Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Fivem
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 23 | 36 | 45 | 53 |
| 1440p QHD | 47 | 62 | 76 | 96 |
| 1080p Full HD | 69 | 88 | 117 | 145 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 delivers a straightforward performance profile in Fivem: comfortable frame rates at 1920x1080 across every preset, a playable experience at 2560x1440 on everything except Ultra, and a 3840x2160 experience that falls short of the 60 FPS threshold regardless of settings. The database places this pairing at rank 2900 out of 3707 tested combinations in this multiplayer title, which reflects the RTX 2060's position in the 58th percentile of all GPUs in our records while the Ryzen 5 5600 sits in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. What follows is a resolution-by-resolution analysis of the measured data, along with the settings recommendations it supports.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the recorded averages climb steadily as visual detail drops. Low settings produce 144.6 FPS, Medium produces 117.3 FPS, High produces 88.4 FPS, and Ultra still manages 68.9 FPS. That Ultra figure matters most: it clears the 60 FPS playability threshold with room to spare, meaning a 1080p player never has to sacrifice image quality for smoothness on this hardware. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is roughly a doubling of frame rate, which shows how much headroom the RTX 2060's 6 GB of GDDR6 still has when the pixel count is modest.
At 2560x1440, the averages compress. Low settings deliver 96 FPS, Medium delivers 76.2 FPS, and High delivers 62.4 FPS, the last of which is the tightest margin in the entire dataset relative to the 60 FPS line. Ultra at 1440p records 47 FPS, a 15.4-frame shortfall against the threshold and roughly 24 percent below the High-preset result at the same resolution. The practical reading is that 1440p players should treat High as their ceiling, and that stepping down one preset from Ultra recovers a playable frame rate immediately.
At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. Low averages 53.1 FPS, Medium averages 44.6 FPS, High averages 35.8 FPS, and Ultra averages 23.4 FPS. Even the least demanding preset misses the threshold by nearly 7 frames, and the High-to-Ultra step alone costs over 12 FPS. The 4K data is internally consistent with the lower-resolution results: the Low-setting 1080p figure of 144.6 FPS drops to 53.1 FPS at 4K, a reduction consistent with the RTX 2060's 336.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth being pushed to its limits at quadruple the pixel count.
FAQ
Q: Can the Ryzen 5 5600 and RTX 2060 run Fivem at 60 FPS?
A: Yes, at two of the three tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low through Ultra averages at or above 60 FPS, with Ultra at 68.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, Low, Medium, and High all clear the threshold, topping out at 62.4 FPS on High. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS; the best result is 53.1 FPS on Low.
Q: What is the highest preset that stays playable at 1440p?
A: High, at 62.4 FPS average. Ultra at 2560x1440 records 47 FPS, which falls short of the threshold, so High is the ceiling for a smooth 1440p experience.
Q: How does this combination rank against other tested pairings in Fivem?
A: The database ranks it 2900 out of 3707 tested combinations. That places it in the lower portion of the field, driven primarily by the GPU: the RTX 2060 sits in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, while the Ryzen 5 5600 sits in the 74th percentile of all CPUs.
Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the limiting factor?
A: The GPU. The Ryzen 5 5600's average benchmark score of 20468 compares closely with rivals such as the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V at 20454, the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G at 20425, and the AMD EPYC 7713 at 20363, all within half a percent. The RTX 2060's average score of 15290 is similarly clustered with the GTX 580, the Radeon 680M, and the RX 7600, but in a lower tier of the GPU field, and the large frame-rate drops between resolutions point at the graphics card as the bottleneck.
Q: How much frame rate is lost going from 1080p to 4K?
A: Substantially. On Low settings, the average falls from 144.6 FPS at 1920x1080 to 53.1 FPS at 3840x2160. On Ultra, it falls from 68.9 FPS to 23.4 FPS. In both cases the reduction is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario.
Q: Does the game run at high refresh rates on this hardware?
A: Only at 1080p with reduced detail. The 144.6 FPS Low-setting average at 1920x1080 is the sole result in the dataset that approaches high-refresh territory; every 1440p and 4K configuration lands below 100 FPS.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, averaging 68.9 FPS. There is no reason to run anything lower at this resolution unless targeting frame rates beyond the recorded averages, in which case Medium's 117.3 FPS or Low's 144.6 FPS become relevant.
At 2560x1440, the most demanding playable preset is High, averaging 62.4 FPS. This is the one configuration in the dataset where the margin over the threshold is thin, so players sensitive to dips below the average may prefer Medium at 76.2 FPS for cushion.
At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. The best recorded average is 53.1 FPS on Low, below the 60 FPS threshold, so the database records no recommended settings for this resolution. Players wanting 4K output would need to accept sub-threshold frame rates or different hardware.
Similar Performance Alternatives
On the CPU side, the Ryzen 5 5600's average benchmark score of 20468 sits within a fraction of a percent of several recorded rivals. The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V averages 20454, a difference of just 0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G averages 20425, 0.2 percent behind. Two server-class parts, the AMD EPYC 9454P at 20422 and the AMD EPYC 7713 at 20363, land within 0.5 percent as well, though their positioning in the database reflects aggregate compute rather than gaming deployment. Any of these processors would deliver effectively identical CPU-side behavior in Fivem.
On the GPU side, the RTX 2060's average score of 15290 is matched almost exactly by the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 at 15283, a 0 percent delta. The AMD Radeon 680M averages 15270, just 0.1 percent behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM averages 15199, 0.6 percent behind. The AMD Radeon RX 7600, at 15171, trails by 0.8 percent. Swapping the RTX 2060 for any of these cards would, according to the aggregate data, produce a near-identical performance envelope in this game. The one qualitative difference worth noting is that the RTX 2060 carries 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, hardware features its closest rivals in the list do not all share.
A system built around the Ryzen 5 5600 plus any of these GPUs, or any of the listed CPUs plus the RTX 2060, would be expected to land in the same rank neighborhood: roughly 2900 of 3707 in this title.
How This Combo Ranks
The Ryzen 5 5600 with the RTX 2060 ranks 2900 out of 3707 combinations tested in Fivem. Interpreted as a percentile, that places the pairing below the median of the tested field, which aligns with the component-level data: the CPU contributes from the 74th percentile of all processors, while the GPU contributes from the 58th percentile of all graphics cards. The combo rank lands below what the CPU's standing alone might suggest, and that discrepancy is the GPU's fingerprint on the results.
The game itself dates to a 2017 release in the multiplayer genre, so a mid-field ranking here is a statement about the pairing's relative standing against modern hardware in the database, not about absolute playability. The measured data makes clear the combination is fully capable at mainstream resolutions despite its rank, because the rank aggregates configurations that include far faster graphics cards.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can run Fivem, with one clear caveat about resolution. At 1920x1080, the verdict is unambiguous: all four presets, Low, Medium, High, and Ultra, average at or above 60 FPS, with Ultra recording 68.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, three presets qualify, Low at 96 FPS, Medium at 76.2 FPS, and High at 62.4 FPS, with High designated the best playable setting. Ultra at 1440p, at 47 FPS, does not qualify. At 3840x2160, the verdict is negative: the best result is 53.1 FPS on Low, and the database records no playable settings at that resolution.
The summary is simple. For 1080p and 1440p play, this combination handles Fivem without compromise at 1080p and with a single-preset concession at 1440p. For 4K, it is not sufficient on the recorded data.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling data points decisively to the GPU as the component that matters most in Fivem on this system. Frame rates respond strongly to both resolution and preset changes, which is the signature of graphics-bound behavior. Going from 1080p to 1440p on High drops the average from 88.4 to 62.4 FPS; going from 1440p to 4K on the same preset drops it further to 35.8 FPS. If the CPU were the limiter, resolution scaling would flatten out, and it does not.
Preset scaling tells the same story. At 4K, moving from High to Ultra costs 12.4 FPS, from 35.8 down to 23.4. At 1080p, the same step costs 19.5 FPS, from 88.4 down to 68.9. Sensitivity to rendering detail of this magnitude indicates that the RTX 2060's 1920 shading units, 48 render output units, and 336.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are the resources under pressure, not the processor.
The Ryzen 5 5600, by contrast, shows no evidence of constraint anywhere in the dataset. Its credentials are strong for this workload: six cores and twelve threads on the Zen 3 architecture at a 4.40 GHz boost clock, 32 MB of shared L3 cache, and a single-thread Passmark score of 3256 alongside a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2584. Its multi-thread results, including 18309 in Cinebench R23 and 21541 in Passmark multithread, sit in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. None of the measured frame rates plateau in a way that would suggest the processor is capping output, even at 144.6 FPS on Low at 1080p.
The practical conclusion for owners of this pairing: upgrades to visual quality and resolution should be evaluated against the GPU's limits, and any future component refresh should target the graphics card first. The CPU has headroom to spare at every tested configuration, and the data indicates it would remain comfortable feeding a faster GPU at the resolutions where this game is actually playable on the current setup.