Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

66%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
155 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
72 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
102 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
49 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
56 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
27 FPS
10.3ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 21,088
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 27 34 46 56
1440p QHD 49 63 81 102
1080p Full HD 72 97 118 155

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 97
1920x1080 Low 155
1920x1080 Medium 118
1920x1080 Ultra 72
2560x1440 High 63
2560x1440 Low 102
2560x1440 Medium 81
2560x1440 Ultra 49
3840x2160 High 34
3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 46
3840x2160 Ultra 27

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

Fivem is a multiplayer title released on 2017-03-31. This analysis covers the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the Intel Arc B580, based on measured frame rates across three resolutions and four quality presets. The CPU carries a launch MSRP of $259, while the GPU has a launch MSRP of 249 USD. All data points are drawn from the benchmark database; no min/max frame times are provided, so the following discussion uses average FPS only.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The dataset contains average FPS for 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080, each with Low, Medium, High, and Ultra settings. The results are as follows:

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|

| 3840x2160 | Low | 56.3 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 45.6 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 34.3 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 26.6 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 102.4 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 80.7 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 62.5 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 48.6 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 155.0 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 118.0 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 97.3 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 71.5 |

At 4K, every preset falls short of the 60 FPS playability threshold. Low comes closest at 56.3 FPS, but even that is a miss. Medium drops to 45.6, High to 34.3, and Ultra to 26.6. The gap between Low and Ultra is large, but the entire resolution tier is effectively unplayable for smooth multiplayer sessions.

Moving to 1440p, the situation improves considerably. Low runs at 102.4 FPS, Medium at 80.7, and High at 62.5 — all above 60. Ultra falls to 48.6, which is the only sub-60 result at this resolution. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline, but the first three presets remain viable.

At 1080p, every setting clears 60 FPS by a comfortable margin. Low hits 155 FPS, Medium 118, High 97.3, and even Ultra manages 71.5. This is the resolution where the combo shows its strongest performance, with headroom to spare even at the highest quality preset.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that still maintains at least 60 FPS average defines the best playable configuration for each resolution.

  • 3840x2160: No setting reaches 60 FPS. The best average is 56.3 FPS at Low, which is below the threshold, so no recommended preset exists.
  • 2560x1440: High is the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS, with an average of 62.5 FPS. Low and Medium also qualify, but High offers the best visual quality while remaining playable.
  • 1920x1080: Ultra is the most demanding preset that clears 60 FPS, delivering 71.5 FPS. All four presets are playable, but Ultra gives the highest fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.

For users who prioritize frame rate over visuals, Low at 1080p provides 155 FPS, and Low at 1440p provides 102.4 FPS. But the data clearly shows that the system can handle Ultra at 1080p and High at 1440p without dropping below the 60 FPS line.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling of frame rates across resolutions reveals which component limits performance. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 97.3 at 1080p to 62.5 at 1440p and then to 34.3 at 4K. A similar pattern appears at Low settings: 155 at 1080p, 102.4 at 1440p, and 56.3 at 4K. Even at Ultra, the progression is 71.5, 48.6, and 26.6. The consistent, steep drop as resolution increases points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck at higher pixel counts.

At 1080p, the CPU appears to have enough headroom to feed the GPU. Low settings produce 155 FPS, which is far above the playable threshold, and Ultra still manages 71.5. This suggests that the Ryzen 5 5600G, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is not limiting frame delivery at this resolution. The GPU, meanwhile, is able to keep up with the workload.

At 1440p, the GPU begins to show its limits. The jump from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 35 FPS at High (97.3 to 62.5) and about 53 FPS at Low (155 to 102.4). The CPU is likely still capable, but the Arc B580's rendering capacity becomes the deciding factor. At 4K, the GPU is clearly overwhelmed — even Low settings cannot reach 60 FPS, and the margin to the threshold is only 3.7 FPS. The pattern across all settings and resolutions indicates a GPU-bound scenario once the resolution rises above 1080p.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Fivem? The answer depends on the target resolution.

  • 1920x1080: Yes, fully playable. All four presets exceed 60 FPS, with Ultra at 71.5 FPS. This is the sweet spot for this combination.
  • 2560x1440: Yes, with caveats. High, Medium, and Low all stay above 60 FPS, with High at 62.5 FPS. Ultra drops to 48.6 FPS, so users must settle for High or lower for a smooth experience.
  • 3840x2160: No. No preset reaches 60 FPS; the best is Low at 56.3 FPS. This resolution is not playable with this hardware.

In short, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Intel Arc B580 combination is well-suited for 1080p gaming and can handle 1440p with reduced settings, but it cannot deliver a 60 FPS experience at 4K in Fivem.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Ryzen 5 5600G's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark score, include the Intel Core i3-1220P (average score 21066, delta +0.1%), the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (21112, delta -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (21133, delta -0.2%), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (21174, delta -0.4%). These processors sit within a fraction of a percent of the 5600G's average score of 21088, meaning they would deliver very similar frame rates in Fivem when paired with the same GPU.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B580's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (average score 23061, delta -0.2%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, delta +0.6%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172, delta -0.7%), and the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, delta -1%). The B580's own average benchmark score is 23021, so these cards are all within 1% of its performance. In practice, swapping the B580 for any of these would yield nearly identical FPS results in Fivem, assuming the CPU remains the same.

For a full system alternative, pairing the 5600G with one of these GPUs would produce essentially the same measured frame rates as the B580. Conversely, using one of the listed CPUs with the B580 would also keep performance within a narrow band. The data indicates that this combo sits in a performance cluster where small benchmark differences translate to negligible in-game changes.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Intel Arc B580 ranks 2825 out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. That places it in the lower half of all pairings, with a majority of other systems delivering higher frame rates in this title. The CPU itself sits in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 68th percentile. The relatively modest ranking for the combo reflects the fact that many other CPU-GPU pairings offer more headroom, particularly at higher resolutions.

The ranking does not tell the whole story, however. At 1080p, this combo is fully capable of running Fivem at Ultra settings with 71.5 FPS, which is a solid experience. The low rank is driven largely by the 4K results, where the GPU falls short. For users targeting 1080p or 1440p, the system is competitive; for 4K, it is not. The data shows that this pairing is a mid-tier option, best suited for mainstream gaming rather than high-end or enthusiast setups.