SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

83,807 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700

30,433 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285K + AMD Radeon RX 6700: A Flagship CPU Paired with a Mainstream GPU

This pairing combines Intel's top-tier desktop processor, the Core Ultra 9 285K, with AMD's mid-range Radeon RX 6700 graphics card, creating a system where the CPU's immense computational power vastly outstrips the GPU's rendering capabilities. The data indicates a desktop build with a combined performance percentile of 86, placing it in the upper tier of all systems. The Core Ultra 9 285K alone sits at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 6700 achieves the 75th percentile among all GPUs, a significant gap that shapes the system's overall behavior. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance discussion is framed as an estimate derived from the individual benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is the flagship of the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It features 24 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. This is a desktop-class processor with a TDP of 125 W, and its multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking. The die contains 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² area, and the cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB of L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, providing a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes and includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The processor was released on 2024-10-23 with a launch MSRP of $589.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and heavily threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 42,522 in multi-core and 2,377 in single-core. The multi-core result is particularly strong, reflecting the 24 physical cores working in concert. The single-core score of 2,377 is also competitive, indicating strong per-core performance from the Arrow Lake architecture. The Geekbench scores follow a similar pattern: 26,702 multi-core and 2,870 single-core. PassMark results further illustrate the CPU's capabilities, with a multi-thread score of 67,260 and a single-thread score of 5,087. The PassMark integer math score of 172,379 and floating-point math score of 224,324 show strong arithmetic throughput, while the data compression score of 790,052 and data encryption score of 57,745 highlight its prowess in data-intensive tasks. The extended instructions score of 62,277 indicates robust SIMD and vector processing capability.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 9 285K is tightly clustered. Its average benchmark score of 83,807 is just 0.2% below the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus (84,003), 0.9% above the AMD EPYC 4584PX (83,090), 1% above the AMD EPYC 9135 (82,980), and 1.5% below the AMD EPYC 7F72 (85,072). This places it at the 96th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. For real workloads, this translates to exceptional performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and any multi-threaded application that can utilize all 24 cores. The single-thread performance is also strong enough to handle everyday tasks and lightly threaded games with ease.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is based on the Navi 22 chip, built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using a 7 nm process. It has 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The GPU is equipped with 36 ray tracing cores, and while it has no dedicated tensor cores, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The graphics card features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), and the GPU has a base clock of 1941 MHz, a game clock of 2174 MHz, and a boost clock of 2450 MHz. It has a TDP of 175 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 450 W. The card is dual-slot, measures 267 mm in length, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. The RX 6700 is end-of-life, having been released on 2021-06-08.

Benchmark scores for the RX 6700 show a GPU that is solidly mid-range but not exceptional. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,014. Geekbench results show 122,223 in Metal, 97,841 in OpenCL, and 83,974 in Vulkan. PassMark scores include a G3D score of 18,931, a G2D score of 936, and a GPU compute score of 8,240. The DirectX 11 score of 166 and DirectX 12 score of 71 indicate moderate performance in modern APIs, while the DirectX 9 score of 250 and DirectX 10 score of 115 suggest legacy API performance. The pixel rate is 156.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 352.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 11.29 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 22.58 TFLOPS (2:1).

The RX 6700's average benchmark score is 30,433, placing it at the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are very close: the NVIDIA CMP 70HX scores 30,476 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA Tesla M60 scores 30,490 (0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 scores 30,095 (1.1% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti scores 29,945 (1.6% lower). This means the RX 6700 is essentially neck-and-neck with an RTX 3070 Ti in aggregate benchmark terms. For rendering, the 10 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though the 160-bit bus limits bandwidth compared to wider-memory cards. The 36 ray tracing cores provide some RT capability, but RDNA 2's ray tracing performance is generally not as strong as NVIDIA's Ampere architecture, so RT workloads may see lower frame rates.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is one of stark asymmetry. The CPU's average benchmark score of 83,807 places it at the 96th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 30,433 places it at the 75th percentile. The combined system percentile is 86, reflecting the CPU's dominance pulling the overall score upward. In Cinebench R23, the CPU achieves 42,522 multi-core and 2,377 single-core. The Geekbench multi-core score is 26,702, and the single-core score is 2,870. These numbers indicate a processor that is among the best available for compute-heavy tasks.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,014 and PassMark G3D score of 18,931 are respectable but not top-tier. The GPU's nearest rival, the RTX 3070 Ti, is only 1.6% behind in average score, which suggests the RX 6700 performs at a level comparable to that popular high-end card. However, the CPU's nearest rivals are enterprise-grade EPYC processors, showing that the Core Ultra 9 285K is competing with server-class silicon in multi-threaded workloads.

The combined percentile of 86 means that this system outperforms 86% of all desktop builds in the database. This is a high-ranking position, but the gap between CPU and GPU percentiles (96 vs. 75) is substantial. In a balanced system, these two percentiles would typically be closer. The benchmark data shows a system that can handle extreme computational workloads with ease but is held back in graphics-intensive scenarios by the GPU's more modest capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this build. The Core Ultra 9 285K's 96th percentile CPU performance is bottlenecked by the RX 6700's 75th percentile GPU performance in any workload that is graphics-limited. In CPU-bound tasks, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, or data processing, the system will perform at a level near the CPU's full potential, which is among the best available. In GPU-bound tasks, such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system's performance will be capped by the RX 6700.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this analysis. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,377, PassMark single-thread score of 5,087) would allow the GPU to be the limiting factor in most games. At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU's workload increases, and the RX 6700 with its 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth will become increasingly stressed, further cementing its role as the primary bottleneck. The CPU's 24 cores are unlikely to be a limiting factor in any gaming scenario, as most games utilize far fewer threads. This imbalance means that for gaming, the user is effectively getting RX 6700-level performance, while for productivity, the user is getting near-flagship CPU performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 86, meaning it outperforms 86% of all desktop builds. This is driven largely by the CPU's 96th percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 75th percentile.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 9 285K compare to its nearest rival, the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285K has an average benchmark score of 83,807, which is 0.2% lower than the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus's score of 84,003. This is a negligible difference in real-world performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 6700, and how does it affect performance?

A: The RX 6700 has a memory bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s, achieved via 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may be a limiting factor at higher resolutions with demanding textures.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 9 285K support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory. It uses DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the RX 6700?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 6700 is 450 W. The GPU itself has a TDP of 175 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: How does the RX 6700 compare to the RTX 3070 Ti in benchmark scores?

A: The RX 6700 has an average score of 30,433, which is 1.6% higher than the RTX 3070 Ti's score of 29,945. This puts the two cards at a very similar performance level in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the process node and transistor count for the Core Ultra 9 285K?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285K is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285K uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for the Core Ultra Series 2 desktop processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, offering high-bandwidth connections for modern SSDs and GPUs. The platform is current and active, so there is a clear path for future upgrades within the same socket family.

The RX 6700 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the GPU will operate at Gen 4 speeds. The GPU's suggested PSU of 450 W is modest, and the CPU's TDP of 125 W means that a quality 450 W PSU could theoretically run the system, though headroom for overclocking (the CPU multiplier is unlocked) or additional components would warrant a larger unit. A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU is unlikely to be the bottleneck in any gaming scenario. The RX 6700's 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are the constraining factors for modern games at higher settings, so moving to a card with more VRAM and higher bandwidth would unlock the CPU's full potential in gaming workloads. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a future GPU upgrade will have ample bandwidth.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, indicated by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,377 and a PassMark single-thread score of 5,087, suggests that it will not be a limiting factor in games. The GPU's performance, however, will determine the gaming experience. The RX 6700's average benchmark score is 30,433, which is 1.6% higher than the RTX 3070 Ti's score of 29,945. This places the RX 6700 in the upper mid-range tier, capable of handling 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles and 1440p gaming at medium-to-high settings. In less demanding games, the RX 6700 may deliver smooth framerates at 1440p, but in graphically intensive titles at 4K, the 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely be insufficient to maintain high detail levels. The GPU's 36 ray tracing cores provide some RT capability, but ray tracing performance is expected to be modest, so enabling RT effects may require lower resolutions or settings. The estimated FPS at 1080p should be solid, with the GPU being the primary constraint, while at 1440p and 4K, performance will scale down accordingly. The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads are ample for any game, and its high boost clock of 5.70 GHz ensures that even lightly threaded games will run well.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a flagship 24-core Intel processor with a mainstream 10 GB AMD graphics card. The Core Ultra 9 285K is a top-tier CPU, sitting at the 96th percentile of all processors, while the RX 6700 is a solid mid-range GPU at the 75th percentile of all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 86 places the system in the upper tier of desktop builds. The CPU is designed for maximum multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,522, while the GPU offers balanced 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming capability. The system is an excellent choice for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, but it is less suited for high-end gaming at high resolutions. The pairing is inherently unbalanced, with the CPU's capabilities far exceeding the GPU's, making this a workstation-first build that can handle gaming as a secondary task.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RX 6700 can likely push high framerates in esports titles, but the CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2,870) ensures no bottleneck. At 1440p, the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit performance to medium settings, and 4K gaming will be constrained by the GPU's 75th percentile performance.

Streaming: The Core Ultra 9 285K's 24 cores provide ample headroom for encoding and gaming simultaneously. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,522 and PassMark multi-thread score of 67,260 indicate that software encoding will have minimal impact on game performance, making this an excellent streaming CPU.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this workload, with a PassMark data compression score of 790,052 and a floating-point math score of 224,324. Video editing software that utilizes multi-threading will see near-flagship performance, and the GPU can assist with effects and rendering, though its 10 GB VRAM may limit work with large projects.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 24,003 and R15 multi-core score of 6,494 show outstanding rendering performance. The GPU's 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate renderers that support GPU compute, but its 75th percentile ranking means it is not a primary rendering workhorse.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 172,379 and extended instructions score of 62,277 are strong indicators of fast compilation and code execution. The 24 threads will handle parallel builds with ease, making this a powerful development machine.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 5,087) ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. The CPU is overkill for this use case, but the system will handle any office task effortlessly, and the GPU is more than sufficient for productivity applications.

Who Should Build It

This system is aimed at users who require extreme CPU performance for professional workloads. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will see near-flagship processing power, as indicated by the CPU's 96th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,522. Gamers who primarily play at 1080p will find the RX 6700 sufficient, with performance comparable to an RTX 3070 Ti (which is 1.6% behind in average benchmark score), but those targeting 1440p or 4K high-refresh gaming will be disappointed by the GPU's limitations. Developers and engineers will benefit from the CPU's integer math and extended instruction scores (172,379 and 62,277, respectively), making compile times short. Students and small business workstations will find this system far more powerful than needed, but it will handle any task they throw at it. The primary audience is professionals who need a workstation-class CPU and are willing to accept a mid-range GPU as a secondary component for occasional gaming or light graphics work.