SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

83,807 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is an Ampere-architecture GPU built on Samsung's 8 nm process, packing 17,400 million transistors across a 392 mm² die. Its memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. With 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, the card is positioned as a high-throughput part for its class.

The RTX 3070's compute capabilities are anchored by 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-driven features like DLSS. The GPU achieves 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and an identical 20.31 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1 ratio), meaning it processes single-precision and half-precision workloads at the same rate — a notable trait for mixed-precision rendering pipelines. Pixel fill rate is 165.6 GPixel/s, while texture fill rate reaches 317.4 GTexel/s. The card operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz and boosts to 1725 MHz, with a 220 W TDP that suggests a dual-slot cooler is adequate.

Benchmark scores for the RTX 3070 reveal its rendering strengths. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3162. Geekbench OpenCL returns 112821, while Vulkan scores 21022. Passmark results show a G3D score of 22214, a GPU compute score of 11195, and DirectX 12 performance at 85. These numbers indicate strong rasterization throughput but comparatively modest compute scaling. The GPU's percentile rank against all GPUs is 61, placing it in the upper-middle tier.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the RTX 3070's average benchmark score of 17208 sits just 0.7% below the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17083), meaning the two trade blows within noise margins. It is 1% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037) and 1.1% faster than the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019), while trailing the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17468) by 1.5%. These deltas are small, suggesting the RTX 3070 holds its ground against both older multi-GPU flagships and newer mid-range parts.

For rendering workloads, the data shows a balanced profile. The DirectX 12 score of 85 and DirectX 11 score of 182 indicate that modern APIs are handled competently, though the gap between them hints that driver overhead may be less optimal in DX12 titles. The RT cores and tensor cores do not appear in raw benchmark scores, but their presence means ray-traced effects and AI upscaling are hardware-supported, which is critical for contemporary games. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p texture streaming, though 8 GB of VRAM may constrain ultra-quality textures at higher resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pairing yields a combined percentile rank of 79 across all desktop configurations. This is a strong result, indicating that the system outperforms roughly four-fifths of benchmarked builds. However, the CPU and GPU percentile positions differ markedly: the CPU sits at the 96th percentile, while the GPU is at the 61st percentile. This disparity is central to understanding the platform's overall character.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 83807, with nearest rivals being the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus at 84003 (-0.2% delta), the AMD EPYC 4584PX at 83090 (+0.9%), the AMD EPYC 9135 at 82980 (+1%), and the AMD EPYC 7F72 at 85072 (-1.5%). These deltas are all within roughly 1.5%, meaning the 285K trades places with enterprise-class EPYC processors depending on the workload mix. The 285K leads the EPYC 4584PX and EPYC 9135 by less than a percentage point, but falls slightly behind the Ultra 9 290K Plus and EPYC 7F72.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 17208, as detailed in the previous section. Its nearest rivals show a similar clustering: the RX 7600 XT is 0.7% slower, the GTX 690 is 1% slower, the HD 7970M is 1.1% slower, and the Tesla K40c is 1.5% faster. This tight grouping means the RTX 3070's performance envelope is well-established, with no single competitor dominating it by more than 1.5%.

The combined picture is one of asymmetry. The CPU is a top-tier part that can drive heavy multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU is a mid-range component that will cap frame rates in graphically intensive scenarios. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression or encryption, the 285K will show its 96th-percentile strength. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions, the RTX 3070's 61st-percentile position will be the limiting factor. This is not a balanced build, but it is a coherent one: the CPU provides headroom for future GPU upgrades without becoming a bottleneck itself.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process. It contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The TDP is 125 W, and the chip uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform. It supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is enabled — a feature uncommon in mainstream desktop CPUs. PCIe Gen 5 is supported with 20 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement favors workloads with high locality and frequent data reuse. The CPU is unlocked for overclocking, though the data does not specify how far it can be pushed.

Benchmark scores for the 285K are uniformly strong. Cinebench R15 multicore yields 6494, single-core 359. Cinebench R20 multicore hits 24003, single-core 3388. Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 42522, single-core 2377. Geekbench multicore scores 26702, single-core 2870. Passmark results include multithread at 67260, single-thread at 5087, floating-point math at 224324, integer math at 172379, and extended instructions at 62277. Data compression scores 790052, data encryption 57745, random string sorting 94927, physics 3938, and prime number finding 541.

These numbers indicate a processor that excels at both single-threaded responsiveness and multi-threaded throughput. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2377 places it among the fastest desktop chips for lightly-threaded tasks. The multicore score of 42522 is roughly 18 times the single-core figure, suggesting near-perfect scaling across the 24 cores — though the lack of Hyper-Threading (24 threads for 24 cores) means each core does the work directly.

For real workloads, the 285K is formidable. Data compression at 790052 points reflects strong integer performance, which matters for file archiving and database operations. Floating-point math at 224324 supports scientific computing and financial modeling. The extended instructions score of 62277 indicates robust SIMD throughput for vectorized code. The physics score of 3938 is lower in absolute terms but still positions the CPU well above mainstream parts. The 96th-percentile rank against all CPUs confirms that this is a flagship-level processor, rivaling server-class EPYC chips within 1.5% in average benchmark score.

The architecture's efficiency is notable: 125 W TDP for 24 cores on a 3 nm process is a favorable power-to-performance ratio, though the data does not provide direct comparison figures. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for dual-channel DDR5, but it is not extraordinary — the 36 MB L3 cache helps mitigate bandwidth pressure in many workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core Ultra 9 285K and RTX 3070 is heavily skewed toward CPU performance. The CPU's 96th-percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st-percentile ranking creates a clear hierarchy: the CPU will almost never be the limiting factor in any workload, while the GPU will frequently cap performance in graphics-intensive scenarios.

In CPU-bound tasks, the 285K's 42522 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 67260 Passmark multithread score mean it can handle compilation, rendering, and simulation workloads without breaking a sweat. The GPU's role in these tasks is secondary — its 11195 GPU compute score in Passmark suggests it can assist with OpenCL-accelerated tasks, but the CPU will dominate.

In GPU-bound tasks, the RTX 3070's 22214 Passmark G3D score and 3162 3DMark Steel Nomad score determine the ceiling. For gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the GPU is the primary driver of frame rates. The CPU's single-core score of 5087 in Passmark ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles, as it can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them. However, at 4K or with ray tracing enabled, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 61st-percentile performance will be the constraint.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means bottleneck analysis must rely on percentile deltas. The 35-percentage-point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles is large enough to conclude that the GPU is the bottleneck in gaming, while the CPU is the bottleneck in compute-heavy non-graphics workloads. In mixed workloads — such as game streaming while encoding — the CPU's 24 threads can handle both game logic and encoding, while the GPU handles rendering, but the GPU's mid-range position will still limit overall quality settings.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need extreme CPU performance but are willing to compromise on GPU capability. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will benefit from the CPU's high single-thread performance, which ensures consistent frame pacing even in CPU-heavy titles. The RTX 3070's 61st-percentile performance is sufficient for high refresh rates at these resolutions, though not for maxed-out settings at 4K.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will find the CPU's 24 cores and 42522 Cinebench R23 multicore score invaluable. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate preview renders and GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU will carry the load for final exports.

Students and small business workstations can leverage the CPU's 96th-percentile rank for data analysis, virtualization, and compile-heavy workloads. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations. The GPU's 220 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU mean the system can be built without exotic power delivery, making it a practical workstation choice.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 24 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3070 have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What percentile does the CPU rank at compared to all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K ranks at the 96th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 83807.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile rank, and what is its average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 3070 ranks at the 61st percentile, with an average benchmark score of 17208.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a desktop processor.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, indicating the system outperforms roughly 79% of all benchmarked desktop configurations.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The RTX 3070 has a suggested PSU of 550 W, with a GPU TDP of 220 W.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3070's 22214 Passmark G3D score and 3162 3DMark Steel Nomad score support 1080p and 1440p gaming at high frame rates. The CPU's 5087 Passmark single-thread score ensures no bottleneck in CPU-bound titles, making this a solid 144Hz-capable system at 1080p.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 42522 Cinebench R23 multicore score can handle game encoding via x264 while gaming, freeing the GPU for rendering. The GPU's 184 tensor cores also support NVENC-like acceleration, though the data does not specify encoder details.

Video editing: The CPU's 224324 floating-point math score and 790052 data compression score accelerate codec processing and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 112821 Geekbench OpenCL score aids in GPU-accelerated effects, though its 8 GB VRAM may limit 4K multi-stream editing.

3D rendering: The CPU's 96th-percentile rank makes it a rendering powerhouse, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 42522. The GPU's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance can handle viewport rendering, but final-frame renders will favor the CPU unless using a GPU-accelerated renderer that fits within 8 GB VRAM.

Software development: The CPU's 24 threads and 67260 Passmark multithread score speed up compilation, testing, and virtualization. The GPU's compute capability (11195 Passmark GPU compute) supports OpenCL-based development and machine learning inference, though training large models would exceed VRAM.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU's 2870 Geekbench single-core score ensures snappy application launches. The ECC memory support adds data integrity for research computing, while the 220 W GPU TDP keeps power requirements modest for a workstation environment.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 — a combination that offers ample bandwidth for current and near-future components. The platform supports ECC memory, which is valuable for workstation use.

The GPU's 220 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate that the current power delivery is sufficient, but a sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with higher performance and similar or lower power draw. The CPU's 125 W TDP leaves headroom in the PSU for a more powerful GPU, though the data does not specify a maximum recommended PSU for the CPU.

Memory expansion is straightforward via the dual-channel DDR5 slots, and the 36 MB L3 cache helps mitigate bandwidth limitations. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, which could extend its useful life. A future GPU upgrade to a higher-percentile card would balance the system, as the CPU's 96th-percentile rank means it can support significantly faster graphics hardware without becoming a bottleneck.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, a 24-core desktop flagship from the Core Ultra Series 2, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, an Ampere-based mid-range GPU. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 79. The CPU is at the 96th percentile, making it one of the fastest desktop processors available, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile, representing a solid but not top-tier graphics solution.

The system is a high-CPU, mid-GPU configuration. It excels in CPU-intensive tasks like rendering, compilation, and data processing, while providing competent 1080p and 1440p gaming performance. The CPU's 83807 average benchmark score places it in the same league as enterprise EPYC processors, while the GPU's 17208 average score aligns it with mainstream RX 7600 XT-class parts. This is a workstation-first build with gaming as a secondary capability, not the reverse.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K with RTX 3070. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Based on the GPU's 22214 Passmark G3D score and 3162 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score, the RTX 3070 is capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming and solid 1440p performance in most titles. The CPU's 5087 Passmark single-thread score and 2870 Geekbench single-core score ensure that it will not limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. At 1080p ultra settings, expect frame rates in the 100-144 FPS range for esports and older titles, with 60-100 FPS for modern AAA games. At 1440p ultra, frame rates will likely drop to 50-80 FPS, depending on the title's optimization. At 4K ultra, the 8 GB VRAM and 61st-percentile GPU rank will constrain performance to 30-50 FPS in demanding games, with lower settings required for consistent 60 FPS.

Ray tracing will reduce performance significantly, as the 46 RT cores are not as numerous as those in higher-tier Ampere cards. DLSS, supported by the 184 tensor cores, can offset some of this loss through upscaling, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality when DLSS is combined with ultra settings. These are estimated figures based on benchmark scores; actual performance may vary by title and driver version.