SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

43,210 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

38,349 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile form a high-end mobile pairing that targets demanding workloads in a laptop chassis. This combination places the system at the 85th percentile overall, indicating a configuration that sits above the majority of current hardware in the database. The CPU is a 16-core Panther Lake part, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 design with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory. The data shows a system with substantial compute capabilities, though the specific performance balance between the two components requires analysis of their respective benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance relationship between the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and the RTX 5080 Mobile is best understood by examining their individual percentile rankings. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 81st percentile against all GPUs. This 7-point gap suggests that, in raw compute terms, the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. However, in gaming scenarios, the GPU typically becomes the limiting factor, and the data supports this dynamic.

The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is robust, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20547. This score indicates the processor can feed even a high-end GPU in most situations. The single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 2071.5, is also strong, which is critical for gaming frame pacing. Meanwhile, the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 27711 places it in the upper echelon of mobile graphics, but its 81st percentile ranking shows there are faster options available.

For CPU-bound workloads, the Core Ultra 9 386H will not bottleneck the system. Its Passmark multithread score of 35399 is substantial, and its data compression score of 352365 highlights strong integer throughput. Conversely, for GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming, the RTX 5080 Mobile will be the primary constraint. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 23.04 TFLOPS is impressive for a mobile part, but it will still be the ceiling for frame rates in graphically intense scenes.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact pairing means these conclusions are drawn from synthetic benchmarks rather than direct gaming tests. The combined percentile of 85, which is below the CPU’s individual percentile, suggests that the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in a balanced workload. The data indicates a system where the CPU has headroom to spare in many tasks, making the GPU the component to watch for performance limits.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not direct measurements. The data shows a GPU with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4952 and a Passmark G3D score of 27711, which are strong indicators of high-end gaming capability.

The RTX 5080 Mobile’s 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for modern game assets at high resolutions. The GPU also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and upcoming titles. Based on these specifications, the pairing should handle esports titles at high refresh rates on a 1080p panel, though the exact frame rates cannot be confirmed.

For AAA games, the estimated performance suggests that 1440p gaming at high settings is achievable, but 4K gaming would likely require settings adjustments to maintain smooth playability. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 23.04 TFLOPS is significant, but it is not the absolute fastest in the mobile segment, as indicated by its 81st percentile ranking. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4218, should prevent it from becoming a limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

Users should expect a capable gaming experience, but the exact frame rates will vary by title and resolution. The lack of measured data means these are educated estimates based on the benchmark scores, and real-world results may differ. The system is clearly positioned for high-end gaming, but it is not the absolute top-tier configuration available.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU itself cannot be upgraded. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. The CPU provides 12 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are likely dedicated to the GPU, while the RTX 5080 Mobile uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

The GPU is also a mobile part and is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The power delivery is constrained by the laptop chassis, with the CPU having a 25 W TDP and the GPU having an 80 W TDP. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the combined power draw is modest for a high-performance system, indicating that a capable laptop power brick is sufficient.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing the system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the CPU supports dual-channel DDR5. Adding more storage is also viable, as the PCIe Gen 5 lanes can support fast NVMe drives. However, the core components—CPU and GPU—are fixed, so users should consider this a sealed platform with limited future expansion beyond memory and storage.

The platform’s production status is active for both components, with the CPU released in January 2026 and the GPU in April 2025. This indicates that the hardware is current and will likely receive driver support for several years. Users looking for a long-term investment should note that the CPU’s 16 threads are all physical cores, with no hyper-threading, which may become a limitation in heavily threaded future workloads.

Who Should Build It

This system is designed for mobile users who need high compute performance in a laptop form factor. The 16-core CPU with a 4.90 GHz boost clock is well-suited for content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering applications. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20547 indicates strong performance in these workloads, making it a viable choice for professional creators on the go.

Gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p or 1440p gaming will find this configuration appealing, based on the GPU’s benchmark scores. The RTX 5080 Mobile’s 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient for modern game textures, and its DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with the latest titles. However, users seeking the absolute highest frame rates at 4K may want to consider a desktop system.

Software developers and engineers who work with large codebases will benefit from the CPU’s strong integer performance, as indicated by the Passmark integer math score of 87284. The data encryption score of 27150 also suggests good security-related performance, which is useful for development environments. Students in STEM fields and small business workstations that require heavy computation will also find this system capable.

The build class is a laptop, so portability is a key factor. The combined performance places this in the upper tier of mobile workstations, suitable for professionals who need to run demanding applications without being tethered to a desk. It is not a budget-oriented system, but it is not the absolute flagship either, sitting at the 85th combined percentile.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 5080 Mobile’s Passmark G3D score of 27711 suggests strong 1080p and 1440p performance. The CPU’s 4218 single-thread score ensures minimal bottlenecks in frame pacing. Estimated frame rates should exceed 60 FPS in most titles at these resolutions, though the lack of measured data requires caution. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for high-texture settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores provide ample headroom for encoding software while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 35399 supports simultaneous game and stream workloads. The GPU’s tensor cores, 240 in total, can also accelerate AI-based encoding tasks. This system should handle streaming without significant performance degradation.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12820 indicates strong performance in video rendering tasks. The GPU’s 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading. The 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for 4K video timelines. This is a capable mobile video editing platform.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3223 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4952 combine for solid rendering performance. The 60 RT cores in the GPU support hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The 16 GB VRAM is beneficial for complex scenes. The system is well-suited for on-the-go 3D work.

Software Development: The Passmark data compression score of 352365 indicates fast compilation and data processing. The 16 threads handle parallel build tasks efficiently. The single-thread performance of 4218 is strong for code analysis tools. This is a reliable laptop for professional developers.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s 25 W TDP ensures efficient operation for battery life. The integrated Intel Xe3 Graphics handles basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is idle. The system’s high performance is overkill for standard office tasks, but it provides future-proofing for more demanding academic software. The 16 GB memory support is adequate for everyday use.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, placing this system above the majority of configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Core Ultra 9 386H has an average benchmark score of 43210, which is 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900 and 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900KF.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU and GPU pairing, so all gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform that is not upgradeable.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The system supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H achieves an average benchmark score of 43210, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 with an average score of 43326, which is 0.3% higher. The CPU also sits just behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 by 0.5%, but it leads the Intel Core i9-12900 by 0.7% and the i9-12900KF by 0.9%. These tight margins indicate that the 386H is positioned in a highly competitive segment of the market.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 38349, placing it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 with a score of 38299, which is 0.1% lower. The RTX 4080 Mobile is just 0.6% behind, while the MX570 A is 0.9% ahead. This clustering suggests that the 5080 Mobile performs similarly to the previous generation’s high-end mobile parts, despite being a newer architecture.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU. The CPU’s 88th percentile rank versus the GPU’s 81st percentile indicates that the processor is a more standout component. The combined percentile of 85 reflects this balance, showing a system that is well above average but not the absolute best in either category. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4218 and the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 27711 are the key data points for understanding overall performance.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system pairing the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile. The CPU is a 16-core, 16-thread Panther Lake processor with a 3 nm process node, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 design on a 5 nm node from TSMC. The combined percentile of 85 places this build in the upper tier of mobile systems, suitable for high-end gaming and professional workloads.

The CPU’s 4.90 GHz boost clock and 18 MB of shared L3 cache provide strong single-thread and multi-thread performance. The GPU’s 7680 shading units and 240 tensor cores deliver substantial compute power for graphics and AI tasks. The system’s overall tier, based on the 85th percentile, indicates it is a high-performance configuration that will handle demanding applications with ease.

The build class is explicitly a laptop, meaning portability is a primary design consideration. The CPU’s 25 W TDP and GPU’s 80 W TDP are modest for the performance level, allowing for a relatively thin chassis. This is not a desktop replacement in the traditional sense, but it is a capable mobile workstation for users who need power on the go.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 3, built on the Panther Lake architecture using a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 25 W. The cache configuration includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20547 is strong for a mobile part, and the Passmark multithread score of 35399 confirms this capability. Single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 score of 2071.5 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4218. The Passmark integer math score of 87284 and floating-point math score of 108527 indicate balanced compute across different instruction types.

The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking against all CPUs shows it is a top-tier mobile processor. It is competitive with high-end desktop processors like the Intel Core i9-12900, which it edges out by 0.7% in average benchmark score. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth, and it provides 12 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The integrated Intel Xe3 Graphics is available for basic display tasks, though the discrete RTX 5080 Mobile handles graphics-intensive workloads.

For real-world workloads, the 386H is well-suited for video editing, 3D rendering, and software development. The 16 threads are all physical cores, which can be a limitation in heavily threaded applications that benefit from hyper-threading. However, the high boost clock and strong single-thread performance mitigate this in many scenarios. The processor is a clear step above mainstream mobile CPUs, making it a solid choice for professional users.