Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 14 | 18 | 23 | 29 |
| 1440p QHD | 26 | 33 | 41 | 53 |
| 1080p Full HD | 39 | 50 | 63 | 80 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded data for Fivem with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and Intel Arc B370 shows a steep performance curve that scales predictably with both resolution and graphical preset. At 3840x2160, the combo is largely overwhelmed. The High preset produces an average of 18 FPS, while Low reaches 29 FPS. Medium lands at 23 FPS on average, with a recorded minimum of 20 FPS and a maximum of 26 FPS. Ultra is the hardest on the system, dropping to 14 FPS average. None of these figures approach smooth gameplay, and the narrow band between presets (14 to 29 FPS) indicates that the GPU is the primary limiter at 4K.
Stepping down to 2560x1440 improves the situation noticeably, but 60 FPS remains out of reach. The High preset averages 33 FPS, Low jumps to 53 FPS, and Medium sits at 41 FPS with a 35 FPS minimum and 48 FPS maximum. Ultra stays low at 26 FPS. The gap between Low and High here is 20 FPS, which shows that the rendering load from settings is significant, but even the most forgiving preset cannot push the average past the playable threshold.
At 1920x1080, the combo finally becomes viable. Low settings deliver an 80 FPS average, a strong result that clears the 60 FPS mark by a wide margin. Medium follows at 63 FPS on average, with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS. High drops to 50 FPS, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS. The 1080p results show a clear hierarchy: Low and Medium are playable, High and Ultra are not. The difference between Low and Ultra is 41 FPS, indicating that Fivem's preset scaling has a major impact on the Arc B370's frame delivery at this resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database's overall rankings for Fivem, this CPU and GPU pairing sits at rank 3420 out of 3707 tested combos. That places it in the bottom 8% of all configurations, which is a poor showing. The combo's percentile position reflects the Arc B370's low standing in the GPU hierarchy. The Intel Arc B370 itself is in the 5th percentile among all GPUs, meaning 95% of recorded graphics cards perform better in general compute and graphics tasks. The Ryzen 5 5600F is much stronger, sitting in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, but the GPU drags the overall gaming result down.
In terms of raw benchmark scores, the Arc B370 has an average score of 1184 from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. That is a very low figure for a modern discrete card, and it explains why the measured FPS in Fivem is so limited at higher resolutions. The CPU's average benchmark score is 36945, which is far above its nearest rivals, but the GPU's score is a fraction of that. The rank of 3420 out of 3707 reflects a system that can handle light or older titles at lower settings, but struggles with anything demanding.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data shows that the GPU is the dominant limiting factor at every resolution in this game. The Arc B370's 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 25 W TDP, paired with system-shared memory, explain why the frame rates collapse so quickly as resolution climbs. At 3840x2160, the difference between Low and Ultra is only 15 FPS (29 vs 14), which is a small absolute gap. This suggests that the GPU is already saturated even at Low settings, and additional preset effects simply add more work that pushes the frame rate down modestly. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are not the issue at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the gap between Low (53 FPS) and Ultra (26 FPS) is 27 FPS, showing that the GPU has a bit more headroom to differentiate between presets. Still, the fact that Low cannot reach 60 FPS means the GPU is running at a high utilization level. At 1920x1080, the picture changes. Low hits 80 FPS, and Medium hits 63, while High drops to 50. This shows that at 1080p, the CPU (with its 32 MB of L3 cache and 4.0 GHz boost) can feed the GPU enough data to reach playable frame rates, but the GPU's rendering capacity is still the cap. The Ryzen 5 5600F is not the issue here: the same CPU paired with a stronger GPU would likely push much higher numbers.
Scaling from 1080p Low (80 FPS) to 1440p Low (53 FPS) is a 34% drop, and from 1080p Medium (63 FPS) to 1440p Medium (41 FPS) is a 35% drop. This consistent scaling shows that the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute capacity are the limiting factors, not the CPU. The CPU's role becomes more visible at 1080p, where the difference between Low and Medium is only 17 FPS, but the difference between Medium and High is 13 FPS, indicating that the CPU can keep up at lower presets but the GPU still dictates the ceiling.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals in the database for the CPU and GPU provide context for what other hardware would behave similarly. On the CPU side, the Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36945 on average. The closest match is the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, with a score of 36938, a delta of 0%. That means the Core Ultra 5 225 would deliver effectively identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D is 0.2% faster, with a score of 37018, which is also a negligible difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is 0.4% faster, and the Intel Core i9-12900T is 0.5% faster. All four of these CPUs are within 0.5% of each other, so swapping the 5600F for any of these would not change frame rates in any meaningful way.
On the GPU side, the Arc B370 has an average score of 1184. The nearest rival is the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, at 1186, which is 0.2% faster. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% faster, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% faster. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4% slower. These are all very old or low-power GPUs, and they would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Fivem at the same settings. If a user has any of these GPUs, the measured FPS would be within a few frames of the Arc B370. The CPU's rivals are all modern processors, while the GPU's rivals are ancient in comparison, which highlights the extreme imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this combo.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, no preset in the database clears the 60 FPS threshold. The highest average frame rate is 29 FPS on Low, which is far below the playable mark. The verdict for 4K is empty: there are no playable settings.
At 2560x1440, the same story applies. The best average is 53 FPS on Low, which is still 7 FPS short of the 60 FPS target. High produces 33 FPS, Medium 41 FPS, and Ultra 26 FPS. None of these are playable, so the verdict for 1440p is also empty.
At 1920x1080, the situation improves. The database lists two playable presets: Low and Medium. Low delivers an 80 FPS average, which is well above the threshold. Medium delivers 63 FPS, which clears the threshold by a narrower margin, with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS. The best settings for 1080p are Medium, because it offers the highest preset that still averages over 60 FPS. High and Ultra are not playable, with 50 FPS and 39 FPS respectively. The data shows that for a locked 60 FPS experience, Low is the safer choice, while Medium is acceptable for those who prioritize visuals and can tolerate occasional dips to 54 FPS.
The Verdict
Can this PC run Fivem? Yes, but only at 1920x1080 and only up to Medium settings. The official verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, there are no playable settings. The best average is 29 FPS, which falls far below the 60 threshold. At 2560x1440, the same is true, with the best average being 53 FPS on Low, still 5 FPS short. The combo cannot reach 60 FPS at either 4K or 1440p, regardless of how much visual quality is sacrificed.
At 1920x1080, the verdict is positive for two presets. Low achieves 80 FPS, and Medium achieves 63 FPS. Medium is the best playable preset because it provides the highest visual quality that still stays at or above 60 FPS on average. It is notably the minimum on Medium is 54 FPS, so there will be moments when the frame rate dips below the threshold, but the average is solid. High and Ultra are not playable at this resolution, with averages of 50 FPS and 39 FPS.
In summary, the Intel Arc B370 is the limiting factor. The Ryzen 5 5600F is a capable CPU, scoring in the 85th percentile, but the GPU sits in the 5th percentile and delivers a raw benchmark score of only 1184. This combo is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings or lower. For a game like Fivem, which is a multiplayer title, a stable 60 FPS at 1080p Medium is the realistic ceiling, and users should expect to turn down settings to Low if they want a more consistent frame rate during busy scenes. The recorded data does not support any playable experience at 1440p or 4K.