Fivem

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 sits in a tightly contested performance band according to the database's aggregate benchmarks. Its average benchmark score of 21,484 places it within 1.2% of several comparable processors. The closest match is the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, which scores 21,440, a difference of only 0.2%. The Intel Core i9-11900H trails by 0.5% with a score of 21,367, while the Intel Xeon D-1746TER leads the group slightly at 21,635, putting the Ryzen 0.7% behind. The AMD EPYC 9454 rounds out this cluster at 21,223, which is 1.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 2600. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly indistinguishable frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios, making them reasonable substitutes when building a comparable system.

On the graphics side, the Intel Arc B570 posts an average benchmark score of 20,556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show remarkably similar aggregate performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534, a 0.1% gap. The Intel Arc A750 is essentially tied at 20,582, just 0.1% ahead. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X sit at 20,480 and 20,662 respectively, representing deltas of 0.4% and 0.5% in either direction. For a system builder, swapping between these four graphics cards would yield nearly identical average frame rates across a broad range of titles, though individual game optimizations can shift the balance.

When pairing the Ryzen 5 2600 with the Arc B570, the combined system occupies a performance tier where both components are evenly matched. Neither part dramatically outclasses the other, which means the bottleneck will shift depending on resolution and settings rather than being fixed at one end. The database shows this pairing ranks 2,980 out of 3,707 tested combinations for Fivem, placing it in the lower portion of the distribution but still functional for the game's requirements.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 60 FPS on a 1920x1080 display?

A: Yes. The recorded data shows all four settings presets clear the 60 FPS threshold at 1080p. Low averages 136 FPS, Medium averages 107 FPS, High averages 86 FPS, and even Ultra maintains 67 FPS on average.

Q: What is the highest quality setting that stays above 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: Medium is the most demanding preset that remains playable at 1440p, with an average of 71 FPS and a minimum of 60 FPS. Low also clears the threshold at 89 FPS, but High drops to 56 FPS average and Ultra falls to 44 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, none of the four presets reach 60 FPS. Low averages 50 FPS, Medium averages 39 FPS, High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 24 FPS. The best result, Low at 50 FPS, still falls short of the playable threshold.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its closest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20,556 is within 0.5% of four nearby GPUs: the RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534), Arc A750 (20,582), Quadro M4000M (20,480), and Radeon R9 M390X (20,662). Any of these would produce broadly similar frame rates.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 2600 have close CPU alternatives?

A: Yes. The nearest rivals are the Core Ultra 5 228V (0.2% higher score), Core i9-11900H (0.5% higher), Xeon D-1746TER (0.7% lower), and EPYC 9454 (1.2% higher). All four fall within a 1.2% performance band centered on the Ryzen's 21,484 average benchmark score.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p Medium specifically?

A: The measured data shows an average of 107 FPS, with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 123 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database contains measured frame rate data for twelve combinations of resolution and settings, all recorded for Fivem with this specific CPU and GPU pairing. The results show a clear pattern of diminishing returns as resolution increases and as quality settings climb.

At 1920x1080, the system performs strongly across the board. The Low preset delivers 136 FPS average, which is the highest figure recorded for this pairing. Medium drops to 107 FPS average, with a recorded minimum of 91 FPS and maximum of 123 FPS. High settings produce 86 FPS average, while Ultra still manages 67 FPS average. Every preset at this resolution exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold, and even the most demanding setting retains a 7 FPS cushion above the minimum target.

Moving to 2560x1440 introduces the first signs of strain. Low settings average 89 FPS, still comfortably above 60. Medium averages 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS and maximum of 81 FPS, putting it right at the edge of the threshold. High settings drop to 56 FPS average, which is below the playable mark, and Ultra falls further to 44 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 35% of the frame rate at each corresponding preset, reflecting the increased pixel workload on the Arc B570.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot maintain playable performance at any setting. Low averages 50 FPS, Medium averages 39 FPS with a minimum of 33 and maximum of 45, High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 24 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 26 FPS, showing that the GPU becomes the dominant constraint at this resolution. The step from 1440p to 4K roughly halves the frame rate for each preset, which aligns with the 2.25x increase in pixel count.

The recorded minimum and maximum values are sparse in the data, appearing only for Medium presets. At 1080p Medium, the 91 to 123 FPS range indicates frame pacing is consistent with only a moderate spread. At 1440p Medium, the 60 to 81 FPS range shows the system clinging to the threshold at the low end. At 4K Medium, the 33 to 45 FPS range reflects a tighter band but at an unplayable level.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Fivem depends entirely on the target resolution. The verdict from the database is clear: at 1920x1080, every settings preset clears the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra averages 67 FPS, which means the system can run the game at maximum quality with a small but real margin above the playability line. High settings provide a more comfortable 86 FPS, Medium reaches 107 FPS, and Low hits 136 FPS. For 1080p displays, this combination is fully capable.

At 2560x1440, the system is partially playable. The database lists Low and Medium as playable settings, with Medium being the best option at 71 FPS average. This preset keeps the minimum at exactly 60 FPS, so there is no headroom for demanding scenes. High and Ultra fall below the threshold at 56 FPS and 44 FPS respectively, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is unambiguous: no settings preset is playable. Even Low averages only 50 FPS, and the quality presets descend from 39 FPS at Medium to 31 FPS at High and 24 FPS at Ultra. Users with 4K monitors would need to reduce resolution or accept sub-60 frame rates.

Overall, this system is a solid 1080p performer for Fivem, a marginal 1440p option limited to Medium settings, and not viable at 4K. The playability threshold is set at 60 FPS in the database, and the system meets that bar in seven of the twelve measured configurations.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this specific CPU and GPU combination at 2,980 out of 3,707 tested combos for Fivem. This places the pairing in the 80th percentile of tested systems, meaning roughly 80% of all recorded combinations deliver higher frame rates in this game. The ranking reflects the aggregate performance across all resolutions and settings, weighted by the playability results.

The position is not surprising given the measured data. The system excels at 1080p, where it clears the 60 FPS threshold on all presets, but struggles at higher resolutions. The 4K results, which are uniformly below 50 FPS, drag down the overall ranking. Many competing combos in the database likely handle 1440p with higher settings or achieve playable 4K frame rates, which would push them ahead.

The rank also highlights the balance between the two components. The Ryzen 5 2600 sits in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, while the Arc B570 sits in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The combination does not overperform relative to its individual component percentiles, and the 4K shortfall suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor at high pixel counts. For a system targeting 1080p or light 1440p play, this rank understates the practical capability, but for the full range of tested scenarios, the 2,980 position is an accurate summary.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 67 FPS. This is the maximum quality setting available, and the system maintains a playable frame rate. The margin above the threshold is 7 FPS, which is adequate but not generous in scenes with heavy particle effects or dense geometry. For players prioritizing visual fidelity, Ultra at 1080p is the recommended choice.

For 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, averaging 71 FPS. The recorded minimum for this preset is exactly 60 FPS, meaning the system sits right at the threshold during demanding moments. Low settings would provide more headroom at 89 FPS average, but Medium offers a meaningful visual upgrade while still meeting the playability requirement. High and Ultra are not viable at this resolution.

For 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. The best average frame rate is 50 FPS at Low settings, which falls 10 FPS short of the threshold. The database records no best settings for 4K, confirming that this resolution is out of reach for the combination. Players with 4K displays should run the game at 1080p or 1440p instead.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Ryzen 5 2600 and the Arc B570 shifts noticeably across resolutions and presets. The recorded data shows that the GPU becomes the dominant constraint as resolution increases, while the CPU's role is more apparent at lower resolutions and higher frame rates.

At 1920x1080, the frame rates are high enough that the CPU's single-thread performance matters. The Ryzen 5 2600's single-core benchmark score of 1,154 in Geekbench and 2,239 in Passmark single-thread tests places it in the mid-range, and at 136 FPS on Low settings, the CPU is likely feeding the GPU at near its maximum capacity. The drop from 136 FPS at Low to 67 FPS at Ultra shows that the GPU workload scales with settings, while the CPU maintains similar per-frame overhead. The 69 FPS gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is almost entirely GPU-driven.

At 2560x1440, the GPU's role intensifies. The pixel count increases by 78% compared to 1080p, and the frame rates drop accordingly: Low falls from 136 to 89 FPS, Medium from 107 to 71 FPS, High from 86 to 56 FPS, and Ultra from 67 to 44 FPS. Each preset loses roughly one-third of its frame rate, which is consistent with the GPU being the primary bottleneck. The CPU has more idle time at these lower frame rates, so its performance becomes less critical.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is overwhelmingly the limiting factor. The frame rates compress into a narrow band from 24 to 50 FPS across all presets, and the differences between settings shrink in absolute terms. The 26 FPS spread between Low and Ultra at 4K is smaller than the 69 FPS spread at 1080p, confirming that the GPU is saturated even at Low settings. The CPU's role at this resolution is minimal, as the Arc B570 cannot produce enough frames to stress the Ryzen 5 2600's six cores.

The scaling pattern across resolutions indicates that players targeting 1080p should pay attention to both component choices, while those aiming for 1440p or higher should prioritize GPU performance. The Ryzen 5 2600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides adequate headroom for Fivem at playable settings, but the Arc B570's memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s and 10 GB of GDDR6 become the deciding factors at higher pixel counts.