Fivem

FAQ

Q: Can this system hit 60 FPS in Fivem at 4K?

A: Yes. The recorded data shows all four tested presets at 3840x2160 clear the 60 FPS playable threshold. Ultra averages 60 FPS exactly, Medium averages 96 FPS, High averages 77 FPS, and Low averages 122 FPS.

Q: What is the best 4K preset for this CPU and GPU combo?

A: Ultra is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 3840x2160, with an average of 60 FPS. Medium offers a safer margin at 96 FPS average, with a recorded minimum of 82 FPS.

Q: How much faster is this combo at 1440p versus 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At 2560x1440 Ultra, the average FPS is 107, which is 47 FPS higher than the 60 FPS average at 3840x2160 Ultra. That represents a 78% improvement in frame rate when dropping from 4K to 1440p at the same preset.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the RTX 4080 at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the Ryzen 5 2600 limits scaling at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 152 FPS, while at 2560x1440 Ultra it averages 107 FPS. The 1080p result is only 42% higher than 1440p, despite the resolution having roughly half the pixel count, indicating diminishing returns from the GPU at 1080p.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combination?

A: The highest recorded average is 197 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. Medium at 1080p reaches 181 FPS, and High at 1080p reaches 167 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Fivem?

A: This combination of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 789th out of 3707 tested combos in the database, placing it in roughly the top 21% of all recorded configurations for this game.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU-side nearest rivals in the database benchmark averages show that the Ryzen 5 2600 performs nearly identically to several other processors. The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has an average benchmark score of 21440, which is only 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 2600's 21484. The Intel Core i9-11900H scores 21367, a 0.5% deficit. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635, putting it 0.7% ahead. The AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, trailing by 1.2%. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver essentially the same frame rates in Fivem when paired with the same GPU, since their aggregate performance differences are within measurement noise.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4080 sits in a tight cluster of comparable graphics cards. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has an average score of 54209, a negligible 0.1% difference from the RTX 4080's 54247. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 1.1% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, 2.6% higher, and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, 2.7% higher. These deltas are small enough that a user swapping between these GPUs would not perceive a meaningful difference in Fivem frame rates. The RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest match, being virtually identical in aggregate compute performance.

For a user considering this exact system, the practical takeaway is that the CPU side has several equally capable options within a 1.2% band, and the GPU side has one near-identical sibling in the RTX 4080 SUPER. The other GPU rivals are slightly faster on paper but unlikely to shift Fivem performance by more than a few frames in any preset. The recorded FPS numbers for this combo should therefore transfer well to any of these near-neighbor configurations.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results reveal how the workload shifts between the Ryzen 5 2600 and the RTX 4080 as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are high across all presets, but the scaling pattern exposes CPU limitation. Moving from Low to Ultra at 1080p only drops the average from 197 to 152 FPS, a 23% reduction. The GPU has ample headroom at this resolution, so the CPU's six Zen cores become the primary constraint. The 1080p Ultra result of 152 FPS is particularly telling: even with a top-tier GPU, the Ryzen 5 2600 caps the output well below what the RTX 4080 could theoretically deliver at this pixel count.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts. The spread from Low (171 FPS) to Ultra (107 FPS) is 37%, wider than at 1080p. The Medium preset records a minimum of 134 FPS and a maximum of 181 FPS, showing that the GPU is now doing more of the work. The CPU still matters, but the RTX 4080 begins to assert its dominance as pixel count rises. The 1440p Ultra average of 107 FPS is 71% of the 1080p Ultra figure, a smaller ratio than the pixel-count difference would suggest, indicating the CPU still imposes some ceiling.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The spread from Low (122 FPS) to Ultra (60 FPS) is 51%, the widest of any resolution. The RTX 4080 is now fully saturated, and the CPU's role diminishes. The 4K Ultra average of exactly 60 FPS aligns with the playable threshold, while the Medium preset at 96 FPS with an 82 FPS minimum shows comfortable margins. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at Ultra is steep: 107 to 60 FPS, a 44% drop that mirrors the pixel-count increase. This pattern confirms that for users targeting 4K, the GPU choice is paramount, while the Ryzen 5 2600 is sufficient. For 1080p enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates, a stronger CPU would unlock more performance, but the current combo still delivers 152 FPS at Ultra.

The Verdict

This PC can run Fivem with authority at every resolution and preset combination recorded in the database. The verdict data lists all four settings at all three resolutions as playable, meaning each clears the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, Ultra averages exactly 60 FPS, which meets the playable standard but leaves no headroom for frame drops. Medium at 4K is safer with a 96 FPS average and an 82 FPS minimum. At 2560x1440, the system clears 60 FPS by a wide margin at every preset, with Ultra averaging 107 FPS. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 152 FPS at Ultra and 197 FPS at Low, making it more than adequate for high-refresh-rate monitors.

The practical verdict: this is a 4K-capable configuration, a strong 1440p performer, and an overkill 1080p setup. The only caveat is 4K Ultra, where the 60 FPS average sits precisely at the threshold. Users who prioritize consistency over maximum fidelity should choose Medium at 4K. Everyone else can select the highest preset their monitor and personal preference allow.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 60 FPS. This is a exact match to the playable threshold, so users who want a safety buffer should consider Medium, which averages 96 FPS with a recorded minimum of 82 FPS. The database's verdict designates Ultra as the best setting at this resolution, but the margin is thin.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is Ultra with an average of 107 FPS. This leaves 47 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, making it a comfortable choice. Even the most demanding preset at this resolution does not approach the playable limit, so users can max out the game without concern.

At 1920x1080, the best setting is Ultra with an average of 152 FPS. This is the highest average FPS among all Ultra presets across the three resolutions and provides a 92 FPS margin over the playable threshold. For users with 144 Hz or 165 Hz monitors, this setting delivers frame rates that fully utilize such displays. Low at 1080p reaches 197 FPS, which suits 200 Hz panels, but Ultra is the recommended balance of visual quality and performance.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this combination of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 at 789th out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. That places it in the 79th percentile, meaning roughly 21% of all recorded configurations perform better. This ranking reflects the CPU's position in the overall hardware landscape: the Ryzen 5 2600 sits at the 75th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 4080 sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The combo's in-game rank is slightly lower than either component's individual percentile, which makes sense given that the CPU limits the GPU at lower resolutions.

The rank is respectable but not elite. The GPU is a high-end part that would normally place near the top of any game's ranking, but the 2018-era CPU drags the combined score down. In CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p, the system behaves more like a mid-range configuration despite the RTX 4080. At 4K, the GPU takes over and the ranking improves relative to other combos. Users considering this pairing should understand that the rank reflects the weakest link: the Ryzen 5 2600's single-thread and multi-thread scores, while adequate for 60 FPS gaming, prevent the RTX 4080 from reaching its full potential in less demanding resolutions. The 3707-combo database shows that many configurations with newer CPUs and similar GPUs rank higher, but this specific pairing still delivers playable performance across all tested settings and resolutions, which is the primary criterion for a positive recommendation.