Fivem

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 in Fivem shows a consistent pattern: this combination delivers smooth frame rates across most of the tested resolution and settings matrix, with the only shortfall appearing at 4K with Ultra settings. The database measured average FPS values at three resolutions, each with four quality presets, and the results indicate that the GPU is the dominant factor in most scenarios, while the older CPU still manages to keep up without creating a bottleneck that would drag performance below playable thresholds.

Starting with the most demanding configuration, 3840x2160 at Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 48.2. This is the only measured scenario that falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. At the same resolution, High settings produce an average of 65.5 FPS, Medium yields 80.3 FPS, and Low jumps to 103.2 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 4K is approximately 55 FPS, which highlights how heavily the preset selection impacts performance at this resolution. The data shows that even the second-highest preset, High, clears the 60 FPS mark with a modest margin of 5.5 FPS, suggesting that players targeting 4K should avoid Ultra unless they are willing to accept sub-60 averages.

At 2560x1440, the picture improves substantially. The Ultra preset averages 91.6 FPS, which is more than 30 FPS above the 4K Ultra result. High settings reach 114.9 FPS, Medium hits 147 FPS, and Low tops out at 170.7 FPS. Every preset at this resolution comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold, with the lowest margin being over 30 FPS. The jump from 4K Ultra to 1440p Ultra represents a 43.4 FPS gain, which is a significant improvement for players who prefer higher frame rates over maximum pixel density.

At 1920x1080, the combination reaches its highest measured performance. The Ultra preset averages 138.2 FPS, which is already well above the playable threshold. High settings produce 165.8 FPS, Medium averages 180.5 FPS, and Low reaches 196.7 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 58.5 FPS, and even the most demanding preset leaves a cushion of more than 78 FPS above the 60 FPS line. This resolution clearly favors the RTX 5070, as the frame rates approach or exceed the refresh rate of many standard monitors.

The database did not record min or max FPS values for any of these configurations, so the analysis relies solely on average FPS. However, the consistency of the averages across multiple settings suggests that the pairing does not suffer from severe frame pacing issues in the measured scenarios. The overall pattern is that the CPU, while older and based on the Zen architecture, provides sufficient performance for Fivem at all tested resolutions, and the GPU scales well with resolution changes.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 48.2, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The database indicates that only High, Medium, and Low presets are playable at this resolution.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is fully playable with an average FPS of 91.6. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at this resolution, so players can enable Ultra without worrying about frame rate drops below the threshold.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 perform at 1080p with High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, the average FPS is 165.8. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and leaves ample headroom for high-refresh-rate displays. Even the Ultra preset at this resolution averages 138.2 FPS.

Q: Is there any resolution where this combo fails to hit 60 FPS?

A: The only measured scenario that fails to reach 60 FPS is 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, where the average is 48.2 FPS. All other resolution and settings combinations in the database exceed 60 FPS.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combination?

A: The lowest recorded average FPS is 48.2, which occurs at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. The next lowest value is 65.5 FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings, so the drop from High to Ultra at 4K is substantial.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 2600 bottleneck the RTX 5070 in Fivem?

A: The measured data does not show any scenario where the CPU limits performance below the playable threshold, except at 4K Ultra. Given that the CPU has an average benchmark score of 21484 and sits in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, it appears to provide adequate performance for this game, though the 4K Ultra result may partly reflect CPU limitations.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V with an average score of 21440, which is 0.2% ahead of the Ryzen 5 2600. The Intel Core i9-11900H scores 21367, putting it 0.5% behind. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635, which is 0.7% ahead of the Ryzen 5 2600. The AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, placing it 1.2% behind. These deltas are all within a narrow range, meaning that any of these CPUs would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem when paired with the same RTX 5070. The Ryzen 5 2600 sits in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, so it is a mid-to-high tier processor, and its closest competitors are a mix of laptop and server chips that happen to land at similar aggregate scores.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 580 with an average score of 40318, which is 0.1% ahead of the RTX 5070. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063, a 0.8% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870, which is 1.2% ahead. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568, placing it 2% behind. These rivals are all professional or mobile workstation GPUs, and their average benchmark scores are very close to the RTX 5070's 40377 average. In practical terms, swapping the RTX 5070 for any of these alternatives would result in nearly identical FPS in Fivem at the tested settings, assuming the CPU remains unchanged. The RTX 5070 sits in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs, indicating strong overall performance relative to the broader database.

The combination of the Ryzen 5 2600 with any of these rival CPUs or GPUs would likely produce frame rates very close to the measured values, since the performance deltas are all under 2% in either direction. For players considering a similar build, the data suggests that the CPU choice has a smaller impact on Fivem's frame rates compared to the GPU, as long as the CPU is in this performance tier. The 4K Ultra scenario might be the exception, where a slightly faster CPU could help push the average FPS closer to 60, but the measured data does not directly test that hypothesis.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's ranking of tested combinations for Fivem, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 1024 out of 3707 total combos. This places it in the upper quartile of all tested systems, roughly in the 72nd percentile. The rank reflects the overall average performance across all resolutions and settings, and it is consistent with the individual component percentiles: the CPU is in the 75th percentile and the GPU is in the 82nd percentile. A rank of 1024 out of 3707 means there are 1023 combinations that perform better in this game, but there are also 2683 combinations that perform worse.

The ranking is likely influenced by the fact that the CPU is several generations older than the GPU, which creates an imbalance. The RTX 5070 is a current-generation Blackwell architecture GPU with a release date of 2025, while the Ryzen 5 2600 is a Zen+ architecture CPU from 2018. In less demanding titles like Fivem, this mismatch is less noticeable, but the database still places this combo below many combinations that pair newer CPUs with similarly strong GPUs. Systems with newer high-end CPUs, such as those in the top 1000, would likely show higher average FPS in CPU-sensitive scenarios, even if the GPU remains the same.

However, the measured FPS data shows that this combo handles Fivem well in most situations. The 4K Ultra result is the only sub-60 scenario, and the rank reflects that limitation. Players who target 1080p or 1440p will find this combo well above the playable threshold, and the rank of 1024 out of 3707 should be interpreted as a strong result for a system with an older CPU. The database does not provide specific scores for other combos in this game, so the rank is the primary reference point for comparing this system to others.

The Verdict

The data shows that this PC can run Fivem, but the verdict depends heavily on the target resolution and preset. At 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Medium, and Low, with High being the best choice at an average of 65.5 FPS. Ultra is not playable because it drops to 48.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, and Ultra is the best option with an average of 91.6 FPS. At 1920x1080, all presets are also playable, and Ultra delivers 138.2 FPS on average.

The verdict by resolution is clear: this system clears 60 FPS at every resolution except 4K Ultra. For 4K, players should use High settings to maintain a playable frame rate, with a margin of only 5.5 FPS above the threshold. For 1440p and 1080p, there is no need to compromise on quality, as even the most demanding preset exceeds 60 FPS by a wide margin. The 1440p Ultra result of 91.6 FPS is particularly notable because it offers a high-resolution experience with headroom for fluctuations, while the 1080p Ultra result of 138.2 FPS is suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.

The CPU's age does not prevent the system from being playable in this game, but the 4K Ultra result suggests that there may be a CPU bottleneck in that specific scenario. The GPU alone would likely be capable of higher frame rates, but the combination as a whole falls short of 60 FPS at 4K Ultra. For most players, the practical takeaway is that this system is a strong performer for Fivem, with the only caveat being that 4K Ultra should be avoided.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average FPS of 65.5. This is the recommended configuration for 4K, as Medium (80.3 FPS) and Low (103.2 FPS) are also playable but offer lower visual quality. The 5.5 FPS margin above the threshold is slim, so players should be aware that any additional load from other applications or in-game scenes could push the frame rate below 60.

At 2560x1440, the best settings preset is Ultra, which averages 91.6 FPS. This is the most demanding preset available, and it clears the 60 FPS threshold by more than 30 FPS, providing a comfortable buffer. Players who prefer even higher frame rates can drop to High (114.9 FPS), Medium (147 FPS), or Low (170.7 FPS), but there is no need to do so for playability reasons.

At 1920x1080, the best settings preset is also Ultra, with an average FPS of 138.2. This is more than double the 60 FPS threshold and leaves significant headroom for high-refresh-rate displays or for maintaining performance during busy multiplayer scenes. The other presets, High (165.8 FPS), Medium (180.5 FPS), and Low (196.7 FPS), are all playable as well, but Ultra offers the best visual experience without sacrificing playability.

In summary, the optimal settings for this combination are High at 4K, Ultra at 1440p, and Ultra at 1080p. The database confirms that these configurations deliver average FPS values above 60, with the 1080p and 1440p results being particularly strong. Players targeting 4K should stick to High to stay in the playable range, while those on lower resolutions can maximize quality settings.