SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

83,807 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation presents an unusual hardware combination—a flagship desktop CPU with a professional mobile-class GPU. The benchmark data shows no measured FPS figures for this exact pairing, so all gaming performance analysis herein is estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores. This build sits at the 73rd percentile overall, indicating a powerful configuration that is nonetheless constrained by its GPU component.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K?

A: The CPU features 24 cores and 24 threads, meaning it has no hyperthreading. This is a significant design choice for Arrow Lake architecture, favoring physical cores over logical threads for workloads that scale with core count.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation compare to other GPUs in the database?

A: The GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, placing it exactly at the median. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed, which suggests limited comparable data points for this embedded professional part.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation?

A: The GPU has a 256-bit memory bus with GDDR6 memory running at 18 Gbps effective, yielding a total bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. This is paired with 16 GB of VRAM.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K supports ECC memory. It uses DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a total bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The build achieves a combined percentile of 73, meaning it outperforms approximately 73% of all desktop configurations in the database. This is driven primarily by the CPU's 96th percentile ranking.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the processor itself. This is separate from the GPU's interface, which uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: Is the launch MSRP of the CPU known?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a launch MSRP of $589. The GPU has no listed launch MSRP, consistent with its embedded market positioning.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming figures presented here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and component specifications. The CPU's exceptional multi-threaded performance does not directly translate to gaming FPS, which depends more heavily on single-core speed and GPU capability.

At 1080p resolution, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation's 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute should drive most titles to high frame rates, though the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it will not lead the pack. The CPU's single-core Passmark score of 5087 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2377 provide a strong foundation for frame generation, but the embedded GPU's 120W TDP and IGP slot width indicate thermal constraints typical of mobile parts.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM are adequate for high-texture gaming, but the boost clock of 1680 MHz is modest compared to desktop equivalents. The 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores support ray-traced effects and DLSS, though the lack of measured FPS data means the actual uplift cannot be quantified.

For 4K gaming, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation will likely struggle to maintain high refresh rates in demanding titles. The pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s place it in mid-range territory. The CPU's 96th percentile performance ensures no CPU-side bottleneck at any resolution, but the GPU's median percentile ranking becomes the primary limiter for 4K ultra settings.

The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 359 and multi-core score of 6494 indicate the CPU can feed frames rapidly, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests framerates will be average rather than exceptional. For competitive esports titles at 1080p, the combination should deliver smooth gameplay, but for AAA titles at higher resolutions, users should expect moderate settings to achieve playable framerates.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture using TSMC's 3 nm process node. It contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The 125W TDP is modest for a 24-core part, suggesting excellent power efficiency from the 3 nm process.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. This configuration supports the multi-threaded workloads that dominate professional applications. The 96th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms this processor's elite status, with an average benchmark score of 83807.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42522 and R20 score of 24003 demonstrate strong scaling across all 24 cores. Geekbench multi-core of 26702 and Passmark multithread of 67260 corroborate this. The Passmark data compression score of 790052 and floating point math score of 224324 indicate proficiency in scientific computing and data processing tasks.

Single-thread performance is equally impressive. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2377, R20 score of 3388, and Geekbench single-core of 2870 place it among the fastest desktop processors. The Passmark single-thread score of 5087 supports this, ensuring responsive application behavior and strong gaming performance where single-core speed matters.

The closest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus with an average score of 84003, representing a -0.2% deltaPct, meaning the 285K trails by only 0.2%. The AMD EPYC 4584PX scores 83090 with a 0.9% deltaPct advantage for the 285K, while the AMD EPYC 9135 at 82980 shows a 1% lead. The AMD EPYC 7F72 at 85072 puts the 285K at a 1.5% deficit. These margins are narrow, indicating the 285K is a top-tier performer among all processors.

The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory support makes it suitable for workstation applications where data integrity is critical. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU enable fast NVMe storage and expansion cards, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 via the chipset.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 73 reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile creates a scenario where the processor vastly outperforms the graphics card. This is a textbook CPU-heavy bottleneck for gaming workloads, where the GPU cannot fully utilize the frames the CPU can generate.

The evidence from benchmark scores is clear. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 67260 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 42522 indicate it can process game logic, physics, and AI computations rapidly. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, while respectable, place it at the median of all GPUs. For every frame the CPU can prepare, the GPU will take longer to render it.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the balance reverses. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking is irrelevant when the task relies purely on CPU compute. The 24 physical cores handle multi-threaded rendering tasks with ease, as shown by the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 6494.

The FPS scaling between resolutions demonstrates this bottleneck pattern. At low resolutions like 1080p, the CPU can prepare frames faster than the GPU can render them, making the GPU the limiting factor. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU's rendering time increases, but the gap between CPU frame preparation and GPU rendering widens further, exacerbating the GPU bottleneck.

For mixed workloads like game streaming, the balance becomes nuanced. The CPU's Passmark data encryption score of 57745 and extended instructions score of 62277 enable efficient encoding, while the GPU's tensor cores handle AI-based features. However, the GPU's median performance means streaming at high quality with gaming simultaneously will strain the GPU.

The 120W TDP of the GPU versus the 125W TDP of the CPU suggests both components have similar power envelopes, but the GPU's embedded form factor limits sustained performance. The IGP slot width indicates this is not a standard desktop GPU, potentially affecting thermal headroom in a way that amplifies the bottleneck under extended gaming sessions.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 83807, placing it at the 96th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU has no benchmark scores recorded, with an average of 0, but holds a 50th percentile position. The combined build percentile is 73, reflecting the CPU's dominance pulling up the GPU's median performance.

Specific CPU scores include Cinebench R15 multi-core of 6494 and single-core of 359, Cinebench R20 multi-core of 24003 and single-core of 3388, and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 42522 and single-core of 2377. Geekbench multi-core is 26702 with single-core at 2870. Passmark scores span data compression at 790052, data encryption at 57745, extended instructions at 62277, find prime numbers at 541, floating point math at 224324, integer math at 172379, multithread at 67260, physics at 3938, random string sorting at 94927, and single thread at 5087.

The nearest rival comparison shows the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus leading by 0.2%, with the 285K leading the AMD EPYC 4584PX by 0.9% and the AMD EPYC 9135 by 1%. The AMD EPYC 7F72 leads the 285K by 1.5%. These deltas are all within a narrow band, confirming the 285K's position at the top of the performance hierarchy.

The GPU's specifications detail an AD103 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs provide the computational foundation. Clock speeds are 930 MHz base and 1680 MHz boost, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The FP32 throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS matches FP16 at a 1:1 ratio.

The combined picture is of a workstation-class CPU paired with a professional mobile GPU. The CPU's 96th percentile performance makes it suitable for the most demanding compute tasks, while the GPU's 50th percentile ranking limits graphics-intensive workloads. This is not a balanced build for gaming, but the CPU alone justifies the platform for productivity-focused users.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU compute over GPU graphics. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 cores and Passmark integer math score of 172379, which accelerates compilation tasks. The Passmark data compression score of 790052 indicates strong performance for database operations and file archival.

Content creators working with video editing will find the CPU's multi-threaded performance valuable for rendering timelines and exporting projects. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42522 suggests fast render times for CPU-based effects and transitions. However, GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the RTX 5000 Embedded's median performance.

Students in engineering or scientific fields will benefit from the CPU's floating point math score of 224324 for simulations and numerical analysis. The ECC memory support provides data integrity for long-running computations. The 3 nm process node ensures power efficiency for prolonged workloads.

Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-threaded performance for accounting, data processing, or server roles will find the CPU's 96th percentile ranking compelling. The 125W TDP allows for compact cooling solutions, and the 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes support fast storage and networking.

Gamers at 1080p with esports titles will appreciate the CPU's single-core performance, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means frame rates will be average. This is not a build for 4K gaming or high-refresh AAA titles. Users seeking a balanced gaming rig should consider a different GPU pairing.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is based on the AD103 chip using Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU's compute capabilities include 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. It has 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The FP32 performance is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no separate FP16 acceleration.

Clock speeds are conservative for a professional embedded part: 930 MHz base and 1680 MHz boost. The memory clock of 2250 MHz translates to 18 Gbps effective. The pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s place it in the mid-range of desktop GPUs.

The 120W TDP is notably low for the performance class, enabling the IGP slot width form factor. The lack of power connectors confirms this is a bus-powered, embedded solution. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides adequate bandwidth, though it trails the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability.

The 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0, suggests this GPU performs at the median of the database. The lack of nearest rivals and measured FPS data makes precise performance comparisons difficult. For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for large scenes, but the modest compute throughput limits complex ray-traced renders.

API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern applications. The display outputs are portable device dependent, reflecting its embedded market segment. The predecessor is Ampere-MW and successor is Blackwell-MW, placing it in the professional mobile line.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory support is available, making this platform suitable for workstation environments where data reliability is paramount.

The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling ultra-fast NVMe storage and high-bandwidth expansion cards. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible but caps bandwidth at Gen 4 speeds. The platform's memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is a potential bottleneck for memory-intensive workloads, though it is standard for dual-channel DDR5.

The CPU's TDP is 125W, and the GPU's TDP is 120W, totaling 245W for the core components. No suggested PSU is listed, but the combined power draw is moderate. The GPU's IGP slot width and lack of power connectors mean it draws power solely from the PCIe slot, simplifying power supply requirements.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the GPU with a higher-percentile desktop card to balance the system. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking has headroom to drive much faster graphics cards without bottlenecking. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and DDR5 memory support future-proof the platform for several years of component upgrades.

The 3 nm process node and 125W TDP suggest the platform can accommodate higher-TDP CPUs in the future, if Intel releases them for Socket 1851. The ECC memory support and professional bias of the CPU make this a viable workstation platform. The dual-channel memory configuration, while not as wide as quad-channel server platforms, is adequate for the desktop segment.

Build Overview

This build pairs the flagship Intel Core Ultra 9 285K desktop CPU with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, a professional mobile GPU. The build class is desktop, though the GPU's embedded nature suggests a specialized or compact system. The combined percentile of 73 indicates a configuration that outperforms most desktops but is far from the top tier.

The CPU is the clear star, with a 96th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 83807. It represents Intel's top desktop offering in the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake architecture. The 24 cores and 24 threads deliver exceptional multi-threaded performance, while the 5.70 GHz boost clock ensures strong single-threaded responsiveness.

The GPU is the weak link, sitting at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores. Its 32.69 TFLOPS and 16 GB VRAM are respectable for professional mobile use, but they lag behind desktop GPUs in the same price class. The 120W TDP and IGP form factor indicate thermal and power constraints that limit sustained performance.

Overall, this is a workstation-oriented build where CPU compute dominates. The 73rd percentile combined ranking reflects the GPU dragging down the CPU's elite performance. Users seeking a balanced system should consider a different GPU, while those prioritizing CPU workloads will find this configuration powerful. The build's tier is upper-midrange, driven almost entirely by the processor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core Passmark score of 5087 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2377 provide a strong foundation for high frame rates at 1080p in esports titles. However, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 1680 MHz boost clock limit performance to average levels. The 32.69 TFLOPS compute is sufficient for moderate settings, but not for maxed-out AAA games at high refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU's Passmark data encryption score of 57745 and extended instructions score of 62277 enable efficient video encoding. The 24 cores can handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously. The GPU's tensor cores support AI-based encoding features, but the median GPU performance may require reduced game settings to maintain stream quality.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42522 accelerates timeline rendering and exports. The Passmark floating point math score of 224324 supports color grading and effects processing. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM handles 4K video buffers, but the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth limits multi-stream editing. CPU-based effects will be fast, while GPU-accelerated effects will be moderate.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24 cores excel at CPU-based rendering, with Cinebench R20 multi-core of 24003 indicating fast render times. The GPU's 9728 shading units and 76 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for GPU-based renderers. The 16 GB VRAM accommodates complex scenes, but the 50th percentile GPU ranking means render times will be longer than high-end desktop GPUs.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 172379 and data compression score of 790052 accelerate compilation and build processes. The 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. ECC memory support ensures data integrity for long compilations. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking makes this an excellent development workstation, with the GPU being secondary for most coding tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance ensures responsive application usage, while the 24 cores handle multitasking across many applications. The 125W TDP allows for quiet cooling in office environments. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking is more than sufficient for standard productivity applications and web browsing. This build is overpowered for typical student and office workloads, but the CPU's efficiency makes it a capable choice for power users.