Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

73%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
227 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
143 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
193 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
95 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
103 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
49 FPS
5.6ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 17,035
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 43,223

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 49 67 83 103
1440p QHD 95 121 151 193
1080p Full HD 143 180 207 227

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 180
1920x1080 Low 227
1920x1080 Medium 207
1920x1080 Ultra 143
2560x1440 High 121
2560x1440 Low 193
2560x1440 Medium 151
2560x1440 Ultra 95
3840x2160 High 67
3840x2160 Low 103
3840x2160 Medium 83
3840x2160 Ultra 49

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for FiveM with the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER shows a clear pattern across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 226.9 FPS on Low settings, 206.5 FPS on Medium, 179.5 FPS on High, and 143.1 FPS on Ultra. Every 1080p preset clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin, with the lowest recorded average still more than double the playability threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show the expected cost of additional pixel throughput. Low settings produce 192.9 FPS, Medium drops to 150.9 FPS, High settles at 120.8 FPS, and Ultra holds at 94.7 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 98.2 FPS, indicating that the preset selection has a substantial impact on performance.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes more dramatically. Low settings manage 103.2 FPS, Medium reaches 83 FPS, High stays playable at 66.9 FPS, but Ultra falls below the 60 FPS line with 48.7 FPS. This is the only configuration in the entire dataset that fails to meet the playable threshold. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at Ultra is particularly steep: 94.7 FPS down to 48.7 FPS, a loss of 46 FPS just from the resolution increase.

The data does not include min/max frame time values, so the analysis relies on average FPS alone. All recorded measurements are average FPS figures, and the consistency across presets suggests the engine responds predictably to graphics setting changes.

CPU and GPU Roles

The Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 2 architecture with a 3.60 GHz base clock and 4.20 GHz boost clock. Its benchmark profile shows a 3DMark max threads score of 4603, a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15045, and a single-core score of 2124. The CPU sits at the 71st percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 17035.

The RTX 4070 SUPER uses the AD104 chip with 7168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 29995, and it sits at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs.

The resolution scaling in the measured FPS reveals how the balance shifts. At 1080p, the CPU has more headroom relative to the GPU workload, and the frame rates are extremely high across all presets. At 1440p, the GPU begins to take on more responsibility, but the system still delivers well above 60 FPS even at Ultra. At 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint, particularly at Ultra where the workload exceeds what the RTX 4070 SUPER can sustain at a playable level.

The comparison between 1080p Ultra (143.1 FPS) and 4K Ultra (48.7 FPS) quantifies this shift. The 4K Ultra result is 94.4 FPS lower, a drop of roughly 66 percent. This magnitude of reduction points to the GPU being the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU's single-thread and multi-thread performance remains constant regardless of resolution. The Ryzen 5 3600's Cinebench R20 single-core score of 892 and multi-core score of 6318 are sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K Ultra, the rendering demands outpace what the graphics card can deliver.

The preset scaling at a fixed resolution also demonstrates GPU sensitivity. At 1440p, moving from Low to Ultra costs 98.2 FPS, while at 1080p the same preset change costs 83.8 FPS. The larger absolute drop at higher resolution indicates that the GPU is doing progressively more work as both resolution and visual fidelity increase.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its position. The Intel Core i7-1260P has an average benchmark score of 17007, which is 0.2 percent below the Ryzen 5 3600's 17035. The Intel Core i5-11400 scores 17067, 0.2 percent above. The AMD EPYC 7573X scores 17070, also 0.2 percent above, and the AMD EPYC 7742 scores 16998, 0.2 percent below. These deltas are negligible, meaning any of these processors would produce nearly identical frame rates in FiveM with the same GPU.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rivals show similar tight clustering. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262, just 0.1 percent below the RTX 4070 SUPER's 43223 average benchmark score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, also 0.1 percent below. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 scores 43301, 0.2 percent below, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667, 1 percent above. The performance deltas here are small enough that users with these alternative GPUs should expect very similar behavior in FiveM at the tested resolutions and presets.

The practical takeaway is that the Ryzen 5 3600 and RTX 4070 SUPER combination sits in a well-populated performance band. Swapping the CPU for an i7-1260P or i5-11400 would not meaningfully alter the measured FPS, and substituting the GPU with an RTX 4090 Mobile would only improve scores by about 1 percent in aggregate benchmarks.

The Verdict

This system can run FiveM at a playable level in most configurations. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra delivering 143.1 FPS and Low reaching 226.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same is true: all four presets are playable, with Ultra at 94.7 FPS and Low at 192.9 FPS. The 1440p Ultra result is particularly strong, offering a high-fidelity experience well above the playability line.

At 3840x2160, the situation is more nuanced. Low (103.2 FPS), Medium (83 FPS), and High (66.9 FPS) all clear 60 FPS, making 4K gaming viable at these settings. Ultra falls short at 48.7 FPS, which fails to meet the playable threshold. Users who want 4K Ultra will need to reduce settings to High or lower, or accept a frame rate below the playability standard.

The database ranks this combination at 797 out of 3707 total combos for FiveM, placing it in the top quarter of tested systems. The overall verdict is that this PC is well suited for FiveM at 1080p and 1440p with maximum settings, and at 4K with High settings or below.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run FiveM at 60 FPS in 4K?

A: Yes, but not at Ultra settings. The measured data shows 66.9 FPS at High, 83 FPS at Medium, and 103.2 FPS at Low for 3840x2160. Ultra settings produce 48.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 deliver 94.7 FPS, which is the highest preset tested and remains comfortably above 60 FPS. This is the most demanding setting that stays playable at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 3600 has an average benchmark score of 17035. The Intel Core i7-1260P scores 17007 (0.2 percent lower), the Intel Core i5-11400 scores 17067 (0.2 percent higher), the AMD EPYC 7573X scores 17070 (0.2 percent higher), and the AMD EPYC 7742 scores 16998 (0.2 percent lower). Performance differences are minimal.

Q: Is the GPU the limiting factor at 4K Ultra?

A: The data indicates yes. The RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 48.7 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra, which is the only configuration below 60 FPS. At lower resolutions, the same GPU handles Ultra settings well, suggesting the 4K Ultra workload exceeds the GPU's capability.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 179.5 at 1920x1080 with High settings. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold and leaves substantial headroom for demanding multiplayer scenarios.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 SUPER compare to the RTX 4090 Mobile?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43223, while the RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667, which is 1 percent higher. In FiveM, this small aggregate difference would translate to nearly identical frame rates.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with a measured average of 143.1 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available in the test set and it clears the threshold by more than double.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is also the best playable preset, delivering 94.7 FPS. This remains well above 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for high-resolution gaming.

At 3840x2160, the most demanding playable preset is High, with an average of 66.9 FPS. Ultra drops to 48.7 FPS and is therefore not recommended. Users seeking 4K should select High for the best visual quality that still maintains playable performance.