SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC. This is a notably power-efficient design, with a 35 W TDP that places it in a class of processors typically reserved for compact or thermally constrained systems, yet it retains a 5.40 GHz boost clock and a 1.40 GHz base clock. The chip integrates 36 MB of shared L3 cache, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 192 KB of L1 per core, with dual-channel DDR5 memory support delivering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is present, which matters for workstation reliability.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that punches well above its power envelope. In Cinebench R23, the 285T scores 33,573 in multi-core and 4,739 in single-core. The multi-core figure is strong enough to place the chip in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly nine out of ten processors in the database. The single-core score of 4,739 is competitive for tasks that rely on lightly threaded performance, such as everyday responsiveness and many gaming workloads. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 14,100 multi-core and 1,990 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 3,384 multi-core and 477 single-core. These numbers indicate consistent scaling across different Cinebench versions, with the multi-core advantage being the standout feature.

PassMark results add further detail. The multithread score of 39,931 is strong, while single-thread performance sits at 4,576. Integer math scores 132,433 and floating-point math scores 137,923, showing balanced arithmetic throughput. Data compression scores 384,140, which is exceptionally high and suggests the chip excels at archiving, file compression, and database workloads. Data encryption at 32,061 and extended instructions at 27,477 indicate solid cryptographic and SIMD performance. Physics simulation scores 2,842, and random string sorting scores 47,695. The average benchmark score of 51,310 places the chip in a competitive position relative to its nearest rivals.

Comparing to the nearest rivals, the 285T is 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900T (avg score 51,015), 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13850HX (50,761), and 1.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (50,718). It trails the Intel Core i9-13900F (51,730) by 0.8%. These deltas are all within a couple of percent, meaning the 285T is effectively performance-adjacent to a range of high-end desktop and mobile chips, but it does so at a dramatically lower 35 W TDP than most of those rivals. The 14900T is also a low-power part, but the 285T's 24 cores at 24 threads (no hyperthreading) shows that Arrow Lake's architectural efficiency carries the load.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The single-core score of 4,739 in Cinebench R23 and 4,576 in PassMark single-thread indicate that the 285T can drive high-refresh gaming workloads, but the GPU pairing (RTX 3090) will be the primary determinant of frame rates at high resolutions. At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's 91st percentile standing ensures it will not be a bottleneck in most titles, though the 35 W TDP may limit sustained boost behavior in prolonged gaming sessions compared to higher-TDP chips.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 24 threads, combined with a strong PassMark multithread score of 39,931, provide ample headroom for encoding and simultaneously playing games. The data encryption score of 32,061 also suggests that stream encryption overhead will be minimal. The chip's 91st percentile position means it handles the multi-tasking load of streaming software, game capture, and the game itself without significant frame drops.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 33,573 and PassMark floating-point math of 137,923 indicate strong performance in video encoding and rendering tasks. The high data compression score of 384,140 also helps with video file I/O and intermediate codecs. This chip can handle 4K timeline scrubbing and export workloads, though the 35 W TDP means export times may be slightly longer than a higher-power chip with similar core counts.

3D rendering: The multi-core Cinebench scores (33,573 in R23, 14,100 in R20, 3,384 in R15) are the key indicators here. A 1.1% lead over the i7-13850HX and a 1.2% lead over the Ryzen 9 5900XT in average score means the 285T is competitive with established rendering workhorses. For CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray, this chip will deliver solid throughput, and the 91st percentile confirms it outpaces the vast majority of installed CPUs.

Software development: PassMark integer math at 132,433 and data encryption at 32,061 are relevant for compilation, code analysis, and cryptographic operations. The 24 threads provide parallelism for build systems, and the high single-thread score of 4,576 ensures that interactive editing and IDE responsiveness remain snappy. The extended instructions score of 27,477 also indicates good SIMD support for modern compiler optimizations.

Student and office work: For this category, the 285T is overkill, but the 91st percentile means it will never feel slow. The low 35 W TDP is a benefit for campus environments where power draw and heat output matter. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a basic display output, and the ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for long-running academic computations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip, fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung. It packs 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.1M per mm². The GPU has 10,496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 82 dedicated RT cores, and AI acceleration by 328 tensor cores. The base clock is 1395 MHz with a boost clock of 1695 MHz, and the memory clock runs at 1219 MHz with an effective data rate of 19.5 Gbps.

Memory is a defining feature: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus delivers 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a massive amount of VRAM and bandwidth, making the 3090 suitable for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and GPU compute workloads that exceed the capacity of smaller cards. The pixel rate is 189.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 556.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is rated at 35.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1), which is unusual and indicates strong compute throughput for both single-precision and half-precision workloads.

The benchmark scores reflect this compute-heavy design. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the 3090 scores 5,118. Geekbench OpenCL shows 172,758, while Vulkan scores 53,927. PassMark G3D scores 26,645, and the GPU compute score is 15,356. The PassMark DirectX tests show 268 for DX9, 220 for DX11, 182 for DX10, and 110 for DX12. The G2D score is 1,063. The average benchmark score is 27,565, placing the GPU in the 73rd percentile among all GPUs. This is a strong but not top-tier position, indicating that the 3090 is a high-end card that has been surpassed by newer generations but still outperforms the majority of installed GPUs.

The nearest rivals show a tight cluster. The RTX 3090 is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (avg score 27,435) and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (27,425). It trails the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 (27,839) by 1% and the AMD Radeon RX 7800M (27,883) by 1.1%. These deltas are minimal, meaning the 3090 performs in the same band as these cards despite being an older, larger die. The 24 GB VRAM is the differentiator, as none of those rivals offer that capacity.

With a 350 W TDP and a suggested 750 W PSU, the 3090 is power-hungry. It is a triple-slot card measuring 336 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, with a 1x 12-pin power connector. Display output includes 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status is end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets a specific user: someone who needs massive CPU core counts for productivity and a GPU with large VRAM for compute or high-resolution content creation, but who is constrained by power or thermal limits on the CPU side. The 285T's 35 W TDP makes it suitable for small-form-factor or low-noise builds where a standard desktop CPU would generate too much heat, while the 3090's 24 GB VRAM is aimed at 4K gaming, 3D rendering with large scenes, machine learning model training, and video editing with high-bitrate footage.

Gamers at 4K resolution will benefit most from the 3090's VRAM and bandwidth, as the 73rd percentile GPU standing ensures solid frame rates, though the lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means estimates must be derived from the benchmark scores. Content creators working with 8K video or massive After Effects compositions will find the 24 GB VRAM indispensable, and the CPU's 91st percentile multi-threaded performance handles encoding and effects rendering concurrently. Developers building and testing large codebases will appreciate the 24 threads and high integer math score, while the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running simulations.

Students and small business workstations are a secondary audience. The low 35 W TDP CPU is efficient for always-on systems, and the integrated GPU provides a fallback if the discrete 3090 is not needed for a given task. However, the overall build is expensive and oversized for typical office workloads, so this is not a value-oriented recommendation. The 3090's end-of-life status and 350 W power draw also mean this build is for users who need the specific capabilities of this GPU rather than those seeking a balanced mainstream system.

Benchmark Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's average benchmark score is 51,310 (91st percentile), and the GPU's average benchmark score is 27,565 (73rd percentile). The combined percentile is 82, indicating that this pairing sits in the upper tier of all system combinations in the database.

The CPU's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 33,573 is the standout, placing it in the 91st percentile and within 0.8% of the i9-13900F's average score of 51,730. The single-core score of 4,739 is also respectable, suggesting that gaming performance will be driven by the GPU in most scenarios. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,118 and PassMark G3D score of 26,645 indicate solid rasterization and compute performance, though the 73rd percentile shows it is not at the very top of the GPU hierarchy anymore.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that is relatively stronger than the GPU. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile while the GPU is in the 73rd, meaning the CPU can feed the GPU in most workloads without becoming the limiting factor. The GPU's average score of 27,565 is only 0.5% ahead of the RTX 4070 Mobile and RX 6700 XT, so in pure compute terms, the 3090 is not dramatically faster than those mid-range parts despite its much larger die and VRAM. The advantage is the 24 GB capacity, not raw speed.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake-S desktop processors. This is a current-generation socket, so future upgrades within the same platform are possible, but the 285T is already at the top of the Ultra 9 tier. The chip supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for a fast NVMe SSD and a PCIe 5.0 GPU, though the RTX 3090 uses PCIe 4.0.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe 5.0 slots. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 750 W, and the CPU's 35 W TDP means total system power is dominated by the GPU at 350 W. This leaves headroom for additional drives, fans, and peripherals within the 750 W envelope. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU with higher performance per watt, as the 3090's 350 W TDP and end-of-life status make it a candidate for replacement as newer GPUs with similar or better performance become available. The CPU, being current and at the 91st percentile, does not need an immediate upgrade.

The 35 W TDP of the CPU is a key platform consideration. It allows for a compact air cooler rather than a large liquid cooler, which simplifies the build and reduces noise. The 3090, however, is triple-slot and 336 mm long, requiring a case with substantial GPU clearance and good airflow. The 1x 12-pin power connector means an adapter or a PSU with native 12-pin support is needed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is the stronger component relative to its class. At the 91st percentile, it outperforms the GPU's 73rd percentile position. This means in CPU-bound workloads — such as physics simulation (PassMark physics score of 2,842), data compression (384,140), and integer math (132,433) — the CPU will not be the limiting factor. The GPU, while capable, is not as dominant in its own percentile, so in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming or GPU compute, the 3090 will be the bottleneck.

The lack of measured FPS data means bottleneck analysis must be inferred from scores. In a typical gaming scenario at 1440p or 4K, the 3090's 73rd percentile suggests it will deliver playable frame rates, but the CPU's single-core advantage (4,739 in R23) ensures it can keep up with the GPU's frame output. The GPU's 24 GB VRAM is a buffer against VRAM-limited stuttering, but the raw FPS will be capped by the GPU's compute throughput. In productivity workloads, the CPU's 91st percentile position means the 285T will drive through multi-threaded tasks faster than the GPU can accelerate GPU-compute tasks, so the balance shifts toward the CPU being the more impactful upgrade.

The FPS scaling, if estimated from the benchmark scores, would show that the CPU's 0.6% lead over the i9-14900T and 1.1% lead over the i7-13850HX translates to negligible frame rate differences in GPU-bound games, while the GPU's 0.5% lead over the RX 6700 XT means the 3090 is not dramatically faster in pure rasterization than that mid-range card. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU in gaming, while the CPU dominates in productivity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. The CPU is a 24-core, 24-thread Arrow Lake processor with a 35 W TDP, and the GPU is a 24 GB Ampere-based card with a 350 W TDP. The combined percentile is 82, meaning this system outperforms 82% of all recorded desktop configurations in the database, though it is not in the top tier.

The CPU is the standout component, with a 91st percentile standing and an average benchmark score of 51,310. The GPU, at the 73rd percentile with an average score of 27,565, is competent but not elite by modern standards. This pairing is best described as a high-end productivity workstation with gaming capability, rather than a pure gaming rig. The 24 GB VRAM and 35 W CPU TDP make it a unique combination for users who need large memory capacity and low CPU power draw, but the GPU's end-of-life status and high power consumption are notable drawbacks. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is upper-mid to high-end, driven primarily by the CPU's exceptional multi-threaded performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile is 82, meaning this desktop configuration outperforms 82% of all recorded systems in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900T?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285T has an average benchmark score of 51,310, which is 0.6% higher than the i9-14900T's 51,015.

Q: Is the RTX 3090 faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT?

A: The RTX 3090 has an average benchmark score of 27,565, which is 0.5% higher than the RX 6700 XT's 27,425. The 3090's main advantage is its 24 GB VRAM.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it affect cooling?

A: The 285T has a 35 W TDP, which allows for a compact air cooler rather than a large liquid cooler. This is a low-power design for a 24-core processor.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3090 have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's boost clock and FP32 compute performance?

A: The GPU has a boost clock of 1695 MHz and an FP32 compute rating of 35.58 TFLOPS.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores.