SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

83,807 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

This desktop build pairs Intel's flagship Arrow Lake-S processor with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4080 SUPER, landing at the 91st percentile overall among all component combinations in the database. The CPU holds the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, making this a high-tier pairing with substantial headroom in both compute and rendering workloads. Notably, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct testing data.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 243 mm² containing 17,800 million transistors. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB of L3 cache. This is the flagship of the Core Ultra Series 2, and it supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop parts.

Benchmark results place this CPU firmly in the top tier. In Cinebench R23, it scores 42,522 points in multi-core and 2,377 points in single-core. The R20 results show 24,003 multi-core and 3,388 single-core, while R15 yields 6,494 multi-core and 359 single-core. Geekbench reports 26,702 multi-core and 2,870 single-core. The multi-core numbers suggest exceptional throughput for heavily threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing. The single-core scores indicate strong responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks such as gaming, web browsing, and office applications.

The PassMark suite adds more texture. The multithread score is 67,260, while single-thread comes in at 5,087. Integer math hits 172,379, floating point math reaches 224,324, and extended instructions score 62,277. Data encryption scores 57,745, data compression hits 790,052, and random string sorting reaches 94,927. Physics simulation scores 3,938, and finding prime numbers scores 541. These numbers suggest the 285K excels at both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads, with particular strength in compression tasks where the 790,052 score is exceptionally high.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 285K trails the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus by 0.2%, leads the AMD EPYC 4584PX by 0.9%, leads the AMD EPYC 9135 by 1%, and trails the AMD EPYC 7F72 by 1.5%. The average benchmark score is 83,807, which is within a narrow band of the competition. This means the 285K is effectively performance-equivalent to those server-class chips in aggregate, though the architectural differences will show in specific workloads. The 96th percentile ranking across all CPUs confirms that this processor is in the top 4% of everything in the database.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The 285K uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the LGA 1851 platform designed for Arrow Lake desktop processors. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory support is included, which is a notable feature for workstation builds that require error correction. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU, which provides substantial bandwidth for the latest NVMe storage and high-end graphics cards.

The integrated graphics is Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, which provides a fallback display output and basic acceleration without a discrete GPU. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is possible for users who want to extract additional performance. The launch MSRP is $589.

For the GPU, the RTX 4080 SUPER has a TDP of 320 W, and the suggested PSU is 700 W. This gives a reasonable estimate of the total system power draw. The CPU's 125 W TDP plus the GPU's 320 W TDP means the rest of the system has roughly 255 W of headroom within the 700 W suggestion, which should cover motherboard, RAM, storage, and fans without excessive stress. A sensible next upgrade path would involve adding more DDR5 memory to exploit the dual-channel bandwidth fully, or adding Gen 5 NVMe storage to utilize the 20 PCIe lanes. The platform supports future Arrow Lake-S processors on the same socket, though no specific upgrade options are listed in the data.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is built on the AD103 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture at a 5 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 379 mm² containing 45,900 million transistors. The transistor density is 121.1M per mm². It has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s. The base clock is 2295 MHz, the boost clock is 2550 MHz, and the memory clock is 1438 MHz with 23 Gbps effective speed.

The GPU contains 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units. It has 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The pixel rate is 285.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 816.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 52.22 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 52.22 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Benchmark results show a passmark G3D score of 34,245, which places it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6,600. Geekbench OpenCL scores 219,065, and Vulkan scores 260,075. The passmark GPU compute score is 19,822. DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 193, 301, and 134 respectively, while DirectX 9 scores 381. The G2D score is 1,270, which handles 2D tasks. The average benchmark score is 54,209.

Compared to rivals, the RTX 4080 SUPER trails the RTX 4080 by 0.1%, leads the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X by 1.1%, leads the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 2.7%, and leads the AMD Radeon 8060S by 2.8%. The deltaPct values show that this GPU is effectively at parity with the non-SUPER RTX 4080, which makes sense given the architecture. The 86th percentile ranking means the 4080 SUPER is in the top 14% of all GPUs, a strong position for 1440p and 4K gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a well-balanced pairing with the CPU slightly ahead of the GPU in percentile terms. The CPU's 96th percentile versus the GPU's 86th percentile creates a situation where the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression, encryption, or physics simulation, the 285K will not hold back the system. In GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the RTX 4080 SUPER will be the limiting factor, but not by a dramatic margin.

The CPU's multi-core score of 42,522 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic without bottlenecking at typical frame rates. The single-core score of 2,377 in Cinebench R23 is strong for gaming, where many titles rely on a few threads. The GPU's 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance suggests it can handle heavy pixel and compute workloads, while the 80 RT cores provide dedicated ray tracing hardware.

The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s for the CPU pairs with 736.3 GB/s for the GPU, so the GPU has much faster access to its own memory, which is expected. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface without bottlenecking. The system is balanced for mixed usage: CPU-heavy tasks like compiling code or video encoding will use the 285K's 24 threads fully, while GPU-heavy tasks like 4K gaming will push the 4080 SUPER to its limits. The bottleneck shifts based on workload, which is a healthy characteristic.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1440p or 4K, this pairing is well-suited. The CPU's single-core performance at 2,377 in Cinebench R23 and 5,087 in PassMark single-thread ensures high frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios, while the GPU's 86th percentile rank provides the raw rasterization power for demanding titles. The 16 GB of VRAM is ample for high-resolution textures and modern game assets.

For streaming, the combination works effectively. The CPU's 24 threads can handle encoding workloads simultaneously with gameplay, and the GPU's 320 tensor cores support AI-based features that can offload encoding tasks. The passmark data compression score of 790,052 suggests fast handling of stream buffers, while the encryption score of 57,745 indicates secure streaming protocols run without significant overhead.

For video editing, the CPU is the star. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,522 handles timeline scrubbing and export rendering quickly, while the GPU's 52.22 TFLOPS accelerates effects and color grading. The 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 4K video timelines with multiple layers of effects. The CPU's ECC memory support adds stability for long render sessions.

For 3D rendering, the CPU and GPU complement each other. CPU-based renderers will use all 24 threads and the 36 MB of L3 cache effectively, while GPU-based renderers will use the 10,240 shading units and 80 RT cores. The passmark floating point math score of 224,324 indicates strong numerical throughput for physics simulations and ray tracing calculations on the CPU side.

For software development, the CPU's 24 threads handle parallel compilation jobs efficiently. The passmark integer math score of 172,379 shows strong performance for code compilation and static analysis. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for large codebases, and the 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth supports heavy database operations. The GPU is less relevant here but can accelerate testing or machine learning workloads.

For student and office work, this system is overkill but not unwieldy. The CPU's single-core performance ensures snappy responsiveness in office software, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The 125 W TDP is manageable for a desktop system, and the overall build class is desktop, so it fits in a standard workstation form factor.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K sits at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 83,807.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4080 SUPER have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and the suggested PSU wattage?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 320 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K supports ECC memory, which is notable for a desktop processor.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER is at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,209.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus?

A: The 285K trails the 290K Plus by 0.2% in average benchmark score, making them effectively performance-equivalent.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build combination ranks at the 91st percentile overall among all component pairings in the database.

Who Should Build It

This system targets enthusiasts and professionals who need top-tier CPU performance with strong GPU capabilities. Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit from the CPU's strong single-core score of 5,087 in PassMark and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking, which handles high-resolution textures and ray tracing with 80 RT cores. Content creators editing 4K video will use the 24 CPU threads and the GPU's 52.22 TFLOPS for effects and rendering. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the integer math score of 172,379 and the 36 MB L3 cache. Students in engineering or data science fields will find the ECC memory support and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth useful for simulations. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or database workloads will use the 24 threads and the data compression score of 790,052. The build class is desktop, so it suits a fixed workstation setup rather than portable use.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K CPU and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER GPU. The CPU is from the Core Ultra Series 2 based on Arrow Lake, while the GPU is from the GeForce 40-series based on Ada Lovelace. The combined percentile is 91, placing this build in the top 9% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is at the 96th percentile and the GPU is at the 86th percentile, so this is a high-tier system with the processor slightly ahead of the graphics card. This pairing is designed for users who want maximum CPU throughput for productivity while retaining excellent GPU performance for gaming and rendering.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 83,807, with a 96th percentile ranking. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 42,522 and single-core at 2,377, Geekbench multi-core at 26,702 and single-core at 2,870, and PassMark multithread at 67,260 with single-thread at 5,087. The GPU's average benchmark score is 54,209, with an 86th percentile ranking. Key scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 6,600, PassMark G3D at 34,245, Geekbench Vulkan at 260,075, and OpenCL at 219,065. The combined picture is a system with exceptional multi-threaded CPU performance that leads its nearest rivals by up to 1% or trails by up to 1.5%, and a GPU that is within 0.1% of the RTX 4080 and leads other rivals by up to 2.8%. This is a balanced, high-performance build where neither component significantly overshadows the other.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores. At 1440p, the GPU's 86th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-core score of 5,087 in PassMark suggest high frame rates in most titles, with the 16 GB VRAM handling large textures. At 4K, the GPU will be the primary limiter, but the 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth indicate playable frame rates in demanding games. For competitive titles at 1080p, the CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2,377 will drive high refresh rates, while the GPU's 320 tensor cores enable DLSS for additional performance headroom. Ray-traced games will use the 80 RT cores, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,600 suggests solid DirectX 12 performance. These are estimates, not measured results, so actual frame rates may vary depending on the title and settings.