SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

98%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus

84,003 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM represents a distinct desktop build where a top-tier 24-core processor is matched with a mid-range Ampere graphics card. The data shows a system where the CPU operates in the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a significant performance imbalance that defines the system's capabilities. The combined percentile for this pairing is 73, indicating that while the whole is greater than its parts, the GPU will be the determining factor in many graphics-intensive workloads. This analysis will detail the benchmark scores, component-specific strengths, and the practical implications of this configuration for various user types.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 73, placing it above the majority of systems. However, this figure is a composite; the CPU’s individual percentile is 96, while the GPU’s is 50, highlighting a significant gap in relative performance capability between the two core components.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus compare to its closest rival, the 285K?

A: The 290K Plus has an average benchmark score of 84,003, which is a 0.2% improvement over the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's average score of 83,807. This indicates that the 290K Plus is a marginal iterative upgrade over its direct predecessor in the same product family.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth available to the CPU, and what type of memory does it support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, providing a total memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, a feature often critical for workstation and server environments where data integrity is paramount.

Q: What are the key specifications of the GPU's memory subsystem?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a core factor in its performance at higher resolutions and with texture-heavy workloads.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics as a fallback or for additional display outputs?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus includes integrated graphics in the form of Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. This allows for basic display output and hardware acceleration even without the discrete GPU installed.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) for each component, and what power supply is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 220 W. Based on these requirements, the suggested power supply for the system is 550 W.

Q: What is the process node and foundry used for the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is built on an 8 nm process at Samsung. This difference in manufacturing technology contributes to the significant gap in transistor density and power efficiency between the two chips.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a clear picture of a processor that is a powerhouse for multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus scores 51,731 points in the multi-core test and 7,303 points in the single-core test. The multi-core score is particularly impressive, placing the CPU in the 96th percentile of all CPUs and demonstrating its capability in heavily threaded workloads like 3D rendering and video encoding. The single-core score of 7,303 is also robust, ensuring strong performance in everyday tasks and games that rely on fewer, faster cores. These results are further corroborated by PassMark scores, which show 60,860 for multithreaded performance and 4,823 for single-thread performance.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 84,003 puts it in elite company. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, scores 83,807, a negligible 0.2% difference. It also trades blows with server-class AMD EPYC processors; it is 1.1% ahead of the EPYC 4584PX and 1.2% ahead of the EPYC 9135, though it is 1.3% behind the EPYC 7F72. This positioning confirms that the 290K Plus is not just a desktop flagship but a processor that can compete with enterprise silicon in raw compute throughput. In contrast, the GPU's benchmark data is absent from the fact pack, offering no direct scores for comparison.

The combined picture is one of an extreme CPU paired with a modest GPU. While the CPU's 96th percentile ranking indicates it can handle the most demanding computational tasks, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle to keep pace in graphics-bound scenarios. The system's combined percentile of 73 reflects this compromise, indicating that while the CPU will rarely be a bottleneck, the GPU will frequently be the primary limiter in gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is built on the Ampere architecture and features the GA104 chip, manufactured on an 8 nm process at Samsung. It comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This is a substantial amount of bandwidth for a card in its class, which is crucial for feeding the 5,888 shading units. The GPU's boost clock is listed as 1,410 MHz, which contributes to its raw compute throughput of 16.60 TFLOPS for FP32 operations.

Ray tracing and AI workloads are handled by the dedicated hardware on the chip. The GPU includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. This hardware allows for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, features that are standard in modern gaming and are increasingly used in creative applications. The presence of these cores is a key feature of the Ampere architecture. The GPU's pixel rate is 135.4 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 259.4 GTexel/s, which are solid figures for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

The absence of GPU benchmark scores in the fact pack makes it difficult to quantify its exact rendering performance relative to other cards. However, its specifications and the 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs imply that it is an average performer in the current market. For rendering tasks, the 8 GB VRAM capacity might be a limiting factor for very large scenes or high-resolution textures, potentially requiring downscaling or texture streaming. The 448 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the core count, but the GPU will likely be the constraint in a system with a CPU that is capable of feeding data much faster. The "TiM" designation and the relatively low boost clock of 1,410 MHz suggest this is a specific, possibly more power-efficient or compact variant of the 3070 Ti, but the data does not provide further specifics on this.

Balance and Bottleneck

This system exhibits a stark imbalance between its components. The CPU, with a 96th percentile ranking, is a top-tier performer, while the GPU, at the 50th percentile, is decidedly mid-range. In any workload that is primarily graphics-bound, the RTX 3070 TiM will be the limiting factor. The CPU will be waiting for the GPU to complete its rendering tasks, meaning the system's overall frame rate in games will be determined by the GPU's capabilities, not the CPU's immense processing power.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as video encoding, 3D scene preparation, or software compilation, the situation reverses. The CPU's 51,731 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 60,860 PassMark multithread score will allow it to process data far faster than the GPU could ever render it. The GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is significant, but it pales in comparison to the CPU's raw integer and floating-point throughput in non-graphics tasks, as evidenced by the PassMark integer math score of 166,194 and floating-point math score of 214,760.

The bottleneck is not a flaw, but a characteristic of the pairing. For a user whose primary focus is high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming, the GPU will be the primary constraint, and the CPU's power will be largely untapped. However, for a user who works with CPU-intensive tasks like software development or data processing and only plays games occasionally, the balance is more sensible. The CPU ensures that no matter what computational task is thrown at it, the system will handle it with ease, while the GPU provides a competent, if not spectacular, graphics experience. The lack of measured FPS data prevents a precise quantification of this bottleneck, but the percentile disparity strongly confirms it.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideally suited for users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive and who have secondary, less demanding graphics needs. The target user could be a software developer who needs to compile large codebases, run multiple virtual machines, or process data. The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads, combined with its 96th percentile ranking, would make short work of these tasks, while the RTX 3070 TiM provides adequate graphics for a multi-monitor setup or occasional gaming.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering could also benefit, but with caveats. For video editing, the CPU would excel at encoding and effects processing, but the 8 GB VRAM of the GPU could become a bottleneck when working with complex timelines or 4K+ footage. For 3D rendering, the CPU would be a workhorse for physics simulations or scene finalization, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means viewport performance and GPU-accelerated rendering would be slower. A student in a STEM field, such as engineering or computer science, would find this system to be a formidable workstation for simulations, programming, and data analysis, with the added benefit of being able to play most games at reasonable settings.

For small business workstations, this combination offers immense processing power for tasks like financial modeling, database management, or running heavy productivity suites. The CPU's ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for critical data. However, it is not a system for a pure gamer. A gamer on a budget would be better served by a less expensive CPU and a more powerful GPU. This build is for users who need a supercomputer for their work and are willing to accept a mid-range graphics experience.

Gaming Performance

The fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the available benchmark scores and component specifications. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 8 GB of VRAM suggest that it is a solid performer for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it will not be able to drive high refresh rates at 4K.

For esports titles and less demanding AAA games at 1080p, the RTX 3070 TiM is likely to deliver high frame rates, often exceeding 100 FPS on high settings. The CPU's strong 7,303 single-core score in Cinebench R23 will ensure that the processor does not hold the GPU back in these scenarios. At 1440p, the GPU will still perform well, but users will need to adjust settings from "Ultra" to "High" in more demanding titles to maintain smooth frame rates. The 8 GB VRAM could become a limiting factor at this resolution in games with high-resolution texture packs.

At 4K, the RTX 3070 TiM will struggle to maintain 60 FPS on high settings in most modern AAA games. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is a bottleneck at this resolution, as is the 16.60 TFLOPS of compute power. Ray tracing performance will also be a challenge; with only 46 RT cores, enabling ray tracing will significantly impact performance, requiring the use of DLSS to compensate. In summary, this system is best suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming or smooth 1440p gaming, but it is not a 4K gaming powerhouse. The CPU will not be a factor in gaming performance, as the GPU will be the definitive limiting component.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: In this scenario, the GPU is the star. At 1080p, the RTX 3070 TiM can likely push frame rates high enough to take advantage of a 144Hz monitor in many titles, while the CPU's powerful single-core performance ensures consistent frame pacing. However, the 8 GB VRAM may require texture quality reductions in the latest games.

Streaming: The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is an excellent choice for streaming. With 24 cores and 24 threads, it can handle the CPU overhead of encoding a livestream using x264 without impacting game performance, as the game itself will be more limited by the GPU. The CPU's high PassMark multithread score of 60,860 supports this.

Video Editing: Video editing software benefits from both the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 51,731 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will make short work of exporting and encoding video, while the GPU's CUDA cores and 448 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects and timeline previews. The 8 GB VRAM may be a limitation for very complex multi-layer projects.

3D Rendering: This is a mixed bag. For CPU-based rendering, this system is a powerhouse. The CPU's 52,563 PassMark encryption score and 214,760 floating-point math score indicate immense compute power for final frame rendering. However, for GPU-accelerated rendering (e.g., with an engine like Octane), the 50th percentile GPU will be slow, and the 8 GB VRAM will be a significant constraint.

Software Development: This is perhaps the ideal use case. Compilation, which is heavily multi-threaded, will be incredibly fast thanks to the CPU's 24 cores. The 96th percentile CPU ranking means that code compilation, testing, and running multiple virtual machines will be fluid. The GPU is more than sufficient for standard desktop use and UI rendering.

Student and Office Work: This system is massively overqualified for standard office tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU will be idle most of the time, and the GPU will be similarly underutilized. However, for a student in a demanding field like engineering or data science, the processing power is invaluable for simulations and complex analysis.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs Intel's top-tier consumer processor, the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, with NVIDIA's mid-range GeForce RTX 3070 TiM. The CPU, part of the Core Ultra Series 2 and based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, is a 24-core, 24-thread processor with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. It is a dominant force in CPU benchmarks, ranking in the 96th percentile. The GPU, based on the Ampere architecture, is a more modest component, ranking in the 50th percentile.

The system's combined percentile of 73 reflects this high-low pairing. The overall tier is defined by the CPU's exceptional performance. This is a system built for compute-heavy tasks where the CPU is the primary engine. The GPU is a competent companion, capable of handling modern games and GPU-accelerated tasks, but it is not the main event. This build reflects the CPU's power, offering a level of processing capability that is typically found in professional workstations.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. This process node, combined with the "Arrow Lake Refresh" architecture, allows for a high transistor count of 17,800 million on a 243 mm² die. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 per core, alongside a large 36 MB shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results show this is a processor designed for heavy lifting. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 51,731 is exceptional, indicating massive parallel processing capability for rendering, scientific computing, and video encoding. Its single-core score of 7,303 is equally impressive, ensuring snappy performance in everyday tasks and games that are not fully multi-threaded. The PassMark scores reinforce this, with a multithread score of 60,860 and a single-thread score of 4,823. The data compression score of 698,346 and integer math score of 166,194 show its strength in data-intensive and logical operations.

The CPU's 96th percentile ranking places it above nearly all other processors, and its nearest rivals include the previous generation 285K and various server-class EPYC chips. This demonstrates that its performance is not just for desktop users but competes with enterprise-grade hardware. For real-world workloads, this means a user can expect near-instantaneous compilation, rapid video renders, and the ability to run extremely demanding multi-threaded applications without breaking a sweat.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. This modern platform ensures high bandwidth for the latest storage devices and expansion cards. The system also includes a separate PCIe 4.0 x16 interface for the GPU, as used by the RTX 3070 TiM.

Given that the CPU is already a top-tier performer, a sensible next upgrade path would focus on the GPU. The CPU's immense processing power is currently being "held back" by the 50th-percentile GPU. A future upgrade to a more powerful graphics card would unlock the CPU's full potential in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures that any modern high-end GPU will be fully compatible and not bottlenecked by the interface.

The suggested power supply for this system is 550 W, which accounts for the 125 W TDP of the CPU and the 220 W TDP of the GPU. There is headroom in this recommendation for a more power-hungry GPU, but a substantial upgrade in the graphics card would likely necessitate a higher-wattage PSU. The GPU's triple-slot cooler requires significant case space, and its 270 mm length should be considered when choosing a case. The platform is solid and future-proof on the CPU side, but the next logical step for this build is a graphics card upgrade to balance the system's capabilities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds