Fivem

Benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 paired with the Intel Arc B570 in Fivem show a configuration that can handle the multiplayer title at 1080p and 1440p with adjusted settings, but falls short of 60 FPS at 4K. The combo ranks 2980th out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the lower half of the database. Measured FPS data across three resolutions and four presets indicates a system where the GPU is the more likely performance ceiling, given the CPU’s 73rd percentile rank versus the GPU’s 65th. The data is measured directly, not simulated, and the playable threshold is set at 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and Intel Arc B570 sits at rank 2980 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This means 2979 configurations perform better, and only 727 perform worse. In percentile terms, the combo outperforms roughly 19.6% of all tested pairings, placing it firmly in the lower quintile of the database. The CPU alone ranks in the 73rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 65th percentile against all GPUs. This discrepancy suggests that the processor is comparatively stronger than the graphics card, and that the GPU is more likely to limit frame rates in this game. The combo’s overall rank is dragged down by the GPU’s relatively lower standing, as well as the demanding nature of Fivem at high resolutions.

When compared to other tested combos, the Ryzen 5 5500’s average benchmark score of 19593 is within 0.7% of the Intel Core i5-11600KF (19723) and within 0.5% of the Intel Core i7-10700F (19499). The Intel Arc B570’s average score of 20556 is within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662) and 0.4% of the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480). These close margins indicate that the combo’s low rank is not due to any single component being a severe outlier, but rather the combination of a mid-tier CPU and a mid-tier GPU relative to the rest of the test pool. The data shows that while each component is respectable on its own, their pairing does not boost the system into the upper echelons of Fivem performance.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS scaling across resolutions reveals how the workload shifts between CPU and GPU. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 136 avg FPS on Low, 107 on Medium, 86 on High, and 67 on Ultra. At 2560x1440, the same settings produce 89, 71, 56, and 44 avg FPS respectively. At 3840x2160, the numbers drop to 50, 39, 31, and 24. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is substantial: Low falls from 136 to 89, Medium from 107 to 71, High from 86 to 56, and Ultra from 67 to 44. Moving from 1440p to 4K further reduces each setting by roughly 40% or more, with Low going from 89 to 50 and Ultra from 44 to 24.

This steep scaling with resolution strongly suggests that the GPU is the primary bottleneck. At 1080p, the CPU’s higher relative strength (73rd percentile) allows the GPU to work closer to its full potential, resulting in high frame rates. As resolution increases, the GPU’s workload grows disproportionately, and the Arc B570’s 65th percentile standing becomes the limiting factor. The CPU’s six cores and twelve threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost of 4.20 GHz, are sufficient to feed the GPU at lower resolutions, but at 4K the GPU simply cannot keep up. The data does not show any setting where the CPU would be the clear constraint, as even at 1080p Ultra the GPU is still producing 67 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. Thus, in this pairing, the GPU is the dominant performance determinant, especially at higher resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table lists all measured average, minimum, and maximum FPS values for the Ryzen 5 5500 + Intel Arc B570 in Fivem. Where the benchmark recorded no minimum or maximum, the field is left blank.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|

| 3840x2160 | High | 31 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 50 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 39 | 33 | 45 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 24 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | High | 56 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 89 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 71 | 60 | 81 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 44 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | High | 86 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 136 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 107 | 91 | 123 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 67 | — | — |

At 1080p, the system clears 60 FPS on every preset, with the lowest average being 67 on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 123, indicating consistent performance. At 1440p, only Low and Medium exceed 60 FPS; High averages 56 and Ultra 44. The Medium preset at 1440p is particularly stable, with a minimum of 60 and maximum of 81. At 4K, no setting reaches 60 FPS. The highest average is 50 on Low, and Ultra drops to 24. The only recorded minimum/maximum at 4K is Medium (33 to 45), which still falls well below the playable threshold. These numbers illustrate a clear resolution ceiling: the system is comfortably playable at 1080p, marginally playable at 1440p with reduced settings, and not playable at 4K.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Fivem? Yes, but with caveats based on resolution and settings. According to the verdict data, the system achieves playable frame rates (at least 60 FPS average) at 1920x1080 across all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra. The best preset at 1080p is Ultra, which delivers an average of 67 FPS. At 2560x1440, the playable settings are Low and Medium, with Medium being the best choice at 71 FPS average. At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings; even Low averages only 50 FPS, and the highest setting, Ultra, averages 24 FPS. Therefore, users targeting 4K will need to lower resolution or upgrade the GPU. For 1440p gaming, Medium is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS, while High and Ultra fall short. At 1080p, the system is fully capable, with headroom on all presets.

The data indicates that the system’s performance is sufficient for mainstream 1080p gaming and acceptable for 1440p at medium quality. For 4K, the hardware is not sufficient. The 60 FPS threshold is a common target, and the system meets it at 1080p and 1440p (with the right settings). The measured minimum FPS at 1440p Medium is exactly 60, which means occasional dips could occur, but the average of 71 provides a buffer. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 67, leaving little headroom but still above the threshold. Overall, the verdict is clear: this combo is a solid 1080p performer and a passable 1440p option, but not a 4K machine.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5500’s nearest rivals, based on average benchmark score, are the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 (19617, -0.1% delta), Intel Core i5-12500 (19668, -0.4%), Intel Core i7-10700F (19499, +0.5%), and Intel Core i5-11600KF (19723, -0.7%). These CPUs would deliver nearly identical FPS in Fivem when paired with the same GPU, as the differences are within a fraction of a percent. Swapping the Ryzen 5 5500 for any of these would not meaningfully change the measured results.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B570’s nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, +0.1%), Intel Arc A750 (20582, -0.1%), NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, +0.4%), and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, -0.5%). Again, the performance deltas are negligible, meaning a system with one of these GPUs and the same CPU would produce essentially the same FPS in Fivem. Notably, the Intel Arc A750 is a direct predecessor in Intel’s lineup and shows a -0.1% difference, making it a near-identical alternative. The NVIDIA RTX 3070 Mobile, despite being a mobile part, also falls within 0.1% of the B570’s average score. These alternatives provide a clear picture of the performance envelope: any of these components would behave similarly in this game.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K?

A: No. At 3840x2160, no setting reaches an average of 60 FPS. The highest average is 50 on Low, and the lowest is 24 on Ultra.

Q: What is the best setting at 1920x1080?

A: Ultra is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 67 FPS. All other presets (High, Medium, Low) also exceed 60 FPS.

Q: What is the best setting at 2560x1440?

A: Medium is the highest preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS, delivering 71 FPS. Low also qualifies at 89 FPS, but Medium offers better visual quality.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more limiting in this combo?

A: The GPU is more likely the bottleneck. The CPU ranks in the 73rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 65th percentile. The sharp FPS drop with increasing resolution points to GPU limitation.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all tested systems?

A: It ranks 2980th out of 3707 tested combos, meaning it outperforms about 19.6% of configurations. This places it in the lower half of the database.

Q: What are the nearest CPU and GPU alternatives with similar performance?

A: For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, Intel Core i5-12500, Intel Core i7-10700F, and Intel Core i5-11600KF are all within 0.7% of the Ryzen 5 5500’s average score. For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, Intel Arc A750, NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, and AMD Radeon R9 M390X are within 0.5% of the Intel Arc B570.

Best Settings per Resolution

The following lists the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS average for each resolution, based on the measured data:

• 1920x1080: Ultra — average 67 FPS. This is the highest preset available and it clears the 60 FPS threshold.
• 2560x1440: Medium — average 71 FPS. Low also works (89 FPS), but Medium provides a better visual balance while staying above 60.
• 3840x2160: No preset qualifies. The highest average is 50 FPS on Low, which falls short of the 60 FPS target.

These settings represent the maximum visual quality that can be maintained without dropping below the playable threshold. At 1080p, users can enable every graphical option; at 1440p, they must dial back to Medium; at 4K, the system cannot sustain playable frame rates on any setting. The data confirms that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, with 1440p as a secondary option at medium quality.