SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This combination pairs Intel’s 24-core, 35-watt flagship Arrow Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA’s 16 GB Turing-based workstation GPU, creating a system that is dramatically stronger in CPU-bound multithreaded work than in GPU-accelerated rendering. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the Quadro RTX 5000 lands in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, meaning the processor is the clear performance leader in this pairing. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 and PassMark multi-thread score of 39,931 indicate exceptional throughput for compilation, simulation, and content creation, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15,616 places it roughly on par with a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which is just 1% ahead in average benchmark score. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming and real-time graphics performance discussed here is estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than observed frame rates. The system is best understood as a workstation-oriented build where the CPU does the heavy lifting and the GPU provides professional-grade features like 16 GB of VRAM and ECC memory support, rather than a high-refresh gaming machine.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture using TSMC’s 3 nm process node, containing 24 cores and 24 threads with no hyper-threading. The base clock is 1.40 GHz, which is remarkably low, but the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz, allowing the chip to scale from power-efficient idle states to high single-thread performance when needed. The 35 W TDP is the defining characteristic here — this is a processor designed for constrained thermal environments like compact workstations or silent builds, yet it still delivers top-tier multi-core results. The L3 cache is 36 MB shared, with 3 MB of L2 per core and 192 KB of L1 per core, providing ample data locality for workloads that fit within the cache hierarchy.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU’s strength. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 33,573, while single-core scores 4,739; Cinebench R20 shows 14,100 multi-core and 1,990 single-core; Cinebench R15 shows 3,384 multi-core and 477 single-core. These numbers indicate that the 285T competes directly with much higher-TDP processors. The nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-14900T, which averages 51,015 across benchmarks, just 0.6% behind the 285T’s average of 51,310. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT is 1.2% behind, and the Intel Core i7-13850HX is 1.1% behind. This means the 285T is effectively at parity with the best previous-generation low-power desktop chips, but it does so with a 35 W TDP, which is significantly lower than typical desktop processors in this performance class.

PassMark results break down the workload characteristics. Integer math scores 132,433, floating-point math scores 137,923, and extended instructions (SIMD) score 27,477. Data compression scores 384,140, which is exceptionally high and suggests strong performance in archiving, database operations, and file server workloads. Data encryption scores 32,061, indicating capable AES-NI throughput. The multi-thread score of 39,931 places the chip in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while single-thread score of 4,576 shows competitive per-core performance. For real workloads, this translates to fast compilation times, smooth 4K video editing timelines, and responsive application switching, all while maintaining a low thermal footprint that allows for smaller cooling solutions and quieter operation.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a Turing-architecture workstation GPU built on TSMC’s 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1620 MHz with a boost clock of 1815 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU contains 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, along with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 11.15 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 22.30 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Benchmark scores place this GPU in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21,629. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which averages 21,856, just 1% higher. The RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.2% behind, and the AMD Radeon HD 8970M is 1.8% behind. This is a striking result: a workstation GPU that cost $2,299 at launch performs roughly equivalently to a mainstream gaming card from the same era in raw compute benchmarks. However, the Quadro RTX 5000’s value lies not in raw FPS but in its 16 GB VRAM, ECC memory support, and certified drivers for professional applications. The PassMark G3D score of 15,616 and DirectX 12 score of 59 indicate that gaming performance will be modest by modern standards, but the GPU’s 448 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB capacity make it suitable for large datasets in scientific visualization or machine learning inference where memory size matters more than raw throughput.

The GPU’s power draw is 230 W, requiring a 550 W suggested PSU, and it uses a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector configuration. Display outputs include 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C. The card is dual-slot, 267 mm long, and 111 mm tall. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status is end-of-life, having been released in August 2018, so this is legacy hardware that would be found in existing systems or used markets rather than new builds.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. Memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a critical feature for workstation reliability and data integrity in scientific or financial computing. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-speed NVMe storage and future GPU connectivity. The integrated graphics is Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, which provides a fallback display output and hardware acceleration for media encoding even without the discrete GPU.

The 35 W TDP of the CPU combined with the 230 W TDP of the GPU means the system’s total power draw is modest, and the suggested PSU of 550 W provides ample headroom. This allows for a wide range of power supply choices, including efficient small-form-factor units. The CPU’s low TDP also means that a capable air cooler is sufficient, and the 267 mm GPU length requires a mid-tower or larger case, but no special cooling considerations beyond standard airflow.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the GPU is the bottleneck in this pairing. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile while the GPU sits in the 67th percentile, and the CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 1.2% of its average score, indicating it has headroom to drive a faster GPU. A user could replace the Quadro RTX 5000 with a more modern workstation or gaming GPU and see significant gains in GPU-bound workloads without needing to change the CPU, memory, or platform. Conversely, upgrading the CPU would yield diminishing returns since the 285T is already at the top of its performance class among low-power desktop chips. The DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that the platform is not a limiting factor for several more generations of components.

Who Should Build It

This system targets professionals who prioritize CPU throughput over GPU gaming performance. The 91st percentile CPU ranking and 35 W TDP make it ideal for developers, researchers, and small business workstation users who run multithreaded applications like code compilation, data analysis, or 3D modeling that are CPU-bound. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 and PassMark multi-thread score of 39,931 demonstrate that this CPU can handle heavy parallel workloads that would otherwise require a much higher-TDP processor, making it suitable for quiet office environments where noise and heat are concerns.

Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-core performance in rendering and export tasks, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM provides enough memory for 4K timelines and effects-heavy compositions. Software developers will appreciate the fast data compression score of 384,140, which accelerates build artifact packing and source control operations, and the 3 nm process node ensures efficient power draw during long compile sessions. Students and small business users who need a reliable workstation for simulations, statistical analysis, or CAD work will find the ECC memory support and professional GPU drivers valuable, even if the GPU’s raw compute is modest by gaming standards.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p who play esports titles or older games may find the system acceptable, but the GPU’s 67th percentile ranking and PassMark G3D score of 15,616 suggest that modern AAA titles at high settings will struggle. This is not a gaming-first build; it is a CPU-first workstation where the GPU provides professional features rather than high frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The combined percentile of this pairing is 79, but this masks a significant disparity: the CPU is in the 91st percentile while the GPU is in the 67th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads like code compilation, data compression, and physics simulation, the 285T will perform at the top of its class, with PassMark physics scoring 2,842 and floating-point math scoring 137,923. The GPU will not bottleneck these tasks because they do not rely heavily on graphics hardware.

In GPU-bound workloads such as 3D rendering with ray tracing or gaming at high resolutions, the Quadro RTX 5000 becomes the limiting factor. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15,616 is roughly 1% below a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, meaning that modern games will run at low to medium settings for acceptable frame rates, and ray tracing performance will be minimal despite the presence of 48 RT cores. The FP32 throughput of 11.15 TFLOPS is adequate for compute tasks, but the DirectX 12 score of 59 indicates that modern graphics APIs will not be fully utilized.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated since no measured FPS data exists, points to the GPU as the bottleneck in any graphics-intensive scenario. The CPU could easily feed a much faster GPU, as evidenced by its 0.6% margin over the Intel Core i9-14900T, which is a capable pairing for higher-end GPUs. Conversely, the GPU cannot fully utilize the CPU’s capabilities in mixed workloads, meaning users who upgrade the GPU will see disproportionate gains in gaming and rendering performance without needing to touch the CPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Quadro RTX 5000’s PassMark G3D score of 15,616 and DirectX 12 score of 59 suggest that high-refresh gaming at 144 Hz or above is not achievable in modern titles. Estimated frame rates at 1080p in esports titles might reach 100+ FPS, but AAA games at high settings would likely fall below 60 FPS. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,576 ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU is the constraint.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 35 W TDP provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, and the PassMark multi-thread score of 39,931 indicates that simultaneous game capture and encoding would not strain the processor. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM can hold game assets and stream buffers, though the overall frame rates would be limited by the GPU’s compute power.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 33,573 enables smooth 4K timeline scrubbing and fast export times. The GPU’s 448 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM accelerate effects and color grading, though rendering with heavy GPU effects may be slower than dedicated content creation GPUs.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray will excel, with the 285T’s multi-thread score of 39,931 handling complex scenes efficiently. GPU-based rendering will be limited by the Quadro RTX 5000’s FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS, which is modest compared to modern workstation GPUs.

Software development: The data compression score of 384,140 and integer math score of 132,433 make this an excellent build for compiling large codebases, running unit tests in parallel, and managing containerized workloads. The 35 W TDP allows for sustained all-core boost without thermal throttling in well-ventilated cases.

Student and office work: The low TDP and ECC memory support make this a reliable, quiet workstation for spreadsheet analysis, statistical computing, and document processing. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics with 64 EUs provides a backup display output, and the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking ensures responsiveness even with many applications open.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread performance of 4,576 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 single-core of 4,739 indicate that the processor will not limit frame rates in most games, as modern titles rarely require more than 8 threads. The GPU, however, will be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios.

Based on the Quadro RTX 5000’s PassMark G3D score of 15,616, which is 1% below a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, estimated performance at 1080p ultra settings would be around 40-60 FPS in titles released around 2018-2020, such as Shadow of the Tomb Raider or Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. For more recent AAA titles with DirectX 12 Ultimate features, the GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests that frame rates would drop below 40 FPS at 1080p high settings. At 1440p, the 16 GB VRAM prevents memory-related stuttering, but the compute throughput will limit frame rates to approximately 30-45 FPS in demanding titles. Esports games like CS:GO or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, could potentially reach 144+ FPS at 1080p low settings, as the CPU’s strong single-thread performance would dominate. However, users seeking high-refresh gaming should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s 67th percentile ranking places it firmly in the mid-range of graphics hardware.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T faster than the Intel Core i9-14900T?

A: Yes, marginally. The 285T has an average benchmark score of 51,310, which is 0.6% higher than the i9-14900T’s average of 51,015. The difference is within noise, but the 285T achieves this with a 35 W TDP compared to the i9-14900T’s higher power envelope.

Q: Can the Quadro RTX 5000 handle modern games at 4K resolution?

A: No. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15,616 places it in the 67th percentile, and its DirectX 12 score of 59 indicates limited support for modern graphics features. Estimated frame rates at 4K would be below 30 FPS in most AAA titles, even at medium settings.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T supports ECC memory, which is listed in the CPU specifications. This is important for workstation reliability in scientific, financial, or server-like workloads where data corruption is unacceptable.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU combined?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP and the GPU has a 230 W TDP, for a combined maximum draw of approximately 265 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU alone is 550 W, which provides ample headroom for the entire system.

Q: Is the Quadro RTX 5000 better than a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB?

A: In raw benchmark scores, no. The GTX 1060 6 GB averages 21,856, which is 1% higher than the Quadro RTX 5000’s 21,629. However, the Quadro offers 16 GB VRAM versus 6 GB, ECC memory, and certified drivers for professional applications, which are not captured in gaming benchmarks.

Q: Can I upgrade the GPU without changing the CPU?

A: Yes. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking and 0.6% margin over the i9-14900T indicate it has significant headroom to drive faster GPUs. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes ensures compatibility with modern graphics cards, though the Quadro RTX 5000 itself uses PCIe 3.0 x16.

Q: What is the release date of this CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T was released on January 6, 2025, and is currently in active production. The GPU, however, was released on August 12, 2018, and is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer manufactured.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 51,310, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-14900T at 51,015, which is 0.6% behind. The Intel Core i9-13900F is 0.8% behind at 51,730, the Intel Core i7-13850HX is 1.1% behind at 50,761, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT is 1.2% behind at 50,718. This clustering indicates that the 285T is at the top of a tight performance band, with no single rival holding a decisive advantage. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 and single-core score of 4,739 are the headline numbers, showing that the chip balances multi-threaded throughput with strong per-core performance.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 21,629, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB at 21,856, which is 1% ahead. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.2% behind at 21,379, the AMD Radeon HD 8970M is 1.8% behind at 21,237, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL is 2.3% behind at 21,153. The PassMark G3D score of 15,616 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,999 indicate that the GPU is competitive with mid-range gaming cards from its era, but the DirectX 12 score of 59 and DirectX 11 score of 140 show that it is not optimized for modern gaming workloads.

The combined percentile of this pairing is 79, which reflects the CPU’s strength pulling up the GPU’s mediocrity. The PassMark multi-thread score of 39,931 for the CPU versus the PassMark GPU compute score of 6,525 for the GPU highlights the disparity: this system excels at CPU-heavy tasks like compilation, data processing, and physics simulation, while GPU-accelerated rendering and gaming will be underwhelming. Users should treat this as a workstation CPU with a professional GPU add-on, not as a balanced gaming rig. The 35 W TDP CPU is a remarkable engineering achievement, delivering near-flagship performance in a power envelope that allows for silent, compact builds, but the GPU is the component that will need upgrading for any graphics-intensive future workloads.