SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

83,807 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and AMD Radeon RX 9060 represent a pairing of a top-tier flagship desktop processor with a mid-range graphics card. The CPU consistently ranks in the 96th percentile against all processors, while the GPU sits in the 59th percentile, creating a significant performance gulf. The benchmark data shows a processor designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads paired with a GPU suited for 1080p gaming and entry-level 1440p, making this a system where the CPU vastly outclasses the graphics adapter in raw compute potential.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a TSMC 3 nm process node. The chip integrates 24 cores and 24 threads, with no hyper-threading on the performance cores, operating at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The processor includes 36 MB of shared L3 cache, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 192 KB of L1 cache per core, with a total transistor count of 17,800 million on a 243 mm² die.

The benchmark results indicate an exceptional multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 42,522 in multi-core and 2,377 in single-core. This multi-core score positions the chip firmly in the top tier for rendering and compilation tasks. The single-core score of 2,377 is equally strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications. The Geekbench results reinforce this, with a multi-core score of 26,702 and a single-core score of 2,870.

The PassMark suite reveals specialized strengths. The data encryption score of 57,745 and data compression score of 790,052 suggest the chip handles cryptographic workloads and archive management with ease. Floating point math at 224,324 and integer math at 172,379 indicate robust scientific and financial computing capability. The processor sits in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 83,807. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, scores 84,003, placing the 285K just 0.2% behind. The AMD EPYC 4584PX scores 83,090, putting the 285K 0.9% ahead, and the AMD EPYC 9135 scores 82,980, making the 285K 1% faster.

The 125 W TDP is modest for a 24-core processor, suggesting strong power efficiency from the 3 nm process. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s via dual-channel DDR5 support provides ample data throughput for the core count. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU offers a basic display output capability, though discrete graphics are essential for demanding workloads.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so the following figures are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 17,631 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,322 provide a baseline, but actual frame rates remain projections.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RX 9060 is expected to deliver high frame rates in most titles, given the GPU's 59th percentile ranking. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 2,377 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the processor will not be a limiting factor in most games. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p textures, though heavier titles may approach VRAM limits.

At 1440p, performance will likely drop to playable but less consistent levels. The RX 9060’s 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides adequate raw compute, but the 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB VRAM cap the resolution scaling. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, scores 16,129, placing the RX 9060 just 0.7% ahead, suggesting similar 1440p capability.

The delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles—96 versus 59—indicates that the graphics card will be the primary determinant of frame rates in most scenarios. The CPU can easily feed the GPU, meaning frame rates will scale with GPU load rather than CPU limits. For competitive titles at 1080p with lower settings, the RX 9060 should produce very high frame rates, while demanding AAA games at ultra settings may require adjustments to maintain smooth performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 83,807 places it in the 96th percentile of all processors, a dominant position. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 16,014 places it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, representing a solid mid-range position. The combined percentile for the pairing is 78, reflecting the imbalance between the two components.

In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the GPU scores 3,322, which is a moderate result for a modern card. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,183 and Vulkan score of 39,476 show the GPU’s compute capabilities. The PassMark DirectX tests show scores of 104 for DX10, 182 for DX11, 44 for DX12, and 280 for DX9, with a G2D score of 1,002 and a G3D score of 17,631. The GPU compute score of 9,919 indicates reasonable compute performance for GPGPU tasks.

The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 67,260 and single-thread score of 5,087 demonstrate a balanced design. The physics score of 3,938 and extended instructions score of 62,277 further highlight its versatility. The nearest CPU rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, is 0.2% faster on average, making the performance difference negligible. The AMD EPYC 4584PX is 0.9% slower, and the AMD EPYC 9135 is 1% slower.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that can handle any workload thrown at it, from multi-threaded rendering to single-threaded legacy applications, paired with a GPU that can handle mainstream gaming and light compute tasks. The imbalance suggests the system is built for productivity first, with gaming as a secondary consideration.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K compare to its nearest rival in multi-core performance?

A: The 285K scores 42,522 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, has an average score 0.2% higher, while the AMD EPYC 4584PX is 0.9% lower and the AMD EPYC 9135 is 1% lower.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean for gaming?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 sits in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it performs better than 59% of graphics cards. This places it in the mid-range for gaming, suitable for 1080p at high settings and entry-level 1440p.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K supports ECC memory, which is a feature commonly required for workstation and server workloads where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU and how does it affect performance?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, which provides sufficient data throughput for its 24 cores, though it is lower than some high-end HEDT platforms.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing. All frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores.

Q: How much faster is the CPU in single-threaded tasks compared to its rivals?

A: The CPU's single-thread score in Geekbench is 2,870 and in Cinebench R23 is 2,377. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, is only 0.2% faster on average, so single-threaded performance is effectively comparable.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming but may be limiting at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-bound system in terms of raw compute, but a GPU-bound system in gaming workloads. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 59th percentile creates a massive imbalance in compute capabilities. In multi-threaded rendering or compilation tasks, the CPU will be the dominant component, with the GPU contributing only where acceleration is possible.

In gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s high single-thread performance ensures it can feed frames to the GPU without becoming a bottleneck, so frame rates will be dictated by the RX 9060’s capabilities. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance at higher resolutions, while the CPU will remain underutilized.

The PassMark physics score of 3,938 for the CPU versus the GPU compute score of 9,919 shows that the GPU handles physics calculations better, which is relevant in games with heavy particle effects. However, the CPU’s overall compute power means it will handle most non-gaming workloads without breaking a sweat. The bottleneck in this system is firmly the GPU, which limits the overall experience to what a 59th percentile card can deliver.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RX 9060’s 59th percentile ranking makes it suitable for 1080p high-refresh gaming, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in less demanding titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures no frame pacing issues, but the GPU will limit maximum frame rates in AAA titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and high PassMark multithread score of 67,260 make it an excellent encoder, capable of handling x264 encoding alongside gaming without affecting performance. The GPU’s lower compute score of 9,919 means hardware encoding will be less efficient, making CPU-based streaming the preferred method.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,522 indicates excellent timeline rendering and export performance. The GPU’s 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 throughput can accelerate effects and color grading, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit working with very high-resolution footage.

3D Rendering: With a 96th percentile CPU ranking, this system excels at CPU-based rendering. The 24 cores will produce fast render times in Blender or V-Ray. The GPU can assist in GPU-accelerated renders, but its 59th percentile ranking means it will be slower than higher-end cards.

Software Development: The Geekbench multi-core score of 26,702 suggests fast compile times for large codebases. The PassMark data encryption score of 57,745 and data compression score of 790,052 indicate efficient handling of build artifacts and git operations.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is overkill for office tasks, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 2,870 in Geekbench ensures snappy application loading. The GPU’s G2D score of 1,002 provides adequate 2D acceleration for productivity software.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for high-bandwidth storage and graphics cards. The platform supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation builds.

The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 300 W, while the CPU has a 125 W TDP, meaning a combined system load will require a power supply that can handle both components. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking means it can support any current or near-future GPU without becoming a bottleneck. Upgrading the graphics card to a higher-tier model would balance the system and unlock the CPU’s full potential in gaming. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier also allows overclocking, though the 5.70 GHz boost clock leaves limited headroom for manual tuning.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, a 24-core desktop processor ranking in the 96th percentile, with the AMD Radeon RX 9060, a mid-range desktop GPU ranking in the 59th percentile. The combined percentile is 78, reflecting a system that is heavily skewed toward CPU performance.

The CPU is a flagship product with an average benchmark score of 83,807, while the GPU scores 16,014 on average. This is a desktop class build, as indicated by the buildClass field, designed for users who prioritize compute-heavy workloads over graphics-intensive gaming. The system is best described as a professional workstation with basic gaming capability.

The imbalance between the components means the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost all graphics workloads. For users who require maximum CPU performance for rendering, compilation, or scientific computing, this pairing is reasonable, but gamers would benefit from a more balanced GPU selection.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, codenamed Strix Point, using a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Navi 44 chip contains 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, with a density of 149.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The GPU has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 28 ray tracing cores.

The GPU operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz, delivering 18 Gbps effective speed on 8 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s, with FP32 and FP16 performance both rated at 21.43 TFLOPS.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 3,322 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 88,183 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 39,476 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 17,631, with a GPU compute score of 9,919. The GPU sits in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 16,014. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, scores 16,129, placing the RX 9060 just 0.7% behind.

The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming and light 1440p use, but the 128-bit bus limits bandwidth scaling. The 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration, though the directx 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern features. The GPU supports DisplayPort 2.1a and HDMI 2.1b outputs, allowing for high refresh rate displays.

The GPU’s performance is solid for its class, but the benchmark scores show it is not a high-end card. The DirectX 12 PassMark score of 44 is notably low, suggesting potential driver optimization issues or a focus on older APIs. The G3D score of 17,631 indicates mainstream gaming capability.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for professionals and power users who require extreme CPU performance for multi-threaded workloads. Software developers will benefit from the fast compile times indicated by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,522 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 26,702. Data scientists and researchers will appreciate the PassMark floating point math score of 224,324 for numerical simulations.

Content creators working with video editing will find the CPU’s 24 cores and 36 MB L3 cache well-suited for timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU can handle light effects work, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit complex projects. 3D artists rendering with CPU-based engines will see excellent performance, though GPU rendering will be slower than with higher-end cards.

Gamers at 1080p will find the RX 9060 adequate for high-refresh gaming in esports titles, with the CPU ensuring no frame drops. Gamers at 1440p will need to adjust settings, as the GPU’s 59th percentile ranking limits performance. The system is not suitable for 4K gaming, as the 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause stuttering in demanding titles.

Students and office workers will find this system overkill, but the CPU’s single-thread performance ensures smooth multitasking. Small business workstations handling databases or financial modeling will benefit from the ECC memory support and high PassMark integer math score of 172,379. This is a system for those who need maximum CPU compute and are willing to accept mid-range graphics performance.