Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

77%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
287 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
180 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
242 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
119 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
135 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
66 FPS
4.3ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 20,468
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 60,347

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 66 85 106 135
1440p QHD 119 153 191 242
1080p Full HD 180 232 263 287

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 232
1920x1080 Low 287
1920x1080 Medium 263
1920x1080 Ultra 180
2560x1440 High 153
2560x1440 Low 242
2560x1440 Medium 191
2560x1440 Ultra 119
3840x2160 High 85
3840x2160 Low 135
3840x2160 Medium 106
3840x2160 Ultra 66

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Fivem, a multiplayer title that scales aggressively with GPU power. Measured data across three resolutions and four quality presets shows this combination rarely dips below the 60 FPS playability threshold, with average frame rates ranging from 66 FPS at 4K Ultra to 287 FPS at 1080p Low. The data indicates a system that is overqualified for most display configurations, offering headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors even at demanding settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the RTX 4090 maintains strong performance across all presets. The Low preset produces an average of 135 FPS, while Medium reaches 106 FPS with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 122 FPS. High settings average 85 FPS, and the most demanding Ultra preset still holds an average of 66 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 69 FPS, which represents a significant performance cost for maximum visual fidelity, yet even the lowest figure remains above the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, frame rates increase substantially. Low settings achieve an average of 242 FPS, while Medium hits 191 FPS with a minimum of 163 FPS and a maximum of 220 FPS. High averages 153 FPS, and Ultra produces 119 FPS. The scaling from 4K to 1440p is notable: at Ultra, the average jumps from 66 FPS to 119 FPS, a gain of 53 FPS. At Low, the increase from 135 FPS to 242 FPS represents a 107 FPS improvement, indicating that Fivem becomes progressively more GPU-bound as resolution drops.

At 1920x1080, the combination becomes nearly unrestricted. Low settings yield an average of 287 FPS, while Medium delivers 263 FPS with a minimum of 224 FPS and a maximum of 303 FPS. High settings average 232 FPS, and Ultra still produces 180 FPS. The minimum frame rate recorded across all 1080p presets is 224 FPS at Medium, which means even the worst-case scenario in this dataset vastly exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold. The spread between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 107 FPS, mirroring the delta seen between 4K Low and 1440p Low.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a system where the GPU dominates performance scaling, but the CPU still matters at lower resolutions. At 4K, the RTX 4090 is the clear bottleneck: dropping from Ultra to Low increases average FPS from 66 to 135, a 2.05x improvement that reflects the GPU's workload reduction. The Ryzen 5 5600 with 6 cores and 12 threads provides sufficient throughput to keep the GPU fed, but the resolution-driven frame rate changes are almost entirely attributable to pixel count and shading load.

At 1440p and 1080p, the CPU's role becomes more visible. The Ryzen 5 5600's single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 882, passmark_single_thread score of 3256) supports high frame rates, but the scaling between 1440p and 1080p is not linear with pixel count alone. For example, 1440p Ultra averages 119 FPS while 1080p Ultra averages 180 FPS, a 51% increase despite a 44% reduction in pixels. This suggests diminishing GPU gains at lower resolutions, where the CPU's physics and draw-call processing begin to impose a ceiling. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 5641 and cinebench_r23_multicore score of 18309 indicate a mid-range CPU that can handle multiplayer scenarios with many entities, but it is not the limiting factor at 4K.

The preset scaling at each resolution further clarifies roles. At 1080p, moving from Low to Medium only drops average FPS from 287 to 263 (8.4% reduction), while moving from Medium to Ultra drops it to 180 (31.6% reduction). This nonlinear response suggests that Ultra settings introduce GPU-intensive effects that outweigh CPU-related costs, whereas Low and Medium presets are partially CPU-limited at 1080p.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 66 FPS. This is the only resolution where the system approaches the threshold, but it still clears it by 6 FPS. High (85 FPS), Medium (106 FPS), and Low (135 FPS) also remain playable, but Ultra offers the highest visual quality without sacrificing playability.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best choice, averaging 119 FPS. This gives substantial headroom above 60 FPS, allowing for smooth gameplay even in heavy multiplayer scenes. Medium (191 FPS) and High (153 FPS) are also viable, but Ultra provides the best visual experience with no risk of dropping below the threshold.

At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 180 FPS, making it the clear recommendation. The system can run the most demanding preset at nearly three times the playable threshold, which means users with high-refresh-rate monitors (144Hz or 240Hz) can take full advantage of the display. Lower presets like High (232 FPS), Medium (263 FPS), and Low (287 FPS) offer even higher frame rates, but they trade visual fidelity for marginal gains in smoothness that most players will not perceive.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Fivem, and it does so with exceptional margin. According to the verdictByResolution data, all four presets at all three tested resolutions are playable, meaning the average FPS never falls below 60. At 4K, the worst case is Ultra at 66 FPS average, which is above the playable threshold. At 1440p, all presets exceed 119 FPS, and at 1080p, all presets exceed 180 FPS. The combination ranks 173rd out of 3707 tested combos in this game, placing it in the top 5% of configurations.

The data shows no scenario where the user must compromise on settings or resolution to achieve playable frame rates. Even at 4K Ultra, the system maintains 66 FPS average, which is suitable for most displays. For competitive play on high-refresh monitors, 1440p or 1080p with Ultra settings delivers frame rates well above 100 FPS. The only caveat is that the RTX 4090's 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are excessive for Fivem's current requirements, indicating that this GPU is overprovisioned for this title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 5 5600 provide context for CPU performance. The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V scores 20454 in average benchmark, a 0.1% delta from the Ryzen's 20468. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G scores 20425 (0.2% delta), and the AMD EPYC 9454P scores 20422 (0.2% delta). These alternatives would produce nearly identical CPU-bound frame rates in Fivem, meaning any of them paired with the RTX 4090 would yield similar results at 4K where the GPU dominates.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals show interesting clustering. The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 60326 (0% delta from the RTX 4090's 60347), while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60140 (0.3% delta). The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61896, which is 2.5% higher, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657, which is 2.9% lower. In practice, these GPUs would produce frame rates within a few percent of the RTX 4090 in Fivem, though the professional-grade cards may lack the gaming optimizations of the GeForce lineup. The RTX 4090's 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it outperforms the vast majority of hardware, and its nearest rivals are not typical gaming cards.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for this system?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 with Ultra settings averages 180 FPS, which is the highest quality preset with the most headroom. However, 2560x1440 Ultra at 119 FPS and 3840x2160 Ultra at 66 FPS are also fully playable.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K with maximum settings?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the measured average FPS is 66, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold by 6 FPS. All other 4K presets (High, Medium, Low) also average above 60 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Fivem with this hardware?

A: At 4K, the GPU is the limiting factor, as shown by the 69 FPS difference between Low (135 FPS) and Ultra (66 FPS). At 1080p, the CPU becomes more relevant, as the gap between Low (287 FPS) and Ultra (180 FPS) narrows to 107 FPS, suggesting the Ryzen 5 5600's single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread: 882) starts to constrain frame rates.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: The combination ranks 173rd out of 3707 tested configurations for Fivem, placing it in the top 4.7% of all combos. The RTX 4090 sits in the 88th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 5 5600 is in the 74th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: What are the closest performance alternatives to this CPU and GPU?

A: For the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 8500G (0.2% delta), and AMD EPYC 9454P (0.2% delta) have nearly identical average benchmark scores. For the GPU, the Intel Arc Pro A60 (0% delta) and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (0.3% delta) are the closest matches, while the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is 2.5% faster and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 2.9% slower.

Q: What minimum frame rates can be expected at Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 Medium, the minimum FPS is 224. At 2560x1440 Medium, the minimum is 163. At 3840x2160 Medium, the minimum is 90. All of these values are well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.