SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 form a desktop pairing that presents a stark contrast in performance tiers. The CPU is a high-end, low-power 24-core processor, while the GPU is a low-profile, entry-level graphics card. The benchmark data shows a significant imbalance, with the processor ranking in the 91st percentile among all CPUs and the graphics card sitting in the 18th percentile among all GPUs. This analysis examines the measured scores, upgrade paths, and workload-specific implications of this configuration.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 55, placing it in the middle of the performance spectrum when both components are considered together.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900T?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285T has an average benchmark score of 51310, which is 0.6% higher than the Core i9-14900T's score of 51015.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile relative to all other graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has a benchmark score of 2893, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it is in the lower performance tier.

Q: Does this CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T supports ECC memory, which is a feature often useful for workstation and server environments.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of the CPU and the suggested power supply for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 watts, while the GPU's suggested power supply is 250 watts.

Q: What is the memory bus width and total bandwidth of the RTX 4010?

A: The RTX 4010 has a 64-bit memory bus and a total memory bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s.

Q: How does the RTX 4010's score compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB?

A: The RTX 4010's score of 2893 is actually 0.5% higher than the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB's score of 2907, despite the name-based expectation that the 4010 would be lower.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a clear picture of two components with vastly different performance profiles. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T delivers an average benchmark score of 51310, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This is a top-tier result, edging out the Intel Core i9-14900T by 0.6% and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT by 1.2%. The CPU's multi-core scores are particularly strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33573 and a Passmark multithread score of 39931. Single-core performance is also robust, as indicated by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4739 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4576.

In stark contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 produces a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This puts it in the entry-level category, behind the vast majority of modern graphics cards. Interestingly, its score is nearly identical to its nearest rivals: the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907), the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910), and the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913). The data shows the RTX 4010 is actually marginally ahead of these cards in this specific test, with a deltaPct of -0.5%, -0.6%, and -0.7% respectively, meaning the 4010's score is slightly higher.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU is a 91st-percentile performer capable of handling heavy computational tasks, while the GPU is an 18th-percentile component that will struggle with graphically intensive workloads. The combined percentile of 55 reflects this dichotomy, showing that the build's overall capability is dragged down significantly by the GPU. In practical terms, the system will excel at CPU-bound tasks but will be severely limited in GPU-bound scenarios like modern gaming at high settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is built on the Intel Socket 1851 platform with the Arrow Lake architecture. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a key feature for users who require data integrity. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 lanes available from the CPU itself, ensuring high-bandwidth connections for the fastest NVMe SSDs and expansion cards.

The CPU has a remarkably low TDP of 35 watts, which is exceptionally efficient for a 24-core processor. This makes it an excellent choice for compact or power-conscious builds. The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010, has a TDP of 50 watts and a suggested power supply of 250 watts. The GPU is a single-slot design that requires no power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCIe slot. This means the entire platform can be powered by a modest power supply unit.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be the graphics card. The CPU's 91st-percentile performance means it can easily support a much more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck. Given the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support and the platform's modern features, a user could upgrade to a higher-tier graphics card in the GeForce 40-series or a future generation to dramatically improve graphics performance. The rest of the platform—memory, storage, and CPU—would not need to be changed for such an upgrade, making the GPU swap a straightforward path to a more balanced system.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows that the RTX 4010 is the limiting factor in this build. The CPU's 91st-percentile score of 51310 is more than sufficient to drive any workload, while the GPU's 18th-percentile score of 2893 is a severe constraint for graphics-intensive tasks. This imbalance is the defining characteristic of the pairing.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression (Passmark score of 384140), data encryption (32061), and physics calculations (2842), the system will perform exceptionally well, leveraging the full power of the 24 cores. The user will experience fast rendering in CPU-based 3D applications and rapid compilation in software development.

However, in GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system will be severely limited. The RTX 4010's low 18th-percentile standing means it will likely be the bottleneck in almost any scenario involving 3D graphics. The FPS scaling in games will be directly tied to the GPU's capabilities, and the CPU's high performance will not be able to compensate for the GPU's limitations. The result is a system that is fast for productivity but slow for gaming at high settings.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is based on the Ampere architecture and utilizes the GA107 chip, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process. It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, resulting in a memory bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost clock of 1762 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

The GPU is equipped with 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. It also includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS. The FP32 performance is rated at 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1). The pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s.

Despite its 40-series naming, the RTX 4010's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 places it in the 18th percentile, indicating that it is a low-tier card. Its performance is on par with the RTX 4060 Ti series in this specific test, but its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are severe limitations for modern games and rendering workloads. The 4 GB frame buffer is insufficient for high-resolution textures, and the low bandwidth will hinder performance in memory-intensive scenes. For rendering, the 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a modest figure, suggesting it is suitable for light 3D work or as a display adapter, but not for professional-grade rendering or high-fidelity gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not recommended. The RTX 4010's 18th-percentile score and 4 GB VRAM will struggle to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings, let alone at high refresh rates. The CPU is not the issue; the GPU is the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33573, provides ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. However, the GPU's low performance will make gaming and streaming at good quality a challenge.

Video Editing: The CPU will handle video editing workflows with ease, thanks to its high single-thread score of 4739 in Cinebench R23. Effects and rendering that are CPU-bound will be fast. However, GPU-accelerated effects and previews will be sluggish due to the RTX 4010's low score.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering, this system is a powerhouse, with the 24-core CPU delivering excellent performance. However, for GPU-based renders using CUDA or OptiX, the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance of the RTX 4010 will result in long render times.

Software Development: This is a strong use case. The CPU's high multi-threaded performance (Passmark multithread score of 39931) will speed up code compilation significantly. The GPU is sufficient for basic UI rendering and 2D tasks.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks, but it will handle them effortlessly. The powerful CPU ensures a responsive system for multi-tasking, spreadsheets, and document editing. The GPU is more than adequate for office applications and web browsing.

Who Should Build It

This build is suited for a specific user: one who requires maximum CPU performance for productivity applications but has minimal or no need for discrete GPU power. This profile fits developers who compile large codebases, engineers running CPU-bound simulations, or researchers processing large datasets. The 91st-percentile CPU performance and support for ECC memory make it a compelling choice for a small business workstation or a high-end developer machine.

Gamers should avoid this combination. While the 24-core CPU is excellent, the RTX 4010's 18th-percentile score means it will not deliver a satisfactory gaming experience at 1080p with high settings, and it is not suitable for 1440p or 4K gaming. Content creators who rely on GPU acceleration for rendering or effects will also be frustrated by the GPU's limitations. The system is best considered a CPU-centric workstation where the GPU is an afterthought for basic display output, rather than a balanced system for gaming or GPU-intensive creative work.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class combination featuring the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T processor and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 graphics card. The Core Ultra 9 285T is a high-end desktop CPU from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture, while the RTX 4010 is an entry-level desktop GPU from the GeForce 40-series.

The overall tier of this build, based on the combined percentile of 55, is mid-range. However, this number is misleading due to the extreme variance between the two components. The CPU's 91st-percentile rank indicates a top-tier processor, while the GPU's 18th-percentile rank indicates a bottom-tier graphics card. This pairing is not a balanced mid-range system; it is a high-end CPU with a placeholder GPU. The combined percentile is dragged down by the GPU, but the true potential of the build lies in its CPU, which could support a much more powerful graphics card.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is a 24-core, 24-thread processor (no hyperthreading) from Intel's Core Ultra Series 2. It has a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The chip is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The architecture is Arrow Lake, specifically Arrow Lake-S.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, providing a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU is designed for the Intel Socket 1851 and features 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. It also includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The TDP is a low 35 watts, and the CPU supports ECC memory. The launch MSRP is $549.

Benchmark results confirm its high-end status. In Cinebench R23, it scores 33573 in multi-core and 4739 in single-core. Passmark tests show strong results in integer math (132433), floating point math (137923), and extended instructions (27477). Its average benchmark score of 51310 places it 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900T and 1.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT. This data shows a CPU that excels in both multi-threaded productivity and single-threaded responsiveness, making it a top-tier choice for demanding desktop workloads.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows available for this exact CPU and GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, any discussion of frame rates is estimated from the benchmark scores, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893, which is in the 18th percentile, gaming performance is expected to be poor. The RTX 4010's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are significant bottlenecks for modern game titles. At 1080p with high settings, the system will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS in many games, and it will be necessary to lower settings to medium or low to achieve playable frame rates. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be severely overburdened, and gaming will not be a viable option. The CPU's high single-core performance will not help in this scenario, as the GPU will be the limiting factor. This system is not designed for gaming, and the estimated performance is in line with an entry-level graphics solution.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds