Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 67 | 87 | 109 | 138 |
| 1440p QHD | 122 | 157 | 196 | 215 |
| 1080p Full HD | 185 | 209 | 227 | 247 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination presents a fascinating study in imbalance for Fivem, a multiplayer title where the CPU often dictates performance. The data shows a system that is overwhelmingly capable across all tested resolutions, with the GPU's immense power rarely being the limiting factor. The benchmark results indicate that this pairing delivers high frame rates even at 4K, but the scaling patterns reveal that the processor is the primary bottleneck, especially at lower resolutions.
Best Settings per Resolution
The most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS at each resolution is the Ultra preset across the board.
- 3840x2160 (4K): The Ultra preset achieves an average of 67 FPS. This is the highest visual quality setting that remains above the 60 FPS playable threshold, albeit with less headroom than at lower resolutions.
- 2560x1440 (1440p): The Ultra preset delivers a robust 122 FPS average, making it the clear choice for high refresh-rate gaming at this resolution.
- 1920x1080 (1080p): The Ultra preset produces an average of 185 FPS, ensuring a fluid experience that far exceeds the 60 FPS threshold.
The data indicates that users can select the maximum settings at any of these resolutions without falling below the playable threshold. The smallest margin is at 4K, where the 67 FPS average leaves room for drops, but it still qualifies as playable according to the 60 FPS benchmark.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K with maximum settings?
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset is 67 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. It is the most demanding playable setting at that resolution.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: The data shows a 62 FPS difference. The Low preset runs at 247 FPS, while the Ultra preset runs at 185 FPS, indicating that the CPU still holds significant headroom even at the highest settings.
Q: Which component seems to be the limiting factor at 1080p?
A: The frame rate progression suggests the CPU is the primary constraint. At 1080p, the difference between Low (247 FPS) and Medium (227 FPS) is only 20 FPS, and from Medium to Ultra (185 FPS) is another 42 FPS. This relatively modest scaling, despite the massive GPU, points to a CPU bottleneck at this resolution.
Q: How does the performance scale from 1080p to 1440p?
A: At the Ultra preset, the average FPS drops from 185 at 1920x1080 to 122 at 2560x1440, a 34% reduction. This significant drop indicates that the GPU is beginning to take on more load as the pixel count increases.
Q: Is the 4K Ultra experience smooth?
A: The 67 FPS average at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is above the 60 FPS threshold, but it has the least headroom of all Ultra presets. While playable, it is the most demanding scenario tested.
Q: What is the best preset for a 144Hz monitor at 1440p?
A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 yields a 122 FPS average, which is below 144 FPS. However, the High preset achieves 157 FPS, which would be a better match for a 144Hz display.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination ranks 252nd out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. This places it in the top 7% of all configurations in the database, which is an exceptionally strong showing. The high ranking is driven by the RTX 5090's raw power, which ensures that even at 4K, the system can push well past the 60 FPS threshold. However, the rank also reflects the CPU's limitations; while the Ryzen 5 5600F is a capable processor, it does not scale to the same heights as more modern high-core-count CPUs in this specific multiplayer title, which is likely why the combo does not rank even higher. The result is a system that is far more powerful than necessary for 1080p and 1440p, but it secures a top-tier position due to its 4K capabilities.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide a context for what other hardware would behave similarly in this combination.
For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F has a Passmark average benchmark score of 36945. Its closest rivals, based on average score, are:
- The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 with a score of 36938 (a 0% delta).
- The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D with a score of 37018 (a -0.2% delta, meaning it scores slightly higher).
- The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 with a score of 37093 (a -0.4% delta).
- The Intel Core i9-12900T with a score of 37112 (a -0.5% delta).
These processors would deliver very similar CPU-bound performance in Fivem. Swapping the 5600F for any of these would likely result in nearly identical frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79842. Its nearest rivals are:
- The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB with a score of 79605 (a 0.3% delta).
- The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB with a score of 79396 (a 0.6% delta).
- The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT with a score of 78940 (a 1.1% delta).
- The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X with a score of 80959 (a -1.4% delta).
These GPUs would provide a similar level of graphics performance, meaning that at higher resolutions like 4K, where the GPU matters more, the frame rates would be comparable. However, these are professional or mobile parts and would not be direct retail alternatives for a desktop gaming build.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at performance across all settings and resolutions.
3840x2160 (4K):
- Ultra: 67 FPS average.
- High: 87 FPS average.
- Medium: 109 FPS average, with a minimum of 92 FPS and a maximum of 125 FPS.
- Low: 138 FPS average.
2560x1440 (1440p):
- Ultra: 122 FPS average.
- High: 157 FPS average.
- Medium: 196 FPS average, with a minimum of 166 FPS and a maximum of 225 FPS.
- Low: 215 FPS average.
1920x1080 (1080p):
- Ultra: 185 FPS average.
- High: 209 FPS average.
- Medium: 227 FPS average, with a minimum of 193 FPS and a maximum of 261 FPS.
- Low: 247 FPS average.
The data shows a clear trend: at 4K, the scaling between presets is substantial, with a 71 FPS spread from Low to Ultra. At 1080p, the spread narrows to 62 FPS. The minimum FPS data points for Medium settings are also notable, showing that the system maintains solid frame times even under load, with a 92 FPS minimum at 4K and a 193 FPS minimum at 1080p.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can run Fivem. The verdict by resolution is unequivocal:
- 3840x2160: All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with the Ultra preset achieving an average of 67 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold.
- 2560x1440: All four presets are playable, with the Ultra preset delivering a 122 FPS average.
- 1920x1080: All four presets are playable, with the Ultra preset reaching a 185 FPS average.
The system clears the playability threshold at every resolution and every preset setting. The only point of concern is the 4K Ultra result, which, at 67 FPS, has the least margin for error. Any other combination of resolution and settings provides a much larger buffer above the 60 FPS target. This is a configuration designed for high refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with the added benefit of being fully capable of 4K gaming at maximum quality.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data strongly suggests that the CPU is the primary bottleneck for this game at 1080p and 1440p, while the GPU becomes more influential at 4K.
Evidence for the CPU's dominance at lower resolutions comes from the scaling between presets. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is only 62 FPS (247 to 185). If the GPU were the limiting factor, this gap would be much larger, as the RTX 5090 is capable of far more. The relatively small delta implies that the Ryzen 5 5600F is unable to feed the GPU with enough frames to fully utilize its potential. This is a classic CPU-bound scenario.
At 1440p, the scaling between Low and Ultra is 93 FPS (215 to 122), showing that the GPU is starting to contribute more to the performance equation as pixel count increases. The gap widens further at 4K, where the difference between Low and Ultra is 71 FPS (138 to 67), but the absolute frame rates are lower, confirming the GPU is now the more significant factor.
The resolution scaling also tells the story. At the Ultra preset, the frame rate drops from 185 at 1080p to 122 at 1440p (a 34% decrease) and then to 67 at 4K (a 45% decrease from 1440p). This steep decline with increasing resolution is a hallmark of GPU-bound performance. Conversely, at the Low preset, the frame rate only drops from 247 at 1080p to 215 at 1440p (a 13% decrease) and then to 138 at 4K (a 36% decrease from 1440p). The smaller initial drop at Low settings suggests that the CPU is still the main constraint until the resolution becomes high enough to saturate the GPU. In summary, the Ryzen 5 5600F holds back the RTX 5090 at 1080p, but the pairing becomes more balanced as the resolution increases, with the GPU taking over as the primary performance driver at 4K.