Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 38 | 49 | 62 | 78 |
| 1440p QHD | 69 | 89 | 111 | 141 |
| 1080p Full HD | 105 | 135 | 169 | 214 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination delivers solid, playable performance in Fivem across most settings, with the data showing a clear resolution-dependent ceiling. At 1080p and 1440p, the combo handles even Ultra presets above the 60 FPS threshold, while 4K requires dropping to Medium or Low to maintain smooth frame rates. Benchmark results indicate this pairing is well-balanced for the game, with the GPU becoming the primary constraint only at the highest resolution.
FAQ
Q: What is the best playable setting at 4K for this combo?
A: At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the highest playable option, delivering an average of 62 FPS with a minimum of 52 FPS and maximum of 71 FPS. Low also clears the threshold at 78 FPS average, while High and Ultra fall below 60 FPS.
Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 1440p with Ultra settings?
A: Yes. The data shows the Ultra preset at 2560x1440 produces an average of 69 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four preset levels (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) at this resolution exceed 60 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, placing it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32707 (0.1% lower), while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 (0.2% higher). Performance is effectively identical across these four processors.
Q: What is the GPU's ranking relative to other tested graphics cards?
A: The RTX 3070 sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 17208. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, scores 17083 (0.7% lower), while the NVIDIA Tesla K40c scores 17468 (1.5% higher). The differences are minor, indicating close performance clustering.
Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p with High settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with the High preset, the combo achieves an average of 135 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, making it highly suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Low preset reaches 214 FPS average, while Ultra still manages 105 FPS.
Q: Is the RTX 3070 a bottleneck at any resolution?
A: At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 38 FPS, indicating the GPU cannot sustain playable performance at the highest settings. At 1440p and below, the GPU keeps all presets above 60 FPS. The CPU's multi-threaded score of 21765 in Cinebench R23 suggests it has ample headroom for this title.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 62 FPS. The frame range spans 52 FPS minimum to 71 FPS maximum, meaning occasional dips below the threshold may occur during heavy multiplayer scenes, but the average remains playable. Low is also viable at 78 FPS, but Medium offers better visual quality while still meeting the target.
At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Ultra, delivering an average of 69 FPS. This is the highest preset available and still clears the 60 FPS mark with margin. All lower presets—High at 89 FPS, Medium at 111 FPS, and Low at 141 FPS—provide progressively higher frame rates for users prioritizing smoothness over visual fidelity.
At 1920x1080, Ultra is the best setting, producing an average of 105 FPS. This is more than 40 FPS above the playable threshold, giving substantial headroom for demanding multiplayer scenarios. Lower presets scale upward sharply: High at 135 FPS, Medium at 169 FPS, and Low at 214 FPS, making this resolution ideal for high-refresh-rate displays.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a shifting balance between CPU and GPU influence across resolutions. At 1080p, the combo achieves 214 FPS on Low and 105 FPS on Ultra—a 109 FPS spread driven primarily by GPU load. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3072 in Cinebench R23 and multi-thread score of 21765 ensure it does not bottleneck at these frame rates, meaning the GPU is the limiting factor as settings increase.
At 1440p, the spread narrows: 141 FPS on Low to 69 FPS on Ultra (72 FPS difference). The GPU's workload scales with resolution, but the CPU still has sufficient headroom. The Ultra average of 69 FPS indicates the GPU is nearing its limit, yet the CPU continues to feed frames adequately. The medium preset's 111 FPS average with a 94 FPS minimum shows consistent delivery without CPU-induced stutter.
At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Low produces 78 FPS, but Medium drops to 62 FPS, and Ultra falls to 38 FPS—a 40 FPS collapse from Low to Ultra. The CPU's role diminishes as resolution increases, since the GPU's pixel throughput becomes the dominant constraint. The 52 FPS minimum on Medium suggests occasional GPU-bound dips, while the CPU remains capable of sustaining frame delivery.
Across all resolutions, the RTX 3070's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handle Fivem's asset streaming, but the 4K Ultra result of 38 FPS indicates memory bandwidth and compute limits. The CPU's 65 W TDP and 6-core/12-thread configuration provide adequate processing for the game's multiplayer logic, with no evidence of CPU limitation in the measured data.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 ranks 1575th out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem, placing it in the upper half of all configurations. This position reflects the balanced nature of the pairing: the CPU's 83rd percentile standing among all processors compensates for the GPU's 61st percentile ranking. The combo outperforms a significant majority of tested systems, though it does not reach the top tier occupied by higher-end GPU pairings.
The rank is particularly notable given the RTX 3070's end-of-life production status, suggesting the GPU still delivers competitive performance in this specific title. The CPU's recent release (2025) and active production status provide a modern foundation, but the overall ranking is constrained by the GPU's 8 GB memory capacity and 220 W TDP. For Fivem, which is not among the most demanding AAA titles, this mid-pack position translates to strong real-world playability across common resolutions.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the CPU's nearest rivals, the Intel Core i5-14600T (avg score 32707, 0.1% lower) would behave nearly identically in Fivem, offering the same multi-threaded capability for handling game logic. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (avg score 32812, 0.2% higher) provides a marginal uplift, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (avg score 32662, 0.3% higher) and Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (avg score 32697, 0.2% higher) round out a cluster of processors within 0.3% performance delta. Any of these would produce effectively the same frame rates when paired with the RTX 3070.
On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (avg score 17083, 0.7% lower) is the closest match, delivering nearly identical Fivem performance. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (avg score 17037, 1% lower) and AMD Radeon HD 7970M (avg score 17019, 1.1% lower) are older architectures but benchmark similarly, though their real-world driver support and feature sets may differ. The NVIDIA Tesla K40c (avg score 17468, 1.5% higher) offers a slight theoretical edge but lacks gaming-oriented drivers. For Fivem specifically, the RX 7600 XT is the most practical alternative, while the CPU-side rivals would preserve the combo's overall balance.
The Verdict
This PC can run Fivem comfortably at 1080p and 1440p with all presets above 60 FPS, including Ultra. At 1080p, the Ultra preset averages 105 FPS, providing a smooth experience for both casual and competitive play. At 1440p, Ultra averages 69 FPS, clearing the threshold with modest headroom. At 4K, the system is playable only on Low (78 FPS) and Medium (62 FPS) presets; High (49 FPS) and Ultra (38 FPS) fall short of the 60 FPS target.
The verdict is straightforward: this is a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming system for Fivem, with 4K requiring settings compromises. Users with 1440p monitors can enable maximum settings without concern, while 4K users should stick to Medium for the best balance of visual quality and frame rate. The 52 FPS minimum on 4K Medium indicates potential dips in dense multiplayer areas, but the average remains playable.
Measured FPS Breakdown
3840x2160 (4K):
- Low: 78 FPS average
- Medium: 62 FPS average, 52 FPS minimum, 71 FPS maximum
- High: 49 FPS average
- Ultra: 38 FPS average
2560x1440 (1440p):
- Low: 141 FPS average
- Medium: 111 FPS average, 94 FPS minimum, 128 FPS maximum
- High: 89 FPS average
- Ultra: 69 FPS average
1920x1080 (1080p):
- Low: 214 FPS average
- Medium: 169 FPS average, 144 FPS minimum, 194 FPS maximum
- High: 135 FPS average
- Ultra: 105 FPS average
The measured data shows consistent scaling: each resolution step down roughly doubles the headroom over the 60 FPS threshold at equivalent settings. The Medium preset at 1080p shows a 144 FPS minimum, ensuring no perceptible stutter even in the most demanding moments. The Ultra preset at 1440p, with a 69 FPS average, is the most marginal playable configuration, but it still maintains a 9 FPS buffer above the threshold. The 4K results highlight the GPU's limits, with a 24 FPS gap between Medium and High underscoring the steep performance cost of higher settings at this resolution.