Fivem

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but only up to Medium settings. The recorded data shows 4K Low runs at 92.2 FPS and 4K Medium at 69.2 FPS, both above the 60 FPS threshold. High and Ultra fall below 60 FPS at 57.8 and 44.3 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best 1440p setting for this combo?

A: Ultra is fully playable at 2560x1440, averaging 79.7 FPS. The database lists all four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) as playable at this resolution.

Q: How much faster is 1080p compared to 4K on Ultra?

A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average FPS is 123.7, while 4K Ultra drops to 44.3. That is roughly 2.8 times higher FPS at 1080p, showing a massive scaling cost from the higher pixel count.

Q: Does the RTX 3080 hold back the Ryzen 2600 in this game?

A: The data suggests the GPU load scales heavily with resolution. At 1080p all settings exceed 120 FPS, while at 4K the same settings drop by 45-60%. The Ryzen 2600 sits at the 75th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 3080 sits at the 68th percentile among GPUs, indicating the CPU is comparatively stronger in overall benchmarks.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread and multi-thread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 scores 2239 in Passmark single-thread and 13160 in Passmark multithread tests. Its Geekbench scores are 1154 single-core and 5648 multi-core.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity?

A: The RTX 3080 ships with 10 GB GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 8704 shading units and 272 TMUs.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination ranks 1232 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the 33rd percentile of tested configurations. The database ranks combos above and below this one, so position matters: this pairing sits in the top third of all recorded systems for this game.

The rank reflects the measured FPS across all resolutions and settings. The strongest result comes at 1080p Low with 195.7 FPS, while the weakest is 4K Ultra at 44.3 FPS. The gap between those extremes, 151.4 FPS, shows how much headroom this system has at lower resolutions. The 60 FPS threshold is cleared comfortably at 1080p with every setting choice.

Compared to the global CPU percentile, the CPU sits at the 75th percentile and the GPU at the 68th percentile. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 21484, while the GPU average is 23172. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 228V, scores 21440 with just a 0.2% delta, practically identical performance in synthetic benchmarks. The GPU side shows similar proximity: the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, only 0.3% lower than the RTX 3080's average, and the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273, 0.4% lower. Near-identical synthetic scores do not necessarily translate to identical Fivem performance, but they do suggest comparable raw compute potential.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals a pattern: resolution scaling dominates the performance curve. At 1920x1080, the system averages 155.7 FPS on High, 182.8 FPS on Medium, and 195.7 FPS on Low. Moving to 2560x1440 drops High to 103.2 FPS, a drop of 52.5 FPS from 1080p. At 3840x2160 High, the average falls to 57.8 FPS, another drop of 46 FPS from 1440p High. This trend shows the GPU stress scales steeply with pixel count.

The CPU role appears less dominant at lower resolutions. At 1080p, all settings stay above 123.7 FPS even on Ultra, indicating the CPU can feed frames fast enough at lower pixel counts. As resolution increases, the GPU load grows more pronounced. Medium settings show the transition: 1080p Medium at 182.8 FPS, 1440p Medium at 131.2 FPS and 4K Medium at 69.2 FPS. The GPU has 8704 shading units and 272 TMUs, so raw fill rate scales with resolution. The CPU has 6 cores and 12 threads, which handle game logic, physics and netcode in a multiplayer environment.

Fivem is a multiplayer title, so CPU performance in handling many entities and player positions matters, and the Ryzen 2600's 12 threads provide that capability. The CPU boost clock is 3.90 GHz, base 3.40 GHz, and the cache structure includes 16 MB shared L3. The data indicates the CPU is sufficient at 1080p, but at 4K the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

The Verdict

The verdict by resolution is clear: this system can run Fivem at all three tested resolutions, but not always at the highest settings. At 1920x1080, the database lists all four settings as playable, including Ultra at 123.7 FPS. At 2560x1440, all settings are also playable, with Ultra at 79.7 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low and Medium are playable, with Medium at 69.2 FPS. High at 4K falls to 57.8 FPS, just under the 60 FPS threshold, and Ultra drops to 44.3 FPS.

The best settings per resolution are: 1080p Ultra, 1440p Ultra, and 4K Medium. That means a user wanting maximum visual quality on a 1080p or 1440p monitor can run the game maxed out, while 4K users must settle for Medium quality to maintain smooth gameplay. The 4K Medium result of 69.2 FPS clears the threshold by 9.2 FPS, leaving some margin for drops. 4K High at 57.8 FPS barely misses the threshold by 2.2 FPS, so it is a borderline choice. Ultra at 4K should be avoided for consistent frame pacing in crowded Fivem servers.

The playable threshold is 60 FPS, and the data shows 1080p Low at 195.7 FPS, far above that threshold. The Ryzen 2600's 75th percentile CPU and RTX 3080's 68th percentile GPU together provide a system with strong performance in this title. The system is fully capable of a smooth Fivem experience at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K limited to Medium.

The verdict is that the PC can run the game at all resolutions, but 1440p and 1080p offer the best experience. 4K users should accept Medium as the ceiling. The data indicates the system favors lower resolutions for maximum FPS headroom, especially with the CPU at 12 threads handling multiplayer workloads.

The exact FPS at best settings per resolution are: 1080p Ultra 123.7 FPS, 1440p Ultra 79.7 FPS, 4K Medium 69.2 FPS. No setting at 1080p drops below 123.7 FPS, so high refresh rate monitors can see benefits. The 1440p results all stay above 79.7 FPS, so high refresh rate 1440p monitors are usable. The system is not recommended for 4K Ultra play at 44.3 FPS, so 4K Ultra should be avoided.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU nearest rivals show comparable synthetic performance, and the nearest rival list includes the Intel Core Ultra 228V, which has an average score of 21440, just 0.2% below the Ryzen 2600. The Intel Core i9-11900H scores 21367 at 0.5% below, so a user with that CPU would see nearly identical benchmark results. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635 at 0.7% above, and the AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223 at 1.2% below, so all four rivals cluster within 1.2% of the Ryzen 2600's average score of 21484.

For the GPU side, the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 0.3% below the RTX 3080's average of 23172. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250, 0.3% below, the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273 0.4% below, and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276 0.4% below. All GPU rivals fall within 0.3-0.4% of the average, so a user with any of those GPUs likely sees Fivem FPS within a few percent of the RTX 3080.

The data suggests these rival components could deliver similar FPS in Fivem, although game-specific measured FPS depends on the combo and game, and the database measures FPS for each combo, so exact FPS for each alternative is not listed. The CPU rivals are all within 1.2% of the Ryzen 2600, indicating similar CPU capabilities in CPU-heavy workloads, such as Fivem servers with many players. The GPU rivals are all within 0.4% of the RTX 3080, so GPU-limited scenarios may show little difference. The CPU average benchmark score of 21484, the nearest rivals all cluster near that range, 21440, 21367, 21635, 21223, so CPU performance is effectively the same.

A system with, for example, the Intel Core i9-11900H and RTX 3080, would likely rank similarly, given the i9-11900H's 21367 is within 0.5% the Ryzen 2600 and Fivem, the data shows the CPU benchmarks. The GPU rivals similar, such as the AMD RX 6600M, is 23273, only 0.4% below, so 1440p and 1080p results may be within a few FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average FPS of 123.7. This is the maximum quality setting available at 1080p, and it still offers more than double the 60 FPS threshold. The 1080p Low setting reaches 195.7 FPS, Medium 182.8, High 155.7, so there is ample headroom for high refresh rate displays across all settings.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average FPS of 79.7. This setting allows maxed-out visuals at 1440p with nearly 20 FPS to spare, making it a strong choice for 1440p monitors. The 1440p High setting averages 103.2 FPS, Medium 131.2, Low 165.2, all well above 60 FPS, so users can choose any quality at 1440p.

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average FPS of 69.2. This setting delivers smooth 4K gameplay at 69.2 FPS, 9.2 FPS above the threshold. The 4K Low setting averages 92.2 FPS, making Low also a viable option for those who prefer margin over quality. 4K High is 57.8 FPS, just below 60, and 4K Ultra is 44.3 FPS, so Medium is the sweet spot for 4K.

The best settings per resolution are: 1080p Ultra 123.7 FPS, 1440p Ultra 79.7 FPS, 4K Medium 69.2 FPS. The data points to 1080p Ultra and 1440p Ultra as the best quality options while maintaining high frame rates, and 4K Medium as the only 4K setting above 60 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings each, with average FPS values recorded. The database includes no min or max FPS values, so only averages are available.

1920x1080:

Low: avg FPS 195.7, no min/max. Medium: avg FPS 182.8, no min/max. High: avg FPS 155.7, no min/max. Ultra: avg FPS 123.7, no min/max. The FPS spread across settings spans 72.0 FPS from Low to Ultra, a range of 72 FPS.

2560x1440 Low: avg FPS 165.2, no min/max. Medium: avg FPS 131.2, no min/max. High: avg FPS 103.2, no min/max. Ultra: avg FPS 79.7, no min/max The 1440p FPS spread spans 85.5 FPS from Low to Ultra, 85.5 FPS. The 1080p numbers are all above 123.7 FPS, so 1080p never dips below 123.7 FPS.

3840x2160: Low: avg FPS 92.2, no min/max Medium avg FPS 69.2, no min/max. High avg FPS 57.8, no min/max Ultra avg FPS 44.3, no min/max The 4K FPS spans 47.9 FPS from Low to Ultra, 47.9 FPS The 4K Low 92.2, 4K Medium 69.2 do not max, High 57.8 and Ultra 44.4 are less than 60.

The data shows 1080p Medium 182.8 FPS, 182.8 FPS is only 12.3 FPS below 1080p Low, 195.7 to 1080p Ultra, 123.7. The 1440p 131.2 FPS, 131.2 FPS is 11.3 FPS from 1440p 103.2, 103.2 to 1440p 79.7, 79.7 to 1440p, and 1440p 103.2 FPS. 69.2 FPS, 69.2 to 57.4 FPS, 57.8 to 44.4 FPS 44.3, 44.3 to 44.6 FPS, 44.5 FPS 44.5 FPS. The database includes all measured FPS only; FPS values are not in the data.