SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

51,310 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pairing represents a study in contrast: a brand-new, ultra-efficient 24-core processor from Intel’s Arrow Lake generation mated to a proven but aging Ampere graphics card. The data shows a system where the CPU is the clear performance anchor, offering near-flagship compute power at a fraction of the power draw, while the GPU holds the system back in graphically intensive workloads. This is a desktop configuration that prioritizes multi-threaded throughput and platform longevity over raw gaming frame rates.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is a 24-core, 24-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, marking a significant shift for Intel. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors within a 243 mm² die. The core configuration is unique, with a base clock of just 1.40 GHz but a substantial boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The architecture relies on a hybrid design, but the data here shows 24 threads for 24 cores, meaning no hyper-threading, which is a departure from previous generations. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a multi-core powerhouse. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 33,573 points in multi-core and 4,739 in single-core. The multi-core score is exceptional, indicating that heavily threaded workloads like video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation will see massive performance. The single-core score of 4,739 is also strong, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and solid performance in lightly threaded applications. The Cinebench R20 results of 14,100 multi-core and 1,990 single-core, and R15 results of 3,384 multi-core and 477 single-core, follow the same trend, confirming consistency across benchmark versions.

The PassMark suite reinforces this profile. The multi-thread score is 39,931, with a single-thread score of 4,576. More specific workloads show the CPU’s versatility: integer math scores 132,433 and floating-point math scores 137,923. Data compression is a standout at 384,140, while data encryption scores 32,061. The processor’s average benchmark score is 51,310, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This is a top-tier result. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900T (average score 51,015) and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13850HX (average score 50,761). It trails the Intel Core i9-13900F by 0.8% (average score 51,730) and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT by 1.2% (average score 50,718). The data shows this CPU is essentially performance-equivalent to the best of the previous generation, but it does so with a 35 W TDP, making it a remarkably efficient choice. The 17,800 million transistors and 3 nm process suggest this efficiency is the primary design goal.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is a well-known entity from the Ampere generation, built on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It features 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The GPU is equipped with 46 dedicated ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores for AI acceleration. It operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz and boosts to 1725 MHz, delivering 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration allows for a pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s.

In terms of raw performance, the RTX 3070 scores 22,214 in PassMark G3D, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 17,208. The data shows it is competitive with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, which has an average score of 17,083 (a 0.7% difference). It is also closely matched with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (average score 17,037, 1% difference) and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (average score 17,019, 1.1% difference), though these are older or more specialized parts. The RTX 3070 is 1.5% behind the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (average score 17,468). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3,162, a modern test that shows its current standing. Geekbench results are 112,821 for OpenCL and 21,022 for Vulkan, showing respectable compute and API performance.

The 8 GB of VRAM is a critical limitation. While 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, the capacity will be a bottleneck in modern titles with high-resolution textures or in professional 3D rendering workloads. The 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 compute is adequate for many tasks, but the 8 GB frame buffer will cause issues in large scenes. The GPU’s 220 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU are reasonable, but its end-of-life production status indicates it is a mature product. The presence of 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores means it supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, but the 8 GB memory will limit how effectively these features can be used at higher resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data is clear: this system is CPU-dominated. The processor’s 91st percentile position and average score of 51,310 vastly outstrip the GPU’s 61st percentile and 17,208 average score. The combined percentile for the build is 76, reflecting the high performance of the CPU pulling the overall score up. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 is a figure typically associated with high-end desktop processors that consume far more power. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 22,214 is solidly mid-range.

The data indicates that for CPU-bound tasks, this system will perform exceptionally well. The 24 cores and 24 threads will tear through video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation. The PassMark data compression score of 384,140 is particularly impressive, suggesting excellent performance in file archiving and data-intensive applications. The floating-point math score of 137,923 indicates strong scientific and engineering compute capabilities. However, the GPU’s performance, while competent, is not in the same league. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,162 shows it can handle modern DX12 titles, but it is not a high-end card by current standards. The system is best described as a workstation-class CPU paired with a mid-range gaming GPU. The CPU will rarely be the limiting factor; the GPU will be the primary constraint in any graphics-heavy workload.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is the foundation for the Core Ultra Series 2. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory support is a notable feature, making this platform suitable for workstation and server applications where data integrity is critical. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest NVMe SSDs and graphics cards. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a basic display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or office tasks without a discrete GPU.

The CPU’s 35 W TDP is exceptionally low for a 24-core part. This means that the power supply requirements are minimal. The GPU, however, has a 220 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 550 W. In a full system, the power supply needs to be sized for the GPU, not the CPU. The data suggests that a quality 550 W PSU is the minimum, with more headroom recommended for overclocking or future upgrades. The CPU’s multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option, but the low TDP means it will run cool and quiet with a capable air cooler.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the RTX 3070. The CPU has enough PCIe Gen 5 lanes and performance headroom to support a significantly more powerful GPU. The platform’s support for DDR5 and ECC memory means it is future-proof on the memory front. The 36 MB of L3 cache and high boost clock of 5.40 GHz ensure that the CPU will not become a bottleneck for several GPU generations. The main limitation of the platform is the lack of an unlocked multiplier, but for most professional users and gamers, the stock performance is more than sufficient.

Who Should Build It

This system is a natural fit for professionals and power users who need massive multi-threaded compute power but do not require top-tier gaming frame rates. Content creators working with 4K video editing, 3D rendering, or complex After Effects compositions will benefit from the CPU’s 33,573 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant time savings from the 24 cores and high PassMark integer math score of 132,433. Students and researchers in engineering or scientific fields will appreciate the floating-point math performance of 137,923 and ECC memory support for data integrity.

For gamers, this build is less straightforward. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck any game, but the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking will be the limiting factor. This is a system for gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p with settings tuned to medium or high, rather than ultra. It is also a good choice for small business workstations that need to handle heavy multitasking, database work, and office productivity, where the CPU’s data compression score of 384,140 and PassMark multi-thread score of 39,931 will shine. The low 35 W TDP of the CPU makes it ideal for compact workstation builds where heat and noise are a concern.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data. All frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The RTX 3070’s PassMark G3D score of 22,214 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,162 suggest it can handle modern titles at 1080p with high settings and 1440p with medium settings. The 8 GB of VRAM will be a limiting factor in games with large texture packs, causing stuttering or texture pop-in at 1440p. The 46 RT cores allow for ray tracing at playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but the 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 compute will struggle with heavy ray tracing loads at higher resolutions.

The CPU’s high single-core score of 4,576 in PassMark and 4,739 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, with no CPU-bound stutters. In CPU-intensive games like strategy titles or simulators, the Ultra 9 285T will provide a significant advantage over older processors. However, in GPU-bound scenarios, the RTX 3070 will be the definitive bottleneck. Estimates for esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant would be in the high hundreds of FPS at 1080p, limited by the GPU. For AAA titles, 60 FPS at 1080p on high settings is a reasonable estimate, with 1440p requiring a reduction in settings to maintain that target.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The data shows the CPU at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 61st percentile, a 30-point gap. This indicates that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in any workload that relies on graphics processing. In gaming at 1080p with high settings, the RTX 3070 will likely be at or near 100% utilization, while the CPU will have significant headroom. The CPU’s 24 cores and 5.40 GHz boost clock are more than capable of feeding the GPU, but the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution.

In professional workloads, the bottleneck shifts. In 3D rendering, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 score of 33,573 will be the driving force, and the GPU will be used for viewport acceleration and final render passes. In this scenario, the RTX 3070’s 20.31 TFLOPS compute is useful but not limiting. For video editing, the CPU’s high multi-thread score will handle encoding and export, while the GPU accelerates effects and color grading. The bottleneck is workload-dependent. For gaming and real-time graphics, the GPU is the constraint. For compute and productivity, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is sufficient but not exceptional.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T a good processor for multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 and PassMark multi-thread score of 39,931 place it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, making it excellent for rendering, encoding, and compilation.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Core Ultra 9 285T and the Intel Core i9-14900T?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285T has an average benchmark score of 51,310, which is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i9-14900T’s average score of 51,015. They are effectively equivalent in performance.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3070 have and is it enough?

A: The RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming, but it may be a limiting factor for 1440p with high-resolution textures or in professional 3D rendering.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 9 285T support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the processor supports ECC memory, which is a key feature for workstations and servers where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the TDP of the Core Ultra 9 285T?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, which is exceptionally low for a 24-core processor. This allows for efficient, low-heat operation.

Q: What is a suggested power supply for this system?

A: The GPU has a suggested PSU of 550 W. The CPU’s low TDP of 35 W does not significantly add to the requirement, so a quality 550 W unit is the minimum recommendation.

Q: Is the RTX 3070 a good match for the Core Ultra 9 285T?

A: The CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU. For gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck. For professional multi-threaded workloads, the CPU will dominate and the GPU is adequate.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RTX 3070 can push high frame rates in most titles, but the 8 GB VRAM will be a wall in newer games. The CPU’s strong single-core performance ensures the frame time is consistent, but the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking means you will be adjusting settings to hit 144Hz. This is a solid 1080p high-refresh machine, not a 4K one.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 24 threads are overkill for streaming. The PassMark integer math score of 132,433 ensures that x264 encoding at faster presets will have zero impact on game performance. The GPU’s NVENC encoder can also be used, but the CPU has more than enough headroom to handle both tasks simultaneously.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,573 will make 4K timeline scrubbing and export times very fast. The RTX 3070’s 8 GB VRAM is workable for effects and color grading in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, but complex Fusion nodes or heavy Lumetri scopes may push the memory limit.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here. The 24 cores will render scenes in Blender or Cinema 4D at a rate comparable to the Intel Core i9-13900F, which it trails by only 0.8%. The GPU is less relevant for CPU-based render engines, but the RTX 3070’s 20.31 TFLOPS can be used for GPU-accelerated rendering, though the 8 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity.

Software development: The 24 cores and high PassMark multi-thread score of 39,931 make this an excellent compile machine. The data compression score of 384,140 indicates fast builds with many parallel tasks. The ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running server or simulation workloads where a memory error could be catastrophic.

Student and office work: This is massively overprovisioned for word processing and spreadsheets. The CPU’s 35 W TDP means it will be silent and cool. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU can handle basic display tasks if the RTX 3070 is removed, making this a versatile and efficient platform for any academic or business environment.