SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation: Performance Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 24-core Arrow Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's flagship workstation GPU based on Ada Lovelace architecture. The data available for this combination contains no measured FPS rows — the FACT PACK confirms `measuredFpsUltraByGame` is empty and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Consequently, all gaming frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores rather than derived from direct gameplay testing. The combined percentile ranking of 95 places this build in the top tier of all desktop configurations tracked in the database.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, frame rates must be inferred from the underlying benchmark scores. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 and OpenCL score of 175,286 place it in the 98th percentile among all GPUs, indicating exceptional raw rendering throughput. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 and single-core score of 4,739 suggest it can feed even the most demanding graphics workloads without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios.

For 1080p gaming, the combination of a 5.40 GHz boost clock on the CPU and the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests the RTX 5000 Ada Generation would deliver very high frame rates in esports titles, likely exceeding 144 Hz in most competitive games. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,576 supports strong per-core performance needed for high-refresh gaming. At 1440p, the GPU's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 32 GB GDDR6 VRAM provide ample headroom for texture-heavy titles, with estimated frame rates remaining well above 60 FPS in graphically demanding AAA games.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate become the dominant factors. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores indicate strong ray tracing and DLSS capability, which would allow playable 4K performance in ray-traced titles when upscaling technologies are employed. However, users should temper expectations for native 4K ultra settings in the most demanding releases — the workstation-oriented GPU prioritizes compute and rendering accuracy over gaming-specific optimizations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which represents the current generation of Intel desktop processors. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The platform supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation users who require data integrity during long compute tasks. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes provides substantial bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage devices.

The CPU carries a 35 W TDP, which is remarkably low for a 24-core processor. This low power envelope means the platform's power delivery requirements are modest, and the 600 W suggested PSU for the GPU leaves considerable headroom for additional components. The GPU itself has a 250 W TDP and requires a single 16-pin power connector, making it compatible with most modern power supplies that meet the 600 W recommendation.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve adding a second RTX-class GPU for compute workloads, though the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU would need to be bifurcated or a motherboard with additional chipset lanes would be required. Alternatively, users could upgrade storage to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives to take advantage of the CPU's lane allocation, or increase memory capacity for larger datasets. The socket 1851 platform is current, so CPU upgrades would only be possible within the same generation unless a future BIOS update enables compatibility with newer Intel parts.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 51,310 places it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs tracked. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900T, scores 51,015, putting the Ultra 9 285T just 0.6% ahead. The Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51,730, meaning the Ultra 9 285T trails that chip by 0.8%. The Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50,761 (1.1% behind) and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50,718 (1.2% behind). This cluster of scores within ±1.2% indicates the Ultra 9 285T is essentially performance-equivalent to the best previous-generation desktop and mobile processors.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 184,664 places it in the 98th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, scores 183,725, making the RTX 5000 Ada Generation 0.5% faster. The NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187,147 (1.3% ahead of the RTX 5000 Ada), while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 182,109 (1.4% behind) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178,050 (3.7% behind). The RTX 5000 Ada Generation sits in a tight competitive band with the A100 series, with differences under 2% across the board.

The combined percentile of 95 reflects the strength of both components. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 98th percentile contribute to a system that ranks among the top 5% of all tracked desktop builds. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 combined with the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 capability indicates a system equally prepared for compute-heavy rendering tasks and demanding gaming workloads.

Who Should Build It

This system targets professionals and enthusiasts who need workstation-class GPU compute without sacrificing CPU performance. The 32 GB VRAM on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation makes it suitable for large 3D scenes, high-resolution texture work, and machine learning model training that exceeds the memory capacity of consumer GPUs. The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 35 W TDP, make it an efficient choice for sustained multi-threaded workloads like video encoding and compilation.

Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions would benefit from the GPU's high percentile ranking, though the workstation-oriented drivers and lack of gaming-specific optimizations mean frame rates may be slightly lower than a comparable GeForce card. Content creators working with 8K video or complex After Effects compositions would leverage the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 39,931 and the GPU's 400 tensor cores for AI-accelerated effects. Software developers compiling large codebases would appreciate the CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14,100, which indicates strong parallel compilation performance.

Small business workstations handling CAD, architectural visualization, or scientific computing would find the ECC memory support and 32 GB VRAM valuable for preventing data corruption during long simulations. Students in engineering or data science programs would benefit from the platform's longevity and upgrade potential, though the initial cost may be prohibitive for a student budget. The low CPU TDP makes this build suitable for compact workstations where heat dissipation is a concern.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T features 24 cores and 24 threads, notably lacking Hyper-Threading. The base clock of 1.40 GHz is modest, but the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz, providing a wide dynamic range that balances idle efficiency with peak performance. The Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process at TSMC, packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. The L3 cache totals 36 MB shared, with 3 MB L2 and 192 KB L1 per core.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 is competitive with the nearest rivals, sitting just 0.6% above the Core i9-14900T and 0.8% below the Core i9-13900F. The single-core score of 4,739 indicates strong per-thread performance, essential for lightly-threaded applications and gaming. The PassMark results provide additional insight: integer math scores 132,433, floating-point math scores 137,923, and extended instructions score 27,477. Data compression scores 384,140, while encryption scores 32,061, reflecting the CPU's capability in security-related workloads.

The 35 W TDP is exceptional for a 24-core processor, suggesting the Ultra 9 285T is designed for power-constrained environments where sustained all-core performance is needed without excessive heat generation. The PassMark physics score of 2,842 and find prime numbers score of 345 indicate solid scientific computing capability. The multi-thread score of 39,931 and single-thread score of 4,576 confirm balanced performance across workload types.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses the AD102 chip with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The 32 GB GDDR6 memory operates on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs provide substantial rasterization throughput. The 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI inference.

Clock speeds range from 1,155 MHz base to 2,550 MHz boost, with memory running at 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The FP32 performance of 65.28 TFLOPS matches the FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio, which is unusual and indicates strong compute capability for both single-precision and half-precision workloads. The pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s support high-resolution rendering.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and Vulkan score of 194,041 place the GPU in the 98th percentile. The 0.5% advantage over the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB is notable given the A100's data-center heritage, while the 3.7% lead over the GeForce RTX 4090 D shows the workstation card's compute advantage over even the fastest consumer GPU. The 250 W TDP with a 600 W suggested PSU makes power requirements manageable, and the dual-slot design with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs supports multi-display workstation setups.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 98th percentile create a system where the GPU is the stronger component. In gaming workloads, the GPU would likely be the limiting factor at 4K resolution, while the CPU could become the bottleneck at 1080p in CPU-intensive titles. The CPU's 0.6% advantage over the Core i9-14900T and the GPU's 0.5% advantage over the A100 SXM4 80 GB suggest both components are well-matched to their respective performance tiers.

For compute workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 and the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS would complement each other, with the GPU handling parallel rendering tasks while the CPU manages scene preparation and physics calculations. The CPU's low 35 W TDP means it will not thermally throttle in most chassis, allowing sustained boost behavior that keeps up with the GPU's output.

The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s on the CPU is relatively modest compared to the GPU's 576.0 GB/s, which could create a bottleneck when transferring large datasets between system memory and VRAM. Users working with datasets larger than 32 GB would need to be aware of this limitation. The PCIe Gen 5 x16 interface (from the CPU's 20 lanes) provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so no bottleneck exists there.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The combined percentile of 95 places this configuration in the top 5% of all tracked desktop systems. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 98th percentile create a high-end workstation-class build that excels in both compute and rendering workloads.

The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads with a 5.40 GHz boost clock provide strong multi-threaded performance, while the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance deliver workstation-grade compute capability. The system is best characterized as a professional workstation that can also handle gaming, rather than a gaming PC with workstation capabilities. The low CPU TDP of 35 W makes this an energy-efficient choice for sustained workloads, while the GPU's 250 W TDP is reasonable for the performance level.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 95, placing it in the top 5% of all tracked desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T has an average benchmark score of 51,310, which is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i9-14900T (51,015) and 0.8% lower than the Intel Core i9-13900F (51,730).

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T supports ECC memory in its dual-channel DDR5 configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU is in the 98th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 184,664. It is 0.5% faster than the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB and 3.7% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 600 W, with the GPU requiring a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and boost clock?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a base clock of 1.40 GHz.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and 194,041 Vulkan score suggest very high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, though no measured FPS data exists. The CPU's 4,739 Cinebench R23 single-core score supports high-refresh gaming in CPU-bound titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with the PassMark multi-thread score of 39,931 indicating strong parallel processing. The GPU's 400 tensor cores could offload AI-based encoding tasks.

Video editing: The GPU's 32 GB VRAM handles large timelines and 8K footage, while the CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14,100 accelerates export rendering. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports smooth scrubbing of high-resolution media.

3D rendering: The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 100 RT cores accelerate both raster and ray-traced rendering. The CPU's 33,573 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles scene preparation and physics simulation.

Software development: The CPU's 24 threads and 5.40 GHz boost clock speed up compilation, with the PassMark data compression score of 384,140 indicating efficient build tooling. The ECC memory support prevents silent data corruption during long builds.

Student and office work: The 35 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption low, while the 91st percentile CPU ranking ensures responsive multitasking. The GPU's 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds