SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

This pairing combines a 24-core, 35-watt Arrow Lake desktop processor with an 8 GB Ada Lovelace graphics card, creating a system that targets efficiency-conscious builders who still want modern features. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is built on TSMC's 3 nm process with 17,800 million transistors packed into a 243 mm² die. It features 24 cores and 24 threads, meaning there is no hyperthreading — each core handles one thread. The base clock sits at 1.40 GHz, which is remarkably low, but the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz for short bursts. This wide clock range is the defining trait of the 285T: it idles at very low power draw (35 W TDP) yet can surge to high frequencies when needed.

The cache hierarchy is generous, with 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. The memory controller supports dual-channel DDR5 with ECC capability, offering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a high-end GPU and one fast NVMe drive. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units provides a basic display output and hardware acceleration fallback, though it is not intended for gaming.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33573 is strong for a 35-watt part, while the single-core score of 4739 indicates excellent per-thread performance. PassMark multithread score of 39931 confirms that the 24 physical cores do real work, and the floating-point math score of 137923 shows solid numerical throughput. Data encryption scores 32061, and compression hits 384140, both indicating that the CPU handles heavily threaded productivity tasks effectively.

The nearest rivals show how competitive this chip is: the Intel Core i9-14900T scores 51015 on average (0.6% lower), the Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51730 (0.8% higher), the Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50761 (1.1% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50718 (1.2% lower). The 285T sits essentially in a dead heat with these alternatives, which means the deciding factor is not raw score but the 35 W TDP — far lower than what those rivals typically require.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 51310, placing it at the 91st percentile. This is a top-decile result, but the nuance is that it achieves this with a 35-watt TDP, making it an outlier in efficiency. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3384 and single-core of 477 show consistent scaling across generations of the test. R20 yields 14100 multicore and 1990 single-core, and R23 pushes multicore to 33573 with single-core at 4739.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, scores an average of 17639, placing it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2302, which gives a modern gaming API baseline. Geekbench OpenCL scores 95057 while Vulkan scores 48643, showing that the card responds well to compute workloads through different APIs. PassMark G3D scores 19545, with G2D at 1037. The GPU compute score of 9213 indicates that while the card is gaming-focused, it has usable compute capability.

The combined percentile for this system is 76, meaning the pairing sits above the average desktop build but below the enthusiast tier. The CPU is clearly the stronger component relative to its peers — 91st percentile versus the GPU's 61st percentile. This imbalance suggests that the 285T has headroom beyond what the RTX 4060 can feed in many workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 uses the AD107 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The GPU has 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines. It includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated features like DLSS. The base clock is 1830 MHz with a boost clock of 2460 MHz, and memory runs at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest amount of VRAM by 2025 standards, but the card's target resolution is 1080p where 8 GB remains workable for most titles. The pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 15.11 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), meaning there is no half-rate penalty for FP16 workloads.

The card draws 115 W TDP and requires a 300 W suggested PSU, which is modest. It uses a dual-slot cooler, is 240 mm long, and needs a single 12-pin power connector. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for this class of GPU. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In the benchmark rankings, the RTX 4060's nearest rivals are unexpected: the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.2% higher), AMD Radeon 780M (0.3% lower), AMD Radeon Pro 560 (0.5% lower), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (0.7% lower). These are not modern gaming competitors, which reflects that the 4060's average score is pulled down by its modest specifications relative to higher-tier cards. The PassMark DirectX scores — 103 for DX10, 175 for DX11, 76 for DX12, and 236 for DX9 — are legacy API tests that do not reflect modern gaming performance accurately.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all gaming figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and single-core strength (Cinebench R23 single-core of 4739) indicate it will not bottleneck gaming workloads at standard resolutions. The GPU's 61st percentile and 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance place it firmly in the 1080p high-refresh category.

For esports titles, expect very high frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings. The CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's modern architecture should deliver well over 144 FPS in games like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, assuming typical scaling from these benchmark scores. For AAA games at 1080p ultra, expect 60–100 FPS depending on the title, with ray tracing enabled dropping performance significantly due to the 24 RT cores being entry-level in the Ada lineup.

At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors. The GPU's 61st percentile suggests it will manage 1440p at medium-to-high settings in most games, but ultra settings with high-resolution textures may exceed the 8 GB buffer. At 4K, the RTX 4060 is not a viable option for playable frame rates in demanding titles — the 128-bit memory bus and modest compute capability will struggle.

DLSS is available via the 96 tensor cores, and enabling DLSS Quality mode at 1440p can recover much of the performance lost to higher resolutions. Ray tracing is technically supported but should be treated as a feature for lighter titles or those with DLSS upscaling, not for full RT workloads. The CPU will not be the limiting factor in any of these scenarios; the GPU dictates the experience.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU sits at the 91st percentile while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile. This means the RTX 4060 will be the bottleneck in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33573 and PassMark multithread score of 39931 indicate it can sustain heavy threaded loads far beyond what the GPU requires.

In gaming, the bottleneck manifests as the GPU being fully utilized while the CPU idles. The 24-core processor is vastly over-provisioned for gaming, which typically uses 4–8 threads. The single-core score of 4739 in R23 ensures that even poorly optimized games that rely on one or two threads will run smoothly, but the GPU will still cap frame rates.

In compute workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's 35 W TDP and 24 cores make it an efficient renderer, while the GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS and 8 GB VRAM limit its compute throughput. For video encoding, the GPU's NVENC (part of the Ada architecture) will offload that task from the CPU, but for 3D rendering that uses GPU compute, the RTX 4060 will be the constraint.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect but informative: the GPU's percentile is 30 points below the CPU's, and the combined percentile of 76 reflects this gap. A system with a more balanced pairing would see the combined percentile closer to the lower of the two components. Here, the CPU's strength does not boost the GPU's performance; it merely ensures the GPU is never waiting on the processor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The 285T's single-core performance will not hold back the RTX 4060 at 1080p. Expect 144+ FPS in esports titles and 60–100 FPS in AAA games at ultra settings, based on the GPU's score positioning. The CPU's 91st percentile ensures consistent frame pacing.

Streaming: The RTX 4060's NVENC encoder handles stream encoding without taxing the CPU. The 285T's 24 threads can run the game, streaming software, and background tasks simultaneously. The 35 W TDP means the system stays cool and quiet under sustained load.

Video editing: CPU-heavy tasks like timeline scrubbing and rendering will benefit from the 24 cores — the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33573 indicates strong export times. The GPU accelerates effects and color grading via its CUDA cores, though 8 GB VRAM may limit 4K timelines with heavy effects.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here, with PassMark floating-point math at 137923 and integer math at 132433 indicating strong simulation and physics calculations. GPU rendering is possible but limited by the 4060's compute score of 9213, which is modest compared to higher-tier cards.

Software development: The 24 cores handle parallel compilation efficiently. Data encryption at 32061 and compression at 384140 show strong throughput for build servers and large repository operations. The ECC memory support is valuable for long-running computation where errors must be caught.

Student and office work: This is overkill for document editing and web browsing, but the 35 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, making it pleasant for daily use. The integrated Arc graphics can handle display output when the discrete GPU is not needed, saving power.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets builders who prioritize efficiency without sacrificing modern features. The 35 W CPU and 115 W GPU create a system that can run on a 300 W power supply, making it suitable for compact cases with limited cooling.

Gamers at 1080p will find this pairing adequate for high-refresh esports and playable AAA performance, especially with DLSS enabled. Content creators who work in video editing and light 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multicore muscle, though GPU-accelerated tasks will be mid-range. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24 threads and ECC memory support.

Students and home-office users get a system that is quiet, cool, and responsive, with the ability to handle occasional gaming or media creation without complaint. Small business workstations that run virtualization or database workloads will leverage the CPU's thread count and the GPU's compute for acceleration where applicable.

The system is not suited for 4K gaming or heavy GPU rendering — the RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM and 61st percentile ranking make that clear. Similarly, enthusiasts seeking maximum throughput should look at higher-tier GPUs, as the CPU has headroom for a faster card.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1851 platform uses DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC support. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is modest for a modern platform, but it is matched to the 35 W CPU's needs. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes provides future-proofing for storage and expansion.

The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is a point of consideration for upgrades. While it is sufficient for the RTX 4060, a future GPU with a higher bandwidth requirement would be limited by the x8 link if it exceeds the PCIe 4.0 spec. The 300 W suggested PSU leaves little headroom for a more powerful GPU — upgrading to a card that draws more than 115 W would require a new power supply.

The CPU's 35 W TDP means the platform has immense thermal headroom. The 240 mm GPU length and dual-slot design fit in most cases, but the 12-pin power connector may require an adapter. The production status of the 285T is active, while the RTX 4060 is end-of-life, so the GPU is the first component likely to be replaced.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU in the same power envelope, if such a card exists, or a larger PSU paired with a more powerful graphics card. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking suggests it will remain relevant for several years, so the platform does not need immediate attention. The 3 nm process and 24 cores give the 285T longevity, but the 8 GB GPU will become the limiting factor as games demand more VRAM.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T good for gaming?

A: Yes, for gaming the 285T is overqualified. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4739 places it at the 91st percentile, ensuring no CPU bottleneck in gaming, though the RTX 4060 GPU will limit frame rates.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4060 have and is it enough?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming at ultra settings in most titles, but 1440p with high-resolution textures may exceed the buffer.

Q: What power supply do I need for this system?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W, and the CPU has a 35 W TDP. A 300 W unit is the minimum, but a slightly larger unit provides headroom for drives and peripherals.

Q: Can this CPU handle video editing?

A: Yes, the 24 cores and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33573 indicate strong performance for rendering timelines and exporting video, while the GPU's NVENC accelerates encoding.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 good for ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 24 RT cores, which support ray tracing. Performance will be modest in heavy RT workloads, but DLSS via the 96 tensor cores can help recover frame rates.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the memory support includes ECC memory capability, which is valuable for workstations that require data integrity.

Q: What is the upgrade path for this platform?

A: The Socket 1851 platform supports DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5. The GPU is end-of-life, so upgrading it first makes sense, though the 300 W PSU may need replacing for a more powerful card.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds