Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

71%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
199 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
99 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
129 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
62 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
72 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
38 FPS
8.1ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 21,088
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 38 44 56 72
1440p QHD 62 82 104 129
1080p Full HD 99 123 158 199

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 123
1920x1080 Low 199
1920x1080 Medium 158
1920x1080 Ultra 99
2560x1440 High 82
2560x1440 Low 129
2560x1440 Medium 104
2560x1440 Ultra 62
3840x2160 High 44
3840x2160 Low 72
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 Ultra 38

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 presents a compelling mid-range combination for Fivem, a multiplayer title that is known for its variable demands. The measured data from the FACT PACK reveals a system capable of delivering strong performance at 1080p and 1440p, with the 4K experience requiring careful settings adjustments to maintain smooth gameplay. The benchmark results indicate that this combo ranks 1821 out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the 49th percentile of all tested systems, a figure that suggests a balanced but not top-tier configuration.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: The Ultra preset achieves an average of 61.7 FPS at 2560x1440, making it the most demanding setting that stays above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data shows that High, Medium, and Low presets also clear this mark at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU's single-threaded performance compare to its multi-threaded capabilities?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600G scores 1409 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 10551 in multi-core, indicating a strong single-thread performance that is 13.4% of its multi-core score. This is relevant for Fivem, which often relies on single-thread performance for game logic and physics.

Q: What is the GPU's synthetic benchmark score relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331, placing it 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon 860M and 0.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, while being 1.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT. These deltas are minimal, suggesting near-identical performance among these four GPUs.

Q: At which resolution does the system experience the most significant performance drop?

A: The transition from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 at Ultra settings shows a dramatic decline from 61.7 FPS to 37.8 FPS, a 38.7% reduction in average frame rate. This indicates that 4K Ultra is beyond the comfortable range for this hardware.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all tested processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G falls in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the processors in the database. Its average benchmark score is 21088, with the nearest rival being the Intel Core i3-1220P at 21066, a 0.1% difference.

Q: Does the system achieve 60 FPS at 3840x2160 with any preset?

A: Yes, the Low preset at 3840x2160 achieves an average of 72.3 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. However, the Medium preset drops to 55.6 FPS, and High falls to 43.5 FPS, showing that only the lowest settings are playable at 4K.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals how the balance shifts between the Ryzen 5 5600G and the RTX 5060. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 199.1 FPS on Low settings and 98.9 FPS on Ultra, indicating that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at this resolution. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at these frame rates, as evidenced by the 123 FPS High preset result. The data shows a 50.3% drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p, which is consistent with GPU-bound rendering tasks.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates decrease across all presets, with Low hitting 128.8 FPS and Ultra reaching 61.7 FPS. The 35.3% reduction from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings (98.9 to 61.7 FPS) suggests that the GPU is now under more stress, but the CPU still manages to keep up. The 1440p results indicate a more balanced workload, as the resolution increase taxes the GPU while the CPU maintains consistent performance.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. The Ultra preset falls to 37.8 FPS, a 38.7% drop from the 1440p Ultra result. Even the Low preset at 72.3 FPS shows a 43.9% reduction from the 1440p Low score of 128.8 FPS. This drastic scaling highlights that the RTX 5060's 8 GB GDDR7 memory and 128-bit bus are insufficient for 4K rendering at higher settings. The CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is not the bottleneck at this resolution, as the GPU cannot maintain playable frame rates regardless of CPU performance.

The data implies that for Fivem, the RTX 5060 is the dominant component at all resolutions, but the CPU's role becomes more critical at lower resolutions where higher frame rates are achievable. The Ryzen 5 5600G's strong single-thread performance (1409 in Cinebench R23) ensures that it does not hold back the GPU at 1080p, where frame rates exceed 120 FPS. At 4K, the GPU's limitations are exposed, and the CPU has ample headroom to spare.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for both components provides insight into what other hardware would behave similarly in Fivem. For the CPU, the Ryzen 5 5600G's average score of 21088 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i3-1220P at 21066 (0.1% difference), the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V at 21112 (-0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U at 21133 (-0.2%). A system using any of these processors would show virtually identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem, particularly at lower resolutions where frame rates exceed 120 FPS.

The GPU's nearest rivals present a more interesting comparison. The RTX 5060's average score of 26331 is within 0.3% of both the AMD Radeon 860M and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, suggesting that these three GPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Fivem. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% behind, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2% ahead. This means that swapping the RTX 5060 for any of these four GPUs would result in FPS differences of less than 2% in most scenarios.

Combining these findings, a system with an Intel Core i3-1220P and an AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT would perform within 1.3% of the tested combo, as the CPU delta of 0.1% and GPU delta of 1.2% would compound. Conversely, pairing the Ryzen 5 5600G with an AMD Radeon 860M would yield nearly identical results, as both components are within 0.3% of their respective rivals. The data suggests that the tested combination sits in a dense cluster of similar-performing hardware, making it a representative mid-range option.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 1821 out of 3707 tested combinations places this system in the 49.1st percentile of all tested hardware. This means that roughly half of the tested systems perform better and half perform worse, indicating a mid-pack positioning. The rank reflects the balance between the Ryzen 5 5600G's 74th percentile CPU score and the RTX 5060's 72nd percentile GPU score, which are both above average but not exceptional.

The ranking suggests that while this combo can handle Fivem at most settings, there are many systems that would outperform it, particularly at 4K where the GPU's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus become limiting factors. The data shows that the combo's performance is consistent with its component percentiles, as neither the CPU nor GPU falls significantly below their individual rankings. This coherence indicates a well-matched pairing where the performance ceiling is determined by the GPU at higher resolutions and the CPU at lower resolutions.

In the context of the 3707 tested combos, this system's rank of 1821 means it sits just above the median, which aligns with the measured FPS results. At 1080p Ultra, the 98.9 FPS result is solidly above the 60 FPS threshold, and at 1440p Ultra, the 61.7 FPS just barely clears it. The 4K results, with only the Low preset being playable, are the weakest aspect of this combo's performance profile.

The Verdict

The verdict by resolution is clear: this system can run Fivem at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 with all presets exceeding the 60 FPS threshold, but at 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves playable frame rates. At 1080p, the Ultra preset delivers 98.9 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS target. The 1440p Ultra setting achieves 61.7 FPS, which is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes in multiplayer sessions.

For 4K, the data shows that the Low preset at 72.3 FPS is the only viable option, as Medium drops to 55.6 FPS and High falls to 43.5 FPS. The Ultra preset at 37.8 FPS is not playable. This indicates that players wishing to use a 4K display will need to compromise significantly on visual quality, as the RTX 5060's memory bandwidth (448.0 GB/s) and 8 GB capacity are insufficient for higher settings at this resolution.

Overall, the system is a strong performer for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Fivem, with the ability to max out settings at both resolutions. The 4K experience is limited to low settings, which may be acceptable for players prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity. The data confirms that this combo is a reliable choice for mainstream gaming, with the caveat that 4K is not its strong suit.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 72.3 FPS. This provides a 12.3 FPS buffer over the threshold, which is adequate for maintaining smooth gameplay in less intense scenarios. The Medium preset at 55.6 FPS and High at 43.5 FPS are both below the playable threshold, making Low the only recommended option at this resolution.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves 61.7 FPS, making it the best visual quality option that remains playable. The 1.7 FPS margin over the threshold is tight, and players may experience occasional drops below 60 FPS in crowded multiplayer areas. The High preset at 82.4 FPS offers a more comfortable margin, but the data shows that Ultra is technically playable.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 98.9 FPS, which is the highest settings option that clears the 60 FPS threshold with a substantial 38.9 FPS margin. This makes Ultra the clear choice for 1080p gaming, as it provides both maximum visual quality and a smooth frame rate. The Medium preset at 158.4 FPS and High at 123 FPS are also excellent options for players seeking even higher frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its best performance across all presets. The Low setting achieves 199.1 FPS, Medium reaches 158.4 FPS, High hits 123 FPS, and Ultra manages 98.9 FPS. This represents a 50.3% performance drop from Low to Ultra, indicating that the GPU is the bottleneck at this resolution. The frame rates are exceptionally high, making this resolution ideal for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors.

The 2560x1440 results show a moderate decrease across the board. Low achieves 128.8 FPS, Medium reaches 104.4 FPS, High hits 82.4 FPS, and Ultra manages 61.7 FPS. The 52.1% drop from Low to Ultra is slightly more pronounced than at 1080p, suggesting that the GPU is being pushed harder. The Ultra preset's 61.7 FPS result is the closest to the 60 FPS threshold in the entire dataset, indicating that 1440p Ultra is the system's performance limit.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. Low achieves 72.3 FPS, Medium reaches 55.6 FPS, High hits 43.5 FPS, and Ultra manages 37.8 FPS. The 47.7% drop from Low to Ultra is the largest in absolute terms, with the Ultra preset falling 37.8% below the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that 4K rendering is severely constrained by the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity, with even Medium settings failing to maintain playable frame rates.