SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 pairing presents an unusual balance of capabilities. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 81st percentile among all graphics cards, with a combined percentile of 86. This gap suggests the processor is the more dominant component in the pairing, but the specific workload determines which part constrains overall performance.

Benchmark results indicate the CPU's strength is heavily tilted toward multi-threaded throughput. In Cinebench R23, the 285T scores 33,573 multi-core and 4,739 single-core, a ratio of roughly 7:1. This indicates the processor can feed the GPU ample data in threaded workloads, but single-threaded performance is comparatively modest. For gaming, where frame generation depends on both CPU serial work and GPU parallel rendering, the RTX 4070 with its 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will likely be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while at lower resolutions the CPU's single-thread ceiling may emerge as a constraint.

The 35W TDP of the 285T is remarkably low for a 24-core processor. This power envelope suggests the CPU will not thermally throttle in most desktop chassis, allowing sustained boost clocks up to 5.40 GHz. The RTX 4070, with a 200W TDP and a suggested 550W PSU, dominates the system power draw. In GPU-bound scenarios the RTX 4070's 12 GB GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth determine texture streaming and resolution scaling, while in CPU-bound scenarios the 285T's 36 MB shared L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth become the relevant limits.

PassMark scores reinforce this split. The CPU's multi-thread score of 39,931 versus single-thread of 4,576 shows a 8.7:1 ratio, while the GPU's G3D score of 26,927 and compute score of 14,720 indicate strong parallel throughput. The data suggests the RTX 4070 will bottleneck at 1080p in esports titles where frame rates exceed the CPU's serial processing capacity, but at 1440p and 4K the GPU becomes the definitive limiter. For productivity, the CPU's 35W envelope and high multi-core scores mean it can sustain heavy workloads without thermal throttling, while the GPU accelerates CUDA-accelerated tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than empirical results.

The RTX 4070's PassMark G3D score of 26,927 places it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the RTX 4080 Mobile at 38,135 (1.3% higher) and the RX Vega 56 at 37,507 (0.4% higher). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,854 provides a synthetic baseline for modern DirectX 12 titles. With 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus delivering 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, the GPU can handle 1440p ultra settings in most current games, though 4K ultra may exceed the memory capacity in texture-heavy titles.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4,739 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,576 suggest frame rates well above 144 Hz at 1080p, provided the game engine scales with one or two cores. The 285T's 5.40 GHz boost clock supports this, but the 1.40 GHz base clock indicates the CPU heavily relies on boost behavior. At 1440p, the RTX 4070's 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput becomes the primary driver, with estimated frame rates dropping by 20-30% compared to 1080p based on typical scaling from the benchmark scores.

For AAA titles at 1440p ultra, the RTX 4070's DirectX 12 PassMark score of 103 (relative to the GPU's internal scale) and Vulkan score of 174,152 in Geekbench suggest solid performance, though the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,854 indicates the GPU is mid-range in the current landscape. At 4K, the 12 GB VRAM capacity and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth will likely force reduced texture quality or reliance on upscaling technologies. The GPU's 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS, but the 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 rate limits raw rasterization throughput compared to higher-tier 40-series cards.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4070's 81st percentile GPU ranking and 26,927 PassMark G3D score support 144 Hz gaming at 1080p and 1440p in most titles. The CPU's 4,576 PassMark single-thread score and 5.40 GHz boost clock prevent significant bottlenecking at lower resolutions, though the 1.40 GHz base clock means sustained all-core workloads may reduce boost headroom.

Streaming: The RTX 4070's 184 tensor cores and 46 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated encoding and ray tracing simultaneously. The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads (no hyperthreading) provide ample headroom for encoding overhead, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 39,931 indicating the processor can handle game logic plus stream encoding without saturating.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 and PassMark data compression score of 384,140 indicate strong performance in codec-intensive tasks. The GPU's 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 14,720 PassMark compute score accelerate effects rendering and timeline scrubbing. The 35W CPU TDP allows sustained all-core workloads in compact chassis.

3D rendering: The 285T's 24 cores deliver a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14,100, while the RTX 4070's 5,888 shading units provide 29.15 TFLOPS for GPU-accelerated renderers. The combination suits Blender Cycles or Octane workloads where CPU and GPU render concurrently, though the GPU's 12 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 132,433 and extended instructions score of 27,477 accelerate compilation and code analysis. The 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, with a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3,384 indicating strong throughput. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for large codebases.

Student and office work: The 35W TDP and integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provide an efficient baseline for document processing and web browsing without engaging the discrete GPU. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,576 handles office suites responsively, while the RTX 4070 remains idle, preserving power.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers at 1440p resolution who want high refresh rates without stepping into the highest GPU tiers. The RTX 4070's 81st percentile ranking and 12 GB VRAM suit 1440p ultra settings in current titles, while the 285T's 91st percentile CPU ranking prevents bottlenecks at frame rates up to roughly 144 Hz. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering benefit from the CPU's 24-core throughput and the GPU's CUDA acceleration, with the 35W CPU TDP enabling quieter, cooler builds.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 132,433 and 24 threads, while the GPU's tensor cores accelerate machine learning inference tasks. Students and small business users gain a system that idles efficiently thanks to the 35W CPU envelope, yet scales to demanding workloads when needed. The RTX 4070's end-of-life production status suggests this build is for users who need current performance without waiting for next-generation parts, not for those seeking the latest hardware.

The combined 86th percentile ranking places this system above the majority of desktop configurations. Gamers at 1080p with 240 Hz monitors may find the CPU's single-thread scores limiting in esports titles, while 4K gamers should consider higher-tier GPUs with more VRAM. This build is best suited for users who split time between gaming at 1440p and productivity workloads that leverage multi-core CPUs.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T achieves an average benchmark score of 51,310, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-14900T with an average score of 51,015, making the 285T 0.6% faster. The Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51,730, putting the 285T 0.8% behind it, while the Core i7-13850HX (50,761) trails by 1.1% and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (50,718) trails by 1.2%. This places the 285T in a tight competitive cluster where no single rival holds a decisive advantage.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 achieves an average benchmark score of 37,648, placing it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 with 37,628, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37,507, 0.4% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38,135, 1.3% higher. The AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37,157, 1.3% lower. The GPU's competitive position is similarly tight, with no rival exceeding a 1.3% delta.

The CPU's individual benchmark scores show a strong multi-core bias: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 33,573 versus single-core of 4,739, and PassMark multi-thread of 39,931 versus single-thread of 4,576. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,854 and PassMark G3D of 26,927 indicate solid DirectX 12 and general 3D performance. The combined percentile of 86 reflects a system where both components sit in the upper quartile of their respective categories, though neither reaches the top tier.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 86, with the CPU at the 91st percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 81st percentile among all graphics cards.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 9 285T compare to its nearest CPU rival?

A: The 285T scores 51,310 average, which is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i9-14900T at 51,015, but 0.8% lower than the Intel Core i9-13900F at 51,730.

Q: What is the RTX 4070's closest GPU competitor in benchmark scores?

A: The NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37,628, just 0.1% lower than the RTX 4070's 37,648. The RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38,135, which is 1.3% higher.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T supports ECC memory, along with dual-channel DDR5 memory providing 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a 35W TDP, while the GPU has a 200W TDP. The suggested PSU for the system is 550W.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the RTX 4070?

A: The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked on the Core Ultra 9 285T, meaning overclocking is not supported.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm TSMC process node with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 and features a base clock of 1.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, a wide range that allows the chip to idle efficiently at 35W TDP while delivering high single-thread performance when needed. The architecture uses a unified cache hierarchy of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3 cache.

The 35W TDP is the defining characteristic of this CPU. For a 24-core processor, this power envelope is exceptionally low, enabling passive cooling in many chassis and drastically reducing system heat output. The trade-off appears in benchmark scores: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 is competitive with higher-TDP rivals like the i9-13900F (which scores 51,730 average, 0.8% higher), but the 285T achieves this at a fraction of the power draw. PassMark results show a similar pattern: multi-thread score of 39,931, integer math of 132,433, floating-point math of 137,923, and data encryption of 32,061.

The 5.40 GHz boost clock supports strong single-threaded performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,739 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,576. However, the 1.40 GHz base clock means sustained all-core workloads may see clocks drop significantly if cooling is inadequate. The PassMark physics score of 2,842 and find prime numbers score of 345 indicate the CPU handles scientific workloads competently, while the data compression score of 384,140 shows strong throughput for archival and file management tasks. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides basic display output and media acceleration, though the discrete RTX 4070 handles all demanding graphics work.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285T uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the LGA 1851 platform for Arrow Lake processors. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and includes ECC memory support for workstation reliability. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 20 CPU lanes, allowing high-speed NVMe storage and GPU connectivity, though the RTX 4070 uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and will not saturate the Gen 5 link.

The 35W CPU TDP and 200W GPU TDP combine for a system draw that the 550W suggested PSU comfortably handles, leaving headroom for additional storage, fans, and peripherals. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector and is dual-slot, requiring 240 mm of case clearance. The platform's memory bus is dual-channel, so users should populate two DIMM slots for optimal bandwidth. The 36 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for the CPU's 24 cores, though faster DDR5 kits could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier RTX 40-series GPU when available, as the CPU's 91st percentile ranking provides ample headroom for more powerful graphics cards. The 285T's 35W TDP means the platform's power delivery is not a limiting factor, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure future GPUs and storage devices can connect at full bandwidth. The Socket 1851 platform likely supports future Arrow Lake refresh processors, though the production status of the 285T is marked active, indicating current availability.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, combining a 24-core Arrow Lake processor with an Ada Lovelace graphics card. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and the GPU's 81st percentile ranking produce a combined percentile of 86, placing this system in the upper tier of desktop configurations. The build targets users who need both multi-core CPU throughput and solid GPU acceleration without committing to flagship components.

The 285T's 35W TDP is the standout feature, enabling compact and quiet builds that would traditionally require high-power cooling solutions for 24-core chips. The RTX 4070's 200W TDP and dual-slot design fit standard ATX cases, while the 550W suggested PSU keeps the system within typical desktop power budgets. The CPU's launch MSRP is $549, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 599 USD, positioning this as a mid-to-high-end desktop pairing. The CPU is not overclockable due to its locked multiplier, so users seeking manual tuning should consider unlocked variants. The overall tier, based on the 86th combined percentile, places this system ahead of the majority of desktop builds while remaining below the top 10% of extreme configurations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm TSMC process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The GPU uses the AD104 chip with 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It operates at a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz, with memory clocked at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1440p gaming but may limit 4K texture-heavy workloads.

The GPU includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-assisted features like DLSS. The FP32 throughput is 29.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), indicating balanced compute for both gaming and professional workloads. Pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s and texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s, supporting high-resolution rendering. The GPU's benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,854, Geekbench OpenCL of 154,858, Vulkan of 174,152, and PassMark G3D of 26,927 with a compute score of 14,720.

The RTX 4070's production status is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50-series as its successor. Its average benchmark score of 37,648 places it at the 81st percentile, with nearest rivals all within 1.3% in either direction. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, has a 200W TDP, and requires a 550W PSU. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor setups. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and near-future titles. For rendering workloads, the GPU's 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 184 tensor cores accelerate both traditional rasterization and AI-enhanced rendering pipelines, though the 12 GB VRAM capacity is the primary constraint for large scenes.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds