SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

98 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

83,807 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a desktop-class workstation combination that targets the 96th percentile of all system pairings. The CPU sits at the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 95th percentile among all graphics cards, making this a top-tier configuration for compute-heavy tasks. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed below are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC with 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² die. This is a 24-core, 24-thread processor with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, using Intel Socket 1851. The core configuration lacks hyperthreading, so thread count equals core count, which is notable for a flagship desktop part. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, providing substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

Benchmark results place this CPU firmly in the top tier. In Cinebench R23, it scores 42,522 multi-core and 2,377 single-core. The multi-core result is particularly strong, reflecting the 24 physical cores' ability to sustain heavy parallel workloads. Cinebench R20 shows 24,003 multi-core and 3,388 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 6,494 multi-core and 359 single-core. Geekbench scores of 26,702 multi-core and 2,870 single-core reinforce the pattern: this is a processor that excels when all cores are engaged but also delivers competitive single-thread performance.

The PassMark suite provides deeper insight into specific workload characteristics. Multi-threaded performance scores 67,260, while single-thread performance sits at 5,087. Integer math scores 172,379, floating-point math reaches 224,324, and extended instructions score 62,277. Data encryption scores 57,745, while data compression is much higher at 790,052, indicating strong throughput for compression algorithms. Random string sorting scores 94,927, and physics processing scores 3,938. The find prime numbers test is comparatively low at 541, suggesting that this architecture does not prioritize that specific integer workload.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 9 285K averages 83,807 points. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus scores 84,003, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the 285K is essentially tied with its newer sibling. AMD EPYC 4584PX scores 83,090, putting the 285K 0.9% ahead. AMD EPYC 9135 scores 82,980, a 1% advantage for the 285K. AMD EPYC 7F72 scores 85,072, meaning the 285K trails by 1.5%. These are all server-class processors, so the 285K's competitive position against them in average benchmark score is remarkable for a desktop part.

For real workloads, the 24 cores with 3 MB L2 per core translate to excellent multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, and compilation performance. The 36 MB shared L3 helps with data-heavy applications that reuse working sets. The 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth is a potential constraint for memory-bound tasks, but it is adequate for most desktop workloads. The processor supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop chip and valuable for workstation stability.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU combination. All gaming figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay testing. The data is clearly marked as not measured, so treat these frame rate expectations as approximations based on component capability.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation's Geekbench Vulkan score of 123,842 and OpenCL score of 146,593 indicate strong compute throughput that should translate to solid gaming performance. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 417.6 GTexel/s texture rate suggest it can handle modern titles at high settings. The 20 GB GDDR6 memory with 360.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity for large textures and high-resolution assets.

At 1080p, this combination should deliver high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU's strong single-core performance (2,377 Cinebench R23 single-core, 5,087 PassMark single-thread) preventing bottlenecks in CPU-bound scenarios. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor, but the 95th percentile GPU score suggests it can maintain playable frame rates in demanding games. At 4K, the 20 GB VRAM capacity becomes advantageous for texture-heavy titles, but the 160-bit memory bus and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios.

The lack of measured data means we cannot specify exact FPS figures. However, the component scores indicate this system should handle high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K gaming possible but potentially requiring settings adjustments in the most demanding titles. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores suggest strong ray tracing and DLSS performance, though specific frame rates depend on the game and settings.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses the AD104 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 35,800 million transistors across a 294 mm² die. This gives a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 2175 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 20 GB GDDR6 memory sits on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute resources include 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The 48 RT cores handle ray tracing workloads, while 192 tensor cores accelerate AI and deep learning tasks. Pixel rate reaches 139.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate hits 417.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 26.73 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), meaning no half-rate penalty for FP16 workloads.

The GPU's benchmark scores are strong. Geekbench OpenCL scores 146,593, and Vulkan scores 123,842. The average benchmark score is 135,218, placing it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. Nearest rivals show tight competition: the NVIDIA A10M scores 135,230 (0% delta), AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 (-0.1%), AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135,774 (-0.4%), and AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136,472 (-0.9%). This places the RTX 4000 Ada Generation essentially at parity with its closest competitors, all within a 1% band.

For rendering workloads, the 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 performance is substantial. The 20 GB VRAM is well-suited for large scenes, high-resolution textures, and multi-model assemblies. The 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing for realistic lighting and reflections in DCC applications. The 192 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features like denoising and upscaling in supported software. The 360.0 GB/s bandwidth is a potential limitation for very large datasets, but it is adequate for most professional workflows.

The single-slot design with a 130 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU makes this a power-efficient option for workstations. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups. PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for most applications, though the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes could theoretically offer more.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The system sits at the 96th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 96th percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 95th percentile among all graphics cards.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus?

A: The 285K averages 83,807 points compared to the 290K Plus's 84,003, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the two processors are effectively tied in average benchmark score.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and it also supports ECC memory for error-correcting workloads.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4000 Ada Generation have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the power draw of the GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The GPU has a 130 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 300 W.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing user-controlled overclocking within the limits of the platform and cooling.

Q: What is the production status of both components?

A: Both the CPU and GPU are marked as Active in production status, meaning they are currently available and supported.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 83,807, placing it at the 96th percentile. Its strongest results are in Cinebench R23 multi-core (42,522), Geekbench multi-core (26,702), and PassMark multi-thread (67,260). Single-core performance is also strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 2,377 and PassMark single-thread at 5,087. The GPU's average benchmark score is 135,218, at the 95th percentile. Geekbench OpenCL scores 146,593, and Vulkan scores 123,842.

The combined picture is a system that excels in multi-threaded CPU workloads and general GPU compute. The CPU's 24 cores deliver 42,522 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is a strong indicator for 3D rendering and video encoding. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports heavy compute tasks in scientific and engineering applications. The 96th combined percentile confirms this is a top-tier configuration, though the lack of measured gaming data means its gaming performance is inferred rather than verified.

The nearest rival comparisons show tight competition at both the CPU and GPU level. The CPU is within 1.5% of all four nearest rivals, and the GPU is within 0.9% of its nearest rivals. This indicates that neither component has a decisive advantage over its closest alternatives, but both are firmly in the upper echelon of available hardware.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need high-end desktop compute performance across CPU and GPU workloads. Gamers at 1440p or 4K will benefit from the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 95th percentile score, though the lack of measured FPS data means expectations should be tempered. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU's 42,522 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the 24 cores and 24 threads, with PassMark multi-thread at 67,260 indicating efficient parallel compilation. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the system capable for coursework and research projects, though the ECC memory support suggests a workstation focus. Small business workstations requiring reliable, high-throughput compute for simulation, data analysis, or design work will find the combination suitable.

The 20 GB VRAM is particularly useful for professionals working with large datasets in machine learning or scientific visualization. The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features in supported applications. The single-slot GPU design with 130 W TDP makes it feasible to build a compact workstation without exotic cooling.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are well-matched in their respective percentiles, with the CPU at 96 and the GPU at 95. This near-parity suggests neither component dramatically outclasses the other, creating a balanced system for mixed workloads. However, the nature of the bottleneck depends on the specific task.

For CPU-bound workloads like code compilation or spreadsheet calculations, the 24 cores provide ample headroom, and the GPU will not be the limiting factor. The PassMark integer math score of 172,379 and floating-point math of 224,324 indicate strong general-purpose compute. For GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or machine learning inference, the 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 20 GB VRAM become the primary resources, and the CPU will likely wait on the GPU.

In gaming scenarios, the balance depends on resolution and settings. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-core performance (5,087 PassMark single-thread) should prevent bottlenecking, but the GPU may not be fully utilized. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with its 360.0 GB/s bandwidth and 160-bit bus potentially limiting performance in bandwidth-intensive titles. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the component scores support this interpretation.

The memory subsystem presents a potential bottleneck for both components. The CPU's dual-channel DDR5 at 102.4 GB/s is modest for a 24-core processor, potentially limiting performance in memory-bandwidth-heavy workloads. The GPU's 360.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate but not exceptional for its class. Users with memory-intensive workloads should be aware of these constraints.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) platform. The socket supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with ECC capability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the GPU does not take full advantage of the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability. This means there is headroom for future PCIe Gen 5 devices like high-speed NVMe storage.

The GPU has a 130 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 300 W, which is modest for a workstation-class GPU. The single 16-pin power connector is standard for modern GPUs. The GPU's successor is listed as Blackwell PRO W, indicating an upgrade path within NVIDIA's professional lineup. The predecessor is Workstation Ampere, showing the generation progression.

A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with higher memory bandwidth or more VRAM for larger datasets, or a CPU with more PCIe Gen 5 lanes for additional high-speed peripherals. The platform supports ECC memory, so upgrading to higher-capacity ECC DDR5 modules would benefit stability-sensitive workloads. The unlocked multiplier on the CPU allows overclocking to extract additional performance without changing hardware.

The 300 W suggested PSU is surprisingly low for this combination, suggesting that the system has significant power headroom for additional components or overclocking. The CPU's 125 W TDP combined with the GPU's 130 W TDP totals 255 W, leaving room for other components within the suggested PSU rating.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, a 24-core Arrow Lake processor on Socket 1851, with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, a workstation GPU based on Ada Lovelace architecture. The CPU is the flagship of the Core Ultra Series 2, while the GPU is a professional-grade card in the GeForce 40-series family.

The combined percentile of 96 places this system in the top 4% of all configurations. The CPU's 96th percentile and GPU's 95th percentile indicate near-flagship performance in both compute and graphics. The system is designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads and professional GPU compute, rather than pure gaming performance, though it should handle gaming adequately based on component scores.

The build class is desktop, confirming this is a stationary workstation rather than a mobile or compact system. The GPU's single-slot design and 245 mm length make it compatible with most desktop cases, and the 300 W suggested PSU keeps system power requirements manageable. The overall tier is high-end, suitable for professional and enthusiast use cases.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's 5,087 PassMark single-thread score should drive high frame rates, while the GPU's 95th percentile score supports smooth gameplay. At 4K, the 20 GB VRAM helps with large textures, but the 360.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in the most demanding titles. These are estimates, as no measured FPS data exists.

Streaming: The 24-core CPU can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously, with PassMark multi-thread at 67,260 indicating ample headroom. The GPU's 192 tensor cores could accelerate AI-based encoding features, though specific streaming performance depends on software implementation.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 42,522 supports fast rendering and export times in editing software. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading, while 20 GB VRAM handles large timelines and high-resolution previews.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-core score and the GPU's 48 RT cores provide strong performance for CPU-based and GPU-accelerated rendering. The 20 GB VRAM allows for complex scenes without out-of-core memory swapping, and the 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 throughput speeds up final frame renders.

Software development: The 24 cores and 24 threads compile large codebases efficiently, with PassMark integer math at 172,379 indicating strong integer performance. The ECC memory support ensures data integrity during long build processes, and the 36 MB L3 cache speeds up repeated access to compilation data.

Student and office work: For general productivity, the CPU's single-core performance and the GPU's compute capability handle spreadsheets, documents, and presentations with ease. The system is overkill for basic office tasks, but it provides headroom for engineering software, statistical analysis, or programming assignments that require more compute power.