Fivem

# Best Settings per Resolution

For 3840x2160 (4K), the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, delivering an average of 71.8 FPS. High settings fall below the 60 FPS threshold at 58.3 FPS average, and Ultra drops further to 44 FPS. Low settings run noticeably faster at 89.7 FPS, but Medium is the highest quality option that maintains smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the combination clears 60 FPS on every preset tested. The best playable setting is Ultra, which produces 79.9 FPS average. High settings reach 101.1 FPS, Medium hits 129.3 FPS, and Low runs at 162.8 FPS. All presets are viable here, so players can prioritize visual quality without sacrificing frame rate.

For 1920x1080, the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS is Ultra at 120.5 FPS average. In fact, every settings level exceeds the 60 FPS target by a wide margin. High delivers 157.7 FPS, Medium reaches 194.8 FPS, and Low peaks at 223.6 FPS. The system has ample headroom at 1080p, making Ultra the recommended choice for maximum visual fidelity.

# How This Combo Ranks

This CPU and GPU pairing ranks 1156th out of 3707 tested combinations in the database for Fivem. That places it in the 69th percentile of all recorded system configurations, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of tested setups while trailing the top third. The rank reflects a balanced pairing where neither component severely bottlenecks the other in this multiplayer title.

The CPU itself sits at the 71st percentile among all processors tested, with an average benchmark score of 17035. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-1260P at 17007 (0.2% behind), the Intel Core i5-11400 at 17067 (0.2% ahead), the AMD EPYC 7573X at 17070 (0.2% ahead), and the AMD EPYC 7742 at 16998 (0.2% behind). These delta values are negligible, indicating the Ryzen 5 3600 performs essentially on par with those alternatives in aggregate workloads.

The GPU ranks at the 68th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 23172. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA P106-100 at 23249 (0.3% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 at 23250 (0.3% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23273 (0.4% ahead), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X at 23276 (0.4% ahead). These differences are within noise levels, meaning the RTX 3080's compute performance is statistically indistinguishable from those cards in aggregate benchmarks.

The combination's overall rank in Fivem specifically reflects the game's multiplayer nature, which often stresses CPU performance alongside GPU throughput. The Ryzen 5 3600's 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 3.60 GHz base and 4.20 GHz boost clock provides solid processing headroom, while the RTX 3080's Ampere architecture with 8704 shading units handles the visual load. Together they land in the upper-middle tier of tested systems.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the recorded data shows a clear hierarchy across settings. Low settings produce an average of 89.7 FPS, Medium delivers 71.8 FPS, High drops to 58.3 FPS, and Ultra falls to 44 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 45.7 FPS, representing a 51% performance loss when maxing out visual quality at 4K. The step from Medium to High costs 13.5 FPS, while the step from High to Ultra costs another 14.3 FPS.

At 2560x1440, all settings remain comfortably above 60 FPS. Low runs at 162.8 FPS, Medium at 129.3 FPS, High at 101.1 FPS, and Ultra at 79.9 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 82.9 FPS reduction, about a 51% drop. Each successive quality level reduces frame rate by roughly 20 to 30 FPS, with the largest single step being from Low to Medium at 33.5 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers high refresh rate performance across the board. Low achieves 223.6 FPS, Medium reaches 194.8 FPS, High hits 157.7 FPS, and Ultra still manages 120.5 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 103.1 FPS, a 46% reduction. Notably, the drop from High to Ultra is 37.2 FPS, which is the largest single-step decline at this resolution, while the Medium to High step costs 37.1 FPS as well.

The data indicates that resolution scaling behaves as expected, with 4K imposing the heaviest load on the GPU. The RTX 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus with 760.3 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient capacity for 4K textures, but the rendering load at that resolution pushes the system near its limits on higher presets. At 1440p and 1080p, the combination has substantial headroom, with even Ultra settings maintaining frame rates well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

# Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearest rivals in the database, several hardware combinations would behave similarly to this Ryzen 5 3600 and RTX 3080 pairing. On the CPU side, the Intel Core i7-1260P scores 17007 in average benchmarks, just 0.2% below the Ryzen 5 3600's 17035. Systems using that mobile processor would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, assuming the GPU remains constant. The Intel Core i5-11400 scores 17067, 0.2% higher, and would be essentially indistinguishable in gameplay. The AMD EPYC 7573X at 17070 and EPYC 7742 at 16998 also fall within 0.2% of the Ryzen 5 3600, though those server-class chips are less common in gaming builds.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, which is 0.3% higher than the RTX 3080's 23172. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250, also 0.3% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23273 and AMD Radeon R9 M290X at 23276 are 0.4% higher. These delta values are all under half a percent, meaning the RTX 3080's aggregate benchmark performance is essentially equivalent to those cards. In Fivem specifically, frame rates would be expected to fall within a few FPS of each other when paired with the same CPU.

It is important to note that these rivals are matched on aggregate benchmark scores, not on gaming-specific performance in Fivem. The database records show that the Ryzen 5 3600's multi-threaded capabilities, including its 15045 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 2124 single-core score, place it in a performance band where differences of 0.2% are not perceptible in real gameplay. Similarly, the RTX 3080's 25086 Passmark G3D score and 14397 GPU compute score place it in a tier where rival cards within 0.4% would deliver visually identical results.

# FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K resolution smoothly?

A: Yes, at 4K the system achieves 71.8 FPS on Medium settings and 89.7 FPS on Low settings, both above the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings drop to 58.3 FPS, which falls just below 60 FPS, and Ultra runs at 44 FPS.

Q: What is the best quality setting at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Ultra settings deliver 79.9 FPS average, which is the highest quality preset that stays above 60 FPS. All four settings levels (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17035 in average benchmarks. The Intel Core i7-1260P scores 17007 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core i5-11400 scores 17067 (0.2% higher), the AMD EPYC 7573X scores 17070 (0.2% higher), and the AMD EPYC 7742 scores 16998 (0.2% lower). These differences are negligible.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 significantly faster than its nearest GPU rivals?

A: No, the differences are minimal. The RTX 3080 scores 23172, while the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276 (0.4% higher).

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system delivers 120.5 FPS average. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the recommended preset for 1080p gaming.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems in Fivem?

A: This combination ranks 1156th out of 3707 tested configurations, placing it in the upper third of all recorded systems. The CPU sits at the 71st percentile and the GPU at the 68th percentile among their respective hardware categories.

# The Verdict

This AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination can run Fivem effectively across all tested resolutions, with limitations only at 4K on the highest presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers playable performance on every setting, with Ultra achieving 120.5 FPS average. This makes 1080p Ultra the clear recommendation for players who prioritize visual quality, as it provides double the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the system also clears 60 FPS on all presets. Ultra settings run at 79.9 FPS, High at 101.1 FPS, Medium at 129.3 FPS, and Low at 162.8 FPS. The 1440p Ultra experience remains smooth and visually rich, making this resolution the best balance of fidelity and frame rate for this hardware.

At 3840x2160, the system's playable settings are limited to Low at 89.7 FPS and Medium at 71.8 FPS. High falls short at 58.3 FPS, and Ultra drops to 44 FPS. Players targeting 4K should use Medium settings to stay above 60 FPS, accepting the visual compromise for smooth gameplay. The verdict by resolution confirms this: 4K supports Low and Medium as playable, 1440p supports all four presets, and 1080p supports all four presets.

The recorded data shows this combination occupies a strong mid-to-upper tier position, ranking 1156th out of 3707 tested combos. The CPU's 71st percentile standing and the GPU's 68th percentile standing indicate balanced performance without a severe bottleneck in either direction. For Fivem's multiplayer environments, which can be demanding on both processor and graphics hardware, this system provides a reliable experience at 1080p and 1440p with high settings, while 4K users should stick to Medium for consistent frame rates above the 60 FPS target.