Fivem

Best Settings per Resolution

The database records measured frame rates for this AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and Intel Arc B370 combination across three resolutions and four quality presets. The playable threshold is 60 FPS, and the data shows a clear pattern: only 1920x1080 offers settings that sustain this target.

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold. The highest average recorded is 29 FPS at Low settings, followed by 23 FPS at Medium, 18 FPS at High, and 14 FPS at Ultra. Even the most forgiving preset falls far short of playable performance, so there is no recommended setting at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves slightly but remains below the threshold. Low settings produce an average of 53 FPS, which is the closest approach to 60 FPS at this resolution. Medium averages 41 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra drops to 26 FPS. None of these clear the playable bar.

At 1920x1080, the combination finally becomes viable. Low settings average 80 FPS, which comfortably exceeds the threshold. Medium settings average 63 FPS, also above 60 FPS. The best playable preset is Medium, since it maintains the 60 FPS target while offering higher visual quality than Low. High settings average 50 FPS, below the threshold, and Ultra averages 39 FPS.

The recommended configuration is therefore 1920x1080 with Medium settings, delivering an average of 63 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this CPU and GPU pairing against all other tested combinations in Fivem. The combo ranks 3420 out of 3707 total combinations, placing it in the lower portion of the field. This percentile position is consistent with the measured frame rates, which show the system only achieving playable performance at the lowest resolution and middle preset.

For context on the processor side, the Ryzen 5 5600GT sits at the 74th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 20733. Its nearest rivals in the CPU database are the Intel Core i5-12490F, which scores 20802 and is 0.3 percent faster, the Intel Xeon 6325P at 20821, 0.4 percent faster, the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U at 20826, 0.4 percent faster, and the AMD EPYC 7J13 at 20845, 0.5 percent faster. These deltas are tiny, meaning the 5600GT's compute performance is essentially on par with these alternatives.

The GPU side tells a different story. The Intel Arc B370 has a benchmark score of 1184, placing it at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, which is very low. Its nearest rivals are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186, 0.2 percent faster, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190, 0.5 percent faster, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M at 1192, 0.7 percent faster, and the AMD FirePro M2000 at 1168, 1.4 percent slower. These are all older or lower-end graphics parts, confirming that the Arc B370 is a very modest performer.

The combination rank of 3420 out of 3707 reflects the GPU's weak standing more than the CPU's, since the processor is mid-pack while the graphics component sits near the bottom.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data provides average frames per second for each resolution and preset, with some entries also including minimum and maximum values.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 14 FPS with no min or max recorded. High averages 18 FPS, also without min or max data. Medium averages 23 FPS, with a minimum of 20 and a maximum of 26. Low averages 29 FPS, again lacking min and max readings.

At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 26 FPS with no min or max. High averages 33 FPS, also without min or max. Medium averages 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 48. Low averages 53 FPS, lacking min and max values.

At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 39 FPS with no min or max. High averages 50 FPS, also without min or max. Medium averages 63 FPS, with a minimum of 54 and a maximum of 72. Low averages 80 FPS, with no min or max recorded.

The pattern across all resolutions shows a consistent scaling: each step up in quality costs roughly 10 to 15 FPS on average. The gap between Low and Ultra is substantial. At 3840x2160, Low is more than double the frame rate of Ultra, 29 FPS versus 14 FPS. At 2560x1440, Low beats Ultra by 27 FPS. At 1920x1080, Low exceeds Ultra by 41 FPS.

The min and max data points, where available, show that Medium presets have a relatively narrow frame time distribution. At 1920x1080 Medium, the range from 54 to 72 FPS indicates reasonably stable performance, while at 2560x1440 Medium, the 35 to 48 FPS range shows more variability relative to the average.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average frame rate is 29 FPS on Low settings, and Medium averages 23 FPS with a minimum of 20 FPS. No preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1920x1080?

A: The database lists Medium as the best playable setting at 1920x1080, with an average of 63 FPS. Low also qualifies with 80 FPS, but Medium offers higher quality while still staying above 60 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20733. Its closest competitors are the Intel Core i5-12490F at 20802, the Intel Xeon 6325P at 20821, the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U at 20826, and the AMD EPYC 7J13 at 20845. All four are within 0.5 percent of the 5600GT's score.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Arc B370 is at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1184. Its nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186 and the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190.

Q: Is 2560x1440 playable at any setting?

A: No. The best average at 2560x1440 is 53 FPS on Low settings, which falls 7 FPS short of the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 41 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS.

Q: What frame rate does the system achieve at 1920x1080 Ultra?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average is 39 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Ultra is not listed as a playable setting for this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured data reveals how the CPU and GPU each contribute to performance in Fivem across resolutions. The Ryzen 5 5600GT is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz and a 74th percentile standing among CPUs. The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated-class GPU with a 5th percentile position among all GPUs. This extreme discrepancy in component standing shapes the scaling behavior.

At 3840x2160, the system averages between 14 and 29 FPS depending on preset. The gap from Low to Ultra is 15 FPS, which is a 107 percent improvement when dropping from Ultra to Low. This large relative difference indicates the GPU is heavily saturated at this resolution, as reducing quality has a strong effect on frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the averages range from 26 to 53 FPS. The improvement from Ultra to Low is 27 FPS, a 104 percent gain. The scaling remains similar to 4K, suggesting the GPU continues to be the primary bottleneck. However, the absolute frame rates are higher across the board, with Low nearly reaching the 60 FPS target.

At 1920x1080, the averages range from 39 to 80 FPS. The improvement from Ultra to Low is 41 FPS, a 105 percent gain. Interestingly, the relative scaling is consistent across all three resolutions, with Low being roughly double the frame rate of Ultra in every case. This uniformity suggests that the GPU's performance ceiling is the dominant factor at all resolutions.

The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, the CPU's mid-pack standing allows the system to reach 80 FPS on Low, which is a reasonable result for a 6-core part. The 5600GT's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17272 and single-core score of 2438 are solid figures, and these likely support the frame rates seen at 1080p.

However, the GPU's low percentile is the limiting factor throughout. Even at 1080p Low, the system only reaches 80 FPS, which is far below what a stronger GPU paired with this CPU could achieve. The Arc B370's 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 1280 shading units are modest specifications, and the measured data reflects this.

The resolution scaling tells the story clearly. Moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces the Low preset average from 80 to 53 FPS, a 34 percent drop. Moving from 1440p to 4K reduces it further to 29 FPS, another 45 percent drop. These steep declines point to the GPU being the binding constraint, as the CPU's workload does not scale as dramatically with resolution.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Fivem has a qualified answer based on the recorded data. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, no settings are playable, and at 2560x1440, no settings are playable either. The system only achieves playable performance at 1920x1080.

At 1920x1080, the playable settings are Low and Medium. Low averages 80 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 63 FPS, which clears the bar by a smaller margin of 3 FPS. The best playable setting is Medium, as it offers the highest quality that remains playable.

High and Ultra at 1080p fall short, with averages of 50 and 39 FPS respectively. These presets would require a more capable GPU to reach the target.

For users with 1080p monitors, this system is viable for Fivem at Medium settings. The 63 FPS average is above the threshold, though the recorded minimum of 54 FPS indicates occasional dips below 60 FPS during demanding moments. Low settings provide a safer buffer with an 80 FPS average.

For 1440p or 4K displays, the system is not suitable for this game. The best result at 1440p is 53 FPS on Low, which is below the threshold, and 4K performance is substantially worse.

The overall combo rank of 3420 out of 3707 confirms this assessment. The system is positioned in the lower tier of tested combinations, capable of playable performance only at the least demanding resolution and preset combination.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals in the database provides context for what other hardware would behave similarly to this system.

On the CPU side, the Ryzen 5 5600GT's closest matches are all within 0.5 percent of its average benchmark score. The Intel Core i5-12490F scores 20802, essentially identical. The Intel Xeon 6325P scores 20821, the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U scores 20826, and the AMD EPYC 7J13 scores 20845. Any of these processors paired with the same GPU would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, since the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combination.

On the GPU side, the Arc B370's nearest rivals are older or lower-end parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, all slightly faster. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, slightly slower. These parts are from a much older era, indicating that the Arc B370's performance class is comparable to legacy integrated and entry-level discrete GPUs.

Swapping the Arc B370 for any of these near-equivalent GPUs would yield similar results in Fivem, with the same general pattern: playable only at 1080p Low or Medium, and unplayable at higher resolutions. Similarly, pairing the 5600GT with a much stronger GPU would change the outcome, but the current GPU is the constraint.

The data suggests that users seeking better Fivem performance should focus on the GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom relative to the graphics component. However, based solely on the recorded measurements, this specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and Intel Arc B370 delivers a playable experience only at 1080p with reduced settings.