Fivem

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, this combination cannot hold 60 FPS at any preset. The closest attempt is Low settings, which averages 53 FPS, still short of the playable threshold. Medium drops to 42 FPS, High to 33 FPS, and Ultra to 26 FPS. The database records no playable settings for 4K, so the recommendation is to avoid this resolution or reduce the output resolution.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of exactly 60 FPS. This is the best playable setting at this resolution. Medium averages 75 FPS and Low averages 96 FPS, both also playable, but High offers the highest visual quality while still clearing the threshold. Ultra falls to 47 FPS, which is not playable.

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, averaging 71 FPS. This is the best playable setting at this resolution. High averages 92 FPS, Medium averages 115 FPS, and Low averages 145 FPS. All four presets clear 60 FPS, so users can run the game at maximum settings with headroom. The gap between Ultra and High is 21 FPS, indicating a notable performance cost for the highest preset.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this CPU and GPU pairing at 2911 out of 3707 tested combinations for Fivem, placing it in the lower portion of the field. This is a percentile position of roughly 78.5% from the top, meaning many other configurations will deliver higher frame rates. The rank reflects the GPU's age and tier more than the CPU, as the Ryzen 5 7400F is a modern 6-core part. The combination is not among the strongest for this game, but it is also not at the very bottom.

Given that the game is multiplayer and heavily dependent on server-side scripting, the measured data still shows a clear hierarchy: 1080p is fully playable at all presets, 1440p is playable up to High, and 4K is not playable at any preset. The rank of 2911 is consistent with a mid-range GPU paired with a strong CPU, where the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the recorded averages are 145 FPS on Low, 115 FPS on Medium, 92 FPS on High, and 71 FPS on Ultra. Medium has a recorded minimum of 97 FPS and maximum of 132 FPS, showing a tight frame delivery window. The other presets at this resolution do not have min/max values recorded, but the averages alone indicate that even Ultra maintains a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The step from Medium to High costs 23 FPS, and the step from High to Ultra costs another 21 FPS.

At 2560x1440, Low averages 96 FPS, Medium averages 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS and maximum of 87 FPS, High averages 60 FPS, and Ultra averages 47 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 64 FPS shows that even in demanding moments, the frame rate stays above the playable threshold. High sits exactly at 60 FPS on average, which is playable but leaves almost no headroom for drops. Ultra falls below the threshold and is not recommended.

At 3840x2160, Low averages 53 FPS, Medium averages 42 FPS with a minimum of 36 FPS and maximum of 48 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. No preset reaches 60 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 36 FPS indicates that frame pacing will be inconsistent, and the overall experience will feel sluggish. The scaling from 1080p to 4K is steep, with Ultra dropping from 71 FPS to 26 FPS, a 63% reduction.

Similar Performance Alternatives

On the CPU side, the Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i5-14600T with an average score of 32707 and a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812 with a delta of -0.2%, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32662 with a delta of 0.3%, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H at 32697 with a delta of 0.2%. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning any of these processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound behavior in Fivem. The Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is technically the closest by score, slightly outperforming the 7400F by 0.2%, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H trails by the same margin.

On the GPU side, the RTX 2060 has an average benchmark score of 15290, placing it at the 58th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 at 15283 with a delta of 0%, the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 with a delta of 0.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM at 15199 with a delta of 0.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 at 15171 with a delta of 0.8%. The GTX 580 is essentially identical in score, differing by 0%, so frame rates in Fivem would be nearly indistinguishable. The RTX 3050 OEM and RX 7600 trail slightly trail by 0.6% and 0.8% respectively, which would translate to roughly 1 FPS difference at the measured averages. Users with any of these GPUs would see similar performance, with the RTX 2060 holding a slight edge over all but the GTX 580.

The data shows that the CPU has more headroom than the GPU. Swapping the CPU for a rival would not change the playable settings at any resolution, as the GPU is the bottleneck. Swapping the GPU for a rival would also not change the playable settings, given the tiny deltas, except that the RX 2060 outperforms all but the GTX 580 by 0.1% or less, which is within measurement noise.

CPU and GPU Roles

The CPU and GPU split changes with resolution and preset. At 1080p Low, the CPU has enough single-thread performance to feed the GPU, but the GPU is still the limiting factor once the preset rises to Medium and above. The CPU is a strong Zen 4 part with 6 cores and 12 threads and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and its PassMark single-thread score of 3689 points to 83rd percentile standing. This gives the GPU room to work up to Ultra at 71 FPS. The CPU's multi-thread score of 25645 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 multi-score of 21765 show that the CPU is not the constraint.

At 1440p, the GPU begins to show its limits. High drops to exactly 60 FPS and Ultra falls to 47 FPS, indicating that the GPU cannot keep up with increased pixel count. The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 1920 shading units, which is adequate for 1080p but strained at higher resolutions. The scaling from 1080p High at 92 FPS to 1440p High at 60 FPS is a 35% reduction, while the CPU performance is unchanged.

At 4K, the GPU is clearly the sole constraint. The GPU's 336.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6.451 TFLOPS are insufficient to push past 53 FPS on Low. The CPU's single-core performance is irrelevant at this resolution, as the pixel and shading workload overwhelms the GPU. The 4K Ultra result of 26 FPS is less than half the 1080p Ultra result of 71 FPS, showing the GPU's compute and memory limits dominate. The CPU has no impact on playability at 4K, while at 1080p the CPU provides enough headroom for the GPU to reach its maximum.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Fivem, but only up to specific settings per resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear 60 FPS, with Ultra at 71 FPS, High at 92 FPS, Medium at 115 FPS, and Low at 145 FPS. This is the only resolution where Ultra is playable. At 2560x1440, High, Medium, and Low are playable, with High at exactly 60 FPS, Medium at 75 FPS, and Low at 96 FPS. Ultra is not playable at 1440p, averaging only 47 FPS. At 3840x2160, no preset is playable, with the highest average being 53 FPS on Low and the lowest being 26 FPS on Ultra. The verdict by resolution is: 1080p Ultra at 71 FPS, 1440p High at 60 FPS, and 4K no playable settings.

The combined rank of 2911 out of 3707 indicates that this is not a high-end configuration, but it is sufficient for 1080p gaming at maximum settings. Users targeting 1440p should stick to High or lower, and users targeting 4K should lower resolution or upgrade the GPU. The CPU is not the limiting factor at any resolution, so any upgrade path should focus on the GPU.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 1080p on Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 on Ultra is 71 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 average 60 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays at or above the playable threshold. Medium averages 75 FPS and Low averages 96 FPS, but Ultra drops to 47 FPS and is not playable.

Q: Is 4K playable with this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 53 FPS on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 42 FPS, High 33 FPS, and Ultra 26 FPS.

Q: How much faster is 1080p compared to 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average is 71 FPS, while at 3840x2160 Ultra, the average is 26 FPS. That is a 45 FPS difference, or about 63% lower performance at 4K.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck at 4K?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor at 3840x2160. The CPU has a high single-thread score of 3689 in PassMark and ranks in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU ranks only in the 58th percentile and has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, which is insufficient for 4K in this game.

Q: What GPU would provide similar performance to the RTX 2060?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 has an average benchmark score of 15283, a delta of 0% from the RTX 2060's 15290, making it nearly identical. The AMD Radeon 680M trails by 0.1%, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 trails by 0.8%, so all four would deliver comparable frame rates.