SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra X9 378H + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra X9 378H

47,468 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra X9 378H + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

This laptop pairing combines a 16-core Intel Panther Lake-H processor with a 16 GB Turing-based professional mobile GPU, landing in the 70th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is the standout component, ranking in the 89th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, creating a notable performance asymmetry. The processor's average benchmark score of 47,468 places it within 0.6% of the Intel Core i9-12900F (47,176) and within 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-13700KF (47,330), meaning this mobile chip trades blows with desktop-class parts from recent generations. The GPU, despite its professional Quadro branding, is built on the older Turing architecture with a 12 nm process node, while the CPU uses Intel's 3 nm node — a two-generation process gap that shapes the entire system's character.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh, with its 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, can drive modern titles, but the CPU's 89th percentile standing will not be the limiting factor. The GPU's 50th percentile position suggests that at 1080p with high refresh rates, the graphics card will cap frame rates well before the processor reaches its ceiling. Gamers targeting 144 Hz panels should expect the GPU to hold performance back in most titles, particularly at higher graphical presets.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and strong multi-core scores — 32,553 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 13,672 in Cinebench R20 multi-core — provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and broadcast software. The PassMark multi-thread score of 38,298 indicates the processor can handle the parallel workload of encoding while maintaining game performance. The Arc B390 integrated graphics can serve as an additional encoding option, though the dedicated GPU's Turing architecture includes dedicated encoder hardware as well.

Video editing: The combination of a high-performing CPU and a professional-grade GPU with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory suits timeline editing and effect-heavy work. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,595 ensures responsive scrubbing and preview rendering, while the GPU's 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores can accelerate AI-assisted tools and ray-traced previews. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports 4K multi-stream editing without excessive caching delays.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering workloads will perform strongly, with the processor matching desktop chips like the Core i9-12900F within 0.6%. The GPU's 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 293.8 GTexel/s texture rate handle OpenGL and DirectX viewport rendering, though the Turing architecture lacks the newer RT and tensor core generations found in later NVIDIA parts. For final-frame CPU rendering, the 16-core/16-thread configuration and 18 MB shared L3 cache deliver competitive results.

Software development: The high single-thread performance (4,595 in Cinebench R23 single-core) accelerates compilation of single-threaded build steps, while the multi-core score of 32,553 shortens parallel builds. The PassMark data encryption score of 29,840 and extended instructions score of 31,315 indicate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance for code signing, hashing, and scientific computing. The 16 threads handle containerized workloads and virtual machines competently.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but the headroom ensures long-term usability. The 25 W TDP CPU and 110 W GPU keep power draw manageable for a laptop chassis, and the 16 GB GPU memory allows large datasets in memory for data analysis coursework. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,453 ensures snappy application launches and UI responsiveness.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 47,468, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 scores 47,527 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T scores 47,697 (0.5% higher), the Intel Core i7-13700KF scores 47,330 (0.3% lower), and the Intel Core i9-12900F scores 47,176 (0.6% lower). This places the Ultra X9 378H in a performance tier where it trades blows with desktop processors from the 12th and 13th generations, a remarkable result for a mobile chip with a 25 W TDP.

Multi-core benchmarks show consistent strength: Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 3,281, R20 multi-core scores 13,672, and R23 multi-core scores 32,553. Single-core results are equally competitive, with R15 at 462, R20 at 1,929, and R23 at 4,595. PassMark sub-tests reveal specific strengths: floating-point math at 114,500, integer math at 92,603, and multi-thread at 38,298. Data compression scores 386,591, while data encryption scores 29,840. The extended instructions score of 31,315 and random string sorting at 44,648 round out the compute profile.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data, but its 50th percentile standing against all GPUs and specifications — 3,072 shading units, 192 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, 384 tensor cores — define its capabilities. The combined system percentile of 70 reflects the CPU's strength pulling the overall score upward while the GPU sits at the median. The data shows a processor that outperforms its mobile classification, paired with a GPU that is firmly mid-pack by current standards.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system exhibits a clear CPU-favored balance. The processor's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile means the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering. In CPU-bound tasks — compilation, spreadsheet calculations, data compression — the processor performs at a level matching desktop chips like the Core i7-13700KF (within 0.3%), meaning no meaningful bottleneck exists on the CPU side.

The memory bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s for the CPU (LPDDR5X, dual-channel) versus 448.0 GB/s for the GPU creates a natural division: the GPU has nearly 3 times the bandwidth for its dedicated frame buffer and compute tasks, while the CPU's bandwidth suffices for general computing. The PCIe Gen 5 connection with 4 CPU lanes provides high-speed data transfer to compatible storage and peripherals, though the GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which for Turing-era graphics is sufficient but limits future GPU upgrades.

For gaming, the FPS scaling will follow the GPU's capabilities. At 1080p, the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, making the Quadro the bottleneck. At higher resolutions, the GPU's workload increases proportionally, and the gap widens further. In productivity applications that use GPU acceleration — video encoding, 3D viewports, AI inference — the GPU's 50th percentile position will cap performance, while the CPU sits idle waiting on graphics results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel BGA 2540 socket, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense. The platform supports LPDDR5X memory in dual-channel configuration with 153.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16 — a legacy interface that matches the GPU's Turing architecture.

The GPU is marked as "End-of-life" production status with a release date of 2020-06-07, and its predecessor is Quadro Pascal-M with successor Ampere-MW. This means the GPU technology is several generations old, and any future upgrade would require replacing the entire laptop. The integrated Arc B390 graphics in the CPU provide a fallback for display output and light acceleration, but the system's performance tier is fixed at purchase.

The combined TDP of the CPU (25 W) and GPU (110 W) totals 135 W, which is modest for a laptop with this performance level. The power connectors for the GPU are listed as "None," indicating it draws power through the motherboard rather than dedicated connectors. The slot width is "IGP," suggesting an integrated form factor. For a user considering this system, the upgrade path is not component-level — the sensible next upgrade is the entire laptop, targeting a platform with a newer GPU generation and PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 support.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra X9 378H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 3, built on Intel's 3 nm process (Panther Lake architecture, Ultra X9 Panther Lake-H generation). It has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 25 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. The processor supports LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus with 153.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Benchmark results show a processor that punches above its mobile classification. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,553 and single-core score of 4,595 place it in reach of desktop processors like the Core i7-13700KF (average benchmark score 47,330, 0.3% lower than this chip's 47,468 average). The PassMark multi-thread score of 38,298 and single-thread score of 4,453 confirm this positioning. The floating-point math score of 114,500 and integer math score of 92,603 indicate strong compute throughput for scientific and financial workloads.

The 16 threads without hyper-threading (16 cores, 16 threads) mean each core handles one thread, which can be beneficial for workloads that scale linearly with physical cores but may slightly reduce performance in heavily threaded workloads that benefit from SMT. The 3 nm process node contributes to the 25 W TDP, making this an efficient processor that can sustain boost clocks without excessive thermal throttling. The integrated Arc B390 graphics provides a secondary display output and basic GPU acceleration when the dedicated GPU is idle or unavailable.

FAQ

Q: How does this CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-13700KF?

A: The Ultra X9 378H has an average benchmark score of 47,468, which is 0.3% higher than the Core i7-13700KF's 47,330. This puts the mobile chip on par with a desktop enthusiast processor in overall compute performance.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh uses the Turing architecture (TU104B chip) built on TSMC's 12 nm process, with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have and what type?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 1750 MHz memory clock (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Is this system better for CPU or GPU-heavy workloads?

A: The data shows a CPU-favored system: the processor ranks in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 50th percentile. CPU-heavy tasks like compilation, data compression, and multi-threaded rendering will perform strongly, while GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming will be limited by the graphics card.

Q: Can the CPU be upgraded in this laptop?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which means it is soldered to the motherboard. The platform does not support CPU upgrades.

Q: What memory type does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus with 153.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The GPU is listed as "End-of-life" with a release date of 2020-06-07. Its predecessor is Quadro Pascal-M and its successor is Ampere-MW, indicating this is older hardware.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component specifications. The CPU's 89th percentile standing and the GPU's 50th percentile position indicate that gaming performance will be GPU-limited in most scenarios. At 1080p with ultra settings, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh's 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can handle modern titles at playable frame rates, but it will not match current-generation gaming GPUs. At 1440p, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking becomes more restrictive, and at 4K, users should expect significant compromises in settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The 16 GB frame buffer provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures, but the Turing architecture's older rasterization and ray tracing performance will cap frame rates in demanding titles. Esports and older games will run well given the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,595 in Cinebench R23 single-core), but the GPU will still limit maximum frame rates. For ray-traced games, the 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores provide some acceleration, but the architecture's age means performance will lag newer RTX generations.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh. The combined percentile of 70 places this system above the majority of all CPU+GPU combinations, driven primarily by the CPU's 89th percentile ranking. The GPU's 50th percentile position moderates the overall tier, creating a system that excels at CPU-intensive professional work while being merely average for graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU's performance rivals desktop processors like the Core i9-12900F (0.6% difference) and Core i7-13700KF (0.3% difference), making this a workstation-class processor in a mobile form factor. The GPU, while professional-branded, is based on 2020-era Turing hardware and delivers mid-pack performance. This pairing suits users who prioritize compute throughput, multi-threaded applications, and CPU-bound workflows over gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering.

Who Should Build It

This system targets professionals and power users whose workloads are CPU-bound. Software developers will benefit from the 16 cores and strong single-thread performance, with PassMark data compression (386,591) and encryption (29,840) scores indicating fast build and cryptographic operations. Data analysts and researchers processing large datasets will use the 16 GB GPU memory for in-memory computation and the CPU's floating-point math score of 114,500 for numerical work. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the CPU's desktop-class performance (within 0.6% of the Core i9-12900F) sufficient for simulation and compilation coursework, though the GPU's age may limit graphics-heavy projects.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering — such as software renderers or CPU-accelerated effects — will see strong performance, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,553 rivaling desktop chips. Video editors who rely on CPU encoding will benefit from the high multi-core throughput. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity will find the system vastly overqualified, but the longevity from the 89th percentile CPU ensures years of usable performance. Gamers should look elsewhere unless they target 1080p or esports titles, as the GPU's 50th percentile position will limit frame rates in demanding games. The system is not ideal for GPU-accelerated machine learning or ray-traced rendering workflows, given the Turing architecture's age and the GPU's mid-pack standing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra X9 378H + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra X9 378H

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds