SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing brings together Intel’s 24-core Arrow Lake desktop processor and NVIDIA’s workstation-class Turing GPU. The CPU is a high-core-count, low-power part designed for sustained throughput, while the GPU is an end-of-life professional card with a 61st percentile standing among all GPUs. The data shows a system with a clear split in capability: the processor is a top-tier multi-threaded workhorse, and the graphics card is a competent but aging professional component. The following analysis is grounded entirely in the supplied benchmark scores, percentile positions, and architectural facts.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data suggests this is not the ideal platform. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15117 places it in the 61st percentile, which is modest for driving high frame rates at demanding settings. While the CPU’s single-thread score of 4739 in Cinebench R23 is strong, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in games that rely heavily on rasterization performance. Expect playable frame rates at lower resolutions and settings, but not the headroom needed for consistent high-refresh output in modern titles.

Streaming and content creation benefit more from the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33573 indicates substantial headroom for encoding, transcoding, and simultaneous background tasks. The PassMark multi-thread score of 39931 and data compression score of 384140 further support this, suggesting the CPU can handle live encoding workloads without choking. The GPU’s 288 tensor cores and 36 RT cores provide some hardware acceleration for AI and ray-tracing tasks, though its overall compute score of 6176 in PassMark is not exceptional.

Video editing workloads will see a mixed picture. The CPU’s strong multi-core performance, with a PassMark floating-point math score of 137923, helps with rendering timelines and applying effects. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 416.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and light 4K editing, but its 61st percentile GPU score suggests it may struggle with heavy GPU-accelerated effects or color grading at high resolutions. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth from the CPU side helps feed both components.

3D rendering is where the CPU shines. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14100 and R15 multi-core score of 3384 demonstrate strong sustained performance for CPU-based renderers. The GPU’s 2304 shading units and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance are respectable for a workstation card, but its 12 nm Turing architecture is older than the CPU’s 3 nm Arrow Lake process. For hybrid rendering pipelines that use both CPU and GPU, the CPU will carry most of the load.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s high core count and strong single-thread performance. The 24 cores and 24 threads, combined with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, provide excellent parallel compilation throughput. The PassMark integer math score of 132433 and extended instructions score of 27477 indicate strong performance for code compilation, testing, and running virtual machines. The GPU’s role in development is minimal unless the work involves CUDA or graphics programming, where its 288 tensor cores could be useful.

Student and office work is over-served by this hardware. The CPU’s 35 W TDP makes it efficient for sustained productivity tasks, and its 91st percentile standing among all CPUs means it will handle spreadsheets, document processing, and web browsing with ease. The GPU’s 61st percentile is more than enough for standard office applications, though the single-slot design and 160 W TDP may be overkill for such workloads. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running academic computations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 51310, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-14900T with an average score of 51015, which is 0.6% lower. The Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51730, putting the Ultra 9 285T 0.8% behind that part. The Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50761 (1.1% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50718 (1.2% lower). This places the Ultra 9 285T in a tight cluster at the top of the desktop CPU performance range, with less than 2% separating it from its nearest competitors.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17789, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790 with an average score of 17666, which is 0.7% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 scores 17639 (0.9% lower), the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (1.1% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (1.4% lower). This indicates the Quadro RTX 4000 is positioned just above a group of mid-range and integrated graphics solutions, but far from top-tier GPU performance.

The combined percentile for this build is 76, reflecting the strong CPU contribution weighed against the modest GPU standing. The CPU’s 91st percentile is a dominant factor, while the GPU’s 61st percentile drags the overall figure down. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 1873, and in Geekbench OpenCL it scores 74540, with Vulkan at 78844. The PassMark G3D score of 15117 and GPU compute score of 6176 round out the picture of a mid-tier professional GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The 24 cores and 24 threads operate without hyper-threading, which is a notable design choice that trades some multi-threading overhead for efficiency. The 35 W TDP is exceptionally low for a 24-core part, indicating a strong focus on power efficiency.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB of L3 cache. This configuration provides ample fast memory for workloads that benefit from large caches. The PassMark single-thread score of 4576 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4739 confirm strong per-core performance, which is essential for lightly threaded tasks like gaming and office applications.

The multi-threaded scores are where this CPU distinguishes itself. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33573 and PassMark multi-thread score of 39931 place it in the top 9% of all CPUs. The PassMark data compression score of 384140 and floating-point math score of 137923 indicate strong performance for scientific computing and data processing. The find prime numbers score of 345 and random string sorting score of 47695 are lower relative to other tests, suggesting some workloads may not scale perfectly across all 24 cores.

The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and it has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EU provides a basic display output capability, though it is not intended for serious gaming. The ECC memory support is a professional feature that adds reliability for workstation use cases.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2. This socket supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5, providing a modern foundation for future upgrades. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU offer high bandwidth for storage and expansion cards, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older interface.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is 450 W, and its TDP is 160 W. The CPU’s TDP is 35 W, so the combined power draw of the two components is well within the capability of a 450 W power supply. This leaves headroom for additional drives, fans, and other peripherals. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and is a single-slot design, measuring 241 mm in length and 111 mm in height, which fits in most standard desktop cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU, as the CPU’s 91st percentile performance has more headroom than the GPU’s 61st percentile. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores suggest it can support a more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the platform means a newer GPU with a PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 interface would be fully compatible, though the current GPU’s PCIe 3.0 interface does not limit its performance given its bandwidth needs.

The motherboard platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, and the CPU’s memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is adequate for most workloads. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for professional use, though it requires compatible ECC DDR5 modules. The platform’s production status is active, indicating ongoing availability and driver support.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 91st percentile versus the GPU’s 61st percentile indicates that the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU’s strong single-thread and multi-thread scores mean it can feed the GPU with data faster than the GPU can process it in many scenarios.

In gaming, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15117 and DirectX 12 score of 52 suggest that frame rates will be constrained by the GPU’s rasterization and shading capabilities. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4576 in PassMark is more than sufficient for game logic and physics, so the bottleneck is squarely on the GPU side. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM may also limit texture quality at high resolutions.

In compute workloads, the CPU’s multi-threaded performance will dominate. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6176 is modest compared to the CPU’s multi-thread score of 39931, so CPU-bound tasks like rendering and compilation will not be hindered by the GPU. The GPU’s tensor cores and RT cores provide specialized acceleration for AI and ray-tracing, but their impact is limited by the GPU’s overall compute throughput.

The FPS scaling in games would likely show CPU-bound performance at low resolutions and GPU-bound performance at high resolutions. At 1080p with low settings, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance could push frame rates higher, but the GPU would still cap them at a moderate level. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s 61st percentile performance would become the primary constraint, with frame rates dropping further.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over GPU performance. Software developers and data scientists will benefit from the CPU’s 24 cores and strong multi-threaded scores, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33573 and PassMark integer math score of 132433 supporting compilation and data processing tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s performance adequate for most tasks, though the GPU may limit GPU-accelerated effects. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14100 and PassMark floating-point math score of 137923 indicate strong CPU rendering capability. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing but may struggle with 4K timelines.

Students and office workers are over-served by this hardware, but the low 35 W CPU TDP makes it an efficient choice for sustained productivity. The GPU’s 61st percentile is more than enough for office applications, and the single-slot design keeps the system compact. Small business workstations that run database queries, financial models, or engineering simulations will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance and ECC memory support.

Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find this system capable, but those seeking high-refresh or 1440p performance should look elsewhere. The GPU’s 61st percentile standing and DirectX 12 score of 52 indicate moderate gaming capability, while the CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures games will not be CPU-limited.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is based on the TU104 chip with the Turing architecture, fabricated on a 12 nm process by TSMC. It contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The GPU has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores. This hardware configuration supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1625 MHz, with an effective data rate of 13 Gbps. This bandwidth is adequate for the GPU’s compute capabilities but may be a limiting factor for high-resolution textures. The base clock is 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 222.5 GTexel/s.

The FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 14.24 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. The tensor cores provide additional throughput for AI workloads, though the PassMark GPU compute score of 6176 is modest. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 indicate the GPU’s compute capability is reasonable for its class. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 is a modern benchmark result that reflects the GPU’s aging architecture.

The GPU’s production status is end-of-life, with a release date of November 2018. Its predecessor is the Quadro Volta and its successor is the Workstation Ampere. The launch MSRP is 899 USD. The display outputs include 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C, supporting multiple monitor setups. The GPU is a single-slot design with a 160 W TDP and requires a 450 W PSU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51310.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900T?

A: The Ultra 9 285T has an average score of 51310, which is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i9-14900T’s score of 51015.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17789.

Q: What is the GPU’s nearest rival and how do they compare?

A: The GPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790 with an average score of 17666, which is 0.7% lower than the Quadro RTX 4000’s score.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T supports ECC memory, which is useful for professional and workstation applications.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 76, reflecting the CPU’s high standing and the GPU’s more modest position.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and the GPU’s suggested PSU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the GPU has a suggested PSU of 450 W.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15117 and DirectX 11 score of 128, with a DirectX 12 score of 52, indicate moderate gaming performance. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU’s 61st percentile standing suggests frame rates in the 40-60 FPS range for modern titles, with lower performance in demanding games. The 8 GB of VRAM may cause texture quality to be reduced in some games.

At 1440p, the GPU’s bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance will struggle to maintain playable frame rates at high settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4739, ensures that games will not be CPU-limited. The GPU’s 36 RT cores provide some ray-tracing capability, but the overall GPU performance will limit ray-traced effects to low or medium settings.

At 1080p with medium settings, the GPU should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, with the CPU providing consistent frame pacing. The GPU’s PassMark DirectX 10 score of 108 and DirectX 9 score of 205 indicate strong legacy performance, which is useful for older games. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 78844 suggests the GPU handles Vulkan titles reasonably well, though it is not a top-tier gaming card.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000. The CPU is a 24-core Arrow Lake processor with a 91st percentile ranking, while the GPU is an end-of-life Turing workstation card with a 61st percentile ranking. The combined percentile is 76, indicating a system that excels in CPU-heavy tasks but is limited by GPU performance.

The CPU’s 35 W TDP and the GPU’s 160 W TDP make this a relatively power-efficient combination, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The platform supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5, providing a modern foundation. The overall tier is upper-mid-range, driven by the CPU’s exceptional multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s adequate but aging capability. This build is best suited for professionals and developers who prioritize CPU throughput over gaming graphics, with the GPU providing sufficient workstation-class acceleration for moderate graphics and compute tasks.