SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a desktop configuration that combines a highly efficient, 24-core Arrow Lake processor with NVIDIA’s flagship Blackwell GPU. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination; therefore, all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions of the individual components. Benchmark results indicate this pairing is built for extreme throughput and high-resolution rendering, but the CPU’s low power envelope creates specific behavioral characteristics that are analyzed in the sections that follow.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS rows exist for this CPU+GPU combination, frame rates must be inferred from the component benchmark scores. The GeForce RTX 5090 D posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326, which places it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. This score suggests very high rasterization throughput, and the GPU’s 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth provides the data feed necessary to sustain high resolution rendering. The Passmark G3D score of 44,065 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,915 reinforce the expectation that this GPU can drive demanding titles at high settings. For 1080p and 1440p gaming, the CPU’s single-core performance becomes the limiting factor; the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,739 is modest compared to the GPU’s raw power. At 4K resolution, the GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate should dominate the workload, making the CPU bottleneck less pronounced. The RTX 5090 D’s 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores indicate strong ray tracing and DLSS capability, but without measured FPS data, the actual frame rates remain estimates. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4,576 suggests that esports titles at 1080p with high refresh rates may not fully utilize the GPU, as the processor’s clock speed tops out at 5.40 GHz but its base clock is only 1.40 GHz. The estimated FPS at 4K ultra settings would be high, likely above 60 FPS in most titles, but the lack of measured data prevents precise quantification.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,739 and Passmark single-thread score of 4,576 indicate adequate but not exceptional per-core performance. In a system with the RTX 5090 D, the GPU’s 92nd percentile standing suggests it can push very high frame rates, but the CPU may hold back 1080p or 1440p high-refresh scenarios where the processor must feed frames quickly. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14,326 is the primary indicator that this system is capable of high-refresh 1440p or smooth 4K gaming, but the CPU’s lower single-core performance compared to its multi-core strength means the pairing favors resolution-bound workloads.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 24 threads provide substantial headroom for encoding and streaming tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 39,931 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 indicate that the processor can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The RTX 5090 D’s 680 tensor cores also support hardware-accelerated encoding, offloading work from the CPU. The data suggests this system can manage a game, encoding pipeline, and streaming software concurrently without significant performance degradation, though the CPU’s 35 W TDP means sustained all-core loads may throttle under extended sessions.

Video Editing: The CPU’s multi-core performance is strong, with a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3,384 and a Passmark integer math score of 132,433. The GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth accelerate effects, color grading, and export tasks. The combination of 24 CPU threads and 32 GB of GPU VRAM allows for large timelines and complex compositions. The Passmark data compression score of 384,140 further indicates efficient handling of codec operations. This system should handle 4K or even 8K video editing workflows with ease, though the CPU’s 36 MB of shared L3 cache may limit certain cache-sensitive operations.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14,100 and Passmark floating-point math score of 137,923 show strong compute throughput for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14,326 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 310,674 indicate that GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane would be exceptionally fast. The RTX 5090 D’s 21,760 shading units and 680 texture mapping units provide massive parallel compute. The system is well-balanced for hybrid CPU/GPU rendering pipelines, with the CPU’s 24 threads handling scene preparation while the GPU executes the final render pass.

Software Development: The CPU’s Passmark data encryption score of 32,061 and extended instructions score of 27,477 indicate solid performance for compilation and cryptographic tasks. The 24 cores and 24 threads allow parallel builds, and the 36 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code. The Passmark find prime numbers score of 345 is low, suggesting no special optimization for integer-heavy algorithms, but general compilation workloads should benefit from the multi-core design. The GPU’s compute capabilities could accelerate machine learning training or inference tasks during development, though the CPU remains the primary driver for most developer workflows.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4,576 and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provide adequate performance for productivity applications, web browsing, and document editing. The 35 W TDP makes this an energy-efficient choice for long sessions. The system’s overall performance is far beyond what is needed for typical office tasks, and the GPU’s 92nd percentile ranking is excessive for such workloads, but the configuration would handle any productivity suite without issue. The ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive tasks.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T have enough single-core performance for gaming?

A: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score is 4,739, and its Passmark single-thread score is 4,576. These scores are moderate, placing the CPU in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. For gaming, this means the processor can handle most titles, but the RTX 5090 D’s raw power may be underutilized at lower resolutions where the CPU must keep up with frame generation.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the RTX 5090 D have?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. This is a high figure that supports 4K texture streaming and large datasets.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and what does it mean for cooling?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T has a TDP of 35 W. This is a low power envelope for a 24-core processor, meaning it requires less cooling than typical high-core-count CPUs, but it also limits sustained all-core performance under heavy loads.

Q: Is the RTX 5090 D compatible with PCIe 5.0?

A: Yes, the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. The CPU also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, so the pairing can take advantage of the full bandwidth for data transfers.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing performance?

A: The RTX 5090 D has 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 14,326, which indicates strong DX12 performance, but no specific ray tracing benchmark scores are provided in the data.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T supports ECC memory. It has dual-channel DDR5 memory support with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 92, meaning this configuration ranks higher than 92% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this configuration is a professional or enthusiast who prioritizes GPU compute and high-resolution rendering over raw CPU single-thread speed. Gamers at 4K resolution will benefit the most, as the RTX 5090 D’s 92nd percentile GPU performance and 32 GB VRAM are designed for texture-heavy, high-resolution workloads. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s 24 threads and the GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute to be a strong combination for accelerating exports and render passes. Software developers who run parallel builds or machine learning tasks can leverage the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 39,931 and the GPU’s compute capabilities. Students and small business workstations would be overserved by this hardware, but the system’s 35 W CPU TDP makes it an efficient option for long-running tasks, and the ECC memory support adds stability for data-intensive workflows. The build class is desktop, so it suits a stationary workstation rather than a portable setup.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It has a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 51,310, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-14900T, which has an average score of 51,015, putting the 285T 0.6% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50,718, which is 1.2% behind. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 indicates strong multi-threaded performance, while the single-core score of 4,739 is more modest. The Passmark multithread score of 39,931 and integer math score of 132,433 show robust compute throughput. The CPU’s 35 W TDP is remarkably low for its core count, suggesting power efficiency is a design priority, but this may limit sustained performance under all-core loads. The memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB202 chip fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. It has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s base clock is 2017 MHz with a boost clock of 2407 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The shading units number 21,760, with 680 texture mapping units and 176 ROPs. The GPU has 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores. Its pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 and FP16 performance are both 104.8 TFLOPS. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 77,712, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT with an average score of 76,904, which is 1.1% behind. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326 indicates strong modern API performance. The Passmark G3D score of 44,065 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,915 further confirm high compute capability. The GPU has a TDP of 575 W and requires a 950 W suggested PSU, with a 1x 16-pin power connector input. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows a balanced profile with strengths in multi-core workloads. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 3,384, R20 multi-core is 14,100, and R23 multi-core is 33,573. Single-core scores are 477, 1,990, and 4,739 for R15, R20, and R23 respectively. The Passmark tests show data compression at 384,140, encryption at 32,061, extended instructions at 27,477, floating-point math at 137,923, and integer math at 132,433. The multithread score is 39,931 and single-thread is 4,576. The CPU’s percentile vs all CPUs is 91, with an average benchmark score of 51,310. The GPU’s benchmarks include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326, Geekbench OpenCL of 310,674, and Geekbench Vulkan of 376,915. Passmark scores include G2D at 1,487, G3D at 44,065, and GPU compute at 28,396. The GPU’s percentile vs all GPUs is 92, with an average benchmark score of 77,712. The combined percentile for the pair is 92. The CPU is 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900T and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13850HX, but 0.8% behind the Intel Core i9-13900F. The GPU is 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT but 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T, a 24-core desktop processor with a 35 W TDP, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, a 575 W flagship GPU. The build class is desktop. The CPU is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, based on Arrow Lake, and the GPU is from the GeForce 50-series, based on Blackwell 2.0. The combined percentile of 92 indicates that this configuration outperforms 92% of all tested pairs. The CPU’s 91st percentile and GPU’s 92nd percentile are closely matched, suggesting a cohesive performance tier. The system is designed for high-end desktop use, with the CPU’s low power draw contrasting sharply with the GPU’s high demand, creating a configuration that is efficient for CPU-bound tasks but power-hungry under GPU load. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $549, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 2,299 USD. The overall tier is high-end, given the 92nd combined percentile, but the CPU’s modest single-core performance relative to the GPU’s dominance means the system is not perfectly balanced for all workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals an asymmetric pairing. The CPU’s 91st percentile and the GPU’s 92nd percentile are numerically close, but their workload characteristics differ significantly. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 is strong, but its single-core score of 4,739 is relatively low for a flagship-tier processor. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14,326 and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute indicate it can generate frames faster than the CPU can feed it in CPU-bound scenarios. In gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes the limiting factor, as the Passmark single-thread score of 4,576 suggests it may struggle to keep up with the GPU’s frame output. At 4K resolution, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, but it is a high-performance bottleneck that still delivers excellent frame rates. For multi-threaded workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU’s 24 threads can keep pace with the GPU’s compute, so the balance is better. The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, suggests that reducing resolution shifts the bottleneck to the CPU, while increasing resolution shifts it to the GPU. The CPU’s 35 W TDP also means it may throttle under sustained all-core loads, further limiting its ability to feed the GPU in extended gaming sessions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU has PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The CPU’s TDP is 35 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 575 W, and the suggested PSU is 950 W. This headroom means the power supply is sized for the GPU, and the CPU’s low draw leaves significant PSU capacity for other components or future upgrades. The socket is current for the Core Ultra Series 2, so a future CPU upgrade within the same socket is possible, but the 285T is already near the top of the series. The GPU’s predecessor is the GeForce 40 series, and its successor is the GeForce 60 series, indicating a mature product that may be outclassed by newer models. A sensible next upgrade would be a CPU with higher single-core performance, as the current processor’s Passmark single-thread score of 4,576 is a potential bottleneck for gaming. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 modules could improve the CPU’s 102.4 GB/s bandwidth ceiling. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures the GPU can maintain full bandwidth. The ECC memory support allows for error-correcting memory modules, which is a niche feature for workstations. The 950 W PSU provides ample headroom for the 575 W GPU and leaves room for additional drives or expansion cards.