 91
3840x2160 Medium 72
3840x2160 Ultra 45

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination delivers a robust Fivem experience, with benchmark data indicating strong performance across all tested resolutions. The pairing of a Zen 4 desktop processor with an Ampere-based GPU produces a system that comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold at 1080p and 1440p under maximum settings, while 4K requires a modest reduction in visual fidelity to maintain smooth frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo reveals a clear performance hierarchy across the three resolutions and four presets tested. At 1920x1080, the system shows exceptional headroom, with the Low preset achieving an average of 250 FPS, which is the highest recorded score across all configurations. Moving to Medium settings drops the average to 197 FPS, with minimum and maximum readings of 167 and 226 FPS respectively, indicating consistent frame pacing. High settings further reduce the average to 157 FPS, while Ultra still delivers a robust 122 FPS average, making this resolution entirely playable at any setting.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows a predictable step down. The Low preset averages 164 FPS, while Medium achieves 130 FPS with a minimum of 110 and maximum of 149 FPS. High settings produce an average of 104 FPS, and Ultra still maintains an average of 80 FPS. This resolution demonstrates that the combo has sufficient overhead for high-refresh-rate monitors, as even the most demanding preset stays well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

The 3840x2160 resolution reveals the first limitations of this hardware combination. Low settings produce an average of 91 FPS, which is playable but not particularly challenging. Medium settings average 72 FPS, with a minimum recorded at 61 FPS and maximum at 83 FPS — this preset sits right at the edge of the playable threshold. High settings drop the average to 58 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS target, while Ultra averages only 45 FPS. The data shows a clear breakdown: the system can handle 4K at medium or low presets, but higher settings will result in sub-60 frame rates.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, the processor sits in a tightly clustered performance group. The Intel Core i5-14600T has an average score of 32707, a delta of just 0.1% from the 7400F’s score. Similarly, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, showing a 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is slightly higher at 32812, meaning the 7400F trails by 0.2%, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, putting it 0.3% behind. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, as the CPU is not a limiting factor in most scenarios.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, the nearest rivals present a different situation. The NVIDIA P106-100 shows an average score of 23249, a 0.3% difference from the 3080’s 23172. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 also scores 23250, a 0.3% delta, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600M averages 23273, showing a 0.4% difference. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X completes the group with a score of 23276, again a 0.4% delta. These GPUs would produce similar FPS figures in Fivem, though the RTX 3080’s nearest rivals are notably less prominent in the desktop enthusiast space.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?

A: Yes, the benchmark data shows the combination achieves an average of 72 FPS at Medium settings, with a minimum of 61 FPS. The Low preset averages 91 FPS. However, High settings fall to 58 FPS, and Ultra drops to 45 FPS, so visual fidelity must be capped at Medium for a consistent 60 FPS experience.

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 80 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that all four presets — Low at 164 FPS, Medium at 130 FPS, High at 104 FPS, and Ultra at 80 FPS — are playable, so the Ultra setting is the most demanding option that stays above the target.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in terms of average score?

A: The RTX 3080’s average benchmark score is 23172. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA P106-100, scores 23249, a 0.3% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250, the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273, and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276, each showing a delta of -0.3% to -0.4% relative to the 3080.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F a significant performance outlier among its nearest CPU rivals?

A: No, the 7400F sits in a tight performance band. Its average score of 32750 is within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, which scores 32812, and within 0.2% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, which scores 32697. The differences are negligible, so any of these CPUs would perform similarly in Fivem.

Q: Does the system achieve 60 FPS at 1080p with all settings?

A: Yes. The data shows the Low preset averages 250 FPS, Medium averages 197 FPS, High averages 157 FPS, and Ultra averages 122 FPS. All presets at 1920x1080 exceed the 60 FPS threshold by a substantial margin.

Q: What is the lowest FPS recorded for any setting in the test set?

A: The minimum recorded FPS value is 45, which occurs at 3840x2160 on the Ultra preset. The next lowest is the 4K High preset, which averages 58 FPS, but no minimum or maximum values are listed for that configuration. The lowest min FPS that includes a measured floor is 61 FPS at 4K Medium.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that this AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination is fully capable of running Fivem at a playable level across all tested resolutions, though the 4K resolution requires a preset adjustment. The verdict by resolution shows that at 1920x1080, every preset — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — is playable, with the best average FPS at Ultra being 122. At 2560x1440, the same story repeats: all four presets are playable, and the Ultra preset delivers an average of 80 FPS, making it the best visual option without sacrificing frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the verdict narrows to just two playable settings: Low and Medium. The Medium preset provides an average of 72 FPS, which is the best option at this resolution. The High preset at 58 FPS and Ultra at 45 FPS do not meet the 60 FPS standard. Consequently, the system is fully playable at 1080p and 1440p with maximum settings, and at 4K with medium settings, making it a high-performance configuration for this multiplayer title.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is identified as follows. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear choice, delivering an average of 122 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while maintaining a frame rate nearly double the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also qualifies, averaging 80 FPS, which ensures smooth gameplay with maximum visual detail. At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the top pick, averaging 72 FPS. The High preset falls below the threshold at 58 FPS, so Medium is the boundary between playable and unplayable performance.

The data shows that the system’s performance scales with resolution, as expected. The 1080p Ultra at 122 FPS offers a significantly higher frame rate than the 1440p Ultra at 80 FPS, which in turn is higher than the 4K Medium at 72 FPS. For users who prioritize visual fidelity, the 1440p Ultra preset provides the best balance of quality and speed, while 4K users must settle for Medium to stay above 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 ranks 1048th out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places the system in the top 28% of all tested configurations, reflecting a solidly upper-mid-pack position. The rank indicates that a substantial number of hardware combinations outperform this setup, likely including systems with more powerful GPUs or newer architectures, but it also shows that this pairing is well above the median performance level for the game.

The percentile data for the individual components supports this ranking. The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile among all tested CPUs, meaning it outperforms the majority of processors. The GPU, however, is in the 68th percentile among all GPUs, showing that the graphics card is more of a limiting factor in this ranking. This suggests that the Ryzen 5 7400F has additional headroom to support a more powerful graphics card, while the RTX 3080 is the component that primarily constrains the combo’s overall position.