Control

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a mixed bag for Control, a 2019 Action Adventure title. At 1080p, this pairing is genuinely capable, but the demands of higher resolutions quickly expose the GPU's limits. The data shows a clear performance ceiling, with the system only managing to clear the 60 FPS playable threshold at 1440p when settings are dropped to Low, and failing to reach that mark entirely at 4K.

Best Settings per Resolution

Benchmark results indicate that the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS varies significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, the system can handle the High preset, which produces an average of 63 FPS. This is the highest visual quality setting that remains playable at this resolution. The Medium preset is also an option, averaging 71 FPS, but High offers a better visual experience while still clearing the 60 FPS bar.

Moving up to 2560x1440, the performance picture changes dramatically. The only setting that achieves an average of 60 FPS or higher is Low, which delivers 76 FPS. The Medium preset falls short at 54 FPS, and High drops further to 48 FPS. For 1440p gaming, users are effectively locked into the Low preset to maintain smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the situation is more restrictive. No preset achieves the 60 FPS target. The highest average frame rate is 51 FPS on the Low preset, which still falls below the playable threshold. The Medium preset drops to 36 FPS, while High and Ultra are at 32 FPS and 28 FPS, respectively. According to the verdict data, there are no playable settings at this resolution.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Control at 1080p with High settings?

A: Yes. Benchmark results show an average of 63 FPS at 1920x1080 with the High preset, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data confirms High, Medium, and Low are all playable at this resolution.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gameplay?

A: The only playable setting at 2560x1440 is Low, which achieves an average of 76 FPS. The verdict data lists Low as the best settings preset for this resolution, as Medium (54 FPS) and High (48 FPS) both fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset only manages an average of 51 FPS. The verdict shows no playable settings at this resolution. The highest average frame rate is 51 FPS on Low, which is below the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1080p Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows a minimum FPS of 61 at 1920x1080 with the Medium preset. This is above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating consistent performance without significant dips below the playable level.

Q: How does the combo rank among other tested systems for this game?

A: The combo ranks 2995 out of 3720 tested combinations. This places it in the lower portion of the database, suggesting that while it can handle 1080p well, it is not a top-tier performer for Control.

Q: What is the average FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?

A: The Low preset at 2560x1440 averages 76 FPS, while Ultra averages 42 FPS. This represents a 34 FPS difference, highlighting the significant performance cost of the Ultra preset at this resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rate data provides a detailed look at performance across all resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system performs admirably. The Low preset delivers a robust 101 FPS average. Medium settings produce an average of 71 FPS, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS, showing tight frame pacing. High settings average 63 FPS, just above the 60 FPS target. Ultra settings drop to an average of 55 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, performance takes a noticeable hit. The Low preset is the only one to remain playable, averaging 76 FPS. Medium settings average 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS, indicating some frame drops below the threshold. High settings average 48 FPS, and Ultra drops further to 42 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 22 FPS, showing a steep cost for higher visual fidelity.

At 3840x2160, none of the presets achieve playable frame rates. Low settings average 51 FPS, which is the best result at this resolution. Medium settings average 36 FPS, with a minimum of 31 FPS and a maximum of 42 FPS. High settings average 32 FPS, and Ultra is the slowest at 28 FPS. The data shows that 4K resolution is simply too demanding for the Intel Arc B570 in this title, regardless of settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for both components provides context for what similar hardware would deliver. For the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, the closest competitors are all within a fraction of a percent in average benchmark score. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has a 0% delta, making it effectively identical in performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D is only 0.2% slower, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is 0.4% slower. The Intel Core i9-12900T rounds out the group at 0.5% slower. Any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical results in Control.

For the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570's nearest rivals show similar performance parity. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.1% faster, making it a very close match. The Intel Arc A750 is 0.1% slower, essentially the same performance. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M is 0.4% faster, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X is 0.5% slower. These deltas are so small that they would translate to a frame rate difference of less than one FPS in most scenarios. Users with these alternative GPUs should expect nearly identical results at all resolutions and settings.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Control has a nuanced answer. At 1920x1080, the answer is a clear yes. The verdict data confirms that High, Medium, and Low settings are all playable, with the best playable preset being High at 63 FPS. This provides a good balance of visual quality and performance for most users.

At 2560x1440, the system is technically capable but with significant compromises. The only playable setting is Low, which achieves 76 FPS. While this clears the 60 FPS threshold, it requires sacrificing visual quality. Users who prioritize frame rate over graphics can play at 1440p, but those wanting medium or high settings will need to accept sub-60 FPS performance.

At 3840x2160, the answer is no. The verdict shows no playable settings, and the measured data confirms that even Low settings only reach 51 FPS. This hardware is not suitable for 4K gaming in Control. The system is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it offers a solid experience across multiple presets.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 2995 out of 3720 tested combinations places this system in the bottom 20% of all tested hardware for Control. This is a significant finding, as it suggests that while the system can play the game at 1080p, it is far from optimal. The rank reflects the performance limitations at higher resolutions, where the GPU struggles to maintain playable frame rates.

The ranking also indicates that there are over 700 tested combinations that perform worse than this setup, which provides some context for its position. However, the majority of tested systems deliver better results. For a game released in 2019, this performance level is somewhat underwhelming, particularly at 1440p and 4K. Users considering this hardware for Control should focus on 1080p gaming to get the best experience, as the data shows this is where the system is most competitive.