Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Fivem
Multiplayer 2017

Fivem

79%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
194 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
151 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
170 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
112 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
128 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
59 FPS
5.9ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,479
Your CPU 21,484
Graphics Card
Required 27,716
Your GPU 56,083

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 59 80 99 128
1440p QHD 112 146 155 170
1080p Full HD 151 169 184 194

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 169
1920x1080 Low 194
1920x1080 Medium 184
1920x1080 Ultra 151
2560x1440 High 146
2560x1440 Low 170
2560x1440 Medium 155
2560x1440 Ultra 112
3840x2160 High 80
3840x2160 Low 128
3840x2160 Medium 99
3840x2160 Ultra 59

Performance Analysis: Fivem on Your System

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 ranks 735th out of 3707 tested combinations in the database for Fivem. This places the combo in the top 19.8% of all recorded configurations, a strong showing for a pairing that mixes a 2018-era processor with a current-generation flagship graphics card. The percentile data reinforces this position: the CPU sits at the 75th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 87th percentile among all graphics cards. The ranking suggests that while the CPU is not a top-tier part by modern standards, the sheer graphics horsepower of the RTX 5080 compensates heavily in this particular multiplayer title.

What makes this rank interesting is the imbalance between the two components. The Ryzen 5 2600's average benchmark score of 21484 places it within 1.2% of several rivals, including the AMD EPYC 9454 (21223, 1.2% slower) and the Intel Xeon D-1746TER (21635, 0.7% faster). Meanwhile, the RTX 5080's average score of 56083 puts it 2.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57367, which is actually 2.2% faster) and 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757). The combination lands in a comfortable mid-to-upper tier for Fivem, with the GPU clearly being the dominant contributor to the overall rank.

CPU and GPU Roles

Benchmark results across resolutions reveal a clear pattern: the GPU is the primary driver of performance, but the CPU's influence becomes more noticeable at lower resolutions. At 4K (3840x2160), the gap between Low and Ultra settings is substantial, with Low averaging 128.4 FPS and Ultra dropping to 59.4 FPS. This 69 FPS spread indicates that the RTX 5080 is heavily loaded at this resolution, and the CPU's role is secondary. However, at 1080p, the same settings spread narrows significantly: Low hits 194.4 FPS while Ultra still manages 151.1 FPS, a difference of only 43.3 FPS. The smaller delta at 1080p suggests the Ryzen 5 2600 begins to limit the GPU's ability to stretch its legs, as the processor's six cores and twelve threads become a bottleneck in less GPU-intensive scenarios.

The scaling between resolutions further illustrates this dynamic. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings drops the average from 151.1 FPS to 112.2 FPS, a 25.7% reduction. Going from 1440p to 4K at Ultra drops it further to 59.4 FPS, a 47.1% reduction from the 1440p figure. These steep drops at higher resolutions confirm that the RTX 5080 is the limiting factor at 4K, whereas the relatively modest drop from 1080p to 1440p (25.7%) indicates the CPU is holding back the GPU somewhat at the lower resolution. In short: at 1080p, the Ryzen 5 2600 matters more; at 4K, the RTX 5080 is everything.

FAQ

Q: Can this combination run Fivem at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 4K?

A: No. The recorded average at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 59.4 FPS, just below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable setting at 4K is High, which averages 79.7 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming with this hardware?

A: At 2560x1440, Ultra settings deliver an average of 112.2 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold comfortably. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 2600's average score of 21484 is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V (21440, 0.2% faster) and the Intel Core i9-11900H (21367, 0.5% faster). It trails the Intel Xeon D-1746TER by 0.7% but leads the AMD EPYC 9454 by 1.2%.

Q: Is the RTX 5080 significantly faster than its closest competitors?

A: The data shows a tight cluster. The RTX 5080 scores 56083 on average, which is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757) and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698). The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 2.2% faster, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 2.3% slower.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The recorded average at 1920x1080 with Medium settings is 184 FPS, with Low settings reaching 194.4 FPS and High at 168.8 FPS. All presets at 1080p exceed 150 FPS on average.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at any resolution?

A: The evidence suggests a mild CPU limitation at 1080p. The FPS gap between Low and Ultra narrows from 69 FPS at 4K to 43.3 FPS at 1080p, indicating the processor cannot fully feed the GPU at lower resolutions. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU side, the Ryzen 5 2600's nearest rivals in the database are all within a 1.2% performance band. The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V (21440, 0.2% faster) and Intel Core i9-11900H (21367, 0.5% faster) would behave nearly identically in Fivem, meaning any of these processors paired with the RTX 5080 would yield similar frame rates. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER (21635, 0.7% faster) is a server-oriented part but offers comparable single-thread and multi-thread performance for this workload. The AMD EPYC 9454 (21223, 1.2% slower) sits at the lower end of this cluster, though the difference is negligible in real-world gaming scenarios.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5080's nearest rivals form an even tighter group. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57367, 2.2% faster) would provide a marginal uplift in Fivem, while the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757, 0.6% slower) and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698, 0.7% slower) would produce nearly indistinguishable results. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828, 2.3% slower) is the closest below, though its workstation-oriented design may not translate perfectly to gaming workloads. For a user considering this exact CPU-GPU pairing, swapping either component for its nearest rival would change measured FPS by less than 2.5%, which is well within run-to-run variance for most games.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is High, which averages 79.7 FPS. Medium also clears the threshold at 99.2 FPS, and Low runs at 128.4 FPS, but Ultra falls short at 59.4 FPS. The verdict data confirms High as the best playable setting at 4K.

At 2560x1440, every preset is playable, and Ultra delivers 112.2 FPS on average. This is the recommended setting for 1440p, as it provides the highest visual fidelity while still leaving a 52.2 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium (154.5 FPS) and High (146.4 FPS) are also excellent options for users who prefer higher frame rates over maximum quality.

At 1920x1080, Ultra is the best setting with an average of 151.1 FPS. Low runs at 194.4 FPS, Medium at 184 FPS, and High at 168.8 FPS, but there is no reason to sacrifice quality at this resolution since even Ultra nearly triples the playable threshold. The CPU's mild bottleneck at 1080p does not prevent the combo from delivering a highly smooth experience at maximum settings.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Fivem. The recorded data shows playable performance at all tested resolutions, with the only caveat being 4K Ultra falling just short of the 60 FPS mark. At 1920x1080, all four settings presets clear 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 151.1 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets also clear 60 FPS, with Ultra at 112.2 FPS. At 3840x2160, three of four presets are playable, with High being the best choice at 79.7 FPS. The combination of the Ryzen 5 2600 and RTX 5080 is more than sufficient for this multiplayer title, delivering a fluid experience even at 4K with High settings. The only scenario that fails the 60 FPS test is 4K Ultra, which misses by a slim 0.6 FPS margin, a difference that would likely be imperceptible in actual gameplay.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database contains 12 measured data points for this combo, covering three resolutions and four settings presets. All values are average FPS, with minimum and maximum figures not recorded.

At 3840x2160, the results are: Low averages 128.4 FPS, Medium averages 99.2 FPS, High averages 79.7 FPS, and Ultra averages 59.4 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 69 FPS, showing the GPU's workload scaling strongly with visual quality.

At 2560x1440, the results tighten: Low averages 169.8 FPS, Medium averages 154.5 FPS, High averages 146.4 FPS, and Ultra averages 112.2 FPS. The spread here is 57.6 FPS, indicating a somewhat smaller quality penalty than at 4K.

At 1920x1080, the results are the highest overall: Low averages 194.4 FPS, Medium averages 184 FPS, High averages 168.8 FPS, and Ultra averages 151.1 FPS. The spread is 43.3 FPS, the smallest of the three resolutions, reinforcing the observation that the CPU begins to cap performance at lower resolutions. Across all resolutions, the RTX 5080 provides substantial headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, and the Ryzen 5 2600, despite its age, does not prevent a playable experience in Fivem.