SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

83,807 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800

30,095 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 is a desktop build that combines a flagship 24-core processor with a capable, previous-generation graphics card. The data indicates a system with a combined performance percentile of 86, placing it in the upper tier of all benchmarked configurations. While the CPU is a top-tier performer, the GPU anchors the system at a lower percentile, creating a distinct performance profile where processor-heavy tasks will significantly outpace gaming workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is the centerpiece of this build, featuring 24 cores and 24 threads based on the Arrow Lake architecture on a 3 nm process. It operates at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and can boost up to 5.70 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. This is a desktop-class processor designed for maximum throughput, and the benchmark data confirms its position as a high-end part, sitting in the 96th percentile of all CPUs.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Core Ultra 9 285K posts formidable scores. Its Cinebench R23 multicore result of 42522 points is a strong indicator of its rendering and compute capabilities. The Geekbench multicore score of 26702 further corroborates its strength in heavily threaded applications. This level of performance is 0.9% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4584PX and 1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9135, which are server-class processors, highlighting how competitive this desktop chip is in raw throughput. The PassMark multithread score of 67260 reinforces this, showing a substantial capacity for parallel processing that will be beneficial in video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation.

Single-thread performance is equally impressive, which is crucial for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2377 and the Geekbench singlecore score of 2870 are top-tier figures. The PassMark single_thread score of 5087 supports this, indicating that the CPU can handle tasks that rely on a single core, such as older games or specific productivity tools, with excellent efficiency. The architecture provides a balanced profile, with the L3 cache of 36 MB shared across the cores helping to feed the high core count.

Beyond traditional CPU benchmarks, the data reveals strengths in specific compute tasks. The PassMark data encryption score of 57745 and the data compression score of 790052 indicate that the CPU is well-suited for archival work and secure data handling. The floating point math score of 224324 and integer math score of 172379 further demonstrate its arithmetic throughput, making it a capable processor for scientific computing and financial modeling. The extended instructions score of 62277 also suggests robust support for modern instruction sets. With an average benchmark score of 83807, it sits a mere 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, its closest rival, showing that it is at the very peak of consumer CPU performance. The unlocked multiplier also allows for tuning, although the data does not include overclocked results.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates that this is a system with a significant CPU-favored balance. The Core Ultra 9 285K sits in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, while the Radeon RX 6800 is in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. This 21-point gap in percentiles is the defining characteristic of the pairing, meaning that in most tasks, the CPU will not be the limiting factor.

In CPU-intensive workloads such as video rendering, software development, or data analysis, the CPU will be the dominant component, and the GPU will have little impact on performance. The Core Ultra 9 285K’s multicore score of 42522 in Cinebench R23 suggests that it can power through complex rendering tasks without breaking a sweat. However, in gaming, the dynamic shifts. Here, the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The RX 6800, while a solid performer, will dictate the frame rates, especially at higher resolutions where the demand on the graphics card increases.

The benchmark scores suggest that the CPU has far more headroom than the GPU can utilize. For example, the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 5087 is high enough to handle game physics and AI calculations, but the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 22067 will likely cap the frame rate in graphically intense scenes. This imbalance means that while the system can handle any CPU task with ease, its gaming performance will be constrained by the RX 6800. The data does not include FPS scaling figures, but the percentile disparity alone is sufficient to conclude that this is a CPU-overqualified, GPU-underpowered pairing for gaming. The system will not be balanced in the traditional sense; it is a workstation-class CPU paired with a mainstream gaming GPU.

Benchmark Performance

Looking at the individual benchmark scores, the CPU’s performance is exceptional, while the GPU’s is solidly mid-range. The Core Ultra 9 285K achieves a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 24003 and a single-core score of 3388, further cementing its high-end status. The Geekbench multicore score of 26702 and singlecore of 2870 show consistent performance across different testing methodologies. The PassMark data also shows an average score of 83807, placing it 0.9% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4584PX and 1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9135, but 1.5% behind the AMD EPYC 7F72.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 delivers an average benchmark score of 30095, placing it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, which it trails by 0.5%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, which it leads by 0.6%. The RX 6800 is also 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. In synthetic 3DMark tests, it scores 3188 in Steel Nomad DX12. Its PassMark G3D score of 22067 is a key indicator of its DirectX gaming performance, while its PassMark GPU compute score of 10864 shows its compute capability. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-4% performer and the GPU is a top-25% performer, resulting in an overall combined percentile of 86.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores. The data clearly shows that the Radeon RX 6800 is the limiting factor in gaming scenarios. With a PassMark G3D score of 22067, the GPU is positioned to deliver strong 1080p and 1440p performance, but it will not be able to drive high refresh rates at 4K in demanding titles.

Based on the GPU’s percentile position, which is just behind the RTX 3070 Ti, gamers can expect performance in that general range. At 1080p, the RX 6800 should provide high frame rates in most esports and less demanding titles, likely exceeding 100 FPS. In more graphically intensive AAA games, settings would need to be adjusted to maintain smooth frame rates, but 60 FPS should be achievable in most cases. At 1440p, the GPU will be challenged more, and while it can handle many games at high settings, achieving 60 FPS in the latest titles may require some graphical compromises. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is a positive for texture-heavy games at this resolution. At 4K, the RX 6800 would be the clear bottleneck, and frame rates would likely drop below 60 FPS in most modern games unless settings are significantly lowered. The CPU’s high single-thread performance ensures that it will not be a limiting factor in frame generation, allowing the GPU to reach its full potential.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The data suggests this build is not ideal for high-refresh gaming at 1440p or 4K. The RX 6800’s 75th percentile position means it will likely struggle to maintain frame rates above 144 FPS in modern titles at 1080p, and even at that resolution, it will be the bottleneck. For 1440p, achieving 144 FPS will be difficult in demanding games, requiring lower settings.

Streaming: The Core Ultra 9 285K is exceptionally well-suited for streaming. Its 24 cores and high PassMark multithread score of 67260 provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The CPU can handle the x264 encoding workload without impacting game performance, which is a significant advantage.

Video Editing: This is a prime scenario for this build. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42522 will accelerate video rendering and export times dramatically. The 16 GB of video memory on the GPU also helps with timeline scrubbing and effects, though the CPU is the primary driver of performance here.

3D Rendering: Similar to video editing, the Core Ultra 9 285K is the star of the show for 3D rendering. Its multicore performance will drastically reduce render times in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D. The GPU can assist with viewport rendering, but the CPU will handle the final frame rendering with ease.

Software Development: The CPU’s high core count and strong performance in integer math (PassMark score of 172379) make it excellent for compiling large codebases. The single-thread performance also ensures a responsive IDE. The GPU is less relevant here, making this a solid workstation for developers.

Student and Office Work: This build is massively overqualified for this scenario. The CPU’s power is wasted on word processing and web browsing, and the GPU is more than sufficient for any office application. A less powerful and more efficient system would be a better fit, as this pairing offers far more performance than these tasks require.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance percentile of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K?

A: The CPU is in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is a high-end part.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 6800 compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RX 6800 is 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile in average benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 86.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific configuration?

A: No, the data indicates that there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all FPS discussions are estimates.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU and the GPU?

A: The CPU has a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the GPU has a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP for each component?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a TDP of 125 W, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 has a TDP of 250 W.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 is 579 USD.

Who Should Build It

This system is tailored for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks over gaming. The primary audience is content creators, including video editors and 3D artists, who will benefit immensely from the Core Ultra 9 285K’s multicore power. The data shows the CPU is 0.9% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4584PX, a server chip, making it a top choice for rendering workloads. Software developers will also find this build compelling, as the high core count and integer math performance will speed up compilation times.

For gamers, this is a less obvious choice. The RX 6800 is a capable card for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it is not a top-tier GPU. Gamers who want to play at 1080p with high frame rates will find this system sufficient, but those targeting 1440p or 4K with maximum settings will be disappointed by the GPU’s performance. This build is not for budget-conscious builders, but rather for professionals who need a powerful CPU and want a decent gaming GPU on the side. It could also serve as a high-performance workstation for small businesses that run heavy computation or data analysis tasks. It is less suitable for students or office workers who do not need this level of processing power.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU also supports ECC memory, a feature important for workstation stability. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, ensuring compatibility with the latest high-speed NVMe SSDs and future expansion cards.

The most logical and significant upgrade path is the GPU. The RX 6800 is the current bottleneck, and replacing it with a more powerful graphics card would dramatically improve gaming performance. The CPU has enough headroom to support a much faster GPU, and the 600 W suggested PSU provides some room for a modest GPU upgrade, though a more powerful card might require a higher wattage PSU. The CPU itself is already at the top of its generation, so upgrading it is not necessary. A sensible next step would be to focus on the GPU to achieve a more balanced system. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5, meaning a future GPU upgrade could take advantage of the increased bandwidth, though the current RX 6800 uses PCIe 4.0.

Build Overview

This build is a high-performance desktop workstation with a gaming-capable GPU. It combines the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, a 24-core processor in the 96th CPU percentile, with the AMD Radeon RX 6800, a 16 GB GPU in the 75th GPU percentile. The pairing results in a combined percentile of 86, placing the system in the upper tier of all configurations.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is a top-of-the-line processor for its generation, with an average benchmark score of 83807, making it a leader in multi-threaded tasks. The RX 6800 is a solid mid-range to upper-mid-range GPU from the Radeon RX 6000 series, with an average score of 30095. The system is inherently unbalanced, with the CPU significantly outperforming the GPU. This makes it an excellent choice for compute-heavy workloads like rendering and development, while its gaming performance is capped by the graphics card. It is a desktop-class build that prioritizes processing power, offering exceptional performance in CPU-bound applications and competent, but not class-leading, gaming capabilities.